Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492245Post gringo »

bigcarl wrote:
millarsaint wrote:
Jacks Back wrote:I taped and watched last week's Sandy game and Spencer was terrible. He still looks way too skinny. I'm fearing what might happen to him - both physically and mentally. :(

I hope I'm wrong.
was at the VFL the other week, and make no mistake Spencer is a big boy.
He looks big enough to me

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2014-08-2 ... e-to-debut

We saw him preseason at the JO training and he's bulked up heaps since he was drafted. Looks thicker trough the top half of his body and he already had well developed legs. He looks a footballers build. I see him turning into a G train size long term. He seems a nice young guy too. Good luck to him. Go baby snake. If his intensity ever catches up to his talent the comp had better watch out.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492261Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
millarsaint wrote:
Jacks Back wrote:I taped and watched last week's Sandy game and Spencer was terrible. He still looks way too skinny. I'm fearing what might happen to him - both physically and mentally. :(

I hope I'm wrong.
was at the VFL the other week, and make no mistake Spencer is a big boy.
He looks big enough to me

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2014-08-2 ... e-to-debut

We saw him preseason at the JO training and he's bulked up heaps since he was drafted. Looks thicker trough the top half of his body and he already had well developed legs. He looks a footballers build. I see him turning into a G train size long term. He seems a nice young guy too. Good luck to him. Go baby snake. If his intensity ever catches up to his talent the comp had better watch out.

G train? Not a hope. The club wouldnt let him and he hasnt got that build anyway.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492422Post Con Gorozidis »

We are going in to this game with another experienced side.

If you look at the 18 on the ground there are only two actual young guys . Longer and Wright. That is it.
So really there is no excuse for us not being competitive.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12754
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 764 times
Been thanked: 423 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492430Post Mr Magic »

Con Gorozidis wrote:We are going in to this game with another experienced side.

If you look at the 18 on the ground there are only two actual young guys . Longer and Wright. That is it.
So really there is no excuse for us not being competitive.
Depends on what you define 'experienced' as?
Newnes
Murdoch
Weller
Ross
White
Curren
are 6 names to add to the 2 you have which makes up over a third of the team.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492437Post dragit »

Mr Magic wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:We are going in to this game with another experienced side.

If you look at the 18 on the ground there are only two actual young guys . Longer and Wright. That is it.
So really there is no excuse for us not being competitive.
Depends on what you define 'experienced' as?
Newnes
Murdoch
Weller
Ross
White
Curren
are 6 names to add to the 2 you have which makes up over a third of the team.
That is pretty funny con, throw in Shenton and there are 9 guys with under 50 games,

The starting 18 does look pretty experienced though.


User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5709
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492443Post Dave McNamara »

Cairnsman wrote:If he doesn't get a goal with his first kick he could be under a bit of pressure to keep his spot on the list.
:x

This sort of slack under-achieving attitude is why we are on the bottom of the ladder!

I demand a minimum of three goals from his first kick, or show him the door!














Go Spenc-aarrrrrrh Buddy White... whether it all starts tomorrow, or not till next year... you will eventually end up an absolute star. The hype is justified! 8-)


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492445Post Con Gorozidis »

dragit wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:We are going in to this game with another experienced side.

If you look at the 18 on the ground there are only two actual young guys . Longer and Wright. That is it.
So really there is no excuse for us not being competitive.
Depends on what you define 'experienced' as?
Newnes
Murdoch
Weller
Ross
White
Curren
are 6 names to add to the 2 you have which makes up over a third of the team.
That is pretty funny con, throw in Shenton and there are 9 guys with under 50 games,

The starting 18 does look pretty experienced though.
We dont have a young side . People need to face it. Some of those with under 50 games are well into their 20s (e.g Shenton Weller Curren).
Our starting 18 is closer to Dads Army than a young side. We are all kidding ourselves if we think we are on the bottom because we are young. We are far from the youngest list in the comp.

Roo
Joey
Dempster
Fisher
Gilbert
Armo
Ray
Hayes
Jones
Schneider

Noone can hand on heart honestly tell me we have a young side in.

The way I see it we only have four kids - Longer, Wright, White, Murdoch.

No excuses for any of the other 18 blokes out there.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492449Post dragit »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
dragit wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:We are going in to this game with another experienced side.

If you look at the 18 on the ground there are only two actual young guys . Longer and Wright. That is it.
So really there is no excuse for us not being competitive.
Depends on what you define 'experienced' as?
Newnes
Murdoch
Weller
Ross
White
Curren
are 6 names to add to the 2 you have which makes up over a third of the team.
That is pretty funny con, throw in Shenton and there are 9 guys with under 50 games,

The starting 18 does look pretty experienced though.
We dont have a young side . People need to face it. Some of those with under 50 games are well into their 20s (e.g Shenton Weller Curren).
Our starting 18 is closer to Dads Army than a young side. We are all kidding ourselves if we think we are on the bottom because we are young. We are far from the youngest list in the comp.

Roo
Joey
Dempster
Fisher
Gilbert
Armo
Ray
Hayes
Jones
Schneider

Noone can hand on heart honestly tell me we have a young side in.

The way I see it we only have four kids - Longer, Wright, White, Murdoch.

No excuses for any of the other 18 blokes out there.
You started this talking about experience… not kids.

Why are you talking about excuses, you know very well why we lose every week… our stars are past it & the rest of our list is very ordinary side apart from a couple of exciting kids (who aren't playing this week). It's not an excuse, it's just a simple explanation of reality.

Shenton, Curren, Weller, Ross etc might not be 18, but they are still pretty raw (& maybe just s***). I'm tipping Richmond will have less than 9 players with under 50 games experience yeah?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492450Post Con Gorozidis »

I agree with everything u just said dragit.
the tiges have a big bunch of blokes in the 50-150 games range and we wont improve until we do the same.

I guess I just get frustrated that some on here won't accept that as you say most of our older guys are past it.
they keep saying all the old players are still champs but we are losing because we are only playing kids.
it is a kind of cognitive dissonance.

having said that we should get within 5 goals ud hope.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492452Post dragit »

Con Gorozidis wrote:having said that we should get within 5 goals ud hope.
Maybe, but I reckon they are at least a 2 goals per quarter better side than us going on form.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492510Post plugger66 »

dragit wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
dragit wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:We are going in to this game with another experienced side.

If you look at the 18 on the ground there are only two actual young guys . Longer and Wright. That is it.
So really there is no excuse for us not being competitive.
Depends on what you define 'experienced' as?
Newnes
Murdoch
Weller
Ross
White
Curren
are 6 names to add to the 2 you have which makes up over a third of the team.
That is pretty funny con, throw in Shenton and there are 9 guys with under 50 games,

The starting 18 does look pretty experienced though.
We dont have a young side . People need to face it. Some of those with under 50 games are well into their 20s (e.g Shenton Weller Curren).
Our starting 18 is closer to Dads Army than a young side. We are all kidding ourselves if we think we are on the bottom because we are young. We are far from the youngest list in the comp.

Roo
Joey
Dempster
Fisher
Gilbert
Armo
Ray
Hayes
Jones
Schneider

Noone can hand on heart honestly tell me we have a young side in.

The way I see it we only have four kids - Longer, Wright, White, Murdoch.

No excuses for any of the other 18 blokes out there.
You started this talking about experience… not kids.

Why are you talking about excuses, you know very well why we lose every week… our stars are past it & the rest of our list is very ordinary side apart from a couple of exciting kids (who aren't playing this week). It's not an excuse, it's just a simple explanation of reality.

Shenton, Curren, Weller, Ross etc might not be 18, but they are still pretty raw (& maybe just s***). I'm tipping Richmond will have less than 9 players with under 50 games experience yeah?
Starting 18? Are we back in the 70's? Its a starting 21 for a start and secondly when has the 18 in the paper lined up like it says anyway? I think Con is taking the piss.


jamesmc
Club Player
Posts: 303
Joined: Mon 20 Sep 2010 7:08pm
Location: Hampton Park

Re: Team v Tigers

Post: # 1492517Post jamesmc »

Dave McNamara wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:Jones, Pierce, Murdoch, White in
Saunders out
CJ gets his farewell game. :D


I don't know who will be the handed the mighty No 4 jumper after the game.

However, I can confirm that after the game, 'Deemsy will be out on the ground to personally rip the jumper from Clint's back.
Breen, Baldock, Lockett, Jones....?


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9069
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 426 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492519Post spert »

Too many gloating Tiger supporters around me today- for gawds sake Saints put up a fight and win this one,,no excuses for playing crap football today!


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492521Post plugger66 »

spert wrote:Too many gloating Tiger supporters around me today- for gawds sake Saints put up a fight and win this one,,no excuses for playing crap football today!

Not being good enough isnt an excuse? Why didnt Melbourne play better yesterday or Carlton on Friday night?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492524Post Con Gorozidis »

Well Spencer doesn't look immature at all.
going on that video his main weakness is the chest mark.

But I dont see him getting pushed around. He looks old enough.
Let him rip.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9069
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 426 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492526Post spert »

plugger66 wrote:
spert wrote:Too many gloating Tiger supporters around me today- for gawds sake Saints put up a fight and win this one,,no excuses for playing crap football today!

Not being good enough isnt an excuse? Why didnt Melbourne play better yesterday or Carlton on Friday night?
Always excuses for failure down at the Saints..nothing has changed


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492530Post plugger66 »

spert wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
spert wrote:Too many gloating Tiger supporters around me today- for gawds sake Saints put up a fight and win this one,,no excuses for playing crap football today!

Not being good enough isnt an excuse? Why didnt Melbourne play better yesterday or Carlton on Friday night?
Always excuses for failure down at the Saints..nothing has changed

Is that the best answer you can come with. Whats melbourne and carlton reason for failure? Its quite obvious why you are saying there is no excuse for crap foot. Others may fall for it but when we lose today you can have another pot shot at the coach. Can you actually explain why there is no reason for crap footy today.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492533Post Con Gorozidis »

plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
millarsaint wrote:
Jacks Back wrote:I taped and watched last week's Sandy game and Spencer was terrible. He still looks way too skinny. I'm fearing what might happen to him - both physically and mentally. :(

I hope I'm wrong.
was at the VFL the other week, and make no mistake Spencer is a big boy.
He looks big enough to me

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2014-08-2 ... e-to-debut

We saw him preseason at the JO training and he's bulked up heaps since he was drafted. Looks thicker trough the top half of his body and he already had well developed legs. He looks a footballers build. I see him turning into a G train size long term. He seems a nice young guy too. Good luck to him. Go baby snake. If his intensity ever catches up to his talent the comp had better watch out.

G train? Not a hope. The club wouldnt let him and he hasnt got that build anyway.
ok know it all. How would u know what the club would let him do?
Firstly ur not an insider.So stop making out and insinuating you are. It is sad.
Secondly if you were an insider then the club must be run by half wits and will be on the bottom for decades.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492537Post plugger66 »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
millarsaint wrote:
Jacks Back wrote:I taped and watched last week's Sandy game and Spencer was terrible. He still looks way too skinny. I'm fearing what might happen to him - both physically and mentally. :(

I hope I'm wrong.
was at the VFL the other week, and make no mistake Spencer is a big boy.
He looks big enough to me

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2014-08-2 ... e-to-debut

We saw him preseason at the JO training and he's bulked up heaps since he was drafted. Looks thicker trough the top half of his body and he already had well developed legs. He looks a footballers build. I see him turning into a G train size long term. He seems a nice young guy too. Good luck to him. Go baby snake. If his intensity ever catches up to his talent the comp had better watch out.

G train? Not a hope. The club wouldnt let him and he hasnt got that build anyway.
ok know it all. How would u know what the club would let him do?
Firstly ur not an insider.So stop making out and insinuating you are. It is sad.
Secondly if you were an insider then the club must be run by half wits and will be on the bottom for decades.

Did you fail plastercine at school? Im no insider but I have common sense. A thing that becomes more obvious by the day you dont have. Unless the game changes they arent going to want White to get anywhere near a build like G. Its a running game now Con. You have a go at others for thinking in the past but all you do id think in thr past like mentioning starting 18. Hilarious stuff. makes a poor day a lot of fun. Now its about time you moved again Con beofre they chase you down.


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492548Post The Redeemer »

When G came back for the few game stint he was a liability. He was zoned off anytime the ball wasn't a mark and kick at goal from him.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492551Post saintspremiers »

It's all about BuddyWhite today. Tiges will explode themselves if they win and are in the 8.

.....and then go down to the Swines next week to finish Tiger Ninth!


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492610Post Bluthy »

The good thing is on the G Spencer will have a lot of room to work in if he gets on his bike. I'd love to see the team make it a focus of getting it to White early so he can take an early grab, get rid of some nerves and relax into the game.


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492615Post Old Mate »

I hope Spencer doesn't start sub. Nice if he booted 2-3.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6582
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1276 times
Been thanked: 464 times

Re: Team v Tigers (Spencer White in the 22)

Post: # 1492636Post Jacks Back »

Old Mate wrote:I hope Spencer doesn't start sub. Nice if he booted 2-3.
Murdoch sub - Go White! Go Sainters!!


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Post Reply