Russell's Top 25 Saints
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Russell's Top 25 Saints
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Obviously inspired by Saintsational's favourite Saint.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Is this meant to be in order of "greatness"? Winmar at twenty-five, Barker and Loewe outside the top twenty as well? I'm curious to see who 's beaten those three into the top twenty.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
His original top 20.
Harvey won two Brownlows since then. Riewoldt, Hayes and Lazar Vidovic have to be squeezed in.
TOP 20 AS AT 1995
1. Ian Stewart
2. Tony Lockett
3. Darrel Baldock
4. Colin Watson
5. Bill Mohr
6. Dave McNamara
7. Carl Ditterich
8. Alan Morrow
9. Harold Bray
10. Verdun Howell
11. Jim Ross
12. Neil Roberts
13. Ross Smith
14. Wels Eicke
15. Vic Cumberland
16. Brian Gleeson
17. Robert Harvey
18. Trevor Barker
19. Daryl Griffiths
20. Kevin Neale
Harvey won two Brownlows since then. Riewoldt, Hayes and Lazar Vidovic have to be squeezed in.
TOP 20 AS AT 1995
1. Ian Stewart
2. Tony Lockett
3. Darrel Baldock
4. Colin Watson
5. Bill Mohr
6. Dave McNamara
7. Carl Ditterich
8. Alan Morrow
9. Harold Bray
10. Verdun Howell
11. Jim Ross
12. Neil Roberts
13. Ross Smith
14. Wels Eicke
15. Vic Cumberland
16. Brian Gleeson
17. Robert Harvey
18. Trevor Barker
19. Daryl Griffiths
20. Kevin Neale
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Thanks for the mail, Kosi. I know these lists are subjective, but he has to be kidding. I'm an admirer of Russell's work, but even that initial best twenty is bizarre, to say the least. I wait with great anticipation for the next list. Honestly, why do we place so much value on the heroes of yesteryear? I know that champions of any era deserve respect, but seriously, most of them would struggle in the modern game. Watson, Eicke, Cumberland, McNamara, et. al. Alan Morrow better than Winmar, Barker, Harvey (even pre- Brownlows) and Loewe? Surely you jest, Russell.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
As much as my dear old dad loved Alan Morrow, in his humble opinion, Ross Smith, Verdun Howell and Neil Roberts were a galaxy in front of him as players.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
My OPINIONWhite Winmar wrote:Thanks for the mail, Kosi. I know these lists are subjective, but he has to be kidding. I'm an admirer of Russell's work, but even that initial best twenty is bizarre, to say the least. I wait with great anticipation for the next list. Honestly, why do we place so much value on the heroes of yesteryear? I know that champions of any era deserve respect, but seriously, most of them would struggle in the modern game. Watson, Eicke, Cumberland, McNamara, et. al. Alan Morrow better than Winmar, Barker, Harvey (even pre- Brownlows) and Loewe? Surely you jest, Russell.
Stewart & Lockett will still probably be 1 & 2 (I'll leave it to Russell to chose the order)
Riewoldt & Baldock will take the next 2 spots, again which order?
Harvey will be at No 5 (was 17 in 1995. 2 Brownlows and 378? games)
Milne & Hayes will be somewhere in the top 20
It wouldn't surprise me to see Nathan Burke in there either
I never saw some of those names mentioned BUT you can only base an opinion on their standing in the game at that time !!
Last edited by Eastern on Fri 26 Dec 2014 8:00pm, edited 3 times in total.
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Forgot to add, I guess that's what these opinion pieces are about. Like assholes, everyone's got an opinion and they all stink.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Well, yeah, they've been dead for decades.White Winmar wrote:Honestly, why do we place so much value on the heroes of yesteryear? I know that champions of any era deserve respect, but seriously, most of them would struggle in the modern game.
Surely you can only compare how good they were in their day? I mean, Bradman might not go so well today given the changes in the game but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be considered a true all-time superstar.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Bradman was a freak, who averaged twice as many as the next guy. He was clearly so much better that he is beyond comparison. Not a great example. Are you seriously suggesting that those heroes of yesteryear were twice as good as those of today? If Bill Mohr kicked 1472 goals in his career, then he may be considered greater than Lockett. Clearly, statistically, he was not. Did Colin Watson win four Brownlows ?etc. Can you see where I'm going with this? Bringing Bradman into an argument like this, or any argument about relative greatness is erroneous and ultimately, pointless.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4539
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Can't really see Milne ahead of Barker and Winmar but I've never really been a big fan of his!Eastern wrote:My OPINIONWhite Winmar wrote:Thanks for the mail, Kosi. I know these lists are subjective, but he has to be kidding. I'm an admirer of Russell's work, but even that initial best twenty is bizarre, to say the least. I wait with great anticipation for the next list. Honestly, why do we place so much value on the heroes of yesteryear? I know that champions of any era deserve respect, but seriously, most of them would struggle in the modern game. Watson, Eicke, Cumberland, McNamara, et. al. Alan Morrow better than Winmar, Barker, Harvey (even pre- Brownlows) and Loewe? Surely you jest, Russell.
Stewart & Lockett will still probably be 1 & 2 (I'll leave it to Russell to chose the order)
Riewoldt & Baldock will take the next 2 spots, again which order?
Harvey will be at No 5 (was 17 in 1995. 2 Brownlows and 378? games)
Milne & Hayes will be somewhere in the top 20
It wouldn't surprise me to see Nathan Burke in there either
I never saw some of those names mentioned BUT you can only base an opinion on their standing in the game at that time !!
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
275 Games; 574 goals; 4 times leading goal kicker; 2 All Australian; 2 times International Rules; 2 pre-season premierships. Pretty good record !!whiskers3614 wrote:Can't really see Milne ahead of Barker and Winmar but I've never really been a big fan of his!Eastern wrote:My OPINIONWhite Winmar wrote:Thanks for the mail, Kosi. I know these lists are subjective, but he has to be kidding. I'm an admirer of Russell's work, but even that initial best twenty is bizarre, to say the least. I wait with great anticipation for the next list. Honestly, why do we place so much value on the heroes of yesteryear? I know that champions of any era deserve respect, but seriously, most of them would struggle in the modern game. Watson, Eicke, Cumberland, McNamara, et. al. Alan Morrow better than Winmar, Barker, Harvey (even pre- Brownlows) and Loewe? Surely you jest, Russell.
Stewart & Lockett will still probably be 1 & 2 (I'll leave it to Russell to chose the order)
Riewoldt & Baldock will take the next 2 spots, again which order?
Harvey will be at No 5 (was 17 in 1995. 2 Brownlows and 378? games)
Milne & Hayes will be somewhere in the top 20
It wouldn't surprise me to see Nathan Burke in there either
I never saw some of those names mentioned BUT you can only base an opinion on their standing in the game at that time !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Twice as good? No. But they are comparable.White Winmar wrote:Bradman was a freak, who averaged twice as many as the next guy. He was clearly so much better that he is beyond comparison. Not a great example. Are you seriously suggesting that those heroes of yesteryear were twice as good as those of today?
Mohr kicked 735 in 195 games. Lockett kicked 898 in 183 (for us). Lockett was very close to the best footballer of all time and Mohr was obviously not at that level. But on the figures he was comfortably our second-best goalkicker of all time.
Would he "struggle in the modern game", as you suggested? Yes. He was a 182/81 full-forward, so he probably wouldn't be as good as Siposs. But what does that actually matter? He was a great player in the 30s. In a poor team, he won the goalkicking ahead of Bob Pratt and Gordon Coventry one year, and he was one of the first few players to kick 100 in a season. He led our goalkicking for 12 years straight.
I don't know anything about him really. But a glance at the stats suggests he deserves to be right up there on the list. The same possibly applies to the other guys you've mentioned. The fact that they would "struggle in the modern game" makes no difference to that.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Statistically speaking, Bradman was twice as good as any other player. Wisden named him the greatest cricketer of all time, even though he didn't bowl, such was his impact on games. I don't know why you brought Bradman into it as he comes from a completely different sport that shares nothing in common with AFL. In any event, if you want to make a comparison, how about this? If we take the champions of AFL and use their achievements to extrapolate a comparable record for Bradman, it would look something like this. He would've won six Brownlows ( Skilton, Stewart, Reynolds, Bunton each three) twelve Colemans, and eighteen club best and fairest awards.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Did you completely ignore my post?White Winmar wrote:Statistically speaking, Bradman was twice as good as any other player. Wisden named him the greatest cricketer of all time, even though he didn't bowl, such was his impact on games. I don't know why you brought Bradman into it as he comes from a completely different sport that shares nothing in common with AFL. In any event, if you want to make a comparison, how about this? If we take the champions of AFL and use their achievements to extrapolate a comparable record for Bradman, it would look something like this. He would've won six Brownlows ( Skilton, Stewart, Reynolds, Bunton each three) twelve Colemans, and eighteen club best and fairest awards.
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
vidovic????...yo'd have to be kiddingkosifantutti wrote:His original top 20.
Harvey won two Brownlows since then. Riewoldt, Hayes and Lazar Vidovic have to be squeezed in.
TOP 20 AS AT 1995
1. Ian Stewart
2. Tony Lockett
3. Darrel Baldock
4. Colin Watson
5. Bill Mohr
6. Dave McNamara
7. Carl Ditterich
8. Alan Morrow
9. Harold Bray
10. Verdun Howell
11. Jim Ross
12. Neil Roberts
13. Ross Smith
14. Wels Eicke
15. Vic Cumberland
16. Brian Gleeson
17. Robert Harvey
18. Trevor Barker
19. Daryl Griffiths
20. Kevin Neale
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
I just wanted to see who was paying attention.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Russell had Trevor Barker at 18 in 1995. By my calculations three have overtaken TB since. Riewoldt, Hayes & Burke?
20-16 to be released on Monday !!
20-16 to be released on Monday !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Yes. Yes I did. I'll grant that Bill Mohr deserves his place. The problem with some of the others such as Cumberland and McNamara is there's no one left alive who saw them play, there is no film footage of them and we rely on hyperbole strewn descriptions of them from contemporary newspaper reports. Anyhoo, all of these lists are subjective and in the end, a bit of fun and nothing else. The only really matter to the author and the holder of the opinion.bergholt wrote:Did you completely ignore my post?White Winmar wrote:Statistically speaking, Bradman was twice as good as any other player. Wisden named him the greatest cricketer of all time, even though he didn't bowl, such was his impact on games. I don't know why you brought Bradman into it as he comes from a completely different sport that shares nothing in common with AFL. In any event, if you want to make a comparison, how about this? If we take the champions of AFL and use their achievements to extrapolate a comparable record for Bradman, it would look something like this. He would've won six Brownlows ( Skilton, Stewart, Reynolds, Bunton each three) twelve Colemans, and eighteen club best and fairest awards.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
You can't directly compare players across different eras.
You have to rate them relative to their peers.
Billy Mohr was an absolute superstar in his day.
His stats are remarkable - they hold up well against Plugger's - and they relate to an era where scores were lower!
With his build there is a strong argument that Billy would struggle to get a game today.
Similarly some people seriously argue that there isn't a place for even Tony Lockett in today's game as mobile defenders would just run off him.
But in their eras both were absolute superstars relative to the rest of the comp and hence deserve their top 5 spots.
You have to rate them relative to their peers.
Billy Mohr was an absolute superstar in his day.
His stats are remarkable - they hold up well against Plugger's - and they relate to an era where scores were lower!
With his build there is a strong argument that Billy would struggle to get a game today.
Similarly some people seriously argue that there isn't a place for even Tony Lockett in today's game as mobile defenders would just run off him.
But in their eras both were absolute superstars relative to the rest of the comp and hence deserve their top 5 spots.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
So hard to compare across eras.
So as already pointed out, the best way is to compare people against their contemporaries. Asgenerally, I think it's pretty ok to assume that a champion would be a champion in any era.
I too, would like to see what are the exact criteria that Russell is using, coz short careers will no doubt be ruling out the usual suspects such as John McIntosh, Bill Stephenson, Graeme Gellie, Rod Owen and Lazar Vidovic...
As for 'hyperbole', the only player to make our 'Team of the Century' who played before WW1, also twice won the then equivalent of the Brownlow...
And will George Young miss out again...?
So as already pointed out, the best way is to compare people against their contemporaries. Asgenerally, I think it's pretty ok to assume that a champion would be a champion in any era.
I too, would like to see what are the exact criteria that Russell is using, coz short careers will no doubt be ruling out the usual suspects such as John McIntosh, Bill Stephenson, Graeme Gellie, Rod Owen and Lazar Vidovic...
As for 'hyperbole', the only player to make our 'Team of the Century' who played before WW1, also twice won the then equivalent of the Brownlow...
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
And will George Young miss out again...?
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
Dave McNamara wrote:So hard to compare across eras.
So as already pointed out, the best way is to compare people against their contemporaries. Asgenerally, I think it's pretty ok to assume that a champion would be a champion in any era.
I too, would like to see what are the exact criteria that Russell is using, coz short careers will no doubt be ruling out the usual suspects such as John McIntosh, Bill Stephenson, Graeme Gellie, Rod Owen and Lazar Vidovic...
As for 'hyperbole', the only player to make our 'Team of the Century' who played before WW1, also twice won the then equivalent of the Brownlow...![]()
And will George Young miss out again...?
Rod Owen and Lazar Vidovic. Seriously. Dave this now explains you and the JO. No need for anyone else to get it explained to them. Even Graham Gellie is over the top when Winmar is 25. Probably gets in our top 70 though. Just.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
16 - 20 up today
http://saints.com.au/news/2014-12-29/ru ... op-25-2016
http://saints.com.au/news/2014-12-29/ru ... op-25-2016
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9068
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
I reckon the 1966 premiership team automatically go in the top 20, then it's everyone else in whatever order you want, and I am not ignoring some of the great post '66 players in saying that.
Re: Russell's Top 25 Saints
spert wrote:I reckon the 1966 premiership team automatically go in the top 20, then it's everyone else in whatever order you want, and I am not ignoring some of the great post '66 players in saying that.
So you want a player who didn't even get on the ground to be in our top 25? There is no way more than about 4 or 5 should make our top 25 no matter what tey did for the club.