Toy Saint wrote:Reckon he could have won us the 1997 flag, but Alves left him on the bench at a vital stage. May have cost us a flag.
He could've won it by king-hitting Jarman in the third.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Toy Saint wrote:Reckon he could have won us the 1997 flag, but Alves left him on the bench at a vital stage. May have cost us a flag.
Based on how farken Jarman turned out post footy we should've offered him a few free Jars at half time perhaps?SaintPav wrote:Doubt that was the move that lost us the GF.Toy Saint wrote:Reckon he could have won us the 1997 flag, but Alves left him on the bench at a vital stage. May have cost us a flag.
I could never understand why that slow witted Shanahan didn't do that.Waltzing St Kilda wrote:Toy Saint wrote:Reckon he could have won us the 1997 flag, but Alves left him on the bench at a vital stage. May have cost us a flag.
He could've won it by king-hitting Jarman in the third.
Cruel, but fair, saint64. The cat was one of my all time favourites, but I can't forgive him for Keddie. Same with Jamie. Good career ruined by one hour of a clueless performance. Isn't that the cruel irony of life? Reminds me of the Jean Pierre joke. Two Aussies sit down in a Parisian cafe. They hear the patrons summoning the waiter with the cry of, Jean Pierre, c**k suckerr! The Aussies listen for a while, then summon him. They tell him he shouldn't put up with t hat shyte. Be a man, they tell him. He tells them the following. "Gentlemen, let me tell you my story. It is very sad. I fought in the resistance in WWII. I was decorated for bravery. Do they call me Jean Pierre the war hero and liberator of Francais? No. I played football for France in World Cups. Do they call me Jean Pierre the football hero? No. I write a book about my extraordinary life. It goes to number one on the best seller list. Do they call me Jean Pierre the great author? No. I sucked one lousy c**k! I think there's something in that for all of us, don't you?saint64 wrote:Jamie Shanahan was a really good player for us for a number of years leading up to that game. The criticisms of him here are a bit harsh IMO
White Winmar wrote:Cruel, but fair, saint64. The cat was one of my all time favourites, but I can't forgive him for Keddie. Same with Jamie. Good career ruined by one hour of a clueless performance. Isn't that the cruel irony of life? Reminds me of the Jean Pierre joke. Two Aussies sit down in a Parisian cafe. They hear the patrons summoning the waiter with the cry of, Jean Pierre, c**k suckerr! The Aussies listen for a while, then summon him. They tell him he shouldn't put up with t hat shyte. Be a man, they tell him. He tells them the following. "Gentlemen, let me tell you my story. It is very sad. I fought in the resistance in WWII. I was decorated for bravery. Do they call me Jean Pierre the war hero and liberator of Francais? No. I played football for France in World Cups. Do they call me Jean Pierre the football hero? No. I write a book about my extraordinary life. It goes to number one on the best seller list. Do they call me Jean Pierre the great author? No. I sucked one lousy c**k! I think there's something in that for all of us, don't you?saint64 wrote:Jamie Shanahan was a really good player for us for a number of years leading up to that game. The criticisms of him here are a bit harsh IMO
saint64 wrote:Jamie Shanahan was a really good player for us for a number of years leading up to that game. The criticisms of him here are a bit harsh IMO
agreed especially when he seems to be "denigrating" a saints greatBigMart wrote:Bizarre rant
sunsaint wrote:agreed especially when he seems to be "denigrating" a saints greatBigMart wrote:Bizarre rant
what the ranters are forgetting is that Jarman did EXACTLY the same thing twelve months later in their back to back
Jamie Shanahan a saints great? Hardly. 162 games as a GOP at best. Baldock, Stewart, Smith, Ditterich, Lockett, Harvey, Loewe, Winmar, Burke and Roo are greats. Jamie hardly belongs in that company. Let's not rewrite history. He had a big hand in costing us a flag. Then got shopped out.saynta wrote:sunsaint wrote:agreed especially when he seems to be "denigrating" a saints greatBigMart wrote:Bizarre rant
what the ranters are forgetting is that Jarman did EXACTLY the same thing twelve months later in their back to back
Saints great?
What utter rubbish.
You are once again 100% correct.White Winmar wrote:Jamie Shanahan a saints great? Hardly. 162 games as a GOP at best. Baldock, Stewart, Smith, Ditterich, Lockett, Harvey, Loewe, Winmar, Burke and Roo are greats. Jamie hardly belongs in that company. Let's not rewrite history. He had a big hand in costing us a flag. Then got shopped out.saynta wrote:sunsaint wrote:agreed especially when he seems to be "denigrating" a saints greatBigMart wrote:Bizarre rant
what the ranters are forgetting is that Jarman did EXACTLY the same thing twelve months later in their back to back
Saints great?
What utter rubbish.
I was told that they were screaming for Burkey to get on him by Jeans in the stands none the less. Stan was full of moves...stubborn bastard.Johnny Member wrote:Norm Goss told me that the phone broke in the box that day. Alves tried to move Max onto Jarman but couldn't get the message out for about 7 minutes.
Remember when watching this at the "convent" before the 2 sisters booted me out.White Winmar wrote:Jamie Shanahan a saints great? Hardly. 162 games as a GOP at best. Baldock, Stewart, Smith, Ditterich, Lockett, Harvey, Loewe, Winmar, Burke and Roo are greats. Jamie hardly belongs in that company. Let's not rewrite history. He had a big hand in costing us a flag. Then got shopped out.saynta wrote:sunsaint wrote:agreed especially when he seems to be "denigrating" a saints greatBigMart wrote:Bizarre rant
what the ranters are forgetting is that Jarman did EXACTLY the same thing twelve months later in their back to back
Saints great?
What utter rubbish.
Not a great, but a good player for us over 125 games. He played his part in getting us into the GF in the first place, and filled a void for us after Frawley retired. Surely we can celebrate the great things he did for us, as well as lament the circumstances which led him to be one out on a great player who was absolutely on fire and at the top of his game.saynta wrote:You are once again 100% correct.White Winmar wrote:Jamie Shanahan a saints great? Hardly. 162 games as a GOP at best. Baldock, Stewart, Smith, Ditterich, Lockett, Harvey, Loewe, Winmar, Burke and Roo are greats. Jamie hardly belongs in that company. Let's not rewrite history. He had a big hand in costing us a flag. Then got shopped out.saynta wrote:sunsaint wrote:agreed especially when he seems to be "denigrating" a saints greatBigMart wrote:Bizarre rant
what the ranters are forgetting is that Jarman did EXACTLY the same thing twelve months later in their back to back
Saints great?
What utter rubbish.
Some people try to rewrite a player's history as you say.
Doesn't wash with me.
Winmar wrote:He was a very good player up to and including the prelim, then he had a shocker in his last game for us. That doesn't rewrite the history of his previous 124 games.
Agree but he saved one of his worst games to last and his effort I described above was pathetic for a GF.Winmar wrote:He was a very good player up to and including the prelim, then he had a shocker in his last game for us. That doesn't rewrite the history of his previous 124 games.
Ain't that the truth, SP? I'm still trying to persuade our HR manager of the time, Brian Phelan, to write our book of "Blighty" stories. Blight's so called dignified silence after he was sacked was based more on the humiliating things Buttersssss, GT and BP could've revealed about him. BP did a bit of work for me after he left the saints. The long drive to Pt. Henry was always made better by the laughs we got out of Blighty stories. He was an absolute Barry Crocker. I don't think anyone did less to earn as much as he did.SaintPav wrote:Agree but he saved one of his worst games to last and his effort I described above was pathetic for a GF.Winmar wrote:He was a very good player up to and including the prelim, then he had a shocker in his last game for us. That doesn't rewrite the history of his previous 124 games.
Our problem was that Stan did not appear to have a plan b for Rat toss bags moves that everyone saw was coming. We also relied way too much on Harvey and Burke.
Toss bag is the worst coaches that we have ever had. Just wanted the money, a beer and a smoke. Arrogant wanker.
Agreed, Jamie Shanahan wasn't to blame. For a start he wasn't a suitable match up for Jarman. Adelaide had the better of us in the ruck & midfield and smashed us there in the second half. That was due to Renn & Pittman doing as they pleased because we had Everitt & Vidovic out. If both of them, or even one of them had played, Adelaide would have got nowhere near us.saint64 wrote:Jamie Shanahan was a really good player for us for a number of years leading up to that game. The criticisms of him here are a bit harsh IMO
Yep. Even after we supported him after his despicable dog act of breaking Sam McFarlane from North's jaw at Waverley (nice kid who never played another game).The Recruit wrote:Stabbed saints in the back and went to Sydney for money
Spoke poorly of the club after he retired
Played in a winning GF team after punching our best back at the time in the stomach
Where is Barry hall...?
Who gives a f@!k