AFLDelistings 2016

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Sanctorum
Club Player
Posts: 1847
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
Has thanked: 1455 times
Been thanked: 990 times

AFLDelistings 2016

Post: # 1647031Post Sanctorum »

I'm not sure what it proves, but I was quite surprised to see the high rate of player delistings by AFL teams this year:

Adelaide - 3 retired & 4 delisted
Brisbane: 4 & 5
Carlton: 3 & 9
Collingwood: 5 & 3
Essendon: 1 & 10 (not counting the extra players they brought in for those banned)
Fremantle: 1 & 11
Geelong: 2 & 7
Gold Coast: 1 & 8
GWS: 1 & 0
Hawthorn: 0 & 7
Melbourne: 0 & 7
North Melbourne: 3 & 5
Port Adelaide: 1 & 4
Richmond: 2 & 3
St Kilda: 1 & 8
Sydney: 3 & 4
West Coast: 4 & 6
Western Bulldogs: 1 & 3

36 Retired & 104 delisted

Of the 104 delisted only 14 were picked up in the Rookie Draft, mostly by the clubs they were at , leaving 90 to contemplate life after the big league.

Obviously clubs are more than ever of the view that it is better to look for new blood than hope that their 2nd tier players will make the grade, validated by the failure of most of them to find a home elsewhere. In the case of the Saints delistings, neither Murdoch, Saunders, Curren, Lee, Shenton, Delaney and Templeton were able to force their way into the team for any length of time, despite numerous opportunities. Brenton Payne was only ever a rookie.


"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."

Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
George27
Club Player
Posts: 1316
Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
Has thanked: 872 times
Been thanked: 445 times

Re: AFLDelistings 2016

Post: # 1647051Post George27 »

Thanks for those very interesting stats. They serve to show how strong GWS are and will be. Not one of their players was delisted. Aside from the one retiree , they got something for every player they lost or moved on. Every other club moved players on for no return. Every player the Giants have is a valuable asset, so they just keep trading in and out until they have as close as possible to the perfect team. The tragedy of it is that the good folk of Sydney's west have no understanding of how lucky they are.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: AFLDelistings 2016

Post: # 1647056Post Wayne42 »

George27 wrote:Thanks for those very interesting stats. They serve to show how strong GWS are and will be. Not one of their players was delisted. Aside from the one retiree , they got something for every player they lost or moved on. Every other club moved players on for no return. Every player the Giants have is a valuable asset, so they just keep trading in and out until they have as close as possible to the perfect team. The tragedy of it is that the good folk of Sydney's west have no understanding of how lucky they are.
The way the GWS team was put together is so so much better than the way the Bears were put together. The GWS model is the best one, and the correct one for a start up team.

GWS have been so good they now have a talent factory that makes a lot of people bristle.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6566
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1245 times
Been thanked: 450 times

Re: AFLDelistings 2016

Post: # 1647062Post Jacks Back »

Wayne42 wrote:
George27 wrote:Thanks for those very interesting stats. They serve to show how strong GWS are and will be. Not one of their players was delisted. Aside from the one retiree , they got something for every player they lost or moved on. Every other club moved players on for no return. Every player the Giants have is a valuable asset, so they just keep trading in and out until they have as close as possible to the perfect team. The tragedy of it is that the good folk of Sydney's west have no understanding of how lucky they are.
The way the GWS team was put together is so so much better than the way the Bears were put together. The GWS model is the best one, and the correct one for a start up team.

GWS have been so good they now have a talent factory that makes a lot of people bristle.
Image


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8161
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1804 times
Been thanked: 848 times

Re: AFLDelistings 2016

Post: # 1647069Post WellardSaint »

Wayne42 wrote:
George27 wrote:Thanks for those very interesting stats. They serve to show how strong GWS are and will be. Not one of their players was delisted. Aside from the one retiree , they got something for every player they lost or moved on. Every other club moved players on for no return. Every player the Giants have is a valuable asset, so they just keep trading in and out until they have as close as possible to the perfect team. The tragedy of it is that the good folk of Sydney's west have no understanding of how lucky they are.
The way the GWS team was put together is so so much better than the way the Bears were put together. The GWS model is the best one, and the correct one for a start up team.

GWS have been so good they now have a talent factory that makes a lot of people bristle.
I suppose you could say GWS were "tailor-made" to be a flag contender
:shock: :wink:


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22871
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 3827 times

Re: AFLDelistings 2016

Post: # 1647095Post saynta »

Oh. I think someone picked up a delisted GWS player in the rookie draft

Brisbane in fact.


'Who they drafted: Jake Barrett (GWS), Mitchell Hinge (Glenelg), Oscar McInerney (Casey Scorpions), Blake Grewar (Redland, category B)

Summary: The Lions got a little bit of everything in this draft, with midfield grunt in Barrett, half-back polish in Hinge and a project ruckman in McInerney. Barrett has been in the Giants' system three seasons and played just one senior game, but should get some opportunities in Brisbane. He is also capable of being an effective forward and has starred in the NEAFL. The Lions have been looking for good ball users and Hinge fits that bill with his lovely left-foot kick. He usually plays behind the ball, but is capable of moving into the midfield. McInerney is 203cm and will take more time to develop, but with just Stefan Martin, Archie Smith and Matt Eagles on the list as recognised ruckmen, the club needed to add some depth here.

What the club says: "Jake has an outstanding record in the NEAFL, but like a number of GWS boys, probably hasn't had the opportunity – they've got a lot of depth. We're very optimistic he can come in and play a role. Mitchell continues our push to bring in some boys that can use the ball well, and Oscar is a bit older than the other boys, is very raw, but we're hoping with a couple of years in the system, he can develop. We're very happy." - recruiting manager Stephen Conole "


Post Reply