Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Will he be looked at? Our players certainly didn't like what he did. Intentional? High Contact? Low Impact? !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19052
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1597 times
- Been thanked: 2009 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Why was there no 50?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 774 times
- Been thanked: 871 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Deserves a week off and so does the umpire who saw it happen straight in front of him - should have reported Cotchin on the spot. Fifty metre penalties seem to have been put away for the year!
Saint supporter since '62
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8582
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Not reportable in my opinion but a definite 50. Umpires seem to have gone soft on this. Lots of little shoves in the back given after marks were taken. But the Cotchin one was blatant.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
I was ropeable seeing no fifty for that piece of work. Richmond are certainly playing "Hardwick footy" that's for sure. Some of their supporters make Collingwood look almost civilised in comparison!
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
It was good the umpire rewarded Cotchin for his dog act by gifting Richmond the free from the center. Just another appalling display from these bias clowns.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
CURLY wrote:It was good the umpire rewarded Cotchin for his dog act by gifting Richmond the free from the center. Just another appalling display from these bias clowns.
John Farnham.
Anyway it was 50 every day of the week. It isn't reportable every day of the week.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Yet wasnt paid and then gave them the center clearance.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:It was good the umpire rewarded Cotchin for his dog act by gifting Richmond the free from the center. Just another appalling display from these bias clowns.
John Farnham.
Anyway it was 50 every day of the week. It isn't reportable every day of the week.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
CURLY wrote:Yet wasnt paid and then gave them the center clearance.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:It was good the umpire rewarded Cotchin for his dog act by gifting Richmond the free from the center. Just another appalling display from these bias clowns.
John Farnham.
Anyway it was 50 every day of the week. It isn't reportable every day of the week.
Yes the 50 may have stopped the fight but the free was certainly there. I can see it now. The umpire said in his head if I don't pay the 50 Weller will do something stupid and then I can pay a free to start the next passage of play.
John Farnham.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
So he ignored a clear head high free yet decided to pay a free a few blokes bumping each other. Makes sense.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Yet wasnt paid and then gave them the center clearance.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:It was good the umpire rewarded Cotchin for his dog act by gifting Richmond the free from the center. Just another appalling display from these bias clowns.
John Farnham.
Anyway it was 50 every day of the week. It isn't reportable every day of the week.
Yes the 50 may have stopped the fight but the free was certainly there. I can see it now. The umpire said in his head if I don't pay the 50 Weller will do something stupid and then I can pay a free to start the next passage of play.
John Farnham.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Curly you really don't watch the game do you. The free was for throwing Cotchin to the ground. Your bias makes you look completely silly and just shows your lack of knowledge of the rules.CURLY wrote:
So he ignored a clear head high free yet decided to pay a free a few blokes bumping each other. Makes sense.
John Farnham.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Answer the question why was Cotchins high hit ignored which is free yet they paid the next. Seems odd to all other than you.plugger66 wrote:Curly you really don't watch the game do you. The free was for throwing Cotchin to the ground. Your bias makes you look completely silly and just shows your lack of knowledge of the rules.CURLY wrote:
So he ignored a clear head high free yet decided to pay a free a few blokes bumping each other. Makes sense.
John Farnham.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
CURLY wrote:
Answer the question why was Cotchins high hit ignored which is free yet they paid the next. Seems odd to all other than you.
How can I answer that. Speak to the umpire.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10332
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 1320 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
So predictable. It was a mistake just like the free they got in the goal square.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:
Answer the question why was Cotchins high hit ignored which is free yet they paid the next. Seems odd to all other than you.
How can I answer that. Speak to the umpire.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
CURLY wrote:So predictable. It was a mistake just like the free they got in the goal square.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:
Answer the question why was Cotchins high hit ignored which is free yet they paid the next. Seems odd to all other than you.
How can I answer that. Speak to the umpire.
I said it was a mistake. Unlike you I can watch a game through 2 eyes. It wasn't like the free in the goal square.
And what do you mean so predictable. Tell me how I could possibly answer your silly question. It is impossible to answer unless you think umpire's cheat which in turn means the AFL cheat. I don't. If you want to then go for it. Just makes you look silly to those who use common sense. And seems odd to all bar me. Can you tell me how you came to that emotive conclusion? Do you want one wrong decision to mean another wrong decision? How stupid would any game become if that was the rules.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8089
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
NaEastern wrote:Will he be looked at? Our players certainly didn't like what he did. Intentional? High Contact? Low Impact? !!
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8089
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Cotchin's 'Cheapy' !!
Nothing in that. Shouldn't have been a free. Umpires always over react to that stuffplugger66 wrote:Curly you really don't watch the game do you. The free was for throwing Cotchin to the ground. Your bias makes you look completely silly and just shows your lack of knowledge of the rules.CURLY wrote:
So he ignored a clear head high free yet decided to pay a free a few blokes bumping each other. Makes sense.
John Farnham.
Posting 20 years of holey crap!