Number 1 pick

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
The_President
Club Player
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696302Post The_President »

Brisbane are open to trading it.


Hypothetically, who or what are we sending up there to get it?


http://m.afl.com.au/news/2017-08-26/lio ... h-no1-pick
Last edited by The_President on Mon 28 Aug 2017 4:57pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Number 1 pixk

Post: # 1696304Post St Chris »

7 & 8 would probably do it, especially if Brisbane aren't set on who to pick.

It seems like a pretty open top 10, no real standouts, and who goes No. 1 depends on who you ask.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Number 1 pixk

Post: # 1696308Post saintspremiers »

Don't worry,the AFL will gift them a priority pick


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Number 1 pixk

Post: # 1696312Post St Chris »

saintspremiers wrote:Don't worry,the AFL will gift them a priority pick
They will when somebody takes Rocky as a FA......


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696315Post Con Gorozidis »

7 and 8 is definitely better than pick 1.
The only reason we would do that deal is if we had no faith in our recruiters. Which I understand. Giving them two goods picks just doubles the chances of a stuff up.
So pick 1 might be a better option in our situation.

Lions could end up with 2,8 and 9.
Absolute bonanza.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Mon 28 Aug 2017 7:28pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19105
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2019 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696317Post SaintPav »

If Brisbane get pick 2 for Rocky, I'll spew


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696331Post older saint »

No this draft doesn't have a stand out and if we don't trade for a gun in this draft 7 & 8 will be a better option bringing in 2 top 10 picks


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11351
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1344 times
Been thanked: 459 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696349Post Sainternist »

#1 priority for the club should be to recruit Josh Kelly. If we can afford to trade for a first pick in the draft after that, it is a bonus.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696374Post Con Gorozidis »

Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993


User avatar
IluvHarvey
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696401Post IluvHarvey »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993
This really is a pointless stat.


"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696404Post Con Gorozidis »

IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993
This really is a pointless stat.
True. Martin Leslie was actually a very good player but he deferred moving to the VFL and stayed an extra two seasons in the SANF after being drafted. So he actually doesnt count and should not be there.

But all the others are relevant because it shows they dont have durable enough bodies for the rigours of AFL (VFL) footy.

Even Jon Patton managed 29 games and he did his ACL twice in his first three seasons.

If people arent seriously concerned about Paddy then they are truly optimists....


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6607
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1326 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696432Post Jacks Back »

Please don't get pick 1. We will definitely stuff it up again. Keep 7 & 8 and ask the next two teams who they would take for those picks and pick those players as our recruiters really have no clue. Or go off the phantom drafts and just get rid of the recruiters altogether.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23243
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1798 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696448Post Teflon »

Jacks Back wrote:Please don't get pick 1. We will definitely stuff it up again. Keep 7 & 8 and ask the next two teams who they would take for those picks and pick those players as our recruiters really have no clue. Or go off the phantom drafts and just get rid of the recruiters altogether.
Surely we can just outsource these recruiting clowns?
Cut lunch commandoes with no clue

Recruitment meeting at saints:

"He's a great young fella, ripping attitude , really strong family ethic "

"But he's only a torso Trout"

"Yeah but medical opinion suggests that's a mere flesh wound..... "


“Yeah….nah””
footynut
Club Player
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696531Post footynut »

We need to seriously consider it. Could we offer picks 7&8 for pick 1 & there 3rd rounder. And then use both 3rd rounders to get back in the 2nd round of the draft.

Also need to consider if it wld take both 1st rounders to get kelly & if we get anything else in return???

Its getting interesting...


footynut
Club Player
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696532Post footynut »

Jacks Back wrote:Please don't get pick 1. We will definitely stuff it up again. Keep 7 & 8 and ask the next two teams who they would take for those picks and pick those players as our recruiters really have no clue. Or go off the phantom drafts and just get rid of the recruiters altogether.
Great idea, and use that money to recruit goal kicking and forward coaches


User avatar
IluvHarvey
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696550Post IluvHarvey »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993
This really is a pointless stat.
True. Martin Leslie was actually a very good player but he deferred moving to the VFL and stayed an extra two seasons in the SANF after being drafted. So he actually doesnt count and should not be there.

But all the others are relevant because it shows they dont have durable enough bodies for the rigours of AFL (VFL) footy.

Even Jon Patton managed 29 games and he did his ACL twice in his first three seasons.

If people arent seriously concerned about Paddy then they are truly optimists....
So are you saying he is not good enough or had too many injuries?
Armo played 19 games in his first three years..... so what?
Steven 29!
Riewoldt played 6 in his first year same as McCartin and.... they had exactly the same amount of marks and kicksand Rooey had less goals and less tackles..... what a concern he was.

As I said pointless stat


"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696556Post Con Gorozidis »

IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993
This really is a pointless stat.
True. Martin Leslie was actually a very good player but he deferred moving to the VFL and stayed an extra two seasons in the SANF after being drafted. So he actually doesnt count and should not be there.

But all the others are relevant because it shows they dont have durable enough bodies for the rigours of AFL (VFL) footy.

Even Jon Patton managed 29 games and he did his ACL twice in his first three seasons.

If people arent seriously concerned about Paddy then they are truly optimists....
So are you saying he is not good enough or had too many injuries?
Armo played 19 games in his first three years..... so what?
Steven 29!
Riewoldt played 6 in his first year same as McCartin and.... they had exactly the same amount of marks and kicksand Rooey had less goals and less tackles..... what a concern he was.

As I said pointless stat
McCartin has been in the system three years.
Serious concerns exist over his durability for elite AFL footy.
Would u be please if Armo was a pick 1 in the draft.

How did Roo go in years 2 and 3? Please answer that.


User avatar
GregPackhamsHeadband
Club Player
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
Location: Goward's Gulch

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696560Post GregPackhamsHeadband »

Jacks Back wrote:Please don't get pick 1. We will definitely stuff it up again. Keep 7 & 8 and ask the next two teams who they would take for those picks and pick those players as our recruiters really have no clue. Or go off the phantom drafts and just get rid of the recruiters altogether.
I've been saying that for years, JB. Seriously, where the top 30 picks are concerned, the really good amateur watchers and phantom draft compilers get it right more often than not. The skill is in picking up the hidden gem further down. In the main, your guns come from first and second rounders. May as well call Callum Twomey on the eve of the draft and save yourself a million or so.

You can't ring Emma anymore as GWS have put her on staff now, so she's getting paid a lot extra to do what she's always done. Nice work if you can get it. Don't forget GWS also has that other recruiting legend, Tom Scully's dad! Most recruiters are very ordinary, with a few notable exceptions. Fortunately, the AFL has introduced an accreditation and development course similar to the one agents go through. About time, too.


I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
User avatar
GregPackhamsHeadband
Club Player
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
Location: Goward's Gulch

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696561Post GregPackhamsHeadband »

IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993
This really is a pointless stat.
True. Martin Leslie was actually a very good player but he deferred moving to the VFL and stayed an extra two seasons in the SANF after being drafted. So he actually doesnt count and should not be there.

But all the others are relevant because it shows they dont have durable enough bodies for the rigours of AFL (VFL) footy.

Even Jon Patton managed 29 games and he did his ACL twice in his first three seasons.

If people arent seriously concerned about Paddy then they are truly optimists....
So are you saying he is not good enough or had too many injuries?
Armo played 19 games in his first three years..... so what?
Steven 29!
Riewoldt played 6 in his first year same as McCartin and.... they had exactly the same amount of marks and kicksand Rooey had less goals and less tackles..... what a concern he was.

As I said pointless stat
Riewoldt won the Rising Star Award in his second year. MVP in his fourth. A champion of the competition after 4 years. I'll take any bet you want to lay, that Paddy won't win the MVP next year. I'll just be glad if he can play a season without getting knocked out. Still hasn't kicked more than two in a game.

Neither Armo nor Steven were No. 1 picks whom the club was basing its future forward structure on. Paddy can't help the fact he's vulnerable to concussion, but to be frank, he's one bad knock from retirement and has only shown us very brief glimpses of ability. To compare him to Riewoldt in any way is ludicrous. Chalk and cheese.


I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10783
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696562Post ace »

Con Gorozidis wrote:7 and 8 is definitely better than pick 1.
The only reason we would do that deal is if we had no faith in our recruiters. Which I understand. Giving them two goods picks just doubles the chances of a stuff up.
So pick 1 might be a better option in our situation.

Lions could end up with 2,8 and 9.
Absolute bonanza.
But who would our recruiters go for if they had pick No 1.
Correct me if I am wrong but there are no type 1 diabetics in the running.
And I don't think there are any headless chooks.
Maybe they will find a paraplegic with good character and a great family.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
MickThomas
Club Player
Posts: 632
Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
Location: Doncaster, Victoria
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696564Post MickThomas »

IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993
This really is a pointless stat.
No it's quite relevant.

It demonstrates that the draft system is like Macroeconomics, not a fixed science, but is speculation and prediction
based on a whole lot of data
and the data set will change with time, and it's more of an educated gamble
with the "experts" relying on their own interpretation of the data.


2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
User avatar
IluvHarvey
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696565Post IluvHarvey »

GregPackhamsHeadband wrote:
IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
IluvHarvey wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Since the introduction of the national draft in 1986, only four number one picks have played fewer games in their first three seasons than McCartin.

Richard Lounder (Richmond) - four games 1988-90
Alex McDonald (Hawthorn) - seven games 1989-91
Martin Leslie (Brisbane Bears) - 11 games 1987-89
Stephen Hooper (Geelong) - 21 games 1991-1993
This really is a pointless stat.
True. Martin Leslie was actually a very good player but he deferred moving to the VFL and stayed an extra two seasons in the SANF after being drafted. So he actually doesnt count and should not be there.

But all the others are relevant because it shows they dont have durable enough bodies for the rigours of AFL (VFL) footy.

Even Jon Patton managed 29 games and he did his ACL twice in his first three seasons.

If people arent seriously concerned about Paddy then they are truly optimists....
So are you saying he is not good enough or had too many injuries?
Armo played 19 games in his first three years..... so what?
Steven 29!
Riewoldt played 6 in his first year same as McCartin and.... they had exactly the same amount of marks and kicksand Rooey had less goals and less tackles..... what a concern he was.

As I said pointless stat
Riewoldt won the Rising Star Award in his second year. MVP in his fourth. A champion of the competition after 4 years. I'll take any bet you want to lay, that Paddy won't win the MVP next year. I'll just be glad if he can play a season without getting knocked out. Still hasn't kicked more than two in a game.

Neither Armo nor Steven were No. 1 picks whom the club was basing its future forward structure on. Paddy can't help the fact he's vulnerable to concussion, but to be frank, he's one bad knock from retirement and has only shown us very brief glimpses of ability. To compare him to Riewoldt in any way is ludicrous. Chalk and cheese.
Agreed they are chalk and Cheese, my point is that you can manipulate stats to tell any story you want. Which is what Con did.


"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
User avatar
GregPackhamsHeadband
Club Player
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed 02 Aug 2017 8:25pm
Location: Goward's Gulch

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696569Post GregPackhamsHeadband »

Fair point, but after their respective first seasons, their career trajectories are polar opposites. I wish Paddy was as good as Nick. It's pretty clear he's not. Not many have been as good as roo. If Paddy just becomes a consistent, decent marking target in our F50 then I'll be thrilled. It ain't the kid's fault he was the number one pick. As we've seen, the expectations that come with that selection verge on the ridiculous.


I think you're pretty tough, don't I?
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Number 1 pick

Post: # 1696964Post Con Gorozidis »

IluvHarvey wrote:
Agreed they are chalk and Cheese, my point is that you can manipulate stats to tell any story you want. Which is what Con did.
Sorry but there are a litany of red flags swirling around Paddy.
Not my fault. You can deny it all you like but it wont change it.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10783
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Re: Number 1 pixk

Post: # 1696981Post ace »

St Chris wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:Don't worry,the AFL will gift them a priority pick
They will when somebody takes Rocky as a FA......
Just like Melbourne who begged Hawthorn to take Frawley off their hands.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
Post Reply