magnifisaint wrote:Be interesting to see how Melbourne do against Hawthorn this week
So do you barrack for
A. Dees losing to increase our finals chances
b. Hawks losing to improve our draft pick
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
magnifisaint wrote:Be interesting to see how Melbourne do against Hawthorn this week
Dees to improve our draft pick. -Melbourne go to Adelaide the next week,and we meet them later in the year so can get revenge for round 1 then and move ahead of them.saintsRrising wrote:magnifisaint wrote:Be interesting to see how Melbourne do against Hawthorn this week
So do you barrack for
A. Dees losing to increase our finals chances
b. Hawks losing to improve our draft pick
Cant wait it will be soooo informative and interesting. Great coach worse than ordinary media performer! Chris Scott makes Richo look as exciting as a mortician!saintbrat wrote:@&
tonight
Yep Richo's win/loss is about 25% and Scott's nearly 60% - yep he is definitely a beauty!longtimesaint wrote:I'd rather have Richo than a smarmy Scott twin
He uses Ross as a run with type tagger with moderate sucess. Best pùt a complete stopper on Sloane someone like Weller has done that before.Jacks Back wrote:The panel said if you stop Sloane it can help stop the crows. Richo was asked if he would tag Sloane. I got the impression from Richo that we will not tag Sloane.
Is that maybe because we don't have a tagger? Sounds like we need to get one then!
He uses Ross as a run with type tagger with moderate sucess. Best pùt a complete stopper on Sloane someone like Weller has done that before.Jacks Back wrote:The panel said if you stop Sloane it can help stop the crows. Richo was asked if he would tag Sloane. I got the impression from Richo that we will not tag Sloane.
Is that maybe because we don't have a tagger? Sounds like we need to get one then!
+1. Couple of thugs.longtimesaint wrote:I'd rather have Richo than a smarmy Scott twin
Well, you're so keen to get your message across, you sent it twiceImpatient Sainter wrote:He uses Ross as a run with type tagger with moderate sucess. Best pùt a complete stopper on Sloane someone like Weller has done that before.Jacks Back wrote:The panel said if you stop Sloane it can help stop the crows. Richo was asked if he would tag Sloane. I got the impression from Richo that we will not tag Sloane.
Is that maybe because we don't have a tagger? Sounds like we need to get one then!
No thats because Scott can give an intellectual broader footballing answer. Richo is as dull a media performer as I have seen since Craig when he was with Adelaide, not very bright is our AR.longtimesaint wrote:What really annoys me about that segment is that Whately (rabid Cats supporter) directs most of the questions to Chris Scott and Geelong issues.
I have timed this to my frustration and find that on average 75 to 80% of the time is Geelong issues while Richo sits there like a tailors dummy.
I got the impression he wasn't willing to give that away.Jacks Back wrote:The panel said if you stop Sloane it can help stop the crows. Richo was asked if he would tag Sloane. I got the impression from Richo that we will not tag Sloane.
Is that maybe because we don't have a tagger? Sounds like we need to get one then!
Watch it a bit closer -he doesn't get the chance.Impatient Sainter wrote:No thats because Scott can give an intellectual broader footballing answer. Richo is as dull a media performer as I have seen since Craig when he was with Adelaide, not very bright is our AR.longtimesaint wrote:What really annoys me about that segment is that Whately (rabid Cats supporter) directs most of the questions to Chris Scott and Geelong issues.
I have timed this to my frustration and find that on average 75 to 80% of the time is Geelong issues while Richo sits there like a tailors dummy.
Richo is measured and careful in his responses. Like a politician. Why? Because he is running a team of 40+ players, and assistant coaches, and has to answer to a board.longtimesaint wrote:Watch it a bit closer -he doesn't get the chance.Impatient Sainter wrote:No thats because Scott can give an intellectual broader footballing answer. Richo is as dull a media performer as I have seen since Craig when he was with Adelaide, not very bright is our AR.longtimesaint wrote:What really annoys me about that segment is that Whately (rabid Cats supporter) directs most of the questions to Chris Scott and Geelong issues.
I have timed this to my frustration and find that on average 75 to 80% of the time is Geelong issues while Richo sits there like a tailors dummy.
Still prefer Richo to Scott.
That's just not right.Impatient Sainter wrote:No thats because Scott can give an intellectual broader footballing answer. Richo is as dull a media performer as I have seen since Craig when he was with Adelaide, not very bright is our AR.longtimesaint wrote:What really annoys me about that segment is that Whately (rabid Cats supporter) directs most of the questions to Chris Scott and Geelong issues.
I have timed this to my frustration and find that on average 75 to 80% of the time is Geelong issues while Richo sits there like a tailors dummy.
Toothy pegs and fang farriers. Haven't heard those terms for years, Loris. Absolute frigging gold, my good lady!!loris wrote:Well I hope he doesn't get a referral to Shane Warne's fang farrier. Warne's laminated toothy pegs are so bright, you can play night cricket under the glare of them!White Winmar wrote:If you are going to succeed in life, a "winning smile" is essential. It's all AR is lacking. It would be pleasing if he had a million dollar smile.