Team v GWS
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Team v GWS
StKilda v GWS Giants
Webster, Longer, Dunstan, Membrey in for Templeton.
Smith, Cameron, Haynes, Hopper in for Tomlinson.
Webster, Longer, Dunstan, Membrey in for Templeton.
Smith, Cameron, Haynes, Hopper in for Tomlinson.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Team v GWS
Interchange from
7 8 13 18 28 29 41
7 8 13 18 28 29 41
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Team v GWS
Reckon Dunstan, Webster are certainties. Minch should hold his spot. Lonie or Acres to be one in and one out. Membrey and Billy there as back-up.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Team v GWS
Agree.st.byron wrote:Reckon Dunstan, Webster are certainties. Minch should hold his spot. Lonie or Acres to be one in and one out. Membrey and Billy there as back-up.
One of the kids will still be sore so very likely 2 changes
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Team v GWS
INTERCHANGE FROMkosifantutti wrote:Interchange from
7 8 13 18 28 29 41
7 Luke Dunstan
8 Blake Acres
13 Jack Lonie
18 Billy Longer
28 Tim Membrey
29 Jimmy Webster
41 Darren Minchington
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Re: Team v GWS
I think if Dunstan and Webster pull up ok they will go in. Eli's out and maybe Sinclair or Acres to go out. I think you've got to back Hickey to get the job done on Mummy alone with his form. He's doing well in the ruck and can hurt Mummy around the ground.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Team v GWS
Dunstan and Webster for Eli and Blacres.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Team v GWS
Did Acres sleep with the wife/daughter/cousin?
Jesus he's stiff.
When is he contracted to?
Jesus he's stiff.
When is he contracted to?
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Team v GWS
2018The_President wrote:Did Acres sleep with the wife/daughter/cousin?
Jesus he's stiff.
When is he contracted to?
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
Re: Team v GWS
Shame about the Blacres but someone had to give to get both Jimmy and Dunny back in. And we don't know if he is doing all the things they want him to do or not meeting a standard or they are worried about him being able to back up after a tough game. I'm just putting it down to the 'big guys take time' principal. As long as he keeps soaking in all the knowledge around him he'll be a ripper.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
- Location: Mentone
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 263 times
Re: Team v GWS
It had to be Acres or Minchington to make way and perhaps Minch showed a bit more.loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
The only other one who may have been tested was Lonie but has s bit of X factor round the goals.
One year will be our year
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Team v GWS
Of course Lee held his spot. He played well and we need a key defender to fill the injury to Roberton. You can't put Spud Delaney in and Goddard appears not to be ready at this stagefreely wrote:Interesting to see that Lee held his spot. Reckon Webster has a bit of class - be nice to see him freed up on the wing.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1275 times
- Been thanked: 463 times
Re: Team v GWS
Lonie and Sinclair having been setting the world on fire of late so it could have been one of those two to make way instead of 8cres.longtimesaint wrote:It had to be Acres or Minchington to make way and perhaps Minch showed a bit more.loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
The only other one who may have been tested was Lonie but has s bit of X factor round the goals.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Re: Team v GWS
That could be the standards thing Tony said he wasn't meeting. Sinclair got dropped for not chasing his man enough as well. Maybe Acres doesn't have the tank yet for full two way running in the incredibly fast AFL - he's a big unit. I think he is only playing 60-70% game time or something which indicates he might not be able to run out full games yet.loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
Re: Team v GWS
From memory it was 58% game time last week I think. Numbers were impressive considering but I'm guessing he has issues keeping with the pace for 4 quarters which doesn't suit our current running style. He was involved around clearances I think but not sure if I saw him too much as part of those running chains moving forward.Bluthy wrote:That could be the standards thing Tony said he wasn't meeting. Sinclair got dropped for not chasing his man enough as well. Maybe Acres doesn't have the tank yet for full two way running in the incredibly fast AFL - he's a big unit. I think he is only playing 60-70% game time or something which indicates he might not be able to run out full games yet.loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
still a reserve atleast so I doubt he's in the dog house.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Team v GWS
I am a bit confused about Webster this week and last. Why did he miss against the Hawks? Was he ill or injured? I can't recall.
Did he come back too soon? 7 disposals. Why play a sick or injured Webster and leave a healthy Acres in the sheds?
Did he come back too soon? 7 disposals. Why play a sick or injured Webster and leave a healthy Acres in the sheds?
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Team v GWS
Clearly they are having 2nd thoughts on Acres, and so they should.Con Gorozidis wrote:I am a bit confused about Webster this week and last. Why did he miss against the Hawks? Was he ill or injured? I can't recall.
Did he come back too soon? 7 disposals. Why play a sick or injured Webster and leave a healthy Acres in the sheds?
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Team v GWS
What do you mean by '2nd thoughts' and I am trying to get to the bottom of what (if anything) has ailed Jimmy the last fortnight?Wayne42 wrote:Clearly they are having 2nd thoughts on Acres, and so they should.Con Gorozidis wrote:I am a bit confused about Webster this week and last. Why did he miss against the Hawks? Was he ill or injured? I can't recall.
Did he come back too soon? 7 disposals. Why play a sick or injured Webster and leave a healthy Acres in the sheds?
Edit: looked this up. Webster had a sore calf or hamstring apparently?