Ins and outs vs Pies
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- The Recruit
- Club Player
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 118 times
Ins and outs vs Pies
Not started yet so thought I would
Out Gilbert In Membry
Out Gresham. In. Acres
If Newnes goes for a week Minshington should get a run also
Apart from that have to keep rolling with the young kids....not many other options.....
Unless Farren and Schnider want another run?
Out Gilbert In Membry
Out Gresham. In. Acres
If Newnes goes for a week Minshington should get a run also
Apart from that have to keep rolling with the young kids....not many other options.....
Unless Farren and Schnider want another run?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sun 01 Apr 2012 12:15pm
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
In: ACRES, MINCHINGTON, Membrey, Lee & Templeton
Out: McCartin, Sinclair, Dunstan, Gilbert & Gresham (All dropped)
Acres should never have been dropped in the first place!
As for Meatball, what does he have to do to get in, 44 touches and 4 goals last week and couldnt get in...stupid. and this week he kicks 5 goals. in the form of his life. and was dominat late last season in vfl and when he played the last 3 games of the season, espiecally against Geelong. if he doesnt get picked this week, he should request a trade elsewhere, because he can play way better then the 5 listed above!
All those outs i listed were absolutely terrible last night and deserve to be dropped...but they wont drop them all..but they should be!
Out: McCartin, Sinclair, Dunstan, Gilbert & Gresham (All dropped)
Acres should never have been dropped in the first place!
As for Meatball, what does he have to do to get in, 44 touches and 4 goals last week and couldnt get in...stupid. and this week he kicks 5 goals. in the form of his life. and was dominat late last season in vfl and when he played the last 3 games of the season, espiecally against Geelong. if he doesnt get picked this week, he should request a trade elsewhere, because he can play way better then the 5 listed above!
All those outs i listed were absolutely terrible last night and deserve to be dropped...but they wont drop them all..but they should be!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4320
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1442 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Out: Gresham
In: Minchington or Templeton
Surely Gilbert can't play another game like like night's, and he's one of our few quickish players.
Dunstan had better get amongst it soon. Hanging on by a thread at the moment
McCartin...hmm..well..I'd be inclined to play him again. if they've decided to give him game time for him to develop, then give him at least 4 in a row.
We were lose to full strength last night. There really aren't many options left that would make any significant difference
In: Minchington or Templeton
Surely Gilbert can't play another game like like night's, and he's one of our few quickish players.
Dunstan had better get amongst it soon. Hanging on by a thread at the moment
McCartin...hmm..well..I'd be inclined to play him again. if they've decided to give him game time for him to develop, then give him at least 4 in a row.
We were lose to full strength last night. There really aren't many options left that would make any significant difference
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
coopergrech wrote:In: ACRES, MINCHINGTON, Membrey, Lee & Templeton
Out: McCartin, Sinclair, Dunstan, Gilbert & Gresham (All dropped)
Acres should never have been dropped in the first place!
As for Meatball, what does he have to do to get in, 44 touches and 4 goals last week and couldnt get in...stupid. and this week he kicks 5 goals. in the form of his life. and was dominat late last season in vfl and when he played the last 3 games of the season, espiecally against Geelong. if he doesnt get picked this week, he should request a trade elsewhere, because he can play way better then the 5 listed above!
All those outs i listed were absolutely terrible last night and deserve to be dropped...but they wont drop them all..but they should be!
I respect your opinion, but I'd humbly like to point out that you have absolutely no clue.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
saaaawing the changes tiger.coopergrech wrote:In: ACRES, MINCHINGTON, Membrey, Lee & Templeton
Out: McCartin, Sinclair, Dunstan, Gilbert & Gresham (All dropped)
Acres should never have been dropped in the first place!
As for Meatball, what does he have to do to get in, 44 touches and 4 goals last week and couldnt get in...stupid. and this week he kicks 5 goals. in the form of his life. and was dominat late last season in vfl and when he played the last 3 games of the season, espiecally against Geelong. if he doesnt get picked this week, he should request a trade elsewhere, because he can play way better then the 5 listed above!
All those outs i listed were absolutely terrible last night and deserve to be dropped...but they wont drop them all..but they should be!
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Wasn't far off our best team so I'd give them another go
Out - Geary
In - Lee
Out - Geary
In - Lee
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it. Geary and Roberton simply too slow.
Is this a thread about what we would do or what we think they will actually do? It is never clear in the OP.
What I would do:
Out: Geary, Dunstan, Gresham, Sinclair, Gilbert
In: McKenzie, Minch, Lee, Acres, Membrey
What they will probably do:
No change
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it. Geary and Roberton simply too slow.
Is this a thread about what we would do or what we think they will actually do? It is never clear in the OP.
What I would do:
Out: Geary, Dunstan, Gresham, Sinclair, Gilbert
In: McKenzie, Minch, Lee, Acres, Membrey
What they will probably do:
No change
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Mon 04 Apr 2016 3:29pm, edited 4 times in total.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Out
Gresham, have a spell and come back when form warrants it
Geary, Richo could make a stand here regards ball use (but won't)
Dunstan, let him knock the door down with strong sustained VFL form (same reason I don't have Acres in)
In
Lee, good ball user. Speed through ball movement
Membrey, hit up forward who can take a strong mark and isn't small
Minchington, great kick killing it in VFL
Gresham, have a spell and come back when form warrants it
Geary, Richo could make a stand here regards ball use (but won't)
Dunstan, let him knock the door down with strong sustained VFL form (same reason I don't have Acres in)
In
Lee, good ball user. Speed through ball movement
Membrey, hit up forward who can take a strong mark and isn't small
Minchington, great kick killing it in VFL
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Out - Pessimism
In - Optimism and Acres
In - Optimism and Acres
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1964
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Hard for Gilbo to supply dash out of defence when he played the entire game either in the midfield or half forward and Savage was one of our few defenders to actually hit a target coming out of defensive 50, he had 22 disposal at 90% efficiency.Con Gorozidis wrote:Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it.
My outs would be Gresham, Sinclair, Dustan
Ins: Acres, Meatball, TC
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
So Gilbert was a midfielder and got 7 disposals? But you think he went ok?BringBackMadDog wrote:Hard for Gilbo to supply dash out of defence when he played the entire game either in the midfield or half forward and Savage was one of our few defenders to actually hit a target coming out of defensive 50, he had 22 disposal at 90% efficiency.Con Gorozidis wrote:Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it.
My outs would be Gresham, Sinclair, Dustan
Ins: Acres, Meatball, TC
And Savage hit targets because he played so conservatively - he went backwards every single time he got it. Did you watch the game?
You are defending the indefensible. I know people are one eyed and all of that but this is ridiculous.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Con Gorozidis wrote:Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it. Geary and Roberton simply too slow.
Is this a thread about what we would do or what we think they will actually do? It is never clear in the OP.
What I would do:
Out: Geary, Dunstan, Gresham, Sinclair, Gilbert
In: McKenzie, Minch, Lee, Acres, Membrey or Goddard
What they will probably do:
No change
You want to take out 4 smalls and Gilbert and put in potentially 3 talls?
No doubt if I go back through some of your posts from the weekend, you would be saying we are too big and slow somewhere
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Who are my three talls?The_President wrote:Con Gorozidis wrote:Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it. Geary and Roberton simply too slow.
Is this a thread about what we would do or what we think they will actually do? It is never clear in the OP.
What I would do:
Out: Geary, Dunstan, Gresham, Sinclair, Gilbert
In: McKenzie, Minch, Lee, Acres, Membrey or Goddard
What they will probably do:
No change
You want to take out 4 smalls and Gilbert and put in potentially 3 talls?
No doubt if I go back through some of your posts from the weekend, you would be saying we are too big and slow somewhere
McKenzie - small
Minch - small
Lee - medium
Acres- medium
Membrey - medium
Out is four smalls and a medium. In is two smalls and three mediums.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Mon 04 Apr 2016 3:31pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
You have Lee & Membrey in the same category as Acres?Con Gorozidis wrote:Who are my three talls? Reading comprehension not your strong point?The_President wrote:Con Gorozidis wrote:Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it. Geary and Roberton simply too slow.
Is this a thread about what we would do or what we think they will actually do? It is never clear in the OP.
What I would do:
Out: Geary, Dunstan, Gresham, Sinclair, Gilbert
In: McKenzie, Minch, Lee, Acres, Membrey or Goddard
What they will probably do:
No change
You want to take out 4 smalls and Gilbert and put in potentially 3 talls?
No doubt if I go back through some of your posts from the weekend, you would be saying we are too big and slow somewhere
I say Goddard OR Membrey. That means potentially 0 talls.
McKenzie - small
Minch - small
Lee - medium
Acres- medium
Membrey - medium
Goddard - tall
That is 1 tall and maybe NO talls in.
Out is three smalls and a medium
And I think we are slightly small hence i go a bit taller but i also add pace off half back (McKenzie)
If you are going to take a pot - at least get your basic facts right.
A lead up forward and a Fullback? Comparing them to a midfielder?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Are you saying you hope Dempster gets injured?Con Gorozidis wrote:Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it. Geary and Roberton simply too slow.
Is this a thread about what we would do or what we think they will actually do? It is never clear in the OP.
What I would do:
Out: Geary, Dunstan, Gresham, Sinclair, Gilbert
In: McKenzie, Minch, Lee, Acres, Membrey or Goddard
What they will probably do:
No change
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Con, for the most part I'm confused with what stance you're taking on Geary.
In the Geary thread you've posted these..
Are you just posting for the sake of posting?
In the Geary thread you've posted these..
Con Gorozidis wrote:Saved us a couple of goals with his courage and timing running backwards. Battled like a true warrior. Probably cost us a couple of goals from poor kicks as well. All up he probably broke even.
Deserves his spot in our best 22 but I still find it bizarre we signed him up through 2018. By 2018 I really hope DMac and/or White & Rice are ahead of him.
So after Geary "probably broke even" on the weekend, you think he should be dropped for McKenzie, even though McKenzie "might be a few years away"Con Gorozidis wrote:
Geary will play until DMac or Rice are ready to take his spot. They might be a few years away. Certainly wont be this year and probably not next. 2018 I think Geary will lose his spot in the side. But that is 43 games he still has to play. That takes him beyond the 150 career game mark.
Are you just posting for the sake of posting?
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1964
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Tell me where I said Gilbert had a good game? I said he didn't play in the back half. Savage is one of about 4 players in our side who can kick and break lines so to drop him would be ridiculous. And, not that it matters, I have been a member for nearly 40 years and have missed maybe 20 games in that time.Con Gorozidis wrote:So Gilbert was a midfielder and got 7 disposals? But you think he went ok?BringBackMadDog wrote:Hard for Gilbo to supply dash out of defence when he played the entire game either in the midfield or half forward and Savage was one of our few defenders to actually hit a target coming out of defensive 50, he had 22 disposal at 90% efficiency.Con Gorozidis wrote:Does Dempster ever get injured? Sometimes I wonder if Tom Lee wouldnt mind putting a banana peel in the shower because Dempster is ensuring that Tom Lee never gets an opportunity to play as a defender in the AFL.
Anyway McKenzie has to come in imo. We need dare and dash off half back and Gilbert and Savage are simply not providing it.
My outs would be Gresham, Sinclair, Dustan
Ins: Acres, Meatball, TC
And Savage hit targets because he played so conservatively - he went backwards every single time he got it. Did you watch the game?
You are defending the indefensible. I know people are one eyed and all of that but this is ridiculous.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17024
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3644 times
- Been thanked: 2916 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Gresham has to go... Pbly for Minchington
Geary out for DMac (won't happen)
Gilbert/Dempster out for Lee (nothing against Dempster... More of a Balance thing)
Sinclair out for Acres
I don't want to drop Paddy but i need to find a way to bring Holmes in he's on notice. Hickey can rest up forward as a third tall
Geary out for DMac (won't happen)
Gilbert/Dempster out for Lee (nothing against Dempster... More of a Balance thing)
Sinclair out for Acres
I don't want to drop Paddy but i need to find a way to bring Holmes in he's on notice. Hickey can rest up forward as a third tall
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23134
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9076 times
- Been thanked: 3939 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Sort of crap response one would expect from plugga.The_President wrote:Con, for the most part I'm confused with what stance you're taking on Geary.
In the Geary thread you've posted these..
Con Gorozidis wrote:Saved us a couple of goals with his courage and timing running backwards. Battled like a true warrior. Probably cost us a couple of goals from poor kicks as well. All up he probably broke even.
Deserves his spot in our best 22 but I still find it bizarre we signed him up through 2018. By 2018 I really hope DMac and/or White & Rice are ahead of him.So after Geary "probably broke even" on the weekend, you think he should be dropped for McKenzie, even though McKenzie "might be a few years away"Con Gorozidis wrote:
Geary will play until DMac or Rice are ready to take his spot. They might be a few years away. Certainly wont be this year and probably not next. 2018 I think Geary will lose his spot in the side. But that is 43 games he still has to play. That takes him beyond the 150 career game mark.
Are you just posting for the sake of posting?
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Nice piece of archiving - but get your facts straight. I dont think Geary broke even against the Dogs. I said he broke even against Port but was terrible against the Dogs. Yes. McKenzie probably isnt ready but either is Lonie, McCartin.The_President wrote:Con, for the most part I'm confused with what stance you're taking on Geary.
In the Geary thread you've posted these..
Con Gorozidis wrote:Saved us a couple of goals with his courage and timing running backwards. Battled like a true warrior. Probably cost us a couple of goals from poor kicks as well. All up he probably broke even.
Deserves his spot in our best 22 but I still find it bizarre we signed him up through 2018. By 2018 I really hope DMac and/or White & Rice are ahead of him.So after Geary "probably broke even" on the weekend, you think he should be dropped for McKenzie, even though McKenzie "might be a few years away"Con Gorozidis wrote:
Geary will play until DMac or Rice are ready to take his spot. They might be a few years away. Certainly wont be this year and probably not next. 2018 I think Geary will lose his spot in the side. But that is 43 games he still has to play. That takes him beyond the 150 career game mark.
Are you just posting for the sake of posting?
Geary's 7 crap disposals (mostly misdirected mongrel punts) is just not acceptable. I'd move Newnes to a lock down role and let McKenzie play as a free spirit.
On top of that, me saying 'a few years away' didn't mean I think he shouldnt play AFL at all for a few years. It meant I think he is a 'few years away' from being a fully fledged hardened senior player capable of playing 22 games + finals. McKenzie is almost 20. Old enough to play 10-12 games this year. This week seems as good a time as any to play one of those 10-12.
So no - despite your efforts, you havent 'caught me out' on any inconsistencies at all. Not even a good attempt frankly.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12038
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3682 times
- Been thanked: 2567 times
Re: Ins and outs vs Pies
Out: Gresham and McCartin
In: Minch and Membrey
Sinclair and Dunstan get 1 more week to prove their worth
In: Minch and Membrey
Sinclair and Dunstan get 1 more week to prove their worth