Contenders Or Pretenders?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2011 7:19pm
- Has thanked: 612 times
- Been thanked: 398 times
Contenders Or Pretenders?
Now there's a question and a half.
And I'm not sure it's one I can truthfully answer.
Scintillating one week. Pathetic the next. Seriously WTF?
Our footy team is schizophrenic.
If we were awful all the time that I understand.
I'd be depressed but I wouldn't be confused.
This was the perfect moment to really make a statement:We've arrived, we're serious.
Now I don't know what we are. Contenders or pretenders.
I just wish the players would make up their minds.
Don't give us false hope. It's the worst kind of hope there is.
If you're not interested in winning a premiership don't pretend you are
At least be honest with yourselves and to your supporters.
Besides all this confusion is doing my head in.
And I'm not sure it's one I can truthfully answer.
Scintillating one week. Pathetic the next. Seriously WTF?
Our footy team is schizophrenic.
If we were awful all the time that I understand.
I'd be depressed but I wouldn't be confused.
This was the perfect moment to really make a statement:We've arrived, we're serious.
Now I don't know what we are. Contenders or pretenders.
I just wish the players would make up their minds.
Don't give us false hope. It's the worst kind of hope there is.
If you're not interested in winning a premiership don't pretend you are
At least be honest with yourselves and to your supporters.
Besides all this confusion is doing my head in.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
They're neither. The team hasn't developed enough to be a genuine flag threat. I thought that was pretty clear from over the course of the season with the way we matched up against some of the elite teams e.g. Geelong and Adelaide. Granted, last night was a poor loss, but it was typical of the trend of this season with winning a few here and then losing a few there.
The false hope you refer to is brought on from being sucked in by the likes of the fickle AFL media. They'll be backing a horse one week and be totally off it the next.
The false hope you refer to is brought on from being sucked in by the likes of the fickle AFL media. They'll be backing a horse one week and be totally off it the next.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Agree with Sainternist. We are neither.
I see us as trapped in the middle of no man's land.
We aren't really developing and we aren't contenders.
We are just bog average.
Besides Long and Gresham we don't even have any players under 21 getting a regular game. Player development has completely stalled.
We are treading water in the sea of mediocrity.
I see us as trapped in the middle of no man's land.
We aren't really developing and we aren't contenders.
We are just bog average.
Besides Long and Gresham we don't even have any players under 21 getting a regular game. Player development has completely stalled.
We are treading water in the sea of mediocrity.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Thu 06 Dec 2007 3:14pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
We are a developing team. Very immature. Richo main job will be to build a base for the players confidence. We can't have them believing the hype. I can't remember a team pumped up so much by the media after a big win. Last night they turned up expecting to win. Same went for the Melbourne game. Expect to win, believe the hype and the bubble will burst.
Very very poor by the saints.
All very well to be enlightened. The mongrel coaches tend too be the one's that win the flags.
Very very poor by the saints.
All very well to be enlightened. The mongrel coaches tend too be the one's that win the flags.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9067
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
No doubt that Richo is pretty one-dimensional- if his systems work then we look ok, if the systems fail, we don't just falter a bit, the wheels totally fall off!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
- Location: Mentone
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 263 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
It is the nature of this season as we see wildly fluctuating results every week.
How did Adelaide feel when beaten in consecutive weeks by North (17th) by 10 goals and then Melbourne by 40 odd points at home.
Essendon have been up and down losing to Brisbane two weeks ago.
We also lack sufficient depth to be a contender as we were unable to replace Longer and Membrey adequately.
How did Adelaide feel when beaten in consecutive weeks by North (17th) by 10 goals and then Melbourne by 40 odd points at home.
Essendon have been up and down losing to Brisbane two weeks ago.
We also lack sufficient depth to be a contender as we were unable to replace Longer and Membrey adequately.
One year will be our year
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 200 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
The disappointing thing is that this time last year, we wouldn't have even thought of Longer because Hickey was having a great season. Hell, we played Holmes ahead of Hickey last year. So Hickey hasn't improved or been able to reproduce his form of last year. Blake Acres hasn't been able to reproduce it either, we were really excited about him at the end of last season.
Our two main midfielders Ross and Stevens can get shut down too easily and our forward line has not produced a constant threat, we don't kick big scores, and even when we have the chance, we miss easy shots.
There have been improvements in guys like Billings, Sinclair and with the exception of last night Ross, who would be heading the best and fairest.
Also, Roo has dropped off from last year and I hope he doesn't go one year too many.
Our two main midfielders Ross and Stevens can get shut down too easily and our forward line has not produced a constant threat, we don't kick big scores, and even when we have the chance, we miss easy shots.
There have been improvements in guys like Billings, Sinclair and with the exception of last night Ross, who would be heading the best and fairest.
Also, Roo has dropped off from last year and I hope he doesn't go one year too many.
Think of me long enough to make a memory.
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5870
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: M32
- Has thanked: 837 times
- Been thanked: 785 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Agree with all of this except that Hickey wasn't dropped for Holmes, he was injured against Sydney and didn't play the last 2 rounds injured.Bruce G McAbee wrote:The disappointing thing is that this time last year, we wouldn't have even thought of Longer because Hickey was having a great season. Hell, we played Holmes ahead of Hickey last year. So Hickey hasn't improved or been able to reproduce his form of last year. Blake Acres hasn't been able to reproduce it either, we were really excited about him at the end of last season.
Our two main midfielders Ross and Stevens can get shut down too easily and our forward line has not produced a constant threat, we don't kick big scores, and even when we have the chance, we miss easy shots.
There have been improvements in guys like Billings, Sinclair and with the exception of last night Ross, who would be heading the best and fairest.
Also, Roo has dropped off from last year and I hope he doesn't go one year too many.
We are not ready for finals this year, but it is a promising sign that we were still contending late in the year for finals last year, and we will still be in the top 8 until at least next week this year. This gives supporters and sponsors hope and if we at least win the ones we should for the rest of the year we'll finish about ninth meaning that with a far more difficult fixture we've held ground, which = improvement.
Most worrying for me is our complete lack of ability to execute rudimentary goal kicking - 2 goals in a half of footy against any opposition is really poor, and it is not like we didn't have our chances. This is part of the reason why we get opened up by so many teams. Scoreboard pressure is one of those things which develops the element of doubt into your opponent's collective mindset and stops them from playing with the flair that Essendon did last night.
I don't know how this can be fixed and it doesn't help us that we are playing two sides with very good defensive games interstate in the next two games.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
damienc wrote:Now there's a question and a half.
And I'm not sure it's one I can truthfully answer.
Seriously? It's simple to answer.
We're nowhere near being contenders.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13243
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 644 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
perfect!The Fireman wrote:Precontenders.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
I was originally thinking along those lines. But post Dons game I have realised that we simply are poor when our opposition plays good pressure football and works hard and quick on the rebound.damienc wrote:
Our footy team is schizophrenic.
.
GWS was an aberration as due their talent they just tend to always play full on attack and run, without strong defensive pressure. This allowed us to get on a roll.
Simply put we are this year a team of downhill skiers, or flatrack bullies. That is the harsh reality. Against weaker teams, and teams off their game we can look good, even really good. But against a good team playing well, then the repeated pattern this year is that we go to water, lose our skills and team play and get ripped apart.
Last edited by saintsRrising on Sat 15 Jul 2017 6:14pm, edited 1 time in total.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
As much as it pains me, have to agree with you here!!!!!!!Sainternist wrote:They're neither. The team hasn't developed enough to be a genuine flag threat. I thought that was pretty clear from over the course of the season with the way we matched up against some of the elite teams e.g. Geelong and Adelaide. Granted, last night was a poor loss, but it was typical of the trend of this season with winning a few here and then losing a few there.
The false hope you refer to is brought on from being sucked in by the likes of the fickle AFL media. They'll be backing a horse one week and be totally off it the next.
Last edited by stonecold on Sun 16 Jul 2017 11:24am, edited 1 time in total.
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Why are you calling me Numpty Dumpty?stonecold wrote:As much as it pains me, have to agree with you here, Numpty Dumpty!!!!!!!Sainternist wrote:They're neither. The team hasn't developed enough to be a genuine flag threat. I thought that was pretty clear from over the course of the season with the way we matched up against some of the elite teams e.g. Geelong and Adelaide. Granted, last night was a poor loss, but it was typical of the trend of this season with winning a few here and then losing a few there.
The false hope you refer to is brought on from being sucked in by the likes of the fickle AFL media. They'll be backing a horse one week and be totally off it the next.
YOU'RE the Numpty Dumpty of the forum, mate.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Plus one.longtimesaint wrote:It is the nature of this season as we see wildly fluctuating results every week.
How did Adelaide feel when beaten in consecutive weeks by North (17th) by 10 goals and then Melbourne by 40 odd points at home.
Essendon have been up and down losing to Brisbane two weeks ago...
Disappointing, but hey, this team is still in the young, and hence inconsistent, developing-side stage.
The thing though, that I suspect some may be overlooking, is that we have shown that our best is well and truly good enough. And, our best will get better too.
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
So get over to the bandwagon thread and hop on.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Keep the faith.
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 217 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Are you the same Con who's been going on about how crap our coaches are (and God knows you told us so!) for playing Battle?Con Gorozidis wrote:Agree with Sainternist. We are neither.
I see us as trapped in the middle of no man's land.
We aren't really developing and we aren't contenders.
We are just bog average.
Besides Long and Gresham we don't even have any players under 21 getting a regular game. Player development has completely stalled.
We are treading water in the sea of mediocrity.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
AgreesaintsRrising wrote:I was originally thinking along those lines. But post Dons game I have realised that we simply are poor when our opposition plays good pressure football and works hard and quick on the rebound.damienc wrote:
Our footy team is schizophrenic.
.
GWS was an aberration as due their talent they just tend to always play full on attack and run, without strong defensive pressure. This allowed us to get on a roll.
Simply put we are this year a team of downhill skiers, or flatrack bullies. That is the harsh reality. Against weaker teams, and teams off their game we can look good, even really good. But against a good team playing well, then the repeated pattern this year is that we go to water. lose our skills and team play and get ripped apart.
Into this game who have we really beaten?
I don't rate Richmond, never have and think they'll crumble in finals
North ?? Woo hoo
Gold Coast ????
Flat injured Freo ??
When we win game against Sydney, Cats etc when we win games we are EXPECTED to win then take note - otherwise we are pretenders.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4304
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Just proves my point. Player development is so poor we desperately and prematurely throw a school kid in there.freely wrote:Are you the same Con who's been going on about how crap our coaches are (and God knows you told us so!) for playing Battle?Con Gorozidis wrote:Agree with Sainternist. We are neither.
I see us as trapped in the middle of no man's land.
We aren't really developing and we aren't contenders.
We are just bog average.
Besides Long and Gresham we don't even have any players under 21 getting a regular game. Player development has completely stalled.
We are treading water in the sea of mediocrity.
Absurd.
What the hell is happening with:
White
Rice
Pierce
Wright
Dunstan
NOK
Joyce
Coughlan
Freeman
Connellan
Etc
All stalled.
Some of these guys should be ready. Instead we desperately throw a school kid in.
Rabble.
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
I can't help but think that Battle's debut was also about suring up our insurance policy should Paddy's situation worsen.Con Gorozidis wrote:Just proves my point. Player development is so poor we desperately and prematurely throw a school kid in there.freely wrote:Are you the same Con who's been going on about how crap our coaches are (and God knows you told us so!) for playing Battle?Con Gorozidis wrote:Agree with Sainternist. We are neither.
I see us as trapped in the middle of no man's land.
We aren't really developing and we aren't contenders.
We are just bog average.
Besides Long and Gresham we don't even have any players under 21 getting a regular game. Player development has completely stalled.
We are treading water in the sea of mediocrity.
Absurd.
What the hell is happening with:
White
Rice
Pierce
Wright
Dunstan
NOK
Joyce
Coughlan
Freeman
Connellan
Etc
All stalled.
Some of these guys should be ready. Instead we desperately throw a school kid in.
Rabble.
Bad management is bad management
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1959 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
None of those could replace Membrey.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Acres or Marshall.SaintPav wrote:None of those could replace Membrey.
Are you saying Battle replaced Membrey? Battle clearly not ready to replace Membrey.
Also Marshall is 21. Rather get him in there.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Contenders Or Pretenders?
Exactly. Is our goal to win more games than last year? Play finals? Win a final? Win the whole thing?Con Gorozidis wrote:I guess the question is what are we trying to achieve this season?
Our selection last week was somewhat questionable at best