Port v Sandy elimination final

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
George27
Club Player
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
Has thanked: 880 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635639Post George27 »

Does anyone know if the lads who were not allowed to play because they were in the Seniors last week - Holmes, McKenzie, Wright, White ,Lonie - can play next week ? It seems extraordinary that senior selection in round 23 would bar an otherwise qualified player from representing Sandy throughout the finals.


SuperDuper
Club Player
Posts: 1311
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 99 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635643Post SuperDuper »

saintbrat wrote:http://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/loca ... 31b63725a3

Port Melbourne 1.1 6.2 11.5 15.10 (100)

Sandringham 4.5 10.8 13.11 22.13 (145)

GOALS:

Port Melbourne: Mihocek 3 Rivett 3 Arnot 2 Osborne 2 Iaccarino Lange Clarke Golby Lisle

Sandringham: Lee 5 Shenton 4 Dennis-Lane 4 Templeton 2 Wilkins 2 Answerth Sinclair Grace Fisscher Pierce

BEST:

Port Melbourne: Tynan Cain Arnot Mihocek Rivett Lange

Sandringham: Longer Noone Curren Lee Cook Shenton
nice work by Billy...

If we do trade him it is a big call...
hopefully it would end up a win-win


User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635650Post saintbrat »

was interesting listening to the radio coverage post game where they checked the stats
Port lead most of them including clearances and many others
But the one the Zebras did lead was ''' Surprise surprise- " tackles"

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/vfl/head-2 ... r8jbz.html
Sandringham had the answers when it mattered most against Port Melbourne to win an intense elimination final by 45 points at North Port Oval on Sunday.

The Zebras, who meet reigning premier Williamstown in next Saturday's semi-final at North Port Oval, appeared galvanised after a turbulent finish to the home and away season, in which they lost six of their last seven matches.

In the background was a coach, Paul Hudson, who recently said he will be leaving the club at the end of the season, along with news of an alignment extension with St Kilda, which is set to allow more Saints – and less Zebras – to develop their craft in the VFL senior team, rather than in the development league, from next season.
>>>>>>
Tom Lee's five goals on return was a major factor in the victory, as was Cameron Shenton, whose fourth goal at the start of the final term, was just as crucial.

Trent Dennis-Lane has also had a major influence, returning from a shoulder injury, with three goals.

"We thought if we could get back to some of the footy that we played in the first half of the season … we [had] the leg speed to run over these guys and I thought we executed that well," Dennis-Lane said.

Tom Curren, after receiving the news of being delisted by St Kilda during the week, racked up 14 disposals in the opening term – and finished with 31. Myke Cook (24 disposals) and Eli Templeton (22) were other solid contributors.

Port Melbourne put in another blue-collar-like performance, but are ranked the least effective team in the competition for kicking efficiency, which ultimately cost them in their time of need on Sunday.


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8581
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635654Post kosifantutti »

SuperDuper wrote:
saintbrat wrote:http://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/loca ... 31b63725a3

Port Melbourne 1.1 6.2 11.5 15.10 (100)

Sandringham 4.5 10.8 13.11 22.13 (145)

GOALS:

Port Melbourne: Mihocek 3 Rivett 3 Arnot 2 Osborne 2 Iaccarino Lange Clarke Golby Lisle

Sandringham: Lee 5 Shenton 4 Dennis-Lane 4 Templeton 2 Wilkins 2 Answerth Sinclair Grace Fisscher Pierce

BEST:

Port Melbourne: Tynan Cain Arnot Mihocek Rivett Lange

Sandringham: Longer Noone Curren Lee Cook Shenton
nice work by Billy...

If we do trade him it is a big call...
hopefully it would end up a win-win
Longer was nowhere near our best.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
noddy04
Club Player
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu 19 Mar 2009 3:51pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635655Post noddy04 »

I got my eldest son to try to stream the game and was able to see all of it. First time i have seen sandy play and really enjoyed it. Good luck next weekend boys....go the saints :D


BringBackMadDog
Club Player
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635660Post BringBackMadDog »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Does anyone know the eligibility rules and whether any Saints listed players will play next week?

Here you go, good luck making sense of it

Finals Eligibilty - 2016 Peter Jackson VFL Legendairy Finals Series

20. Participation in Finals


(a) A Player who has not played in at least one AFL, VFL Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Match in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in the Senior Grade Finals Series.

(b) Subject to Rule 20(c) below, a Player who has played in an AFL Home and Away Match after 1 July in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in VFL Senior Grade or Development League Finals Series Matches unless that Player has played in a combined total of at least six (6) Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Matches in the same season.

(c) A Player who has not played in at least two (2) Development League Home and Away Matches in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in a Development League Finals Series Match unless, immediately prior to selection:

(i) the Player has missed at least ten (10) consecutive VFL Home and Away Matches through injury; and

(ii) the Player’s Club remains active in the VFL Senior Grade Finals Series.

(d) A Player who has played in more than eight (8) VFL Senior Grade Home and Away Matches will be ineligible to play in Development League Final Series Matches unless that Player has played in at least six (6) Development League Home and Away Matches.

(e) Despite any other provision of this Rule 20, but subject to Rule 20(f), where a Club has both its AFL and VFL Senior Teams engaged on the same weekend, any Player may be selected to play in the VFL Senior Team so long as that Player has played in at least one AFL or VFL Senior Grade Home and Away Match or Development League Home and Away Match in that relevant season.

(f) When an AFL Club is eliminated from the AFL Final Series on the same weekend as the VFL Grand Final, the selection of players in the VFL Senior Grade team shall be unrestricted, provided the player has participated in at least one (AFL or VFL) Senior Grade or AFL Victoria Development League match in the relevant season.

(g) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, where a Club does not field a Development League Team, an AFL listed Player must:

(i) qualify under Regulation 20(b); and

(ii) have played no more than 12 AFL Home and Away Matches,

to be eligible to play in VFL Finals Series Matches.

(h) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, in circumstances where:

(i) an AFL Club is participating in the AFL Finals Series, but is not required to play on a particular weekend (by virtue of winning its AFL Qualifying Final and earning a one-week break before its AFL Preliminary Final); and

(ii) the AFL Club’s VFL team is playing on that weekend,

any AFL listed player who did not play in the AFL Qualifying Final will be eligible to play in the Club’s VFL team in the week in which the AFL Club has a one-week break.

(i) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, in circumstances where:

(i) an AFL Club is participating in the AFL Finals Series, but is not playing on the weekend of the AFL bye weekend after the final round of the AFL home and away season; and

(ii) the AFL Club’s VFL team is playing on that weekend,

any AFL listed player who did not play in the AFL Club’s AFL team in the final round of the AFL home and away season will be eligible to play in the Club’s VFL team in the AFL bye round after the final round of the AFL home and away season.

(j) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, the CEO of AFL Victoria (or nominee) may deem any Player eligible to play in any VFL Finals Series Match.


User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635662Post saintbrat »

noddy04 wrote:I got my eldest son to try to stream the game and was able to see all of it. First time i have seen sandy play and really enjoyed it. Good luck next weekend boys....go the saints :D

Just don't believe everything the commentators told you
Bugs me when they can't get info straight- or keep their eyes open.
Just watching a replay and it would seem the radio got it marginally more correct than tv

Hudson coached from the boundary all day- readily available then to encourage the players as they came to an from.

and Ayres from the box first qu and then the boundary


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635664Post saintspremiers »

The eligibility rules make our tax laws seem simple.

From what I can gather is that Belinda isn't eligible, even if the drug bans are over


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635671Post Enrico_Misso »

So proud of the boys and the spirit they showed.
(Not sure where that has been the last two months!).

Big chance to beat Williamstown next week.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30089
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635674Post saintsRrising »

Great result.

Lee looked good as a permanent forward and I think it helped the team a lot by having him there. In many games this year Sandy has had to play with an overly cumbersome forward set up.

Players looked very sharp.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6582
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1276 times
Been thanked: 464 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635690Post Jacks Back »

BringBackMadDog wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Does anyone know the eligibility rules and whether any Saints listed players will play next week?

Here you go, good luck making sense of it

Finals Eligibilty - 2016 Peter Jackson VFL Legendairy Finals Series

20. Participation in Finals


(a) A Player who has not played in at least one AFL, VFL Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Match in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in the Senior Grade Finals Series.

(b) Subject to Rule 20(c) below, a Player who has played in an AFL Home and Away Match after 1 July in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in VFL Senior Grade or Development League Finals Series Matches unless that Player has played in a combined total of at least six (6) Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Matches in the same season.

(c) A Player who has not played in at least two (2) Development League Home and Away Matches in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in a Development League Finals Series Match unless, immediately prior to selection:

(i) the Player has missed at least ten (10) consecutive VFL Home and Away Matches through injury; and

(ii) the Player’s Club remains active in the VFL Senior Grade Finals Series.

(d) A Player who has played in more than eight (8) VFL Senior Grade Home and Away Matches will be ineligible to play in Development League Final Series Matches unless that Player has played in at least six (6) Development League Home and Away Matches.

(e) Despite any other provision of this Rule 20, but subject to Rule 20(f), where a Club has both its AFL and VFL Senior Teams engaged on the same weekend, any Player may be selected to play in the VFL Senior Team so long as that Player has played in at least one AFL or VFL Senior Grade Home and Away Match or Development League Home and Away Match in that relevant season.

(f) When an AFL Club is eliminated from the AFL Final Series on the same weekend as the VFL Grand Final, the selection of players in the VFL Senior Grade team shall be unrestricted, provided the player has participated in at least one (AFL or VFL) Senior Grade or AFL Victoria Development League match in the relevant season.

(g) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, where a Club does not field a Development League Team, an AFL listed Player must:

(i) qualify under Regulation 20(b); and

(ii) have played no more than 12 AFL Home and Away Matches,

to be eligible to play in VFL Finals Series Matches.

(h) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, in circumstances where:

(i) an AFL Club is participating in the AFL Finals Series, but is not required to play on a particular weekend (by virtue of winning its AFL Qualifying Final and earning a one-week break before its AFL Preliminary Final); and

(ii) the AFL Club’s VFL team is playing on that weekend,

any AFL listed player who did not play in the AFL Qualifying Final will be eligible to play in the Club’s VFL team in the week in which the AFL Club has a one-week break.

(i) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, in circumstances where:

(i) an AFL Club is participating in the AFL Finals Series, but is not playing on the weekend of the AFL bye weekend after the final round of the AFL home and away season; and

(ii) the AFL Club’s VFL team is playing on that weekend,

any AFL listed player who did not play in the AFL Club’s AFL team in the final round of the AFL home and away season will be eligible to play in the Club’s VFL team in the AFL bye round after the final round of the AFL home and away season.

(j) Despite any other provision in Rule 20, the CEO of AFL Victoria (or nominee) may deem any Player eligible to play in any VFL Finals Series Match.
:shock: Bloody hell!!

So can the likes of Lonie, White, et al play this weekend or not? Does anyone know?

On that though, I don't think Sandy should play 3 ruckmen if Holmes is eligible to play. Makes them too slow.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
George27
Club Player
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
Has thanked: 880 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635780Post George27 »

Well I am stuffed if I can see any rule in there that prevents White, Lonie, Holmes , Wright and McKenzie - all of whom surely have played at least games for Sandy this season- from lining up this weekend. Of course the club may decide not to pick some or all, and I recall they left some eligible guys out of finals last year.


User avatar
prwilkinson
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1999
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635783Post prwilkinson »

George27 wrote:Well I am stuffed if I can see any rule in there that prevents White, Lonie, Holmes , Wright and McKenzie - all of whom surely have played at least games for Sandy this season- from lining up this weekend. Of course the club may decide not to pick some or all, and I recall they left some eligible guys out of finals last year.
Yeah... I was trying to work out what was going on with so many St Kilda players that should be playing... not playing. A few of those guys played for Sandy nearly all season!


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635802Post Bluthy »

a Player who has played in an AFL Home and Away Match after 1 July in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in VFL Senior Grade or Development League Finals Series Matches unless that Player has played in a combined total of at least six (6) Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Matches in the same season.
Isn't this the key - they need to have played 6 VFL games?


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8581
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635815Post kosifantutti »

George27 wrote:Well I am stuffed if I can see any rule in there that prevents White, Lonie, Holmes , Wright and McKenzie - all of whom surely have played at least games for Sandy this season- from lining up this weekend. Of course the club may decide not to pick some or all, and I recall they left some eligible guys out of finals last year.
Could we get a lawyer to look at it?


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
George27
Club Player
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue 22 Dec 2015 7:59pm
Has thanked: 880 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635836Post George27 »

Bluthy wrote:
a Player who has played in an AFL Home and Away Match after 1 July in the relevant season will be ineligible to play in VFL Senior Grade or Development League Finals Series Matches unless that Player has played in a combined total of at least six (6) Senior Grade or Development League Home and Away Matches in the same season.
Isn't this the key - they need to have played 6 VFL games?
Yes, and Holmes , White clearly have , and I would have thought McKenzie, Lonie and Wright would have too.


SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Port v Sandy elimination final

Post: # 1635865Post SemperFidelis »

(a) and (b) are the only ones we need to look at for VFL senior grade finals (given that the
saints are done for AFL finals).

So.

1. You MUST have played at least one AFL, VFL or Dev league game to be eligible to play for Sandy in the finals at all.

2. If you passed GO at 1., if you also played for the Sainters after July 1 (so, from the Suns debacle onwards), then to play VFL finals you MUST also have played 6 times during the season for Sandy.

I haven't done the numbers on our boys, but I should think Billy, Lonie, Brandon, Holmes etc are all eligible.

Different question as to whether they are picked. And I'm not sure how the STK/Sandy maximum number rules apply in finals.


Always loyal
Post Reply