At almost 23 and wth 39 games I think we will really start to see Webster blossom this season.Con Gorozidis wrote:A defence based on Carlisle-Goddard-Webster-Roberton does look very very good.
Carlisle ban?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Getting close to the magical 50 game mark.saintsRrising wrote:At almost 23 and wth 39 games I think we will really start to see Webster blossom this season.Con Gorozidis wrote:A defence based on Carlisle-Goddard-Webster-Roberton does look very very good.
Roberton is only 24 and has 84 games to his name and finished 6th in the B & F.
If these 4 stay healthy and Jake comes back it is one hell of a backline for the next 6 or 7 years.
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Carlisle ban?
others who similarly have to show:
hickey 41
ross 37
dunstan 35
longer 43
delaney 59
bruce 46
by season end nearly all these players will be in the swinging sixties where we currently have Newnes and Weller. so it's a good level to aim for.
hickey 41
ross 37
dunstan 35
longer 43
delaney 59
bruce 46
by season end nearly all these players will be in the swinging sixties where we currently have Newnes and Weller. so it's a good level to aim for.
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
Re: Carlisle ban?
Con Gorozidis wrote:A defence based on Carlisle-Goddard-Webster-Roberton does look very very good.
+1
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
yep, Webster looks the goods IMO... very much so... I remember a game last year when someone (cant recall, but classy player) was cutting Shenton to shreds... poor guy was getting outclassed ... Webster moved on to him and matched him in each contest, quelling his influencesaintsRrising wrote:At almost 23 and wth 39 games I think we will really start to see Webster blossom this season.Con Gorozidis wrote:A defence based on Carlisle-Goddard-Webster-Roberton does look very very good.
23 is the age when players start to get to their best, on average... so I am looking forward to a big year from JW...
Re: Carlisle ban?
Webster turns it over wat too much at the moment. He needs to work on disposal consistency.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Con Gorozidis wrote:1. yes he did get a strike for the video incident.
2. very good question.... can you get a strike under the illicit drug policy when you are serving a ped ban? I'm not sure if this has been clarified..... What is his 'status' within the AFL and is he still subject to their code?
I tend to think YES he is (he is still contracted) and as such he does still fit under the AFL code. So I think that he probably could get another strike for party drugs this year.
e.g. if a player is serving a regular suspension they could still get a strike.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4624
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 400 times
- Been thanked: 477 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Finnis has now made it official, today. Saints have asked AFL for an extra Rookie. They are going to upgrade a current rookie to cover for Carlilse, so they want another rookie to cover the upgraded rookie. Info is on the AFL. Com site. They are waiting on the response from AFL.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-01-31/s ... suspensionloris wrote:Finnis has now made it official, today. Saints have asked AFL for an extra Rookie. They are going to upgrade a current rookie to cover for Carlilse, so they want another rookie to cover the upgraded rookie. Info is on the AFL. Com site. They are waiting on the response from AFL.
ST KILDA wants the AFL to allow it to add a rookie to its list after losing recruit Jake Carlisle to suspension after the Court of Arbitration for Sport's imposition of season-long bans on 34 past and present Essendon players.
Saints CEO Matt Finnis said on Sunday the club would upgrade a rookie to the senior list to replace Carlisle but would like the opportunity to add another player as a rookie so they were not disadvantaged.
He said the AFL was considering the matter.
"Our focus is to upgrade a rookie … [but it] remains to be seen whether we will have another player to add to our rookie list in place in that upgrade."
Finnis also confirmed that the four clubs other than Essendon with suspended players on their 2016 list (St Kilda, Western Bulldogs, Melbourne and Port Adelaide) believed they should not have to pay those players for this season.
He hoped the matter would not become bogged down in legalities and that the AFL, Essendon and the affected clubs could work to ensure a fair result for the Saints, Bulldogs, Demons and Power.
"I think there has been enough legal action and it is time for people to come together and work these things through, and I am confident that will happen," Finnis said.
Suspended players received a further update on compensation talks on Friday at the AFL Players Association.
Finnis said the lack of clarity around what Carlisle could and couldn't do during his suspension remained frustrating but St Kilda would not do anything that might potentially lengthen his suspension.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Lorisloris wrote:Finnis has now made it official, today. Saints have asked AFL for an extra Rookie. They are going to upgrade a current rookie to cover for Carlilse, so they want another rookie to cover the upgraded rookie. Info is on the AFL. Com site. They are waiting on the response from AFL.
the herald Sun read the same article we did
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/t ... 0780aadf15
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Re: Carlisle ban?
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/essendon-t ... mi4ai.html
That will ease the pain of his suspension a bit. If they can have that subtracted from the salary cap they could even put it into the Morrabbin development. There's half a mill down.Essendon, not St Kilda, are likely to have to pay former Don Jake Carlisle's contract at the Saints this year as he serves his year-long drug ban as one of the Essendon 34.
The Saints do not believe they have to pay Carlisle during his ban and that non-payment forms part of a compensation claim against the Bombers by Carlisle – and by all players banned by the Court of Arbitration for Sport – for Essendon's role in the drug case.
Re: Carlisle ban?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-02-05/a ... -melbourne
No go on Jakey replacement. No drama for us but reckon Port are stiff with Monfries.
No go on Jakey replacement. No drama for us but reckon Port are stiff with Monfries.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4624
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 400 times
- Been thanked: 477 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Agree there Bluthy re Monfries......... I think it's most unfair. Monfries signed before the whole Essendope scandal came out, yet Essendon knew it was going to happen, duplicitous mob that they are.Bluthy wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-02-05/a ... -melbourne
No go on Jakey replacement. No drama for us but reckon Port are stiff with Monfries.
Unfair inthat Port now have one less player this season, than the deliberate cheaters of the AFL.
- bozza1980
- Club Player
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
It is illogical for the AFL to decide a club that breaches the drug code can replace players suspended as a result of their actions but other clubs can't.Bluthy wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-02-05/a ... -melbourne
No go on Jakey replacement. No drama for us but reckon Port are stiff with Monfries.
Talk of "buyer beware" is BS. Trading for a player should not have greater ramifications than injecting a player with illegal substances.
Life is very short and there's no time for fussing and fighting my friends.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Again the AFL have got it wrong. Essendon are the perpetrators yet they are allowed top ups. Really the club should have been banned this year
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/p ... 9ade766b0c
.IN just 83 days at St Kilda Jake Carlisle denied and then admitting snorting drugs, slept through training sessions, then was banned for the entire 2016 season.
Not a bad hit parade for a player on a $2.4 million contract, as St Kilda’s bold recruitment was roundly mocked as a catastrophic failure.
Yet the collateral damage to St Kilda’s long-term plans is exactly zero, with 25-year-old Carlisle’s absence actually containing a small silver lining
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7936
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 578 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
So what is the silver lining?saintbrat wrote:http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/p ... 9ade766b0c
.IN just 83 days at St Kilda Jake Carlisle denied and then admitting snorting drugs, slept through training sessions, then was banned for the entire 2016 season.
Not a bad hit parade for a player on a $2.4 million contract, as St Kilda’s bold recruitment was roundly mocked as a catastrophic failure.
Yet the collateral damage to St Kilda’s long-term plans is exactly zero, with 25-year-old Carlisle’s absence actually containing a small silver lining
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 463 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
I agree with that Bozza!bozza1980 wrote:It is illogical for the AFL to decide a club that breaches the drug code can replace players suspended as a result of their actions but other clubs can't.Bluthy wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-02-05/a ... -melbourne
No go on Jakey replacement. No drama for us but reckon Port are stiff with Monfries.
Talk of "buyer beware" is BS. Trading for a player should not have greater ramifications than injecting a player with illegal substances.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
magnifisaint wrote:So what is the silver lining?saintbrat wrote:http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/p ... 9ade766b0c
.IN just 83 days at St Kilda Jake Carlisle denied and then admitting snorting drugs, slept through training sessions, then was banned for the entire 2016 season.
Not a bad hit parade for a player on a $2.4 million contract, as St Kilda’s bold recruitment was roundly mocked as a catastrophic failure.
Yet the collateral damage to St Kilda’s long-term plans is exactly zero, with 25-year-old Carlisle’s absence actually containing a small silver lining
Melbourne will easily absorb the loss of Jake Melksham for a year, with Dees fans a little unsure of his talents and the club’s onball unit steadily gaining depth anyway.
St Kilda are years away from a flag, should more easily pump games into centre half-back Hugh Goddard, and might hope Carlisle’s travails are the circuit-breaker for a potentially squandered talent.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
wrong thread sorry
Last edited by saintbrat on Sun 07 Feb 2016 10:32pm, edited 1 time in total.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Theoretically I agree that affected teams should be allowed a top-up player but I just dont think it makes any practical difference to our situation at all.
We can promote a rookie - so maybe we give Coughlan (Payne) or O'Kearney a few senior games.
If we bring in some outsider for one season - there wouldnt be much point giving him a game for development purposes. Id rather play Coughan or O'K anyway.
Now for the Power - I think it does hurt them much more because now they are a ruckman down which hurts when you are challenging for a flag.
We can promote a rookie - so maybe we give Coughlan (Payne) or O'Kearney a few senior games.
If we bring in some outsider for one season - there wouldnt be much point giving him a game for development purposes. Id rather play Coughan or O'K anyway.
Now for the Power - I think it does hurt them much more because now they are a ruckman down which hurts when you are challenging for a flag.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
The question is "Who pays ANY attention to ANY article in any Murdoch outlet, globally?"
A politically biased and poisoned media organisation which lacks any semblance of credibility on ANY subject.
And, to boot, they tap people's telephone conversations - including the telephone conversations of parent's whose children have been murdered.
Says it all really.
A politically biased and poisoned media organisation which lacks any semblance of credibility on ANY subject.
And, to boot, they tap people's telephone conversations - including the telephone conversations of parent's whose children have been murdered.
Says it all really.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 463 times
Re: Carlisle ban?
Yeah but tell us what you really think.To the top wrote:The question is "Who pays ANY attention to ANY article in any Murdoch outlet, globally?"
A politically biased and poisoned media organisation which lacks any semblance of credibility on ANY subject.
And, to boot, they tap people's telephone conversations - including the telephone conversations of parent's whose children have been murdered.
Says it all really.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!