Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

SinCitySainter
Club Player
Posts: 945
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 113 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572842Post SinCitySainter »

It is irrelevant this year anyway as we can't trade one this year as we will not get fair value for them.
It looks like Kruzuer, either Luenburger or Stefan Martin and possibly Lobbe are going to be up for trade and all would be more desirable than either of our two.
There are also a couple of others as well, I think it is Smith up at GCS and you would imagine either Griffen or Clarke from Freo will want more footy.
You can only get fair value for a ruck man if they are thin on the ground, this year they are not.
Keep them for one more year and then reevaluate.
Last edited by SinCitySainter on Sun 16 Aug 2015 11:15am, edited 1 time in total.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572844Post saintspremiers »

I'm happy if we keep Longer Hickey and Holmes for next year. Plenty of hacks to delist so it's not
like they are taking up valuable list space at this stage


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6582
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1276 times
Been thanked: 464 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572965Post Jacks Back »

samuraisaint wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
samuraisaint wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Why cant we trade a ruckman? One in a side is fine but as someone suggested you need to have the right one.
Hickey plays as a forward, gives Longer a chop out - you do mean we keep both, don't you?

The club will be flat out just replacing the guys who haven't made it, plus retirees. Some of the recruiting really has been poor, not just under Ross, but under Scott as well. Looks like Lee and White won't make it now, and we can probably add Markworth to that list as well, which is sad for the guy, but what can you do?

Then we have a few with massive question marks next to their name as well.

Hickey played well yesterday apparently but I don't think it works most times having him as a forward and Longer rucking. The problem we have is Longer can only play ruck. I think having Hickey as mainly a forward limits out ability to play Membery or McCartin. If it was me I would play Hickey in the ruck and he would be our lone ruckman.
We need to keep them both in my opinion. McCartin is going to take years, and Membery may or may not be the forward we all hope he will be.
Membrey kicked 5 today for Sandy on top of 4 last week. He should come back in this week really but then what do you do with the Hickey/Longer combo? I would tend to play Hickey as first ruck as he has more strings to his bow (marking, going forward, kicking goals) than Longer has (imho).


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572966Post Con Gorozidis »

Its a good problem to have? As others have posted, no rush on this. We have a luxury in the Ruck division. Lets wait and see.


citywest

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572967Post citywest »

If any team is willing to give pick 20 or better for Hickey then we should take it. We then have picks 5, 20 and 23 to use in the National draft. Pick 5 Darcy Parish, pick 20 Kieran Collins and pick 23 the best available midfielder. Then we promote Holmes and he becomes the backup ruck along with Pierce. It's a calculated risk worth taking IMHFO.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16890
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3580 times
Been thanked: 2850 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572968Post skeptic »

I like our ruck stocks as they are to be honest.

Hickey and Longer fighting for the number 1 spot

Holmes looks likely but has a lot of of work to do... He has time

Pierce has been described as the most naturally talented of them... Starting to play well for Sandy. Could be a ruck forward. He also has time.

I say lets run with this


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4539
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572969Post whiskers3614 »

citywest wrote:If any team is willing to give pick 20 or better for Hickey then we should take it. We then have picks 5, 20 and 23 to use in the National draft. Pick 5 Darcy Parish, pick 20 Kieran Collins and pick 23 the best available midfielder. Then we promote Holmes and he becomes the backup ruck along with Pierce. It's a calculated risk worth taking IMHFO.
Are you Ross Lyon's investment adviser?
You keep peddling this line about Hickey and pick 20.
What pick did he cost us, has he gone backwards that much?
While we're promoting Holmes on VFL form , we might want to grab that Jones guy who keeps getting 30plus possessions!


citywest

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572972Post citywest »

whiskers3614 wrote:
citywest wrote:If any team is willing to give pick 20 or better for Hickey then we should take it. We then have picks 5, 20 and 23 to use in the National draft. Pick 5 Darcy Parish, pick 20 Kieran Collins and pick 23 the best available midfielder. Then we promote Holmes and he becomes the backup ruck along with Pierce. It's a calculated risk worth taking IMHFO.
Are you Ross Lyon's investment adviser?
You keep peddling this line about Hickey and pick 20.
What pick did he cost us, has he gone backwards that much?
While we're promoting Holmes on VFL form , we might want to grab that Jones guy who keeps getting 30plus possessions!
I'm just looking at ways to improve our list but not for the now. For 2018 and beyond. Parish would be a replacement for Montagna, Collins would be a replacement for Fisher/Dempster and pick 23 will be used on a much needed midfielder.


LTN16
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2494
Joined: Sun 11 Jun 2006 9:50pm

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1572980Post LTN16 »

citywest wrote:
whiskers3614 wrote:
citywest wrote:If any team is willing to give pick 20 or better for Hickey then we should take it. We then have picks 5, 20 and 23 to use in the National draft. Pick 5 Darcy Parish, pick 20 Kieran Collins and pick 23 the best available midfielder. Then we promote Holmes and he becomes the backup ruck along with Pierce. It's a calculated risk worth taking IMHFO.
Are you Ross Lyon's investment adviser?
You keep peddling this line about Hickey and pick 20.
What pick did he cost us, has he gone backwards that much?
While we're promoting Holmes on VFL form , we might want to grab that Jones guy who keeps getting 30plus possessions!
I'm just looking at ways to improve our list but not for the now. For 2018 and beyond. Parish would be a replacement for Montagna, Collins would be a replacement for Fisher/Dempster and pick 23 will be used on a much needed midfielder.
You just worry about your own team chitypest.. We will be alright.


Saint wagga
Club Player
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1573003Post Saint wagga »

Glad to see Hickey clunk some marks and look more dangerous up forward and he and Longer seemingly work more as a combo. Certainly an example of that setup working better. I hope it's not the last time, but I also expect more short term frustration and average performances along the journey. I just hope we stay the journey...and given Longer has missed like 1 game in nearly 2 seasos of footy, there will be injury along the way you'd where having a good stock of rucks will be key to a really powerful squad.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1573006Post plugger66 »

Saint wagga wrote:Glad to see Hickey clunk some marks and look more dangerous up forward and he and Longer seemingly work more as a combo. Certainly an example of that setup working better. I hope it's not the last time, but I also expect more short term frustration and average performances along the journey. I just hope we stay the journey...and given Longer has missed like 1 game in nearly 2 seasos of footy, there will be injury along the way you'd where having a good stock of rucks will be key to a really powerful squad.

Do you think hickey will be happy to play second fiddle to Longer all next season? Im worried that if he plays up forward all year he will dropped a few times because he isn't really a forward. Good game this week but has struggled most weeks when playing forward.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23010
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8904 times
Been thanked: 3883 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1573008Post saynta »

citywest wrote:If any team is willing to give pick 20 or better for Hickey then we should take it. We then have picks 5, 20 and 23 to use in the National draft. Pick 5 Darcy Parish, pick 20 Kieran Collins and pick 23 the best available midfielder. Then we promote Holmes and he becomes the backup ruck along with Pierce. It's a calculated risk worth taking IMHFO.
Rubbish, rubbish and more rubbish.

Bit like Armo to the Tigers rant last year.

Hickey just played one of his better games for the saints last week. There is no way that the Saints will trade him

Yes we might get pick 5 , then again we might not. Carlton may yet get picks 1 & 2, Brisbane 3 & 4, Essendon 5 & 6 and the Gold Coast 7 & 8. Our first pick could be 9 or 10 depending where the Dees finish up. God only knows what no our second pick will be.

Pierce and Holmes aren't really good VFL players at this stage. Who knows if either will make it to AFL level. I very much doubt both of them will.


Saint wagga
Club Player
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1573010Post Saint wagga »

plugger66 wrote:
Saint wagga wrote:Glad to see Hickey clunk some marks and look more dangerous up forward and he and Longer seemingly work more as a combo. Certainly an example of that setup working better. I hope it's not the last time, but I also expect more short term frustration and average performances along the journey. I just hope we stay the journey...and given Longer has missed like 1 game in nearly 2 seasos of footy, there will be injury along the way you'd where having a good stock of rucks will be key to a really powerful squad.

Do you think hickey will be happy to play second fiddle to Longer all next season? Im worried that if he plays up forward all year he will dropped a few times because he isn't really a forward. Good game this week but has struggled most weeks when playing forward.
I'm just glad both are in the 1's because even though Hickey is playing up forward, he is still spending what 20-30% of time in the ruck as well...and I think the more time these young rucks spend at AFL level, with the speed of the game etc...the better. I'd think Hickey would see any chance to be playing the 1's as good and a chance to push his case for unseating Longer as current no.1 pick...but the psychology is all hyopthetical I guess.

Hopefully he can even the ledger between better games and below par games with more experience and development.


Indigo Wolf
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu 06 Aug 2015 8:00pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1573025Post Indigo Wolf »

samuraisaint wrote:should have a look at Essendon. They traded Jenkins, who is now at Adelaide, because they had Bellchambers and Ryder, and now they don't have jack.
And although the second half wasn't stellar, I thought we saw enough today to give us some evidence that the club is heading in the right direction.
Quite honestly, I think you're looking at it wrong. The second half was horrendous, I'd expect more from that move. Looks like it's going to be a looong season.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5871
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 837 times
Been thanked: 785 times

Re: Those who are suggesting we trade one of our ruckmen

Post: # 1573123Post samuraisaint »

Possibly Indigo, possibly. But I have also been following St. Kilda for a very long time, and I remember two blokes running around in the reserves at Moorabbin for years, who took a while to click playing together by the names of Lazar Vidovic and Peter Everitt, who when they did click, combined well enough to take us right to the very top of the ladder in over 30 years and our first Grand Final in a quarter of a century. When they both got injured within one week of each other at the very beginning of the finals, our premiership dream went with them. The big blokes take a bit longer to come on.
And North are a side who can beat anybody on their day, who are absolutely flying now. The third quarter was garbage; yes, but I'd rather follow us than 6 other teams doing the rounds at the moment.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Post Reply