But why do we need two medium sized forwards? Issues aside.maverick wrote:We could then swap pick 17 for watts and pick 35SuperDuper wrote:We could get Stringer by trading 8 to Tigers for 15 and 17 and using 15 for Stringer. Dogs would do it. Tigers would do it (they will get Naish at around 17 anyway without needng the pick so they are getting a 15 to 8 upgrade for free)maverick wrote:There are two exceptions to this.
Watts and stringer.
Both are A grade and could be elite, both are dangerous players with X factor and required development.
We could use either or both and probably get them with pick 8 and a 3rd rounder.
It is incredible to think that our club does not want Stringer for effectively an 8 to 17 downgrade.
I am not even saying we should do it... just that if you said that was possible 8 months ago, and that we would not do it, you would say ya must be dreamin!
Meaning we get stronger and watts plus pick 35 for pick 8
Agressive, not reckless.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Agressive, not reckless.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Agressive, not reckless.
Yeah dont see the need. We have Membrey who's better than both of them. Also Acres can go forward.Rosco wrote:But why do we need two medium sized forwards? Issues aside.maverick wrote:We could then swap pick 17 for watts and pick 35SuperDuper wrote:We could get Stringer by trading 8 to Tigers for 15 and 17 and using 15 for Stringer. Dogs would do it. Tigers would do it (they will get Naish at around 17 anyway without needng the pick so they are getting a 15 to 8 upgrade for free)maverick wrote:There are two exceptions to this.
Watts and stringer.
Both are A grade and could be elite, both are dangerous players with X factor and required development.
We could use either or both and probably get them with pick 8 and a 3rd rounder.
It is incredible to think that our club does not want Stringer for effectively an 8 to 17 downgrade.
I am not even saying we should do it... just that if you said that was possible 8 months ago, and that we would not do it, you would say ya must be dreamin!
Meaning we get stronger and watts plus pick 35 for pick 8
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6088
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Agressive, not reckless.
Im going to be aggressive tonight with a bag of limes and a bottle of Gilbeys. We've gone from Kelly and Martin to Strangler and Watts. OMG.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Agressive, not reckless.
Yes, the general direction of discussion seems to have flipped 180 degrees since the OP...let's get reckless!CQ SAINT wrote:Im going to be aggressive tonight with a bag of limes and a bottle of Gilbeys. We've gone from Kelly and Martin to Strangler and Watts. OMG.