Should we try for Riewoldt J?

[BigMart]

More stockpiling

[Old Mate]

Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!

Yup can't stand GWS. I hope they fold.

[saintspremiers]

Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!

Yup can't stand GWS. I hope they fold.

Would be nice. Let's hope Gilligan's love for this pathetic team isn't at Dimwit's level.

[stinger]

dragit says no.

We'll...17 other afl recruiting teams would beg to differ

[PJ]

He's not coming and we would be stupid to even consider it.

[Enrico_Misso]

Looks like this is the week he has stopped sooking!
But what about next week?

[Sainternist]

Richmond will probably tout Jack the sook as their best full forward since Roach after today. No doubt he'll kick a couple more bags of goals but against the weaker teams.

Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!

Yeah, don't think they'll develop as quickly as the other lovechild. The difference being that they didn't get a player that has the caliber of the born-again-baldy.

[dragit]

dragit says no.

We'll...17 other afl recruiting teams would beg to differ

Well, I could think of better ways to spend our first round pick and 800K per year.

He can play, but he's certainly not right for us, we wouldn't be chasing him seriously as he's signed up till 2017.

[saintspremiers]

Richmond will probably tout Jack the sook as their best full forward since Roach after today. No doubt he'll kick a couple more bags of goals but against the weaker teams.

Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!

Yeah, don't think they'll develop as quickly as the other lovechild. The difference being that they didn't get a player that has the caliber of the born-again-baldy.

As compensation they'll prob get a PP at the end of this year. They need some more 1st round picks don't they?

[Rosco]

Would get jack, can't kick straight

[skeptic]

I think if we could get him, we should. Don't know how but that's Pech's job

He is one of if not the best forward in the league... we could draft 10 more forwards and not get one as good as he is. Put him in our forward line and build a structure around him.

[dragit]

He turns 26 this year.

[BigMart]

Fraser was 25 the year we drafted him, Hamill 24, Voss 24 and Powell 26

[jamesmc]

Interesting.

On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.

Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.

If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.

P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.

+1
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.

[plugger66]

Interesting.

On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.

Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.

If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.

P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.

+1
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.

As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.

[SainterK]

Very good player, probably not ready for him

[jamesmc]

Interesting.

On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.

Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.

If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.

P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.

+1
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.

As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.

So who would you have in front of him?

[plugger66]

Interesting.

On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.

Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.

If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.

P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.

+1
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.

As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.

So who would you have in front of him?

Only because of age the 2 jacks.

[jamesmc]

Interesting.

On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.

Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.

If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.

P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.

+1
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.

As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.

So who would you have in front of him?

Only because of age the 2 jacks.

Which players would you say are the guilty ones of poor delivery to Nick?

[plugger66]

Havent got the time or space to answer that question. What are you getting at?

[FQF]

J Riewoldt and J Cameron running around our forward line next year will be good to see...