Saints94 wrote:Why do we need JKH, when we have Jack Billings? LOL biggest thread failure yet! JKH lasted to pick 40 for a reason just like Lewis Taylor lasted to pick 25 because they are classified as to small to be playing AFL but obviously Taylor has had a pretty good season etc. Jack Billings will run rings around JKH imo.
Serious?
So the whole team will just revolve around Jack Billings? 21 duds and Billings?
Unless you have Billings in 10 positions on the field plus rotating with himself off the bench?
We need talent - and lots of it- and in every singe position.
Jack Billings aint no saviour. Hes just one good player when we need another 16.
Why is it a biggest dick comp between Billings and JKH anyway? The OP was clearly saying we need a certain kind of player (which is obviously true because we need more of every type of player).
And people are so insecure they respond by either wanting to pot a 19yo kid (JKH) or for some irrelevant reason talk about whether or not Billings is better as if an entire footy side depends on one single player comparison.
Just weird.
Why cant people just say the obvious - that a pacey guy who can kick would be a nice addition to our current cop of youngsters without either bagging a young kid or saying 'yeah but so and so is better' .
It doesn't have to be one or the other. I mean we still have clint jones on our list ffs. So lets get some humility and perspective.