Agree.st.byron wrote:I think trying to consistently moderate something like third party abuse would be nigh on impossible. There would be just way too many grey areas.
Apart from moderation issues, I don't support the idea at all. I think it would create a pretty beige environment for us all.
Where would you draw the line for abusive language? Saints listed players? Sandy players? What about the footy dept and coaching staff? The board? CEO? Who's exempt from being 'abused' and who isn't? And what exactly constitutes abuse?
My head hurts just thinking about trying to moderate something like that.
And if you draw the line at abuse of Saints players, does that mean it's still ok to call James Hird a &*%$&#*7 6%$#@()*&!@^ ***t? Which he most certainly richly deserves.
If that was the case isn't it just re-drawing the boundary but still making an inherently inconsistent rule -i.e it's ok to abuse some people but not others? And concerns about inconsistency around rules was the main reason for this thread appearing in the first place.
INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9023
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 255 times
- Been thanked: 272 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
st.byron wrote:Anyone else want to have a crack and clear the air whilst we're at it?kimberly saint wrote: This chap by the name of think was st byron had dig at me out the blue in the trades thread suggesting i would get more responses to my post if my gramour was better (maybe the poster had his head wedgd that far up his own back side he failed to see how much toss bag he sounded in suggesting this and just thought he was being helpful) .
Now we are pretty thick skinned up in the remote kimberleys but sum else who has below average english skills may have taken it as cyber bullying, the exact dribble you were talking about couple post ago . Me i just took it personally
Yeah
U suk
just bcoz
LOL.............
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 255 times
- Been thanked: 272 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
As a general rule I would not post soemthing I would not be prepared to say to someone's face - having said that, I have no issue with conflict as many people do.
However, I think trying to regulate abuse against third parties is a bridge too far, and probably unneccessary. However anyone threating violence or an illegal act probably needs their post moderated and told to pull their head in. Saying CJ needs to be dropped and delisted is a tolerable opinion. Saying he should be taken out back and shot is juvenile, tasteless and brainless.
However, I think trying to regulate abuse against third parties is a bridge too far, and probably unneccessary. However anyone threating violence or an illegal act probably needs their post moderated and told to pull their head in. Saying CJ needs to be dropped and delisted is a tolerable opinion. Saying he should be taken out back and shot is juvenile, tasteless and brainless.
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
True Believer wrote:
Anyone else want to have a crack and clear the air whilst we're at it?
Yeah
U suk
just bcoz
LOL.............
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
This thread's been up for long enough now to come to a conclusion about third party abuse, which is :
The rules are designed to protect posters/forum members. Those outside the forum are fair game, provided posts are within the swearing and offensive language rules.
Moderating something like 3rd party abuse would be a total can of worms and when someone does cross the line re one of our players, other posters step up and call them out on it.
No changes to the rules re third party abuse.
The rules are designed to protect posters/forum members. Those outside the forum are fair game, provided posts are within the swearing and offensive language rules.
Moderating something like 3rd party abuse would be a total can of worms and when someone does cross the line re one of our players, other posters step up and call them out on it.
No changes to the rules re third party abuse.
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
st.byron wrote:This thread's been up for long enough now to come to a conclusion about third party abuse, which is :
The rules are designed to protect posters/forum members. Those outside the forum are fair game, provided posts are within the swearing and offensive language rules.
Moderating something like 3rd party abuse would be a total can of worms and when someone does cross the line re one of our players, other posters step up and call them out on it.
No changes to the rules re third party abuse.
sanity prevails....
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
So on a saints forum we can say a saints player is a spastic but then cant tell that person he is an idiot. Seems weird to me on a saints forum.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10404
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
Yes, if someone is an idiot we should be able to call them on it. If not we'll become inundated with them, it's already happened on the streets out there, in social media, in government, everywhere.plugger66 wrote:So on a saints forum we can say a saints player is a spastic but then cant tell that person he is an idiot. Seems weird to me on a saints forum.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
![:popcorn:](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f37f.svg)
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
that's also my view
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
the wind not blowing the moderators way today ?that's also my view
... my view is that Linda make the best electric blankets
on the market.
<this post has been reviewed and a warning issued for baiting the poster based on the fact that the post has no reference at all to the issue being debated, it makes a clear assertion regarding the poster's character designed to aain a response, but also importantly referencing "linda" which is part of a previous "abuse and baiting" for which POQ received a previous warning. For the third time in 8 days (and thus just avoiding a ban), POQ has been warned under this rule>
No matter how much you disagree, or dismiss the worth of any opinion posted, or dismiss the worth of the poster in your eyes, your response must be respectful. Argue the facts. Post an opposing opinion. Do NOT make commentary about the poster - ONLY the post. If you tease, mock or bait another poster, or abuse them, OR repeatedly revisit past disagreements causing or creating an ongoing dispute between one or more posters, this is regarded as a breach of rules in the Fan Forum and will result in the issuing of a Saintsational warning. Such ongoing disputes can result in multiple breaches and can result in multiple Saintsational warnings.
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- GrumpyOne
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8163
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
- Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
My view is the side fence.Principle of Q'uo wrote:the wind not blowing the moderators way today ?that's also my view
... my view is that Linda make the best electric blankets
on the market.
Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
if it is directed at someone who has specifically asked not to be called that you will get reported and if you are a recidivist you will get warned by the moderators.
Why is it so hard for some of you on here to abide by a moderators ruling?
Is to hard to understand?
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
Bunk_Moreland wrote:matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
if it is directed at someone who has specifically asked not to be called that you will get reported and if you are a recidivist you will get warned by the moderators.
Why is it so hard for some of you on here to abide by a moderators ruling?
Is to hard to understand?
He does have a point though BM. If out of the blue and not directed at anyone and he says the poster who used to post another another name is a fruitloop then surely no warning can be given.
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4639
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 506 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
NO.matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
Because it is not a 3rd party.
It is the same party under a different name.
Simple to understand like this - are Beau Wilkes and Beau Maister 2 people or the same person?
Simple answer is SAME PERSON and same legal entity.
He simply has chosen to go by a different name.
By law his assets, liabilities and his criminal record go with him - even in a name change.
BUT by law those assets and liabilities (and criminal record) gets transferred to the new name. The paperwork on this stuff is crazy huge but necessary.
BUT for an example any NEW legal action on old crimes (committed under old name) will be charged and prosecuted under the new name with reference to the old name ONLY if it was required to establish relationship with another legal entity, otherwise the persons name at the time of the criminal act is a mere fact stated and confirmed and everything proceeds under the new name. In court they will be addressed by their name as it is now.
Not that i am saying that beau has committed a crime ... just using an example name that we can all relate to
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5709
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
Hi Simon, "Not that i am saying that ___ has committed a crime ... just using an example ___ that we can all relate to..."BackFromUSA wrote:NO.matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
Because it is not a 3rd party.
It is the same party under a different name.
Simple to understand like this - are Beau Wilkes and Beau Maister 2 people or the same person?
Simple answer is SAME PERSON and same legal entity.
He simply has chosen to go by a different name.
By law his assets, liabilities and his criminal record go with him - even in a name change.
BUT by law those assets and liabilities (and criminal record) gets transferred to the new name. The paperwork on this stuff is crazy huge but necessary.
BUT for an example any NEW legal action on old crimes (committed under old name) will be charged and prosecuted under the new name with reference to the old name ONLY if it was required to establish relationship with another legal entity, otherwise the persons name at the time of the criminal act is a mere fact stated and confirmed and everything proceeds under the new name. In court they will be addressed by their name as it is now.
Not that i am saying that beau has committed a crime ... just using an example name that we can all relate to
If the "SAME PERSON and same legal entity" was to post under two different aliases... are they still the "SAME PERSON and same legal entity"?
Re BBBBeau... "By law his assets, liabilities and his criminal record go with him - even in a name change." Would that also include Beau's thoughts and opinions as previously expressed, what about, say, his on-line posting record...?
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
BackFromUSA wrote:NO.matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
Because it is not a 3rd party.
It is the same party under a different name.
Simple to understand like this - are Beau Wilkes and Beau Maister 2 people or the same person?
Simple answer is SAME PERSON and same legal entity.
He simply has chosen to go by a different name.
By law his assets, liabilities and his criminal record go with him - even in a name change.
BUT by law those assets and liabilities (and criminal record) gets transferred to the new name. The paperwork on this stuff is crazy huge but necessary.
BUT for an example any NEW legal action on old crimes (committed under old name) will be charged and prosecuted under the new name with reference to the old name ONLY if it was required to establish relationship with another legal entity, otherwise the persons name at the time of the criminal act is a mere fact stated and confirmed and everything proceeds under the new name. In court they will be addressed by their name as it is now.
Not that i am saying that beau has committed a crime ... just using an example name that we can all relate to
So that means if we have a topic where the previous nic commented on it and its relevant and not baiting we have every right to bump the topic and sat to the current nic this were your thoughts previously? Im sure the person under the new nic has said he is different to the old nic. he doesnt do things that the old nic did for example no one is on ignore.
I wouldnt expect a warning for bumping an old thread if relevant and not baiting. And that will mean using his old nic so that people understand who we are talking about.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
i see your enjoying yourself again Simon.Principle of Q'uo wrote:the wind not blowing the moderators way today ?that's also my view
... my view is that Linda make the best electric blankets
on the market.
<this post has been reviewed and a warning issued for baiting the poster based on the fact that the post has no reference at all to the issue being debated, it makes a clear assertion regarding the poster's character designed to aain a response, but also importantly referencing "linda" which is part of a previous "abuse and baiting" for which POQ received a previous warning. For the third time in 8 days (and thus just avoiding a ban), POQ has been warned under this rule>
No matter how much you disagree, or dismiss the worth of any opinion posted, or dismiss the worth of the poster in your eyes, your response must be respectful. Argue the facts. Post an opposing opinion. Do NOT make commentary about the poster - ONLY the post. If you tease, mock or bait another poster, or abuse them, OR repeatedly revisit past disagreements causing or creating an ongoing dispute between one or more posters, this is regarded as a breach of rules in the Fan Forum and will result in the issuing of a Saintsational warning. Such ongoing disputes can result in multiple breaches and can result in multiple Saintsational warnings.
... dont get addicted.
Powers like that though ... sneaky little corrupter.
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
the real issues wont be answered in 1950's americanism ,
religion based bullyism or born to rule behaviourism
with its associated cronyism.
like the beautifully expressed discussion on bias
i linked to earlier , in an attempt to facilitate your letting go
of that warped behaviour
i present the following.
just the bottom two paragraphs ,
might help.
it'd help around here thats for sure.
You , i doubt.
Not really your style.
http://blog.transparency.org/2013/12/03 ... must-stop/
religion based bullyism or born to rule behaviourism
with its associated cronyism.
like the beautifully expressed discussion on bias
i linked to earlier , in an attempt to facilitate your letting go
of that warped behaviour
i present the following.
just the bottom two paragraphs ,
might help.
it'd help around here thats for sure.
You , i doubt.
Not really your style.
http://blog.transparency.org/2013/12/03 ... must-stop/
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
Why would you bump an old thread? Surely that is just to bait? If it is only brought up to ridicule and bait, expect it to be reported. Bunk_Moreland cant see any other reason than to be churlish, infantile and to attempt to bait.plugger66 wrote:BackFromUSA wrote:NO.matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
Because it is not a 3rd party.
It is the same party under a different name.
Simple to understand like this - are Beau Wilkes and Beau Maister 2 people or the same person?
Simple answer is SAME PERSON and same legal entity.
He simply has chosen to go by a different name.
By law his assets, liabilities and his criminal record go with him - even in a name change.
BUT by law those assets and liabilities (and criminal record) gets transferred to the new name. The paperwork on this stuff is crazy huge but necessary.
BUT for an example any NEW legal action on old crimes (committed under old name) will be charged and prosecuted under the new name with reference to the old name ONLY if it was required to establish relationship with another legal entity, otherwise the persons name at the time of the criminal act is a mere fact stated and confirmed and everything proceeds under the new name. In court they will be addressed by their name as it is now.
Not that i am saying that beau has committed a crime ... just using an example name that we can all relate to
So that means if we have a topic where the previous nic commented on it and its relevant and not baiting we have every right to bump the topic and sat to the current nic this were your thoughts previously? Im sure the person under the new nic has said he is different to the old nic. he doesnt do things that the old nic did for example no one is on ignore.
I wouldnt expect a warning for bumping an old thread if relevant and not baiting. And that will mean using his old nic so that people understand who we are talking about.
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
Bunk_Moreland wrote:Why would you bump an old thread? Surely that is just to bait? If it is only brought up to ridicule and bait, expect it to be reported. Bunk_Moreland cant see any other reason than to be churlish, infantile and to attempt to bait.plugger66 wrote:BackFromUSA wrote:NO.matrix wrote:so technically then a prev username is open slather to mock and call a peanut?
i mean if that person, ie username, is no longer posting here then its a third party not associated with the site correct?
Because it is not a 3rd party.
It is the same party under a different name.
Simple to understand like this - are Beau Wilkes and Beau Maister 2 people or the same person?
Simple answer is SAME PERSON and same legal entity.
He simply has chosen to go by a different name.
By law his assets, liabilities and his criminal record go with him - even in a name change.
BUT by law those assets and liabilities (and criminal record) gets transferred to the new name. The paperwork on this stuff is crazy huge but necessary.
BUT for an example any NEW legal action on old crimes (committed under old name) will be charged and prosecuted under the new name with reference to the old name ONLY if it was required to establish relationship with another legal entity, otherwise the persons name at the time of the criminal act is a mere fact stated and confirmed and everything proceeds under the new name. In court they will be addressed by their name as it is now.
Not that i am saying that beau has committed a crime ... just using an example name that we can all relate to
So that means if we have a topic where the previous nic commented on it and its relevant and not baiting we have every right to bump the topic and sat to the current nic this were your thoughts previously? Im sure the person under the new nic has said he is different to the old nic. he doesnt do things that the old nic did for example no one is on ignore.
I wouldnt expect a warning for bumping an old thread if relevant and not baiting. And that will mean using his old nic so that people understand who we are talking about.
Not all BM. A person may change there mind or forgot what they said previously. A person you know well has bumped threads previously. Maybe your response here is a perfect example on why a person may bump a thread. You are saying things like churlish and infantile but i can assure you that nic you know real well has done it previously. Not sure if it was to bait or not but it was done so BM how do you feel about it now that i have pointed out that another nic you know has done it before. Is it that the other nic isnt you so we can abuse the other nic or it is you? You are being as confusing as the mods seem to be. I still stand by what i said. banning the nic and issuing warnings for calling you a previous nic is more trouble than its worth.
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
Does this Bunk Moreland character know Lestor Freamon & Jimmy McNulty. Avon Barksdale, known as AB, with his mate Stringer Bell, known as SB, and then Breanna Barksdale, known as BB, might want to avoid Bunk too.
Bunk is a good character. I am unsure as to why he has caused so much angst on here. Is it because he left Baltimore and then went to New York with Michael J Fox?
I have been on holidays and saw a terrific film starring Jon Hamm regarding a real life story about the first professional baseball players from India. It was called the Million Dollar Arm. I'll give a free bottle of wine to who could name for me the main character's name played by Hamm.
Seriously, all this discussion over a nickname on a football forum? Really??
Bunk is a good character. I am unsure as to why he has caused so much angst on here. Is it because he left Baltimore and then went to New York with Michael J Fox?
I have been on holidays and saw a terrific film starring Jon Hamm regarding a real life story about the first professional baseball players from India. It was called the Million Dollar Arm. I'll give a free bottle of wine to who could name for me the main character's name played by Hamm.
Seriously, all this discussion over a nickname on a football forum? Really??
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
SENsaintsational wrote:Does this Bunk Moreland character know Lestor Freamon & Jimmy McNulty. Avon Barksdale, known as AB, with his mate Stringer Bell, known as SB, and then Breanna Barksdale, known as BB, might want to avoid Bunk too.
Bunk is a good character. I am unsure as to why he has caused so much angst on here. Is it because he left Baltimore and then went to New York with Michael J Fox?
I have been on holidays and saw a terrific film starring Jon Hamm regarding a real life story about the first professional baseball players from India. It was called the Million Dollar Arm. I'll give a free bottle of wine to who could name for me the main character's name played by Hamm.
Seriously, all this discussion over a nickname on a football forum? Really??
Hmmmump - giving a f*** when its not your turn to give a f*** eh saintsational?
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
You are garbage - Enough said
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: INPUT DESIRED ON 3RD PARTY ABUSE
SENsaintsational wrote: Bunk is a good character. I am unsure as to why he has caused so much angst on here. Is it because he left Baltimore and then went to New York with Michael J Fox?
he actually went to New Orleans with John Goodman
You are garbage - Enough said