Terrific, another medium defender.
So next year we'll have no-one to play forward/ruck but 15 or so medium defenders.
I hope he's good cause it's certainly not a position that we need any players.
Round 3 for O’Shea
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Round 3 for O’Shea
I think you raise a good point - if we are to sign him I can only imagine its because Richo rates him VERY highly from his time at PA it certainly cannot be because of the position he plays. We need a 196cm+ back and I was hoping we would take a risk on Butcher or someone like that to play back if we can't get a ready to go back man of the right size.dragit wrote:Terrific, another medium defender.
So next year we'll have no-one to play forward/ruck but 15 or so medium defenders.
I hope he's good cause it's certainly not a position that we need any players.
- brewski
- Club Player
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sat 29 Oct 2005 4:26pm
- Location: On the pine
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Round 3 for O’Shea
would be happy with petracca, O'Shea and Membrey from this draft period and also what ever best available from our round 2 and any other live picks
Banned by the censors
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Fri 11 Nov 2005 12:54am
- Location: Chelsea Heights
Re: Round 3 for O’Shea
+1st_Trav_ofWA wrote:but Pluggs these rumours do have some value ... we are 3 weeks from the g/f and people are still talking footy and its still dominating the sports reports - this year especially the interest has been the biggest so for the state of the game this is huge add to the fact its been nearly 8 weeks since our last game and we are still being talked about with so far everything out of our club being possitive thats a big win ...
the rumours also i think help push the trades along and keeps us interested in a period that really not much happens
Certainly far more interesting than fr1ggin' horse racing for sure! IMO of course...