Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
So of all staff sitting watching no-one had presence of mind to get Warner back on? #unforgiveable #unbelieveable
9:12 PM - 24 Nov 2016
That's his tweet re the scandal of Warner going off when Silf Ifrica were 9 down and therefore him being denied opening the batting after the opportunist decarlation by Faf Du Cheat
9:12 PM - 24 Nov 2016
That's his tweet re the scandal of Warner going off when Silf Ifrica were 9 down and therefore him being denied opening the batting after the opportunist decarlation by Faf Du Cheat
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
All's well that ends well.
I wouldn't think they were too worried about the Queensland Captain Khawaja opening with his State team mate and especially as they are coming off a match winning partnership in the last Shield game where both made hundreds - so batted together for a long time.
Having Khawaja at the other end may have been a bonus for Renshaw.
Opening with someone like Warner, scoring as he does, requires a certain character at the other end because you do not want to look at the Scoreboard and see Warner on his score, you on yours and feel a pressure to contribute to the scoring rate - this is why the mature Rogers was such a good foil for Warner.
Renshaw is going to have to learn that.
I wouldn't think they were too worried about the Queensland Captain Khawaja opening with his State team mate and especially as they are coming off a match winning partnership in the last Shield game where both made hundreds - so batted together for a long time.
Having Khawaja at the other end may have been a bonus for Renshaw.
Opening with someone like Warner, scoring as he does, requires a certain character at the other end because you do not want to look at the Scoreboard and see Warner on his score, you on yours and feel a pressure to contribute to the scoring rate - this is why the mature Rogers was such a good foil for Warner.
Renshaw is going to have to learn that.
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Great tactic from the Aussies. Finally got something right.
Sent from my SM-T210 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-T210 using Tapatalk
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2011 10:58pm
- Location: qld
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Warner would have snicker one for sure.
nothing to say
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8375
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Faf fell for it hook line and sinker - Thought he was out thinking our boys and yet he it was he that got played
That last wicket partnership was going along nicely as well
That last wicket partnership was going along nicely as well
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Yeah an extended rest for his shoulder is really going to hurt Warner's chances today.Devilhead wrote:Faf fell for it hook line and sinker - Thought he was out thinking our boys and yet he it was he that got played
That last wicket partnership was going along nicely as well
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I wonder how many first innings have been declared on day one, and how many of those have resulted in victory?
You read it here first; Australia to win by an innnings.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Boof etc should have been on top of this. Most unprofessional and seized upon by the cunning and devious Du Plicity.
However there is also the real possibility that Warner didn't want to bat last night and left it to a night watchman. If that is the case I hope he has to wait until twilight to get a bat.
However there is also the real possibility that Warner didn't want to bat last night and left it to a night watchman. If that is the case I hope he has to wait until twilight to get a bat.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Given where this series has gone to, from chucking the ball into the turf at Perth, to further ball tampering in Hobart and the convoiction and now this, Australia should have appealed and had Fluff de Cheat dismissed "Handling the Ball".
Simply, from the outset you know that a batsman does NOT handle the ball, and the Laws of the game include as a mode of dismissal "Handling the Ball".
Australia should have appealed and had Fluff De Cheat dismissed "Handling the Ball".
If you give it, you should expect to receive it.
As for any defence of Fluff de Cheat and using an introduced substance in his mouth to tamper with the condition of the ball he has no defence.
Once upon a time you looked to protect and shine one side of the ball, including by returning on the full to the 'keeper.
Now you attempt to rough up one side of the ball and to make it heavier so it swings toward the heavy and rough side.
So Fluff de Cheat is correctly again convicted as a cheat.
Simply, from the outset you know that a batsman does NOT handle the ball, and the Laws of the game include as a mode of dismissal "Handling the Ball".
Australia should have appealed and had Fluff De Cheat dismissed "Handling the Ball".
If you give it, you should expect to receive it.
As for any defence of Fluff de Cheat and using an introduced substance in his mouth to tamper with the condition of the ball he has no defence.
Once upon a time you looked to protect and shine one side of the ball, including by returning on the full to the 'keeper.
Now you attempt to rough up one side of the ball and to make it heavier so it swings toward the heavy and rough side.
So Fluff de Cheat is correctly again convicted as a cheat.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11236
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Jamie Cox!stevie wrote:why is this in the main forum?
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2011 10:58pm
- Location: qld
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Would take anything Cox said with a grain of salt.
nothing to say
- stevie
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 144 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Bernard Shakey wrote:Jamie Cox!stevie wrote:why is this in the main forum?
Sorry but not sure who he is
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:39pm
- Location: Ballarat
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
stevie wrote:Bernard Shakey wrote:Jamie Cox!stevie wrote:why is this in the main forum?
Sorry but not sure who he is
GM Football Performance at St Kilda FC
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2011 10:58pm
- Location: qld
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
Formerly long serving Tasmanian cricketer.stevie wrote:Bernard Shakey wrote:Jamie Cox!stevie wrote:why is this in the main forum?
Sorry but not sure who he is
nothing to say
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
Re: Jamie Cox bags the shyte of our cricket team/admin
I agree with you. Mr Du Plicity should be doing as much ball tampering as he likes in this Test ...To the top wrote:Given where this series has gone to, from chucking the ball into the turf at Perth, to further ball tampering in Hobart and the convoiction and now this, Australia should have appealed and had Fluff de Cheat dismissed "Handling the Ball".
Simply, from the outset you know that a batsman does NOT handle the ball, and the Laws of the game include as a mode of dismissal "Handling the Ball".
Australia should have appealed and had Fluff De Cheat dismissed "Handling the Ball".
If you give it, you should expect to receive it.
As for any defence of Fluff de Cheat and using an introduced substance in his mouth to tamper with the condition of the ball he has no defence.
Once upon a time you looked to protect and shine one side of the ball, including by returning on the full to the 'keeper.
Now you attempt to rough up one side of the ball and to make it heavier so it swings toward the heavy and rough side.
So Fluff de Cheat is correctly again convicted as a cheat.
on the sidelines.