Hickey
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Hickey
Wasn't able to watch the game yesterday, but was wondering how Hickey went?
Media reports suggest that Nic Nat lowered his colours, but was he still able to hold his own or at least contribute against the odds?
Thoughts?
Media reports suggest that Nic Nat lowered his colours, but was he still able to hold his own or at least contribute against the odds?
Thoughts?
Bad management is bad management
Re: Hickey
Probably the most damning thing about Hicks yesterday was I barely noticed him. Nic Nat just jumped all over him, and I didn't notice him much around the ground at all. Looked flat and tired and lacking energy (like all the team)
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Hickey
Hickey got a pasting from Natinui. All West Coast's momentum, particularly in the 1st quarter, came from Natinui.
Hickey appeared to have issues with his jumping, which was superb against Gawn & Goldstein. Then again Natanui jumps a bit higher than those two. Hickey will learn from that game, I'll bet Natanui will never touch him up like that again.
Hickey appeared to have issues with his jumping, which was superb against Gawn & Goldstein. Then again Natanui jumps a bit higher than those two. Hickey will learn from that game, I'll bet Natanui will never touch him up like that again.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Hickey
Bit rough on Hickey.Bluthy wrote:Probably the most damning thing about Hicks yesterday was I barely noticed him. Nic Nat just jumped all over him, and I didn't notice him much around the ground at all. Looked flat and tired and lacking energy (like all the team)
He laid 7 tackles which is huge for a ruckman, his season high and well above the 2/3 that he normally lands per game. He also had 11 disposals and 26 hit outs.
So while yes not as good as most games he has played this year he still had some presecence on the ground and was putting in.
He limped off last week and this may have affected him.
However all in all I thought he toiled manfully for most of the day. No denying that Nic Nat was brilliant in the first quarter though.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Hickey
Maybe not 100%, given his corky last week. Bear in mind he's had a consecutive run of Mumford, Gawn and Goldstein, showing each of them the goods (maybe even with Goldy)...he may be a bit stuffed. I know we toyed with Peirce at the selection table, but was always doubtful he'd be given a debut against Nic Nat and Lycett. Can we afford to bring in an extra ruck this week, or will we be too tall against the Dons?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1904 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
Re: Hickey
Hickey was shaded in the first quarter but fought back well and probably broke even thereafter. Meanwhile he got no support from the rest of the midfield. Zero. None.
Well Seb Ross tried his best, but no one else put his hand up
Well Seb Ross tried his best, but no one else put his hand up
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Hickey
In retrospect maybe Holmes should have been played. He went well against Nic Nat in his first ever game last year. He can leap as high as Nic Nat.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Hickey
I didn't think Natanui played a great game. Hickey did OK. Natanui got a few taps but Hickey matched him with possessions ground the ground.
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Hickey
Holmes is not going to cut it. Not his fault that he can't pick up the game.borderbarry wrote:In retrospect maybe Holmes should have been played. He went well against Nic Nat in his first ever game last year. He can leap as high as Nic Nat.
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Hickey
Hickey has been massive all year and looks like he needs a rest. Most other sides use two rucks. Nicnat gets a rest and Lycett rucks while Hickey has to take on two blokes week in week out. Time to play Pierce?
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Hickey
Has been playing great football to date, but he got monstered in the ruck duels yesterday, which is the key to his game. I wonder what the lessons from the tapes will be ??
Agree that he can't ruck all day against the top ruckmen.
We were clearly too short yesterday down back, so why Pierce was not played, surprised me. He could have plugged a few holes when resting.
Agree that he can't ruck all day against the top ruckmen.
We were clearly too short yesterday down back, so why Pierce was not played, surprised me. He could have plugged a few holes when resting.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9022
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Hickey
Assuming he is fit, this was the game he should have played. One ruckman against two high leapers was a recipe for disaster.borderbarry wrote:In retrospect maybe Holmes should have been played. He went well against Nic Nat in his first ever game last year. He can leap as high as Nic Nat.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Hickey
Hickey was beaten in the first quarter and after that nothing really mattered.
He did take one excellent contested mark against Natanui right at the end of the first quarter. Dished off to Ross who passed to Roo.
A goal there might have made some difference.
He did take one excellent contested mark against Natanui right at the end of the first quarter. Dished off to Ross who passed to Roo.
A goal there might have made some difference.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4539
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: Hickey
Has Longer been delisted?Con Gorozidis wrote:Hickey has been massive all year and looks like he needs a rest. Most other sides use two rucks. Nicnat gets a rest and Lycett rucks while Hickey has to take on two blokes week in week out. Time to play Pierce?
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: Hickey
Should've been rested this week. So should a few others. Can't afford not to have our best on the park next week.bigballs wrote:Wouldn't be surprised at all if they rest Hickey next week.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Hickey
whiskers3614 wrote:Has Longer been delisted?Con Gorozidis wrote:Hickey has been massive all year and looks like he needs a rest. Most other sides use two rucks. Nicnat gets a rest and Lycett rucks while Hickey has to take on two blokes week in week out. Time to play Pierce?
No, but has had poor form at Sandy this season.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1390 times
Re: Hickey
He's had a massive load this year. Very little relief for him during games. Losing to the beast Natanui is unsurprising. He monters a lot of opponents. Hickey has been excellent this year, but must be feeling a bit weary. Remember, he bruised his hip/buttock a couple of weeks ago, and I think it's affecting his ability to jump, and he's been running with a bit of limp since. A rest would do him good, but would the coach be prepared to throw Lewis Pierce into the cauldron. We have nothing to lose, really. Not like we're playing for finals.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Hickey
Maybe Hickey a week off and play Longer and Pierce together?
v Bombers is a good week to do it.
v Bombers is a good week to do it.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1904 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
Re: Hickey
Surely we are playing for self respect after a showing like that. Unless he's injured he should play. But by all means bring in someone to give him a hand. Other teams play more than one ruckcwrcyn wrote:. We have nothing to lose, really. Not like we're playing for finals.
Re: Hickey
Hickey was running like he was injured, but he's always got a gait like a baby giraffe
Nic Nat spanked him
First Quarter he was responsible for the demolition ... More than kennedy
Nic Nat spanked him
First Quarter he was responsible for the demolition ... More than kennedy
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Hickey
What? So you want to use more players and test them out? What the hell are you thinking Con. We've got our 27 players that we want to use this year - its straight from the Ross Lyon playbook (and hasn;t that worked a treat for him and his youth development ability). Crazy talk. We need to keep testing out Gilbert and Geary and Dempster and Fish and Joey. Another 6 or 7 years and we might have a handle on where they are at. The rest of our squad can just rot in the VFL. Its not like they would get much benefit from getting a taste of AFL level such as boosting their confidence, feel a proper part of the club and not just a Sandy player, create competition for spots, energise players, increase their knowledge from being exposed to elite players etc.Con Gorozidis wrote:Maybe Hickey a week off and play Longer and Pierce together?
v Bombers is a good week to do it.
No lets not be to bold or experimental or development orientated at selection. Lets just put the old jocks on, the one with the slack elastic that you have to keep pulling up through the day and has holes near the scrotum that rub against your pants in a weirdly enjoyable way, but you just can;t bring yourself to throw out. You should be able to get another 1 or 2 years out of those old fellas. Why spring for those brand new flashy boxers that probably won't hold your tackle properly anyway and you have to wash first. Old is always better, I get that now.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1275 times
- Been thanked: 463 times
Re: Hickey
I think you'll find that Richo doesn't actually have any old players left to bring in from the VFL as he is already playing them all. Fisher will come back in next week rounding out the old timers brigade.Bluthy wrote:What? So you want to use more players and test them out? What the hell are you thinking Con. We've got our 27 players that we want to use this year - its straight from the Ross Lyon playbook (and hasn;t that worked a treat for him and his youth development ability). Crazy talk. We need to keep testing out Gilbert and Geary and Dempster and Fish and Joey. Another 6 or 7 years and we might have a handle on where they are at. The rest of our squad can just rot in the VFL. Its not like they would get much benefit from getting a taste of AFL level such as boosting their confidence, feel a proper part of the club and not just a Sandy player, create competition for spots, energise players, increase their knowledge from being exposed to elite players etc.Con Gorozidis wrote:Maybe Hickey a week off and play Longer and Pierce together?
v Bombers is a good week to do it.
No lets not be to bold or experimental or development orientated at selection. Lets just put the old jocks on, the one with the slack elastic that you have to keep pulling up through the day and has holes near the scrotum that rub against your pants in a weirdly enjoyable way, but you just can;t bring yourself to throw out. You should be able to get another 1 or 2 years out of those old fellas. Why spring for those brand new flashy boxers that probably won't hold your tackle properly anyway and you have to wash first. Old is always better, I get that now.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!