Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Going by all the varied opinions on here, I'd say pick 21 is about right. My personal view I'd like to see them upgrade that pick a few places, taking into account his marks around the ground, his versatility & games played. Any pick from 16 to 21 is as much value as Rhys has shown & I think will be the best offer we would get for him over the next 5 years.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 340 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
plugger66 wrote:Couldn't be bothered reading past page one so sorry if repeating things. Firstly Im not sure Jaxons can claim this one. Was on SEN right at that time though I believe he has some knowledge of trades going from Ben last year.
Anyway 21 is overs for Stanley however that doesn't make the trade a good one. Pick 21 is a very maybe pick. We have spent 6 years getting this guy better and he is slowly improving so that has to be thought of. Secondly we lose our only second ruckman. That is a huge loss. Losing him as a forward isn't a great loss. Its touch and go. They will obviously trade him but I think it isn't a great move. If anyone has any ideas who can help in the ruck I would be very interested.
Hi Plugger
Not trying to claim it or be first with the news, don't really care for that either way.
I knew about this 2 weeks ago however, but there are some things that I can't post on here as I am trying not to hurt the club or player involved until everyone is in agreement.
Lots of things are mooted in trade week and lots of things don't happen, so trying to give you guys accurate information when it is going to happen.
This will happen, so could put it on here now.
I bet SEN didn't mention that we are also giving a late pick back to the Cats as part of the deal?
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Trade Radio did!jaxons wrote:plugger66 wrote:Couldn't be bothered reading past page one so sorry if repeating things. Firstly Im not sure Jaxons can claim this one. Was on SEN right at that time though I believe he has some knowledge of trades going from Ben last year.
Anyway 21 is overs for Stanley however that doesn't make the trade a good one. Pick 21 is a very maybe pick. We have spent 6 years getting this guy better and he is slowly improving so that has to be thought of. Secondly we lose our only second ruckman. That is a huge loss. Losing him as a forward isn't a great loss. Its touch and go. They will obviously trade him but I think it isn't a great move. If anyone has any ideas who can help in the ruck I would be very interested.
Hi Plugger
Not trying to claim it or be first with the news, don't really care for that either way.
I knew about this 2 weeks ago however, but there are some things that I can't post on here as I am trying not to hurt the club or player involved until everyone is in agreement.
Lots of things are mooted in trade week and lots of things don't happen, so trying to give you guys accurate information when it is going to happen.
This will happen, so could put it on here now.
I bet SEN didn't mention that we are also giving a late pick back to the Cats as part of the deal?
Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Um, I think its a bit silly trading Stanley.
Out of Longer, Stanley and Hickey, he is the only one that can go forward, take big marks and kick goals.
Lets face it, Longer is not good enough yet, and Hickey has an ongoing issue with his knee.
Its not like trading a midfielder, where you can easily replace them.
Finding a tall target that is fast and mobile is very difficult.
I think Geelong win here easily, disappointing as Rhys could be anything.
I think you'd find if the team/midfield are on top, the forwards also get on top. If we get belted by 100+ points, the forwards can't really do much, ie the Hawthorn game.
Not really happy tbh, now it will be "kick it to Roo or no one", there's not even Maister, and you better hope White comes on rapidly.
I'd be much more comfortable with Longer going and Stanley staying.
I can't stand the thought of watching the ball be continually kicked to Roo vs 3 players every single time, sigh......
Out of Longer, Stanley and Hickey, he is the only one that can go forward, take big marks and kick goals.
Lets face it, Longer is not good enough yet, and Hickey has an ongoing issue with his knee.
Its not like trading a midfielder, where you can easily replace them.
Finding a tall target that is fast and mobile is very difficult.
I think Geelong win here easily, disappointing as Rhys could be anything.
I think you'd find if the team/midfield are on top, the forwards also get on top. If we get belted by 100+ points, the forwards can't really do much, ie the Hawthorn game.
Not really happy tbh, now it will be "kick it to Roo or no one", there's not even Maister, and you better hope White comes on rapidly.
I'd be much more comfortable with Longer going and Stanley staying.
I can't stand the thought of watching the ball be continually kicked to Roo vs 3 players every single time, sigh......
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5910
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: M32
- Has thanked: 855 times
- Been thanked: 797 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
I hate to say I told you so but ...
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10744
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 822 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Pick No 21 is not much use.
Now if we could get our hands on pick No14 that would be worth chasing.
I would trade picks Nos 21 and 22 for pick No 14.
If Geelong think Stanley is only worth pick No 21 then how about
Pick No 22 and Rhys Stanley for pick No 14.
Now if we could get our hands on pick No14 that would be worth chasing.
I would trade picks Nos 21 and 22 for pick No 14.
If Geelong think Stanley is only worth pick No 21 then how about
Pick No 22 and Rhys Stanley for pick No 14.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 340 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Glad you are not doing deals for us Ace!ace wrote:Pick No 21 is not much use.
Now if we could get our hands on pick No14 that would be worth chasing.
I would trade picks Nos 21 and 22 for pick No 14.
If Geelong think Stanley is only worth pick No 21 then how about
Pick No 22 and Rhys Stanley for pick No 14.
Your proposed deal means we trade Stanley to jump up 8 places in the draft and we would have picks 1, 14, 41....whereas now we will have 1, 21, 22, and 41 thanks!
Pick 21 not much use.....you are kidding right?
Lets see what you say about the player we take with pick 21 in 12 months time.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 340 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
We are giving up a pick we won't be using, not sure how that's dumb.gringo wrote:If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
jaxons wrote:plugger66 wrote:Couldn't be bothered reading past page one so sorry if repeating things. Firstly Im not sure Jaxons can claim this one. Was on SEN right at that time though I believe he has some knowledge of trades going from Ben last year.
Anyway 21 is overs for Stanley however that doesn't make the trade a good one. Pick 21 is a very maybe pick. We have spent 6 years getting this guy better and he is slowly improving so that has to be thought of. Secondly we lose our only second ruckman. That is a huge loss. Losing him as a forward isn't a great loss. Its touch and go. They will obviously trade him but I think it isn't a great move. If anyone has any ideas who can help in the ruck I would be very interested.
Hi Plugger
Not trying to claim it or be first with the news, don't really care for that either way.
I knew about this 2 weeks ago however, but there are some things that I can't post on here as I am trying not to hurt the club or player involved until everyone is in agreement.
Lots of things are mooted in trade week and lots of things don't happen, so trying to give you guys accurate information when it is going to happen.
This will happen, so could put it on here now.
I bet SEN didn't mention that we are also giving a late pick back to the Cats as part of the deal?
Funny that you mentioned it a minute after another poster mentioned it on here. And no mention of another pick then. I heard about it 6 weeks ago. At the least the poster who mentioned it first on here stated he heard it off SEN. Co incidence. Could be. Happy to give you Ben last year. Im not giving you this. Why you would even both to care is a little strange. Anyway don't worry about me because there are plenty who rate you.
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Pull the trigger on Tom Lamb?
If De Goey lasted to that pick I'd be slightly giddy. That kid has it. One-two-three punch with Billings & Petracca.
If De Goey lasted to that pick I'd be slightly giddy. That kid has it. One-two-three punch with Billings & Petracca.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
I would keep Stanley and trade Longer and a low unusable pick for a higher pick from GWS who to the best of my knowledge are short on ruck stockjaxons wrote:We are giving up a pick we won't be using, not sure how that's dumb.gringo wrote:If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
jaxons wrote:We are giving up a pick we won't be using, not sure how that's dumb.gringo wrote:If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
Don't we have to upgrade 3 rookies?
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Oh great and powerful Plugski, ruler of lands and king of his kin, bestower of power and overlord of Men. Knight me with gift and acknowledgement of feat.plugger66 wrote:Happy to give you Ben last year. Im not giving you this.
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
I don't think too much of any of those forwards to be honest and reckon Stanley is probably a little closer than that. Tippet in particular is yet to validate his wage.Sobraz wrote:Honestly how good do people think Stanley will become?
Forget the ultra top liners, so as good as Jack Riewoldt/ Taylor Walker??.. No hope.
Josh Kennedy (WCE)? Kurt Tippet? Also no hope, so let's go a tier lower.
Will he be as good as Chris Dawes? I think Dawes has him covered, although it's a toss up.
I'd just like some feedback as to a comparison as to how good he'll become, after 5 full seasons in the system?
Brad Ottens was used before.. As I mentioned, former number 2 draft pick and real natural footballer, is a terrible comparison. Ottens is 4 times the player.
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Beekay wrote:Oh great and powerful Plugski, ruler of lands and king of his kin, bestower of power and overlord of Men. Knight me with gift and acknowledgement of feat.plugger66 wrote:Happy to give you Ben last year. Im not giving you this.
Weird unit. It seems you care enough about the crap I write to waste your time commenting. I actually love Jaxons. Next time try humour.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 340 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
plugger66 wrote:jaxons wrote:We are giving up a pick we won't be using, not sure how that's dumb.gringo wrote:If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
Don't we have to upgrade 3 rookies?
Yeah, but we can upgrade rookies with up to pick 200, that doesn't matter.
We won't take a live pick past #41.
4 kids and Membrey in the PSD, plus 3-4 rookie upgrades.
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
jaxons wrote:plugger66 wrote:jaxons wrote:We are giving up a pick we won't be using, not sure how that's dumb.gringo wrote:If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
Don't we have to upgrade 3 rookies?
Yeah, but we can upgrade rookies with up to pick 200, that doesn't matter.
We won't take a live pick past #41.
4 kids and Membrey in the PSD, plus 3-4 rookie upgrades.
I know that but at the moment we don't have enough picks. Certainly rules out trading pick one for 2 or 3 picks. I know Schneider will retire but it also means a contracted player will be delisted. And also reckon stopping at 41 is madness. And what about the PSD?
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
What's really going on in this forum??? It's a real pick measuring contest here.
Who cares who said what first??? We all follow St Kilda, I'm guessing & all have opinions, some good, some not so good & some bizarre...just like the outer, play on people.
Who cares who said what first??? We all follow St Kilda, I'm guessing & all have opinions, some good, some not so good & some bizarre...just like the outer, play on people.
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
Its is.Ghost Like wrote:What's really going on in this forum??? It's a real pick measuring contest here.
Who cares who said what first??? We all follow St Kilda, I'm guessing & all have opinions, some good, some not so good & some bizarre...just like the outer, play on people.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 340 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
plugger66 wrote:jaxons wrote:plugger66 wrote:jaxons wrote:We are giving up a pick we won't be using, not sure how that's dumb.gringo wrote:If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
Don't we have to upgrade 3 rookies?
Yeah, but we can upgrade rookies with up to pick 200, that doesn't matter.
We won't take a live pick past #41.
4 kids and Membrey in the PSD, plus 3-4 rookie upgrades.
I know that but at the moment we don't have enough picks. Certainly rules out trading pick one for 2 or 3 picks. I know Schneider will retire but it also means a contracted player will be delisted. And also reckon stopping at 41 is madness. And what about the PSD?
Sorry mate, not sure what you mean by not enough picks?
You mean not enough spaces on our list I presume?
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
- Location: by the seaside..
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 187 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
our list is going to be the same average age as GWS the way we are going. Only problem is they have way more talent.
Wooden spoon here we come again, and again, and again.
Wooden spoon here we come again, and again, and again.
“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
So are we only using 1, 21, 22 and 41 in the draft?jaxons wrote:We are giving up a pick we won't be using, not sure how that's dumb.gringo wrote:If we give up a later pick and Stanley for pick 21 it's a dumb trade. There is no such thing as overs. The fact that a team will pay $1 million a year to an 18 yo who has played 7 games shows there are no overs in footy. If you are buying something on potential the price is what someone is willing to pay.
If we were getting Geelongs teens pick and putting up our second pick or something to target a very highly rated kid I could see logic but I'm not sure what they are doing now. We now have too many same type rucks. Hopefully we can get Pierce to play that role or drop Holmes in there because what we don't need is another frickin ruckman in development.
Peter Wright had better be a kick arse forward if that is who we are after.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
- Has thanked: 769 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Rhys Stanley for Pick #21
No deal as far as I'm concerned. Not enough.
Just about to take a bit step forward in consistency
Show some loyalty to your players st kilda
Just about to take a bit step forward in consistency
Show some loyalty to your players st kilda