Team vs. Blues
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
I kind of like Wrighty in the side. Can force panic in the opposition backs.
Also happy to see DMac get a run.
Dunstan will do his usual game and start off like Dustin Martin and then go missing in the 2nd half as he runs out of puff and ends up a stick in the mud.
Also happy to see DMac get a run.
Dunstan will do his usual game and start off like Dustin Martin and then go missing in the 2nd half as he runs out of puff and ends up a stick in the mud.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Thu 11 May 2017 11:08pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sun 08 May 2016 8:02pm
Re: Team vs. Blues
The thing is that Wright isn't in demand from other AFL clubs, so I doubt he would leave the saints unless he either cops too many injuries or he is delistedEnrico_Misso wrote:Agree it was like for like structural changes.
But last week was probably Wright's best game for us and he deserved a chance to string a few together. Being dumped back to Sandy again will leave him disillusioned and sap his confidence.
Fortius quo Fidelius means Strength through Loyalty. . . I think
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Dustan showed no evidence of developing a tank at Sandy last week. Surprised to see him in.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
- Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1077 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Dunstan did little to deserve his recall, he showed the same lack of run in the VFL as he does when playing AFL. Richo and his team have erred dropping Wright. IMO the only change should have been Weller for Stevens and have Stevens role shared more between Weller, Minchington and Gresham.
Whats going to happen next week when Stevens returns?
Whats going to happen next week when Stevens returns?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Toy Saint wrote:Fact or speculation?bigcarl wrote:Late change.
Out: Riewoldt (managed)
In: McCartin
Who is first emergency?
Just being mischievous. Sorry if I misled you.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8257
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1853 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Dunstan will ruin the midfield dynamic that was working so well.Con Gorozidis wrote:I kind of like Wrighty in the side. Can force panic in the opposition backs.
Also happy to see DMac get a run.
Dunstan will do his usual game and start off like Dustin Martin and then go missing in the 2nd half as he runs out of puff and ends up a stick in the mud.
Is Richo like Donald Trump? Stubbornly refuse to admit an error?
Hope not. Hope he will bring Koby straight back
and drop his little mate.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8257
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1853 times
- Been thanked: 869 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Stevens and Dunstan...
Dunstan will be worried about Koby.
The worry won't increase his aerobic capacity- he physically cannot run after half-time, so he'll
struggle and fall away. We won't see much of him.
Anyone thinks his presence on the ground against Dees, WCE n Cats effectively cost us one mid,
just like having a guy on the bench?
He goes missing in a game, the midfield suffers.
He's dropped, and our mids kill Hawks, and run over Giants.
Hardly coincidence.
Dunstan will be worried about Koby.
The worry won't increase his aerobic capacity- he physically cannot run after half-time, so he'll
struggle and fall away. We won't see much of him.
Anyone thinks his presence on the ground against Dees, WCE n Cats effectively cost us one mid,
just like having a guy on the bench?
He goes missing in a game, the midfield suffers.
He's dropped, and our mids kill Hawks, and run over Giants.
Hardly coincidence.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 5:59pm
- Location: Aisle 36
- Been thanked: 38 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Dunstan will never be an elite runner does not have the body type for that. But I doubt he was recruited for that role anyway.
For me the issue of major concern is the fact that he seems to have gone backwards in the competitive stuff which needs to be his bread and butter.
If you can't be an outside type player , then you need to be a beast in the contest and I am seeing some real concerns there.
He of course needs to work on his running as it is not at an acceptable level but if your bread and butter stuff is missing then you are in real trouble.
Given Armo and Stevens are out I guess he was next cab of the rank for the inside type role.
Wright is stiff as I thought he did well, but Mav was always going to replace him just like I believe Stevens will replace Dunstan pending other injuries of out of this week.
For me the issue of major concern is the fact that he seems to have gone backwards in the competitive stuff which needs to be his bread and butter.
If you can't be an outside type player , then you need to be a beast in the contest and I am seeing some real concerns there.
He of course needs to work on his running as it is not at an acceptable level but if your bread and butter stuff is missing then you are in real trouble.
Given Armo and Stevens are out I guess he was next cab of the rank for the inside type role.
Wright is stiff as I thought he did well, but Mav was always going to replace him just like I believe Stevens will replace Dunstan pending other injuries of out of this week.
A champion team will always beat a team of champions.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
If both Armo and Stevens were ready to go and Dunstan makes way for Stevens, who makes way for Armo?
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 317 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
What was Greg Williams' bodybtype when he used to consistently rack up 40 plus possession games?!Junior wrote:Dunstan will never be an elite runner does not have the body type for that. But I doubt he was recruited for that role anyway.
For me the issue of major concern is the fact that he seems to have gone backwards in the competitive stuff which needs to be his bread and butter.
If you can't be an outside type player , then you need to be a beast in the contest and I am seeing some real concerns there.
He of course needs to work on his running as it is not at an acceptable level but if your bread and butter stuff is missing then you are in real trouble.
Given Armo and Stevens are out I guess he was next cab of the rank for the inside type role.
Wright is stiff as I thought he did well, but Mav was always going to replace him just like I believe Stevens will replace Dunstan pending other injuries of out of this week.
Can he tag and sit on an opposing champion?
Are his hands exceptional?
Can he run out games?
Is he great in clearance work?
Is he great in contested stuff?
Is he a menacing physical presence?
Yes he had some pedigree as a junior but not sure where the upside will come from?
I know he has some improvement in him I just hope it's enough.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2014 3:06pm
Re: Team vs. Blues
Good question.. both leave big hearts but lack pace. Neither in our best 22 at the moment. ImoJacks Back wrote:If both Armo and Stevens were ready to go and Dunstan makes way for Stevens, who makes way for Armo?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
You joking?Joe Bloggs wrote:Good question.. both leave big hearts but lack pace. Neither in our best 22 at the moment. ImoJacks Back wrote:If both Armo and Stevens were ready to go and Dunstan makes way for Stevens, who makes way for Armo?
Armo is definitely in our best 22. He's a grunt machine that goes all day.
Koby is also definitely in our best 22.
Out: Dunny & Meatball (based on current form)
In: Stevens & Armo (when fit)
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16893
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
I would have preferred Weller to have to force his way in...
Other than the Hawthorn game he's been way down so far this season and is currently pbly the worst shot for goal in our team.
I thought Wright did okay last week.
Dunstan for Stevens just seems like a no win situation. He has to make a move Luke. Remind everyone he can play.
Other than the Hawthorn game he's been way down so far this season and is currently pbly the worst shot for goal in our team.
I thought Wright did okay last week.
Dunstan for Stevens just seems like a no win situation. He has to make a move Luke. Remind everyone he can play.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
By way down, you can't mean statistically. So you are meaning in execution I assume?skeptic wrote:I would have preferred Weller to have to force his way in...
Other than the Hawthorn game he's been way down so far this season and is currently pbly the worst shot for goal in our team.
.
Yes there were a couple of easy goals he missed, but apart from that his numbers stack up.
His least number of disposal is 14.
Minche's best is 17.
Wright's best is 12
Lonie's is 16
I agree that Wright is stiff. But Weller's record is good, including this year.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Team vs. Blues
SemperFidelis wrote:A bit tough on Wrighty. Roo must be up and about, because I'd have thought Carlton was the perfect week for a little rest if needed ...
I just dont think Wright is any good.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16893
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
I think many ppl easily forget... this forum was filthy on MAV after Melb and WCE.. he was ok the next few games and great like everyone vs Haw.saintsRrising wrote:By way down, you can't mean statistically. So you are meaning in execution I assume?skeptic wrote:I would have preferred Weller to have to force his way in...
Other than the Hawthorn game he's been way down so far this season and is currently pbly the worst shot for goal in our team.
.
Yes there were a couple of easy goals he missed, but apart from that his numbers stack up.
His least number of disposal is 14.
Minche's best is 17.
Wright's best is 12
Lonie's is 16
I agree that Wright is stiff. But Weller's record is good, including this year.
I like the kid and am happy to see him continue but I don't like different rules for different ppl
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
I agree that Wellers first 2 games were not his best. Though against the Dees there were bigger villians and you could have dropped half the team, and if you believe Weller's Dees game was bad, Wright was clearly worse with 8 disposals and only the one tackle. So if that game was a reason to not bring Weller back, it was a bigger reason to drop Wright.skeptic wrote:
I think many ppl easily forget... this forum was filthy on MAV after Melb and WCE.. he was ok the next few games and great like everyone vs Haw.
I like the kid and am happy to see him continue but I don't like different rules for different ppl
Weller's form has built and his game against the Hawks was superb. So with respect to Weller I am not sure why the different rules apply. Which rule do you mean?
Weller is also a better marking target than the other small forwards.
However again I 100% agree that Wright was stiff to be left out. With a deeper list now many players are going to be stiff.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Lukey Dunstan is the new Sam Gilbert, while according to some experts here anyway!!!!!!
Devo is back, just a different name and number, the blokes who count are backing him, so good enough for me!!!!!
Devo is back, just a different name and number, the blokes who count are backing him, so good enough for me!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
![📯](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f4ef.svg)
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16893
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3583 times
- Been thanked: 2852 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
saintsRrising wrote:I agree that Wellers first 2 games were not his best. Though against the Dees there were bigger villians and you could have dropped half the team, and if you believe Weller's Dees game was bad, Wright was clearly worse with 8 disposals and only the one tackle. So if that game was a reason to not bring Weller back, it was a bigger reason to drop Wright.skeptic wrote:
I think many ppl easily forget... this forum was filthy on MAV after Melb and WCE.. he was ok the next few games and great like everyone vs Haw.
I like the kid and am happy to see him continue but I don't like different rules for different ppl
Weller's form has built and his game against the Hawks was superb. So with respect to Weller I am not sure why the different rules apply. Which rule do you mean?
Weller is also a better marking target than the other small forwards.
However again I 100% agree that Wright was stiff to be left out. With a deeper list now many players are going to be stiff.
I don't think I'm being very difficult to understand...
Players, especially the more established ones like those in the leadership group, should play to the standard expected of them.
On form, Weller has been well done on the very high standard he set last year and I don't view his performance in a 15 goal demolition of an under performing club a huge mark of redemption.
I have nothing against the kid but based on his form this season, he should have (IMO) been made to force his way back into the team. He shouldn't get a free pass when a player like Wright does his job and gets dumped despite it.
That being said, I'm not overly bothered by it because I really rate Weller... one of my favs. I feel for Wright too. Just reiterating that ppl should earn their spots and the reality is we have different expectations on different players.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
Though I think the club has tried out all the small forwards this season.
Long, Minch, Wright, Gresh (who while he probably will become a mid when his aerobic capacity increases) and Lonie have all been played. As has Weller.
Even Billings has had games like last week where he was played forward, and Billings form in hat role will probably see him stay forward for now, and that in turn has helped to squeeze out Wright.
IMO I do not think that any of them has on average played better than Weller this year, and indeed I would believe that Weller has still been the best of them. Though Gresh has had the nice habit of icing some snap goals.
If Weller had been worse then it would be different, but in my view his form has been better. That for me is why he is back in rather than being a favourite.
So I guess where we can agree to disagree is on the overall form showed by Weller this season.
Long, Minch, Wright, Gresh (who while he probably will become a mid when his aerobic capacity increases) and Lonie have all been played. As has Weller.
Even Billings has had games like last week where he was played forward, and Billings form in hat role will probably see him stay forward for now, and that in turn has helped to squeeze out Wright.
IMO I do not think that any of them has on average played better than Weller this year, and indeed I would believe that Weller has still been the best of them. Though Gresh has had the nice habit of icing some snap goals.
If Weller had been worse then it would be different, but in my view his form has been better. That for me is why he is back in rather than being a favourite.
So I guess where we can agree to disagree is on the overall form showed by Weller this season.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
I agree. Weller missed a few goals he should have got.. and normally gets.. and that the coaches would back him to get .. but otherthan that his overall form has been pretty well similar to what we expect of him. His averages in most stats including kicks handballs marks and goals are higher than last yearsaintsRrising wrote:Though I think the club has tried out all the small forwards this season.
Long, Minch, Wright, Gresh (who while he probably will become a mid when his aerobic capacity increases) and Lonie have all been played. As has Weller.
Even Billings has had games like last week where he was played forward, and Billings form in hat role will probably see him stay forward for now, and that in turn has helped to squeeze out Wright.
IMO I do not think that any of them has on average played better than Weller this year, and indeed I would believe that Weller has still been the best of them. Though Gresh has had the nice habit of icing some snap goals.
If Weller had been worse then it would be different, but in my view his form has been better. That for me is why he is back in rather than being a favourite.
So I guess where we can agree to disagree is on the overall form showed by Weller this season.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11557
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3525 times
- Been thanked: 2465 times
Re: Team vs. Blues
I would have liked Roo to be rested this week and next week. Play him against the Dogs. He then gets a 2 week rest again with the bye. I would have thought that if we are going to be serious contenders then Roo needs to be properly managed and rested throughout the year - not just for a week or two at the pointy end.SemperFidelis wrote:He's a champ's champ. Still valuable the last 2 weeks even though not looking 100%. Never thought we would rest him against the Giants, but looking forward to seeing how he goes this week.chook23 wrote:If roo was to be rested....it would have been last week...looked sore/tired after double six day break.....should be fresher this week!!SemperFidelis wrote:A bit tough on Wrighty. Roo must be up and about, because I'd have thought Carlton was the perfect week for a little rest if needed ...
There are no "easy" games for quite a few weeks, although I'd like to see us revisit our recent form at smashijng the Blues.
I'm just stoked we get to have a debate over replacing good players with other good players. In my lifetime we've never had actual depth, what a bloody relief the last few years of recruiting have delivered us.
Our defense is one of the best at the moment imo. Robbo and Webster get the benefit of the shut down defenders and along with our ever improving midfield the team is gaining confidence as a unit. Our forwards are working well together and getting good supply and much better delivery than the last few years. All in all, the development of the team is proving we don't rely on Roo and Joey being in the best players each week. In fact, we are not relying on Roo being a matchwinner in 2017
I know Roo has defied all odds in the last 2-3 years and his knees have held up despite the battering and the workload but the reality is that he's not a little bloke like Banger or Boomer. He hasn't played most of his career with a wiry frame like Tuck or Fletcher. At some point in time he has to accept that he is replaceable in the team. The coach cannot allow Roo to continue playing indefinitely if he is hobbling and inneffective. To make the job easier for the committee and coach and for the footy department to have the retirement conversation with Roo, I have no doubt that was the main reason he was asked to relinquish the captaincy.
I believe Richo is doing the right thing by keeping Paddy in the magoos. Paddy needs some hard lessons and he needs to lift his workload to earn a recall. The management of Paddy although is a seperate issue, it is now being suggested in media circles that perhaps Roo playing on in 2018 could be affecting Paddy's development. It also seems to me that with the injury Roo suffered in round 1, perhaps he is not as agile as last year and can't play up the ground as much as he did last year.
Is it in the interest of the St Kilda footy club and the St Kilda team to keep Roo in the forward line instead of Paddy? Hopefully we win the flag this year, Roo gets the Norm Smith, and retires on a high, but what if we make the 8, we go out early, and Roo has no substantial influence in the result? Can Roo realistically take the place of a youngster going forward in 2018 without a detrimental effect in 2019/2020. Is he doing what's best for the club in the years ahead by wanting to sign on in 2018.