Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Bruce - Ruck option Game over
It clearly hasn't worked for quite a while now.
Clearance & tap work ineffective and forward line suffers. Riewoldt forward when Bruce into the ruck doesn't do much for balance either.. This isn't a knock on Bruce, more a swing at coaching panel.
Time for Richardson to sort this out and come up with a solution. Mix it up. Maybe it's Marshall or Hickey has to play forward ruck with Longer?
If we had another decent backman, you could swing Carlisle into this role as he has the height.
Not a lot of options, time for change nonetheless.
Clearance & tap work ineffective and forward line suffers. Riewoldt forward when Bruce into the ruck doesn't do much for balance either.. This isn't a knock on Bruce, more a swing at coaching panel.
Time for Richardson to sort this out and come up with a solution. Mix it up. Maybe it's Marshall or Hickey has to play forward ruck with Longer?
If we had another decent backman, you could swing Carlisle into this role as he has the height.
Not a lot of options, time for change nonetheless.
- Waltzing St Kilda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Yes. Not working.
Bring in a second ruckman and rest him in the forward line (or on the bench). Bringing the ball to ground is all
that forwards are required to do these days, apparently, and Longer or Pierce can do that as well as
anyone. This will prevent our main ruckman running out of legs in the last quarter, as has happened in
recent weeks.
Bring in a second ruckman and rest him in the forward line (or on the bench). Bringing the ball to ground is all
that forwards are required to do these days, apparently, and Longer or Pierce can do that as well as
anyone. This will prevent our main ruckman running out of legs in the last quarter, as has happened in
recent weeks.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Works OK when Hickey is playing.
Hopefully Billy has a spell now
Hopefully Billy has a spell now
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Bruce started in defence.Rocket wrote:It clearly hasn't worked for quite a while now.
Clearance & tap work ineffective and forward line suffers. Riewoldt forward when Bruce into the ruck doesn't do much for balance either.. This isn't a knock on Bruce, more a swing at coaching panel.
Time for Richardson to sort this out and come up with a solution. Mix it up. Maybe it's Marshall or Hickey has to play forward ruck with Longer?
If we had another decent backman, you could swing Carlisle into this role as he has the height.
Not a lot of options, time for change nonetheless.
Try Carlisle as 2nd ruck and send Bruce back when Jake is on ball.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Which runner gets the chop if we bring in another tall?
We lose a rotation and our spread and pressure will drop a bit... will the inclusion of an extra tall outweigh that?
Possibly, if they play well??
We lose a rotation and our spread and pressure will drop a bit... will the inclusion of an extra tall outweigh that?
Possibly, if they play well??
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 201 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Do you remember when we played Pierce last year for that one game. It actually worked and I was surprised the kid got dropped the following week because I thought he did enough to warrant another game.
Also, I think Bruce had his best game for the year where he was able to just stay at home and not have to go into the ruck.
Also, I think Bruce had his best game for the year where he was able to just stay at home and not have to go into the ruck.
Think of me long enough to make a memory.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9069
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Just another case of dumb player management by the coach. Pierce should be given every chance to play seniors as should Sinclair- heaven knows we need some class and a plan BBruce G McAbee wrote:Do you remember when we played Pierce last year for that one game. It actually worked and I was surprised the kid got dropped the following week because I thought he did enough to warrant another game.
Also, I think Bruce had his best game for the year where he was able to just stay at home and not have to go into the ruck.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
It only worked ( sort of) before the new no third man up rule.. We we second in the league in 2016 for hit outs by third man up with 30.7% of our total hit outs won by third man.. mostly by Roo
intresingly 3rd man up was used against us on Hickey rarely
When Bruce goes into the ruck we get killed because no one can help him out against the bigger bodies, posters saying that five minutes a quarter makes no difference Have no idea, that's twenty minutes total were we get absolutely flogged, It's obvious
It's usually toward the end of the quarter when we are already running out of steam .. it hurts badly
If your going to run with one Ruckman have got to be like Sandilands or Gawn etc, they now give the on ballers an armchair ride. Sadly we only have Longer who's tank ain't great and is struggling around the ground.
I believe the Dogs will suffer as they were quite high in using Bont as third man up the same we we use Nick this is the year of the giant rucks, until the coaches work out how to curb their influence once more.
intresingly 3rd man up was used against us on Hickey rarely
When Bruce goes into the ruck we get killed because no one can help him out against the bigger bodies, posters saying that five minutes a quarter makes no difference Have no idea, that's twenty minutes total were we get absolutely flogged, It's obvious
It's usually toward the end of the quarter when we are already running out of steam .. it hurts badly
If your going to run with one Ruckman have got to be like Sandilands or Gawn etc, they now give the on ballers an armchair ride. Sadly we only have Longer who's tank ain't great and is struggling around the ground.
I believe the Dogs will suffer as they were quite high in using Bont as third man up the same we we use Nick this is the year of the giant rucks, until the coaches work out how to curb their influence once more.
And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Did Lewis Pierce work?
6 disposals, 10 hit outs, 1 goal
Not a good game from a forward, or from a ruckman or from a runner?
6 disposals, 10 hit outs, 1 goal
Not a good game from a forward, or from a ruckman or from a runner?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23011
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8909 times
- Been thanked: 3883 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
How many games has the kid played.BigMart wrote:Did Lewis Pierce work?
6 disposals, 10 hit outs, 1 goal
Not a good game from a forward, or from a ruckman or from a runner?
Hickey, Pierce or Marshall even would have possibly have been of greater value than Long.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
- Location: Del Mar, California
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Have we upgraded a rookie to replace Dempster yet?
It's pretty clear we need a 2nd ruck who can be effective forward?
Marshall may be that guy, no idea how effective his ruck work is, but he does kick goals.
Membrey and Weller are similar types, and neither have been that effective. Perhaps we can't afford both in the same squad.
I'm thinking we should drop Long for Koby Stevens to strengthen our mid field, and repalce Weller with Marshall. Minchington and Billings are probably sufficient small forwards and could rotate through the middle.
It's pretty clear we need a 2nd ruck who can be effective forward?
Marshall may be that guy, no idea how effective his ruck work is, but he does kick goals.
Membrey and Weller are similar types, and neither have been that effective. Perhaps we can't afford both in the same squad.
I'm thinking we should drop Long for Koby Stevens to strengthen our mid field, and repalce Weller with Marshall. Minchington and Billings are probably sufficient small forwards and could rotate through the middle.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
I wonder how Carlisle would go in the occasional ruck contest? Perhaps we could get Bruce to go down back then?
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
As he rucked a fair bit at the Dons, quite well as a relief ruck I would imagine and ceratinly better than Bruce has shown.Sainternist wrote:I wonder how Carlisle would go in the occasional ruck contest? Perhaps we could get Bruce to go down back then?
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Really like the idea.Sainternist wrote:I wonder how Carlisle would go in the occasional ruck contest? Perhaps we could get Bruce to go down back then?
Only reservation is that it might mean that Hickey goes into defence and he isn't much of a defender.
Bad management is bad management
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
You have to holler for a Marshall.saint-stu wrote:Time to call for a Marshall?
But the beauty is if properly charged before hand the battery never runs low during a game.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
In my opinion need another tall.. when you consider that Our tall forwards are Bruce (isn't marking, missing easy shots) and Membrey (who is 188cm), it just lacks abit of balance (esp when Bruce goes in the ruck).
This is even more obvious when we continually bomb it long, surely we need to give something else a try..
This is even more obvious when we continually bomb it long, surely we need to give something else a try..
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
IMO it makes as much sense to ruck Carlisle as Bruce.
None.
What Longer showed is that he does not have the mobility or possession skills to add value - so is a liability.
Marshall?
Don't know apart from his physical attributes being what they are so has the height.
If we play Marshall he is going to be required to play forward for significant periods of the game - giving us McCartin, Bruce, Membrey and Marshall.
Would that work?
Then there is Riewoldt pushing forward.
When rucking whoever is going to get hammered physically - and we saw the result on Longer who was then also dragged around the ground by his opponents to our detriment and the ultimate result.
Longer just could not get the ball going our way and Geelong maximised.
None.
What Longer showed is that he does not have the mobility or possession skills to add value - so is a liability.
Marshall?
Don't know apart from his physical attributes being what they are so has the height.
If we play Marshall he is going to be required to play forward for significant periods of the game - giving us McCartin, Bruce, Membrey and Marshall.
Would that work?
Then there is Riewoldt pushing forward.
When rucking whoever is going to get hammered physically - and we saw the result on Longer who was then also dragged around the ground by his opponents to our detriment and the ultimate result.
Longer just could not get the ball going our way and Geelong maximised.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Much depends on whether we play paddy or not.. if we do then Bruce is stuck in the ruck, if we only play 2 of Bruce, paddy or members then we might be about to fit in a Peirce, Marshall or Longer to back up Hickey.
No simple answer unfortunately..
On another note, has it taken just one game for some people to realize that Hickey is a mile ahead of Longer as our first ruck!? Whilst he hasn't been at his best so far, imo Hickey will get better as the season progresses..
No simple answer unfortunately..
On another note, has it taken just one game for some people to realize that Hickey is a mile ahead of Longer as our first ruck!? Whilst he hasn't been at his best so far, imo Hickey will get better as the season progresses..
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
Well that's one of the many options... they could both play as the key Fwds or the could play Marshall as the 'resting ruck' or they could just play one of them.. who knows..borderbarry wrote:If we played Marshall - why would we need to play Bruce?
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
My opinion is that playing Bruce in the ruck is a double negative. He isn't effective as a ruckman and I feel it's begatively impacting his form at FF.
If we're happy with a ruckman having less than 10 possessions and taking 1 mark a game we might as well play Holmes. At least he'll get 50 hitouts.
I think a hard call will have to be made at the end of the year as playing any two of our listed ruckmen will make us too slow and limit our rotations too much.
If we're happy with a ruckman having less than 10 possessions and taking 1 mark a game we might as well play Holmes. At least he'll get 50 hitouts.
I think a hard call will have to be made at the end of the year as playing any two of our listed ruckmen will make us too slow and limit our rotations too much.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
Re: Bruce - Ruck option Game over
I tend to agree.. Not sure why we went for so many 'pure' ruckman..remboy wrote:My opinion is that playing Bruce in the ruck is a double negative. He isn't effective as a ruckman and I feel it's begatively impacting his form at FF.
If we're happy with a ruckman having less than 10 possessions and taking 1 mark a game we might as well play Holmes. At least he'll get 50 hitouts.
I think a hard call will have to be made at the end of the year as playing any two of our listed ruckmen will make us too slow and limit our rotations too much.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times