Who's Motley?tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18636
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1980 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23144
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9087 times
- Been thanked: 3945 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
What's happened to Brenton Payne?Jacks Back wrote:This, unfortunately, is a great opportunity to see what the side could be like when the more experienced players are no longer there.
With both Fisher and Dempster out of the back line it brings opportunity to see what a future backline would look like without those two (albeit also without Goddard). The only talls we have at Sandy are Lee, Delaney and the rookie Coughlan. Delaney is a bit slow and probably could only play on the gorillas like Close or maybe Hawkins. Robertson might be tall but he plays small. I reckon we need to have a good look at Lee and also promote Coughlan to see how far away (or close) he is. If we upgrade Coughlan we still have a midway upgrade option as well.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23144
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9087 times
- Been thanked: 3945 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
Cripps is listed at 195cm. I saw an interviw where he said he was now 196cm and still growing.saintsRrising wrote:While they can both play as key defenders I would say they are chalk and cheese.SemperFidelis wrote: Described Lee and Delany as "pretty similar players", so suspect only one will come in.
Lee excellent kick and good offensively and handy intercept mark pulling down good numbers of marks. Coaches reoprtedly concerned about defensive aspects of his game.
Delaney is basically the polar opposite. Good defenseively, but witha poor offensive game.
With Fisher, Dempster and Goddard all injured there would even bea case to say play Delaney at FB and Lee at CHB. If I had to go for one it would be Lee.
While this week they will not play a giant forward line, it is not tiny either:
Everitt: 194
Walker: 190
Casboult: 199
Cripps who will push forward is 193
Gilbert 194 and Robbo 194 do not play key defender games despite their height. Gilbert who started the year well has also been quite poor the last 4 weeks and in this period he has played asa defender in the main.
Coughlan at 195 could be a smokie to be promoted. He is however at present lightly built. So you would expect him to be more of a flanker than key defender in the seniors at present.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1533 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
No idea.bigcarl wrote:Who's Motley?tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.
And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
Peter Motley????? If so, that's harsh,b but slightly funny!!!!!kosifantutti wrote:No idea.bigcarl wrote:Who's Motley?tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.
And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18636
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1980 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
What's an ITK?kosifantutti wrote:No idea.bigcarl wrote:Who's Motley?tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.
And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
I would tell you but I can't as you are not in the know.bigcarl wrote:What's an ITK?kosifantutti wrote:No idea.bigcarl wrote:Who's Motley?tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.
And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18636
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1980 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
OICsaintsRrising wrote:I would tell you but I can't as you are not in the know.bigcarl wrote:What's an ITK?kosifantutti wrote:No idea.bigcarl wrote:Who's Motley?tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.
And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18636
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1980 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
Uh huhstonecold wrote:Peter Motley????? If so, that's harsh,b but slightly funny!!!!!kosifantutti wrote:No idea.bigcarl wrote:Who's Motley?tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.
And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:39pm
- Location: Ballarat
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
Motley would be Tommy Lee
If true he must have his passport stamped i guess
If true he must have his passport stamped i guess
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
st.rick wrote:Motley would be Tommy Lee
If true he must have his passport stamped i guess
Ah...Mötley Crüe
and yes if he does not play this week after having been an emergency last week and with all that tall timber out then he must be well and truly on the outer.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
Tommy Lee is Tetley to the players!
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
If it was me thensaynta wrote:Cripps is listed at 195cm. I saw an interviw where he said he was now 196cm and still growing.saintsRrising wrote:While they can both play as key defenders I would say they are chalk and cheese.SemperFidelis wrote: Described Lee and Delany as "pretty similar players", so suspect only one will come in.
Lee excellent kick and good offensively and handy intercept mark pulling down good numbers of marks. Coaches reoprtedly concerned about defensive aspects of his game.
Delaney is basically the polar opposite. Good defenseively, but witha poor offensive game.
With Fisher, Dempster and Goddard all injured there would even bea case to say play Delaney at FB and Lee at CHB. If I had to go for one it would be Lee.
While this week they will not play a giant forward line, it is not tiny either:
Everitt: 194
Walker: 190
Casboult: 199
Cripps who will push forward is 193
Gilbert 194 and Robbo 194 do not play key defender games despite their height. Gilbert who started the year well has also been quite poor the last 4 weeks and in this period he has played asa defender in the main.
Coughlan at 195 could be a smokie to be promoted. He is however at present lightly built. So you would expect him to be more of a flanker than key defender in the seniors at present.
Casbolt= Delaney
Walker = lee
Everett = Roberton / Gilbert
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
If it was me thensaynta wrote:Cripps is listed at 195cm. I saw an interviw where he said he was now 196cm and still growing.saintsRrising wrote:While they can both play as key defenders I would say they are chalk and cheese.SemperFidelis wrote: Described Lee and Delany as "pretty similar players", so suspect only one will come in.
Lee excellent kick and good offensively and handy intercept mark pulling down good numbers of marks. Coaches reoprtedly concerned about defensive aspects of his game.
Delaney is basically the polar opposite. Good defenseively, but witha poor offensive game.
With Fisher, Dempster and Goddard all injured there would even bea case to say play Delaney at FB and Lee at CHB. If I had to go for one it would be Lee.
While this week they will not play a giant forward line, it is not tiny either:
Everitt: 194
Walker: 190
Casboult: 199
Cripps who will push forward is 193
Gilbert 194 and Robbo 194 do not play key defender games despite their height. Gilbert who started the year well has also been quite poor the last 4 weeks and in this period he has played asa defender in the main.
Coughlan at 195 could be a smokie to be promoted. He is however at present lightly built. So you would expect him to be more of a flanker than key defender in the seniors at present.
Casbolt= Delaney
Walker = lee
Everett = Roberton / Gilbert
To give our backs any chance we must win the midfield battle
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
It's official. No Roo.
But for some reason Rupert isn't an out yet. Surely he has to be dropped even though there are 4 out injured?
But for some reason Rupert isn't an out yet. Surely he has to be dropped even though there are 4 out injured?
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1533 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
So who was Motley if it's not Tom Lee.tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50
Doesn't matter. There's no Motley in the team so Tony must be rightkosifantutti wrote:So who was Motley if it's not Tom Lee.tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk