Man I hope that happens.St Chris wrote:And if he was out of contract, he's been at the Junkies long enough to be a free agent, so he's just walk to Port anyway.dragit wrote:The PSD is after the trade period, so he would have to spend a year with us.Con Gorozidis wrote:Now from where I sit pick 17 for Paddy Rider is a completely fair trade and Essendon should just get on with it. But of course Essendon dont do 'fair.'
Out of interest - if there was a complete meltdown in relations. Could Paddy walk into the PSD and to us and then we could trade him on to Port for something decent - like their pick 17 which they are prepared to give up for him?
Or would this be against the rules?
Seriously, essendon's arrogance is pitiful, they wanted pick 6 for Crameri too - lol. I hope to god they force paddy to invoke his legal right to walk away, they deserve nothing.
2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
gringo wrote:He is not likely to go that early but he is a very good player. You can imagine him being a bolter like those two. There is a heap of players who could go anywhere from about 5th to 20th or so and it will be interesting to see who gets picked where.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Could do worse. He a nice player. He's one of those that could be the Bontempelli or Lewis Taylor of the draft.SaintSimmo wrote:If we do happen to trade pick 1 to GWS then I reckon we'd be pretty keen in taking Paul Ahern at pick 4
If he is pick 4 I hope he is better than nice. Those 2 you mentioned are better than nice.
Bont was hardly a bolter. If he is a 5th to 20th player I hope we go no where near him on our first pick.
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
I think we need to wait and see if Melbourne trade out one of picks 2 or 3. If they don't we should trade with GWS as we would likely get McCartin at pick 4. Something like pick 1 and 21 for pick 4(McCartin), Jaksch and O'Rourke. Would seem to fit with the whole 3 picks in the top 20 model. I think Melbourne do trade one of those picks though which would throw things up in the air as I don't think we need a Peter Wright type who seems to be the other top 4 player. Assuming he is more of a ruck/fwd than vice versa.
Having said that I don't know if Jaksch and O'Rourke are top end talent or not. With the PSD and the number 1 pick it seems to be an opportune time to inject some significant talent into the list.
Having said that I don't know if Jaksch and O'Rourke are top end talent or not. With the PSD and the number 1 pick it seems to be an opportune time to inject some significant talent into the list.
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
It just comes down to cash - he gets 4 years @ $600k and Melbourne will get pick 3.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:He is not likely to go that early but he is a very good player. You can imagine him being a bolter like those two. There is a heap of players who could go anywhere from about 5th to 20th or so and it will be interesting to see who gets picked where.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Could do worse. He a nice player. He's one of those that could be the Bontempelli or Lewis Taylor of the draft.SaintSimmo wrote:If we do happen to trade pick 1 to GWS then I reckon we'd be pretty keen in taking Paul Ahern at pick 4
If he is pick 4 I hope he is better than nice. Those 2 you mentioned are better than nice.
Bont was hardly a bolter. If he is a 5th to 20th player I hope we go no where near him on our first pick.
So do I but there are worse players, I think he has a lot of star potential, he's very fast, kicks goals and racks up possessions. Hard not to like him. I think unless a club absolutely loves him he will go around 10 to 15 in the draft. I meant Bontempelli burst on to the scene early rather than bolted up the draft order although he did a bit.
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view
Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
The other issue is that AFL ultimately have discretion as to compensation picks. So, although it is completely beyond the rules, they may decide to give Melbourne a slightly better compensation because they rejected their priority pick bid.plugger66 wrote:chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view
Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7282
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
those reasons should not be connected............both treated seperately..........have toFQF wrote:The other issue is that AFL ultimately have discretion as to compensation picks. So, although it is completely beyond the rules, they may decide to give Melbourne a slightly better compensation because they rejected their priority pick bid.plugger66 wrote:chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view
Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.
saint4life
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
We hope so... but we aren't exactly dealing with a transparent organisation.chook23 wrote:those reasons should not be connected............both treated seperately..........have toFQF wrote:The other issue is that AFL ultimately have discretion as to compensation picks. So, although it is completely beyond the rules, they may decide to give Melbourne a slightly better compensation because they rejected their priority pick bid.plugger66 wrote:chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view
Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
chook23 wrote:those reasons should not be connected............both treated seperately..........have toFQF wrote:The other issue is that AFL ultimately have discretion as to compensation picks. So, although it is completely beyond the rules, they may decide to give Melbourne a slightly better compensation because they rejected their priority pick bid.plugger66 wrote:chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view
Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.
They wont need to treat them together if the rumour of what he is getting is true. That is first band for sure.
Last edited by plugger66 on Tue 30 Sep 2014 6:21pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7282
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
trueFQF wrote:We hope so... but we aren't exactly dealing with a transparent organisation.chook23 wrote:those reasons should not be connected............both treated seperately..........have toFQF wrote:The other issue is that AFL ultimately have discretion as to compensation picks. So, although it is completely beyond the rules, they may decide to give Melbourne a slightly better compensation because they rejected their priority pick bid.plugger66 wrote:chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view
Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.
saint4life
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
plugger66 wrote:Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Hang on a moment!
If that's how it works... BJ got 4 years and $800K!
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
I think band 1 compo is the pick immediately after your first pick. Our first pick was 11, hence we got 12 as compensation.Dave McNamara wrote:plugger66 wrote:Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hang on a moment!
If that's how it works... BJ got 4 years and $800K!
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
Damn!remboy wrote:I think band 1 compo is the pick immediately after your first pick. Our first pick was 11, hence we got 12 as compensation.Dave McNamara wrote:plugger66 wrote:Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hang on a moment!
If that's how it works... BJ got 4 years and $800K!
![Mad :x](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
Thanks though for filling me in on that Rem'.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
yes we got band 1 for bj, pick 12remboy wrote:I think band 1 compo is the pick immediately after your first pick. Our first pick was 11, hence we got 12 as compensation.Dave McNamara wrote:plugger66 wrote:Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hang on a moment!
If that's how it works... BJ got 4 years and $800K!
so did the Hawks for buddy, pick 19
the system is rubbish imo, if they are going to have compo it should be to fixed spots in the draft, mid-round 1, end round 1, etc
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
Unfortunately it's what the clubs agreed to so we're stuck with it. Another way of trying to favour lower clubs over higher clubs.Rosco wrote:yes we got band 1 for bj, pick 12remboy wrote:I think band 1 compo is the pick immediately after your first pick. Our first pick was 11, hence we got 12 as compensation.Dave McNamara wrote:plugger66 wrote:Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hang on a moment!
If that's how it works... BJ got 4 years and $800K!
so did the Hawks for buddy, pick 19
the system is rubbish imo, if they are going to have compo it should be to fixed spots in the draft, mid-round 1, end round 1, etc
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
That's the spirit.
Bunk_Moreland wrote:WinnersOnly wrote: Fair trade that would suit both clubs...
Why should it be a fair trade?
there is a reason the #1 pick has been trade once in 15 years, it is because it is the golden ticket.
f*** fair. They offer overs or we keep #1 and take Petracca
Or we tell them we are gunna offer #1 for Dangerfield.
Come to the party, lube up and bend over, or we keep the golden ticket.
Fair? - our turn to do the screwing.
- Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
it could only involve Boyd.Old Mate wrote:Petracca has totally dominated TAC Cup footy for two years which includes his year as an under-ager. He's a ready to go power mid of the Boak & Dangerfield variety. It will take a seriously good offer to trade the rights to pick 1.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
On the small chance we do get Boyd or Cameron its going to be hard to keep a lid on the messiah mania.
We will still need quite a few more good young players. Remember we still finished last with Roo in the side.
So Boyd or Cameron will only mean we break even when Roo retires.
We will still need quite a few more good young players. Remember we still finished last with Roo in the side.
So Boyd or Cameron will only mean we break even when Roo retires.
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
Rosco wrote:yes we got band 1 for bj, pick 12remboy wrote:I think band 1 compo is the pick immediately after your first pick. Our first pick was 11, hence we got 12 as compensation.Dave McNamara wrote:plugger66 wrote:Because the rumour is 5 years and 700K. That makes pick 3 certain.chook23 wrote:Why are people so convinced Melbourne will get pick 3 for frawley...............massive overs in my view![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hang on a moment!
If that's how it works... BJ got 4 years and $800K!
so did the Hawks for buddy, pick 19
the system is rubbish imo, if they are going to have compo it should be to fixed spots in the draft, mid-round 1, end round 1, etc
But the idea is to help the bottom sides if they lose good players, not the top sides if they lose good players.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
- Has thanked: 419 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
Emma Quayle on Petracca.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... 0o6nk.html
Clearly the key question for all of us is whether McCartin can also make a short macchiato ...
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... 0o6nk.html
Clearly the key question for all of us is whether McCartin can also make a short macchiato ...
Always loyal
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
nice articleSemperFidelis wrote:Emma Quayle on Petracca.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... 0o6nk.html
Clearly the key question for all of us is whether McCartin can also make a short macchiato ...
ok
ive made my mind up
just take him with pick 1 ffs
we have a vision to 2018 and all that jazz so im sure we will have more picks inside the top ten in the next couple of years so lets grab Petracca now
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
- Has thanked: 419 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
We can also put him on the coffee cart at family day.matrix wrote:nice articleSemperFidelis wrote:Emma Quayle on Petracca.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... 0o6nk.html
Clearly the key question for all of us is whether McCartin can also make a short macchiato ...
ok
ive made my mind up
just take him with pick 1 ffs
we have a vision to 2018 and all that jazz so im sure we will have more picks inside the top ten in the next couple of years so lets grab Petracca now
The club will be out of debt in a jiffy.
Always loyal
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2014 List Management - Draft & Trade Discussion
From the Hun
ST KILDA
Working hard to nab Giant Kristian Jaksch to lead its forward line. Prepared to trade pick No. 1 for a quality player.
Saints head of football Chris Pelchen said the club was prepared to give up pick 1 to land former top-10 draft picks Jono O’Rourke and Jaksch in a deal similar to the one that saw Dom Tyson traded to Melbourne last year. The Demons moved from pick 2 to pick 9 in the draft, taking Christian Salem.
“If that deal is formally put to us we’ll consider it but it hasn’t been at this stage ... but that’s the type of deal we’re looking at,” he told AFL Trade Radio.
Pelchen said the club was “open-minded” about trading the first pick in November’s national draft, but wasn’t targetting any specific players.
The Saints are also in talks with banned forward Ahmed Saad and are likely to pursue fringe Geelong midfielder Taylor Hunt.
He said Patrick Dangerfield was not on the club’s radar and Sydney gun Luke Parker wasn’t in the frame either, despite persistent rumours.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/t ... 7074447591
ST KILDA
Working hard to nab Giant Kristian Jaksch to lead its forward line. Prepared to trade pick No. 1 for a quality player.
Saints head of football Chris Pelchen said the club was prepared to give up pick 1 to land former top-10 draft picks Jono O’Rourke and Jaksch in a deal similar to the one that saw Dom Tyson traded to Melbourne last year. The Demons moved from pick 2 to pick 9 in the draft, taking Christian Salem.
“If that deal is formally put to us we’ll consider it but it hasn’t been at this stage ... but that’s the type of deal we’re looking at,” he told AFL Trade Radio.
Pelchen said the club was “open-minded” about trading the first pick in November’s national draft, but wasn’t targetting any specific players.
The Saints are also in talks with banned forward Ahmed Saad and are likely to pursue fringe Geelong midfielder Taylor Hunt.
He said Patrick Dangerfield was not on the club’s radar and Sydney gun Luke Parker wasn’t in the frame either, despite persistent rumours.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/t ... 7074447591
Foundation Social Club Member No. 296