Tom Lynch it still hurts
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2523
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 171 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
Tom Lynch it still hurts
Watching some of the Adelaide NAB game yesterday and Jono Brown said he believes Tom Lynch is the BEST mid sized forward in the comp!!!
I have no reason to disagree, last year he led the comp in goal assists and kicked quite a few himself
Every time I watch Adelaide he plays well, working really well with Eddie Tex and Jenkins , and he is still only 25
I think back to his first game with us and he was put on D. Fletcher and you could see his confidence draining in real time.
Now it is like "if only" and we wouldn't be having these ongoing discussions here about who and how for the forward line hit up role
I have no reason to disagree, last year he led the comp in goal assists and kicked quite a few himself
Every time I watch Adelaide he plays well, working really well with Eddie Tex and Jenkins , and he is still only 25
I think back to his first game with us and he was put on D. Fletcher and you could see his confidence draining in real time.
Now it is like "if only" and we wouldn't be having these ongoing discussions here about who and how for the forward line hit up role
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Give me Jack any day of the week.Bunk_Moreland wrote:So you don't like Jack Newnes?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Mon 20 Jul 2015 6:19pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 14 times
Stewart Loewe looks correct on Tom Lynch
I remember Buckets Loewe endorsed Tom Lynch as a young player the club should invest in. I also remember thinking that Tom Lynch showed genuine ability during his early day @ St.K. His kick passing seemed good for a big guy I thought.
Sometimes the project player pays you back and Adelaide had a good inkling he would.
I was disappointed when Tom was let go - it seemed a bit early at the time.
Heard that the crows would like Bruchey as well to make the journey over to crow-land.
If true their endorsement of Bruchey along with Dermies' is focusing the club (i hope) to keep him a Saint.
On Lynchey I agree that he would be handy for us right now.
I guess if we can keep learning from the past that will be a positive in spite of our loss.
Sometimes the project player pays you back and Adelaide had a good inkling he would.
I was disappointed when Tom was let go - it seemed a bit early at the time.
Heard that the crows would like Bruchey as well to make the journey over to crow-land.
If true their endorsement of Bruchey along with Dermies' is focusing the club (i hope) to keep him a Saint.
On Lynchey I agree that he would be handy for us right now.
I guess if we can keep learning from the past that will be a positive in spite of our loss.
- St Chris
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Our lament makes it sound like we sent him packing....
Tom needed to agree to a move. We were in the midst of Rossie's reign and Lynch couldn't get on the park in the seniors. He wanted more opportunity, we couldn't accommodate that, so both parties agreed to part ways. History shows us he would have played a lot more had he stuck it out at St Kilda, but that wasn't to be known at the time. Although Ross pulled the pin prior to the deal being done, Tom's mind was probably made up well and truly by then.
It was the perfect trade, all parties got what they wanted. We got a future skipper in Newnes, the Crows got a young player who has blossomed, and Tom got enough senior footy to establish himself.
Tom needed to agree to a move. We were in the midst of Rossie's reign and Lynch couldn't get on the park in the seniors. He wanted more opportunity, we couldn't accommodate that, so both parties agreed to part ways. History shows us he would have played a lot more had he stuck it out at St Kilda, but that wasn't to be known at the time. Although Ross pulled the pin prior to the deal being done, Tom's mind was probably made up well and truly by then.
It was the perfect trade, all parties got what they wanted. We got a future skipper in Newnes, the Crows got a young player who has blossomed, and Tom got enough senior footy to establish himself.
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Well Lyon isn't renown for bringing young talent through. There was talk that at St Kilda he had very little to do with players outside his top 25. But you don't know what Lynch's situation was - did he feel neglected, I don't think we had a great development environment for young players. But maybe he just didn't click at the club or we saw some bad signs about his attitude or work rate. Sometimes it just doesn't work at a club and does at others where your really click with coaches and players. But Newnes is developing nicely so could be win win.
- On the Bench
- Club Player
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Sun 20 Nov 2005 10:41pm
- Location: Perth. Where Foxtel has now allowed me to watch my beloved Saints each week.
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Tom did not feel loved. He says that Ross only spoke to him 3 times in his time at the Saints. He was asked to stay after Rossy left but he was ready to move by then. It has probably worked out best for him and the the Saints.Bluthy wrote:Well Lyon isn't renown for bringing young talent through. There was talk that at St Kilda he had very little to do with players outside his top 25. But you don't know what Lynch's situation was - did he feel neglected, I don't think we had a great development environment for young players. But maybe he just didn't click at the club or we saw some bad signs about his attitude or work rate. Sometimes it just doesn't work at a club and does at others where your really click with coaches and players. But Newnes is developing nicely so could be win win.
I am still hurting from 71;
my gut churns thinking of 97;
2009 was agony,
2010a was a pleasure to watch only to be devastated by 2010 b.
It hurts barracking for the Saints
my gut churns thinking of 97;
2009 was agony,
2010a was a pleasure to watch only to be devastated by 2010 b.
It hurts barracking for the Saints
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
wasnt his workrate
he was considered an elite runner for his size. Ran a near 15 beep at Sandy training to lead the pack, had a huge on field motor which was his strength... he does not play that tall, and mobility is his asset. hes a clever player, not clean skilled and certainly not a genuine KPP.
its funny becausae Ross was crying out for a 3rd in his teams... but wouldn't look at a young player... preferring to try Gardiners Gamble's of the world and even Dempster, Gwilt or Raph forward?
Lynch is no gun, but not poor either... and should definitely played more at a younger age at Stk. as should have Armo, Jack S and a few others...
he was considered an elite runner for his size. Ran a near 15 beep at Sandy training to lead the pack, had a huge on field motor which was his strength... he does not play that tall, and mobility is his asset. hes a clever player, not clean skilled and certainly not a genuine KPP.
its funny becausae Ross was crying out for a 3rd in his teams... but wouldn't look at a young player... preferring to try Gardiners Gamble's of the world and even Dempster, Gwilt or Raph forward?
Lynch is no gun, but not poor either... and should definitely played more at a younger age at Stk. as should have Armo, Jack S and a few others...
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm
- Has thanked: 268 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
My memory of Tom was that he was fairly poor for is. Hardly touched the ball. Too early to make a call on him back then though. Should never make a decision until they're at least 23 IMO.
1ac46a38
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 463 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Linton Lodger wrote:Give me Jack any day of the week.Bunk_Moreland wrote:So you don't like Jack Newnes?
![Image](https://static-secure.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Film/Pix/pictures/2012/5/22/1337709078456/The-Shining-008.jpg)
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Often wondered what people think regards drafting. Was it a mistake to draft Lynch? If so, who was at fault the recruiters, as he was a failure at the saints or was it the match commitee who under valued him?
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16888
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3580 times
- Been thanked: 2848 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
The thing i remember about Tom in his early seasons, was watching him play at Sandy, I was so impressed with just how well he worked with the big Sandy forward... Sautner
He had what i thought was an uncanny ability to lead to the right spot each and every time... Often, just on instinct it appeared, he would know to draw his man away from Sautner, block for him... But he equally knew when to be the focal point of the entry too.
You can't teach that stuff... You just learn it over time usually but Tom got it right away.
Me personally, i just thought it was rubbish that people expected him to kick 20-30 goal seasons as a 20yo in a team with Riewoldt and Kosi.
The fans turned on him really quickly after Dustin Fletcher did a number on him early (first game I think), but despite having a few promising games... He was victim to the Lyon development process which was that if you weren't a star right away you didn't play.
Did he ever even play consecutive games?
He had at least 2 good games for us.
That whole era of recruiting gets trashed but i really have always wondered could we really have been that bad at it. I mean i can usually pick one decent player around our pick based on what i read in the paper alone and I'm supposed to believe that our football club got like 1 out of 10 picks right in 3 or so seasons?
I think we were just bloody awful at developing players in that era. Once Lyon left Armo got better, Geary too... And a few others whilst Lynch improved at the Crows too.
Meanwhile we took Siposs, played him as a medium forward, then as a running back, then as a small forward, then as a mid, the on as a 3rd man up backman.
We took Sam Dunnel, played him as a defender at Sandy and as a forward for the Saints and so on.
I think we did well in the trade for Lynch don't get me wrong but i think we were quite hopeless the way we went about playing/developing him
He had what i thought was an uncanny ability to lead to the right spot each and every time... Often, just on instinct it appeared, he would know to draw his man away from Sautner, block for him... But he equally knew when to be the focal point of the entry too.
You can't teach that stuff... You just learn it over time usually but Tom got it right away.
Me personally, i just thought it was rubbish that people expected him to kick 20-30 goal seasons as a 20yo in a team with Riewoldt and Kosi.
The fans turned on him really quickly after Dustin Fletcher did a number on him early (first game I think), but despite having a few promising games... He was victim to the Lyon development process which was that if you weren't a star right away you didn't play.
Did he ever even play consecutive games?
He had at least 2 good games for us.
That whole era of recruiting gets trashed but i really have always wondered could we really have been that bad at it. I mean i can usually pick one decent player around our pick based on what i read in the paper alone and I'm supposed to believe that our football club got like 1 out of 10 picks right in 3 or so seasons?
I think we were just bloody awful at developing players in that era. Once Lyon left Armo got better, Geary too... And a few others whilst Lynch improved at the Crows too.
Meanwhile we took Siposs, played him as a medium forward, then as a running back, then as a small forward, then as a mid, the on as a 3rd man up backman.
We took Sam Dunnel, played him as a defender at Sandy and as a forward for the Saints and so on.
I think we did well in the trade for Lynch don't get me wrong but i think we were quite hopeless the way we went about playing/developing him
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
I can definitely see the logic behind drafting Lynch. When you look at who played in the '09 & '10 Grand Finals as the third tall. McQualtor and Dempster then McQualtor and Eddy.skeptic wrote:The thing i remember about Tom in his early seasons, was watching him play at Sandy, I was so impressed with just how well he worked with the big Sandy forward... Sautner
He had what i thought was an uncanny ability to lead to the right spot each and every time... Often, just on instinct it appeared, he would know to draw his man away from Sautner, block for him... But he equally knew when to be the focal point of the entry too.
You can't teach that stuff... You just learn it over time usually but Tom got it right away.
Me personally, i just thought it was rubbish that people expected him to kick 20-30 goal seasons as a 20yo in a team with Riewoldt and Kosi.
The fans turned on him really quickly after Dustin Fletcher did a number on him early (first game I think), but despite having a few promising games... He was victim to the Lyon development process which was that if you weren't a star right away you didn't play.
Did he ever even play consecutive games?
He had at least 2 good games for us.
That whole era of recruiting gets trashed but i really have always wondered could we really have been that bad at it. I mean i can usually pick one decent player around our pick based on what i read in the paper alone and I'm supposed to believe that our football club got like 1 out of 10 picks right in 3 or so seasons?
I think we were just bloody awful at developing players in that era. Once Lyon left Armo got better, Geary too... And a few others whilst Lynch improved at the Crows too.
I think we did well in the trade for Lynch don't get me wrong but i think we were quite hopeless the way we went about playing/developing him
When you see Lynch work with Tex and Jenkins you can see he would of been handy working with McCartin and Bruce.
Yes we did alright out of the trade but i can't help thinking to trade a good young player for a good young player, "How does your list improve doing that?"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4887
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Every time I read these Tom Lynch threads I think, 'did ppl actually watch him play?'
He was absolutely woeful when given a go by Ross. Admittedly he didn't get many games, but he literally showed NOTHING when he did play. Now a young bloke doesn't have to be BOG or even in the best players when he's starting out to hold his spot, but he does have to show something. Ross was correct at the time to give him limited chances. It was definitely impacting the team b/c Lynch was so poor. Lynch was treacle slow, he COULDN'T kick, and when he did try to kick his depth of kicking was roughly 45 metres. He didn't appear to have any agility at all. I don't reckon I'd seen a young player so out of his depth.
I have been staggered by his development at The Crows, and full credit to him. He has turned himself into a good AFL player. Not a great one, but a good one. He has an impact in games and is an important player for them.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. I recall at the time thinking it was a good move by us to release him. Sometimes a new environment is exactly what a player needs.
He was absolutely woeful when given a go by Ross. Admittedly he didn't get many games, but he literally showed NOTHING when he did play. Now a young bloke doesn't have to be BOG or even in the best players when he's starting out to hold his spot, but he does have to show something. Ross was correct at the time to give him limited chances. It was definitely impacting the team b/c Lynch was so poor. Lynch was treacle slow, he COULDN'T kick, and when he did try to kick his depth of kicking was roughly 45 metres. He didn't appear to have any agility at all. I don't reckon I'd seen a young player so out of his depth.
I have been staggered by his development at The Crows, and full credit to him. He has turned himself into a good AFL player. Not a great one, but a good one. He has an impact in games and is an important player for them.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. I recall at the time thinking it was a good move by us to release him. Sometimes a new environment is exactly what a player needs.
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Well in answer to your question< "Yes i did see him play and i have a different assessment than you do". I am guessing but i think Adelaide would also disagree with your assessment as they did trade for him. Yes a player sometimes needs a change of environment to get the best out of himself but that is only relevant in this case if YOUR ASSESSMENT OF TOM WAS CORRECT!!Moods wrote:Every time I read these Tom Lynch threads I think, 'did ppl actually watch him play?'
He was absolutely woeful when given a go by Ross. Admittedly he didn't get many games, but he literally showed NOTHING when he did play. Now a young bloke doesn't have to be BOG or even in the best players when he's starting out to hold his spot, but he does have to show something. Ross was correct at the time to give him limited chances. It was definitely impacting the team b/c Lynch was so poor. Lynch was treacle slow, he COULDN'T kick, and when he did try to kick his depth of kicking was roughly 45 metres. He didn't appear to have any agility at all. I don't reckon I'd seen a young player so out of his depth.
I have been staggered by his development at The Crows, and full credit to him. He has turned himself into a good AFL player. Not a great one, but a good one. He has an impact in games and is an important player for them.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. I recall at the time thinking it was a good move by us to release him. Sometimes a new environment is exactly what a player needs.
With all due respect there is some change you assessed Tom incorrectly.
Footy is an opinion business.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4887
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Wasn't having a go specifically at your opinion Hayes66 - I was having a go at everyone's, if that makes you feel betterhayes66 wrote:Well in answer to your question< "Yes i did see him play and i have a different assessment than you do". I am guessing but i think Adelaide would also disagree with your assessment as they did trade for him. Yes a player sometimes needs a change of environment to get the best out of himself but that is only relevant in this case if YOUR ASSESSMENT OF TOM WAS CORRECT!!Moods wrote:Every time I read these Tom Lynch threads I think, 'did ppl actually watch him play?'
He was absolutely woeful when given a go by Ross. Admittedly he didn't get many games, but he literally showed NOTHING when he did play. Now a young bloke doesn't have to be BOG or even in the best players when he's starting out to hold his spot, but he does have to show something. Ross was correct at the time to give him limited chances. It was definitely impacting the team b/c Lynch was so poor. Lynch was treacle slow, he COULDN'T kick, and when he did try to kick his depth of kicking was roughly 45 metres. He didn't appear to have any agility at all. I don't reckon I'd seen a young player so out of his depth.
I have been staggered by his development at The Crows, and full credit to him. He has turned himself into a good AFL player. Not a great one, but a good one. He has an impact in games and is an important player for them.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. I recall at the time thinking it was a good move by us to release him. Sometimes a new environment is exactly what a player needs.
With all due respect there is some change you assessed Tom incorrectly.
Footy is an opinion business.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
You're right of course. Footy is an opinion business. I would love for someone to show me footage of Lynch doing one effective thing in a game of footy when he played at the saints (I'm sure someone will Utube and do exactly this) but I'll genuinely be interested if anyone can find anything.
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
"Wasn't having a go specifically at your opinion Hayes66 - I was having a go at everyone's, if that makes you feel better
You're right of course. Footy is an opinion business. I would love for someone to show me footage of Lynch doing one effective thing in a game of footy when he played at the saints (I'm sure someone will Utube and do exactly this) but I'll genuinely be interested if anyone can find anything."
I probably didn't express myself well. I take no offensive. I was trying to make the point whether Tom did or did not show anytime for us is an opinion and not a fact.
I personally rated Tom, whether you take my word or not does not really matter. I am assuming our recruiters saw something in him and Adelaide saw something in Tom.
Regards looking up YouTube or whatever is a rather pointless exercise, i think.
Let's just agree to disagree.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
You're right of course. Footy is an opinion business. I would love for someone to show me footage of Lynch doing one effective thing in a game of footy when he played at the saints (I'm sure someone will Utube and do exactly this) but I'll genuinely be interested if anyone can find anything."
I probably didn't express myself well. I take no offensive. I was trying to make the point whether Tom did or did not show anytime for us is an opinion and not a fact.
I personally rated Tom, whether you take my word or not does not really matter. I am assuming our recruiters saw something in him and Adelaide saw something in Tom.
Regards looking up YouTube or whatever is a rather pointless exercise, i think.
Let's just agree to disagree.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Don't watch it all at once. It might be too much for you to take.Moods wrote:
Wasn't having a go specifically at your opinion Hayes66 - I was having a go at everyone's, if that makes you feel better![]()
You're right of course. Footy is an opinion business. I would love for someone to show me footage of Lynch doing one effective thing in a game of footy when he played at the saints (I'm sure someone will Utube and do exactly this) but I'll genuinely be interested if anyone can find anything.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
Well done you have nailed it. Tom's greatest asset is footy smarts. Does he look good to the natural eye? No. He is slow and looks heavy footed when running but he has something you can't measure, reading the game. Possibly a poor example but Greg Williams was rejected by Carlton twice. Why? Slow and a rather small swat body but what he could do was read the game. He was a footballer. Not saying Tom is as good as that but he is a footballer to his boot straps.kosifantutti wrote:Moods wrote:
Don't watch it all at once. It might be too much for you to take.
I give full credit to Adelaide for identifying Tom because many had written him off.
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
It was obvious he could play a bit in his first season... He was very impressive at Sandy in the VFL.
That's what's you'd hope for in an 18yo forward
That's what's you'd hope for in an 18yo forward
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4887
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
Re: Tom Lynch it still hurts
It was....kosifantutti wrote:Don't watch it all at once. It might be too much for you to take.Moods wrote:
Wasn't having a go specifically at your opinion Hayes66 - I was having a go at everyone's, if that makes you feel better![]()
You're right of course. Footy is an opinion business. I would love for someone to show me footage of Lynch doing one effective thing in a game of footy when he played at the saints (I'm sure someone will Utube and do exactly this) but I'll genuinely be interested if anyone can find anything.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Those kicks off the ground or unexpected snaps at goals from our third tall were breath taking.
You did well to find this. I looked everywhere and could only find highlights from when he was playing at the Crows.