No need to rush Tom Hickey back!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
- Been thanked: 52 times
No need to rush Tom Hickey back!
Just read the 'in the mix' wrap on the we page and tom hickey was mooted a possible in. I don't know about others, but if there's a lesson to be learned from the last 2 years, it's ' do not rush players back from long term injury'...I know you can't lay a blanket rule for these things, but geez, our bad luck with injury this year has me spooked!! Would love to see the big guy to play 3-4 solid games of VFL before we see him back at the highest level...it's not like he's a seasoned veteran and there's still plenty of rounds left for him to be eased back via the vfl and play a good 4-6 weeks of senior footy to finish the year on a good note!! IMO.
Re: No need to rush Tom Hickey back!
I know....
Because he's s***.... And wouldn't be any stronger than an Auskicker
He only got outplayed by a VFL listed Ruckman on the weekend
Gumby
Because he's s***.... And wouldn't be any stronger than an Auskicker
He only got outplayed by a VFL listed Ruckman on the weekend
Gumby
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: No need to rush Tom Hickey back!
i hope that's a joke BM....BigMart wrote:I know....
Because he's s***.... And wouldn't be any stronger than an Auskicker
He only got outplayed by a VFL listed Ruckman on the weekend
Gumby
if not seriously go F%$king support the dopers you Flog.... as i said i think you were joking.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16983
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3626 times
- Been thanked: 2897 times
Re: No need to rush Tom Hickey back!
2-3 weeks in vfl then give longer a chop out, he's 21 and will have played ~10 in a row by then
Re: No need to rush Tom Hickey back!
Come on Bigmart, support the boys for god's sake! Just a little positivity, no wonder people have it in for you!! Though if you're joking then that's fine. Sarcasm is hard to detect through written form.. and to be fair given your posting history it appears more likely to be legitimate