Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18636
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1980 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618844Post bigcarl »

tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Who's Motley?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9087 times
Been thanked: 3945 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618846Post saynta »

Jacks Back wrote:This, unfortunately, is a great opportunity to see what the side could be like when the more experienced players are no longer there.

With both Fisher and Dempster out of the back line it brings opportunity to see what a future backline would look like without those two (albeit also without Goddard). The only talls we have at Sandy are Lee, Delaney and the rookie Coughlan. Delaney is a bit slow and probably could only play on the gorillas like Close or maybe Hawkins. Robertson might be tall but he plays small. I reckon we need to have a good look at Lee and also promote Coughlan to see how far away (or close) he is. If we upgrade Coughlan we still have a midway upgrade option as well.
What's happened to Brenton Payne?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9087 times
Been thanked: 3945 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618847Post saynta »

saintsRrising wrote:
SemperFidelis wrote: Described Lee and Delany as "pretty similar players", so suspect only one will come in.
While they can both play as key defenders I would say they are chalk and cheese.

Lee excellent kick and good offensively and handy intercept mark pulling down good numbers of marks. Coaches reoprtedly concerned about defensive aspects of his game.

Delaney is basically the polar opposite. Good defenseively, but witha poor offensive game.

With Fisher, Dempster and Goddard all injured there would even bea case to say play Delaney at FB and Lee at CHB. If I had to go for one it would be Lee.

While this week they will not play a giant forward line, it is not tiny either:

Everitt: 194
Walker: 190
Casboult: 199

Cripps who will push forward is 193

Gilbert 194 and Robbo 194 do not play key defender games despite their height. Gilbert who started the year well has also been quite poor the last 4 weeks and in this period he has played asa defender in the main.



Coughlan at 195 could be a smokie to be promoted. He is however at present lightly built. So you would expect him to be more of a flanker than key defender in the seniors at present.
Cripps is listed at 195cm. I saw an interviw where he said he was now 196cm and still growing.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1533 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618858Post kosifantutti »

bigcarl wrote:
tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Who's Motley?
No idea.

We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.

And only people in the know, know what ITK means.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618861Post stonecold »

kosifantutti wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Who's Motley?
No idea.

We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.

And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
Peter Motley????? If so, that's harsh,b but slightly funny!!!!!


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18636
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1980 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618865Post bigcarl »

kosifantutti wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Who's Motley?
No idea.

We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.

And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
What's an ITK?


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618866Post saintsRrising »

bigcarl wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Who's Motley?
No idea.

We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.

And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
What's an ITK?
I would tell you but I can't as you are not in the know.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18636
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1980 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618867Post bigcarl »

saintsRrising wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Who's Motley?
No idea.

We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.

And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
What's an ITK?
I would tell you but I can't as you are not in the know.
OIC


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18636
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1980 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618868Post bigcarl »

stonecold wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
Who's Motley?
No idea.

We need an ITK to explain what the other ITKs mean.

And only people in the know, know what ITK means.
Peter Motley????? If so, that's harsh,b but slightly funny!!!!!
Uh huh


st.rick
Club Player
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:39pm
Location: Ballarat
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618869Post st.rick »

Motley would be Tommy Lee

If true he must have his passport stamped i guess


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618870Post saintsRrising »

st.rick wrote:Motley would be Tommy Lee

If true he must have his passport stamped i guess

Ah...Mötley Crüe

and yes if he does not play this week after having been an emergency last week and with all that tall timber out then he must be well and truly on the outer.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6083
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618883Post MC Gusto »

That would be pretty devastating for lee if he's not selected this week


#1 Ryder fan
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618895Post Bernard Shakey »

Tommy Lee is Tetley to the players!


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
ROLS-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618898Post ROLS-LEE »

saynta wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
SemperFidelis wrote: Described Lee and Delany as "pretty similar players", so suspect only one will come in.
While they can both play as key defenders I would say they are chalk and cheese.

Lee excellent kick and good offensively and handy intercept mark pulling down good numbers of marks. Coaches reoprtedly concerned about defensive aspects of his game.

Delaney is basically the polar opposite. Good defenseively, but witha poor offensive game.

With Fisher, Dempster and Goddard all injured there would even bea case to say play Delaney at FB and Lee at CHB. If I had to go for one it would be Lee.

While this week they will not play a giant forward line, it is not tiny either:

Everitt: 194
Walker: 190
Casboult: 199

Cripps who will push forward is 193

Gilbert 194 and Robbo 194 do not play key defender games despite their height. Gilbert who started the year well has also been quite poor the last 4 weeks and in this period he has played asa defender in the main.



Coughlan at 195 could be a smokie to be promoted. He is however at present lightly built. So you would expect him to be more of a flanker than key defender in the seniors at present.
Cripps is listed at 195cm. I saw an interviw where he said he was now 196cm and still growing.
If it was me then
Casbolt= Delaney
Walker = lee
Everett = Roberton / Gilbert


ROLS-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618899Post ROLS-LEE »

saynta wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
SemperFidelis wrote: Described Lee and Delany as "pretty similar players", so suspect only one will come in.
While they can both play as key defenders I would say they are chalk and cheese.

Lee excellent kick and good offensively and handy intercept mark pulling down good numbers of marks. Coaches reoprtedly concerned about defensive aspects of his game.

Delaney is basically the polar opposite. Good defenseively, but witha poor offensive game.

With Fisher, Dempster and Goddard all injured there would even bea case to say play Delaney at FB and Lee at CHB. If I had to go for one it would be Lee.

While this week they will not play a giant forward line, it is not tiny either:

Everitt: 194
Walker: 190
Casboult: 199

Cripps who will push forward is 193

Gilbert 194 and Robbo 194 do not play key defender games despite their height. Gilbert who started the year well has also been quite poor the last 4 weeks and in this period he has played asa defender in the main.



Coughlan at 195 could be a smokie to be promoted. He is however at present lightly built. So you would expect him to be more of a flanker than key defender in the seniors at present.
Cripps is listed at 195cm. I saw an interviw where he said he was now 196cm and still growing.
If it was me then
Casbolt= Delaney
Walker = lee
Everett = Roberton / Gilbert

To give our backs any chance we must win the midfield battle


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618901Post saintspremiers »

It's official. No Roo.

But for some reason Rupert isn't an out yet. Surely he has to be dropped even though there are 4 out injured?


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1533 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618905Post kosifantutti »

tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
So who was Motley if it's not Tom Lee.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Dempster, Paddy to miss. Roo 50/50

Post: # 1618908Post Dr Spaceman »

kosifantutti wrote:
tony74 wrote:Roo won't play. Don't think Motley will either.
So who was Motley if it's not Tom Lee.
Doesn't matter. There's no Motley in the team so Tony must be right Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Post Reply