Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- carn_sainter
- Club Player
- Posts: 1470
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:49pm
- Been thanked: 62 times
Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Just wondering if anybody knows - who reviews the coaches' performance? (aka Who polices the police?)
Does anyone know if we have some external review process on the coaches' performance? Do they get constructive criticism and feedback from people outside of the club? (besides Saintsational).
Who does their exit interview?
I hope there is something set-up that assesses their performance, both in terms of how they achieved their goals and also in terms of, for lack of a better word, their technique.
Does anyone know if we have some external review process on the coaches' performance? Do they get constructive criticism and feedback from people outside of the club? (besides Saintsational).
Who does their exit interview?
I hope there is something set-up that assesses their performance, both in terms of how they achieved their goals and also in terms of, for lack of a better word, their technique.
- parkeysainter
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
- Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Tipping the board, pres and CEO reports and reviews on Richo directly as a whole. Also tipping they would get an outside source to do same at the end of each season. Tipping the leadership group gets involved too somehow and reports on every coach.
For the assistants its very possible Richo reports on them for the CEO, pres and board and does his own internal review. Surely some kind of specialist company helps out on all this though. It kind of reminds of the comedy movie "Officespace."
Richo seems very loyal to his assistants. Not a bad thing but like anything at an AFL club you need to turn over staff to stop being predictable and to improve. Those not directly involved in the on field stuff e.g. the board would hear and see things and get inklings on the coaches performance, ability, attitude, etc. during a season.
For the assistants its very possible Richo reports on them for the CEO, pres and board and does his own internal review. Surely some kind of specialist company helps out on all this though. It kind of reminds of the comedy movie "Officespace."
Richo seems very loyal to his assistants. Not a bad thing but like anything at an AFL club you need to turn over staff to stop being predictable and to improve. Those not directly involved in the on field stuff e.g. the board would hear and see things and get inklings on the coaches performance, ability, attitude, etc. during a season.
Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4887
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 466 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Who reviews the coaches performance? We do on Saintsational of course. The CEO downloads our posts and they discuss the merits of our various posts. I think that's how some on here imagine it works anyway. ![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
- St Chris
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Jamie Cox, as the General Manager of the footy department, would be in charge of "coaching" as a whole. Not necessarily Richo's boss, but would have a lot of say on the coaching group as an outsider. He is closer to the action so he'd have a better idea of the coaches performance than Ameet or Matt Finnis.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9370
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 657 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Be as facetious as you like champ, but the "other tried and trued" method hasn't done us a hell of a lot of good over the journeyGregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
St Kilda forever ![🔴](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f534.svg)
![⚪️](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/26aa.svg)
( God help me)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Good to see u back Jiggingsaint. Apparently u upset some demons on bigfooty lol. Best year of individual improvement since 2009 imo.thejiggingsaint wrote:Be as facetious as you like champ, but the "other tried and trued" method hasn't done us a hell of a lot of good over the journeyGregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
- Location: Doncaster, Victoria
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
It's wonderful, isn't it, how Matt Finnis has promised that Richo is the coach to get us a flag.GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
Well. Is Finnis the Emperor, or should the board actually follow due process that the other 17 clubs do,
and conduct an objective and transparent review of the entire football department to see what improvements are needed, how to achieve those targets.
No, the head guy says "Richo's the man" as in that lawyer in "The Castle" saying "it's the VIBE"
Yeah
2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
And the current regime has seen us soar up to 11th in four years. We're in the second phase of a rebuild, with another rebuild coming as our attempts to land a big fish are vanishing before our eyes. Port, Richmond, Melbourne and Essendon have gone past us with the WB jagging a flag. I think a lot of saints fans are smelling the bulls*** the club is peddling. Again. There are real areas of concern, which some have described as "progress" and that we have to be patient. In other words, we don't really know what's going to happen. AR's "pleasing" is becoming the new "Juggernaut".thejiggingsaint wrote:Be as facetious as you like champ, but the "other tried and trued" method hasn't done us a hell of a lot of good over the journeyGregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
We've improved, have we? We went down two spots, had our direct opponents for a spot in the eight go past us, terrible percentage, the third worst average losing margin in the competition, and we were thrashed in eight games against potential finals opponents. We are nowhere near the best teams. We beat only two teams above us on the ladder. We've lost our greatest player and another great leader in Joey. We are the second worst kicks for goal in the competition. Apart from all that, everything is going swimmingly! Nothing but blue skies ahead!
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Lordy lordy - the name's changed but the whining remains the same. Yes "pleasing", yes "positive". That's the way he talks - get over it, already. And how about you try and think of something pleasing and positive to say yourself. Nobody here is complacent - nor at the club. We all want to do better. We all want to kick straighter. We all want to land a big fish. But for crying out loud, doesn't the bile in your stomach tell you it's time to get off this misery-trip?
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Ignore reality. That's not bile in my stomach. More like fluff in your brain.freely wrote:Lordy lordy - the name's changed but the whining remains the same. Yes "pleasing", yes "positive". That's the way he talks - get over it, already. And how about you try and think of something pleasing and positive to say yourself. Nobody here is complacent - nor at the club. We all want to do better. We all want to kick straighter. We all want to land a big fish. But for crying out loud, doesn't the bile in your stomach tell you it's time to get off this misery-trip?
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
- Location: Doncaster, Victoria
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
If the sky is clouded over with no relief in sight, simply pretending it's clear and blue doesn't make it so.freely wrote:Lordy lordy - the name's changed but the whining remains the same. Yes "pleasing", yes "positive". That's the way he talks - get over it, already. And how about you try and think of something pleasing and positive to say yourself. Nobody here is complacent - nor at the club. We all want to do better. We all want to kick straighter. We all want to land a big fish. But for crying out loud, doesn't the bile in your stomach tell you it's time to get off this misery-trip?
That's known as "denial"
2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
You're absolutely right - but endlessly bagging the coach doesn't make him a better coach (if only!) - That's known as magical thinking!MickThomas wrote:If the sky is clouded over with no relief in sight, simply pretending it's clear and blue doesn't make it so.freely wrote:Lordy lordy - the name's changed but the whining remains the same. Yes "pleasing", yes "positive". That's the way he talks - get over it, already. And how about you try and think of something pleasing and positive to say yourself. Nobody here is complacent - nor at the club. We all want to do better. We all want to kick straighter. We all want to land a big fish. But for crying out loud, doesn't the bile in your stomach tell you it's time to get off this misery-trip?
That's known as "denial"
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
I don't know about constant whinging. I've been supportive of AR until late this season past, when he's clearly demonstrated he hasn't got the answers. The last seven weeks were a disaster. It showed he hasn't got the goods when the whips are cracking. I say plenty of positive things, you just want to focus on what you consider negative. I'm concerned they're going to extend him in the face of evidence he's not up to it. How about waiting until early or mid next year to see if he can step up to the challenge? I can't see any other clubs lining up to pinch him. What's wrong with realistic criticism? His coaching is as imaginative and innovative as his pressers. Not pleasing at all. Very worrying.freely wrote:You're absolutely right - but endlessly bagging the coach doesn't make him a better coach (if only!) - That's known as magical thinking!MickThomas wrote:If the sky is clouded over with no relief in sight, simply pretending it's clear and blue doesn't make it so.freely wrote:Lordy lordy - the name's changed but the whining remains the same. Yes "pleasing", yes "positive". That's the way he talks - get over it, already. And how about you try and think of something pleasing and positive to say yourself. Nobody here is complacent - nor at the club. We all want to do better. We all want to kick straighter. We all want to land a big fish. But for crying out loud, doesn't the bile in your stomach tell you it's time to get off this misery-trip?
That's known as "denial"
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:40pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Your negativity is becoming tedious. We are all disappointed with the year clearly, but to finish around the same mark with a much harder draw but do it off the back of the younger players is a step forward. As for next year, finals becomes a must so no denying that measure.GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:And the current regime has seen us soar up to 11th in four years. We're in the second phase of a rebuild, with another rebuild coming as our attempts to land a big fish are vanishing before our eyes. Port, Richmond, Melbourne and Essendon have gone past us with the WB jagging a flag. I think a lot of saints fans are smelling the bulls*** the club is peddling. Again. There are real areas of concern, which some have described as "progress" and that we have to be patient. In other words, we don't really know what's going to happen. AR's "pleasing" is becoming the new "Juggernaut".thejiggingsaint wrote:Be as facetious as you like champ, but the "other tried and trued" method hasn't done us a hell of a lot of good over the journeyGregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
We've improved, have we? We went down two spots, had our direct opponents for a spot in the eight go past us, terrible percentage, the third worst average losing margin in the competition, and we were thrashed in eight games against potential finals opponents. We are nowhere near the best teams. We beat only two teams above us on the ladder. We've lost our greatest player and another great leader in Joey. We are the second worst kicks for goal in the competition. Apart from all that, everything is going swimmingly! Nothing but blue skies ahead!
Re other clubs, Melbourne haven't played finals for 11 years and had 7 of those in the bottom 5. Essendon after a year of suspended players copped the softest draw and the number 1 pick. Port were on a similar trajectory and missed a GF by a kick in 2014 then didn't play finals next 2 years. Richmond are top 4 after some recent finals but years of building.
Every one us has the right to voice our opinion, but it would be great if some did after thinking a bit more
- GregPackhamsHeadband
- Club Player
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
- Location: Goward's Gulch
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Yourself included. What fantastical nonsense.
I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
That's all fins as long as we don't go signing up a coach for a contract extension when clear questions remainSaintly Passion wrote:Your negativity is becoming tedious. We are all disappointed with the year clearly, but to finish around the same mark with a much harder draw but do it off the back of the younger players is a step forward. As for next year, finals becomes a must so no denying that measure.GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:And the current regime has seen us soar up to 11th in four years. We're in the second phase of a rebuild, with another rebuild coming as our attempts to land a big fish are vanishing before our eyes. Port, Richmond, Melbourne and Essendon have gone past us with the WB jagging a flag. I think a lot of saints fans are smelling the bulls*** the club is peddling. Again. There are real areas of concern, which some have described as "progress" and that we have to be patient. In other words, we don't really know what's going to happen. AR's "pleasing" is becoming the new "Juggernaut".thejiggingsaint wrote:Be as facetious as you like champ, but the "other tried and trued" method hasn't done us a hell of a lot of good over the journeyGregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
We've improved, have we? We went down two spots, had our direct opponents for a spot in the eight go past us, terrible percentage, the third worst average losing margin in the competition, and we were thrashed in eight games against potential finals opponents. We are nowhere near the best teams. We beat only two teams above us on the ladder. We've lost our greatest player and another great leader in Joey. We are the second worst kicks for goal in the competition. Apart from all that, everything is going swimmingly! Nothing but blue skies ahead!
Re other clubs, Melbourne haven't played finals for 11 years and had 7 of those in the bottom 5. Essendon after a year of suspended players copped the softest draw and the number 1 pick. Port were on a similar trajectory and missed a GF by a kick in 2014 then didn't play finals next 2 years. Richmond are top 4 after some recent finals but years of building.
Every one us has the right to voice our opinion, but it would be great if some did after thinking a bit more
I'd give Alan till Rd 11 next year, you'll know by then how we stack up against the big boys or if we still kick 1.8 a quarter and get beaten by those around us.....
Stability is great. Stability when you ain't going forward is dumb.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
- Location: Doncaster, Victoria
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Perfect assessment.Teflon wrote:That's all fins as long as we don't go signing up a coach for a contract extension when clear questions remainSaintly Passion wrote:Your negativity is becoming tedious. We are all disappointed with the year clearly, but to finish around the same mark with a much harder draw but do it off the back of the younger players is a step forward. As for next year, finals becomes a must so no denying that measure.GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:And the current regime has seen us soar up to 11th in four years. We're in the second phase of a rebuild, with another rebuild coming as our attempts to land a big fish are vanishing before our eyes. Port, Richmond, Melbourne and Essendon have gone past us with the WB jagging a flag. I think a lot of saints fans are smelling the bulls*** the club is peddling. Again. There are real areas of concern, which some have described as "progress" and that we have to be patient. In other words, we don't really know what's going to happen. AR's "pleasing" is becoming the new "Juggernaut".thejiggingsaint wrote:Be as facetious as you like champ, but the "other tried and trued" method hasn't done us a hell of a lot of good over the journeyGregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
We've improved, have we? We went down two spots, had our direct opponents for a spot in the eight go past us, terrible percentage, the third worst average losing margin in the competition, and we were thrashed in eight games against potential finals opponents. We are nowhere near the best teams. We beat only two teams above us on the ladder. We've lost our greatest player and another great leader in Joey. We are the second worst kicks for goal in the competition. Apart from all that, everything is going swimmingly! Nothing but blue skies ahead!
Re other clubs, Melbourne haven't played finals for 11 years and had 7 of those in the bottom 5. Essendon after a year of suspended players copped the softest draw and the number 1 pick. Port were on a similar trajectory and missed a GF by a kick in 2014 then didn't play finals next 2 years. Richmond are top 4 after some recent finals but years of building.
Every one us has the right to voice our opinion, but it would be great if some did after thinking a bit more
I'd give Alan till Rd 11 next year, you'll know by then how we stack up against the big boys or if we still kick 1.8 a quarter and get beaten by those around us.....
Stability is great. Stability when you ain't going forward is dumb.
Let's be happy that the skipper of the good ship "StKilda"
has our leaky boat going around in circles...
It's important to stay consistent!
He's the captain of the ship, we don't need to find another!
2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
I heard on one of the footy programs tonight that we are one of a number of clubs interested in David Teague for an assistant's role. Currently the forwards coach at Adelaide.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
- Location: Doncaster, Victoria
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
OMGJacks Back wrote:I heard on one of the footy programs tonight that we are one of a number of clubs interested in David Teague for an assistant's role. Currently the forwards coach at Adelaide.
can we finally get rid of that Aaron Hamill, an underperforming, overpaid, brainless and clueless forwards coach.
Useless
2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18839
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Sacking him mid-season would not be a great move in my opinion which is what you would be effectively doing if he was told in round 11 that the club was not going to renew his contract. The is absolutely no guarantee we would get someone better anyway.Teflon wrote:That's all fins as long as we don't go signing up a coach for a contract extension when clear questions remainSaintly Passion wrote:Your negativity is becoming tedious. We are all disappointed with the year clearly, but to finish around the same mark with a much harder draw but do it off the back of the younger players is a step forward. As for next year, finals becomes a must so no denying that measure.GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:And the current regime has seen us soar up to 11th in four years. We're in the second phase of a rebuild, with another rebuild coming as our attempts to land a big fish are vanishing before our eyes. Port, Richmond, Melbourne and Essendon have gone past us with the WB jagging a flag. I think a lot of saints fans are smelling the bulls*** the club is peddling. Again. There are real areas of concern, which some have described as "progress" and that we have to be patient. In other words, we don't really know what's going to happen. AR's "pleasing" is becoming the new "Juggernaut".thejiggingsaint wrote:Be as facetious as you like champ, but the "other tried and trued" method hasn't done us a hell of a lot of good over the journeyGregPackhamsHeadband wrote:Have no fear. The mediocracy rules at the saints. He's doing a great job. The only thing more important than success is STABILITY. It's our new mantra. Keep the status quo at all costs. It's pleasing.
We've improved, have we? We went down two spots, had our direct opponents for a spot in the eight go past us, terrible percentage, the third worst average losing margin in the competition, and we were thrashed in eight games against potential finals opponents. We are nowhere near the best teams. We beat only two teams above us on the ladder. We've lost our greatest player and another great leader in Joey. We are the second worst kicks for goal in the competition. Apart from all that, everything is going swimmingly! Nothing but blue skies ahead!
Re other clubs, Melbourne haven't played finals for 11 years and had 7 of those in the bottom 5. Essendon after a year of suspended players copped the softest draw and the number 1 pick. Port were on a similar trajectory and missed a GF by a kick in 2014 then didn't play finals next 2 years. Richmond are top 4 after some recent finals but years of building.
Every one us has the right to voice our opinion, but it would be great if some did after thinking a bit more
I'd give Alan till Rd 11 next year, you'll know by then how we stack up against the big boys or if we still kick 1.8 a quarter and get beaten by those around us.....
Stability is great. Stability when you ain't going forward is dumb.
After round 15, we were 9 and 6 and practically in the top 4 after one of the best performances of the year by any team. Hence, I wouldn't be setting a particular date or round on signing him up. His performance and the season needs to be looked at in it's entirety and reviewed against his performance targets that have been set by the club and other factors that are outside a coaches control such as player availability etc. We are obviously not privy to these.
Having said that, the club needs to revamp the football department. We need new faces and fresh ideas; coaching personnel from successful clubs is obviously preferable. The big challenge is the competition for talented coaches is fierce and they cost lots of money. Richo needs help. How long has Danny Sexton been there for? I think he's been there since the Lyon years.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7939
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
Starts with the CEO - unless they decide to do some special review. Then they may engage outside help. CEO ould present findings to Board - who will most likely have asked or will ask him to deep dive on particular topics (player management, welfare, match day, development etc).carn_sainter wrote:Just wondering if anybody knows - who reviews the coaches' performance? (aka Who polices the police?)
Does anyone know if we have some external review process on the coaches' performance? Do they get constructive criticism and feedback from people outside of the club? (besides Saintsational).
Who does their exit interview?
I hope there is something set-up that assesses their performance, both in terms of how they achieved their goals and also in terms of, for lack of a better word, their technique.
Ultimately the board will sign off.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18839
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Who reviews the coaches' performance?
With your last point, it also depends with the individuals on the board. Some have a more intricate understanding of the issues and will ask better questions than others. As you know, it can make a critical difference.fingers wrote:Starts with the CEO - unless they decide to do some special review. Then they may engage outside help. CEO ould present findings to Board - who will most likely have asked or will ask him to deep dive on particular topics (player management, welfare, match day, development etc).carn_sainter wrote:Just wondering if anybody knows - who reviews the coaches' performance? (aka Who polices the police?)
Does anyone know if we have some external review process on the coaches' performance? Do they get constructive criticism and feedback from people outside of the club? (besides Saintsational).
Who does their exit interview?
I hope there is something set-up that assesses their performance, both in terms of how they achieved their goals and also in terms of, for lack of a better word, their technique.
Ultimately the board will sign off.
I know what one question I would be asking Richo if I had the chance.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.