Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Yup can't stand GWS. I hope they fold.saintspremiers wrote:Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Would be nice. Let's hope Gilligan's love for this pathetic team isn't at Dimwit's level.Old Mate wrote:Yup can't stand GWS. I hope they fold.saintspremiers wrote:Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
dragit wrote:dragit says no.
We'll...17 other afl recruiting teams would beg to differ
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
He's not coming and we would be stupid to even consider it.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Looks like this is the week he has stopped sooking!
But what about next week?
But what about next week?
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11337
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1329 times
- Been thanked: 453 times
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Richmond will probably tout Jack the sook as their best full forward since Roach after today. No doubt he'll kick a couple more bags of goals but against the weaker teams.
Yeah, don't think they'll develop as quickly as the other lovechild. The difference being that they didn't get a player that has the caliber of the born-again-baldy.saintspremiers wrote:Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/LkJcQq3.jpg?2)
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Well, I could think of better ways to spend our first round pick and 800K per year.stinger wrote:dragit wrote:dragit says no.
We'll...17 other afl recruiting teams would beg to differ
He can play, but he's certainly not right for us, we wouldn't be chasing him seriously as he's signed up till 2017.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
As compensation they'll prob get a PP at the end of this year. They need some more 1st round picks don't they?Sainternist wrote:Richmond will probably tout Jack the sook as their best full forward since Roach after today. No doubt he'll kick a couple more bags of goals but against the weaker teams.
Yeah, don't think they'll develop as quickly as the other lovechild. The difference being that they didn't get a player that has the caliber of the born-again-baldy.saintspremiers wrote:Loving seeing AFL lovechild GWS looking like pathetic rubbish and gifting us 16th spot on the ladder!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16949
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3602 times
- Been thanked: 2875 times
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
I think if we could get him, we should. Don't know how but that's Pech's job
He is one of if not the best forward in the league... we could draft 10 more forwards and not get one as good as he is. Put him in our forward line and build a structure around him.
He is one of if not the best forward in the league... we could draft 10 more forwards and not get one as good as he is. Put him in our forward line and build a structure around him.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Fraser was 25 the year we drafted him, Hamill 24, Voss 24 and Powell 26
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
+1Waltzing St Kilda wrote:plugger66 wrote:Waltzing St Kilda wrote:Interesting.
On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.
Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.
If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.
P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
jamesmc wrote:+1Waltzing St Kilda wrote:plugger66 wrote:Waltzing St Kilda wrote:Interesting.
On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.
Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.
If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.
P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.
As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
So who would you have in front of him?plugger66 wrote:jamesmc wrote:+1Waltzing St Kilda wrote:plugger66 wrote:Waltzing St Kilda wrote:Interesting.
On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.
Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.
If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.
P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.
As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
jamesmc wrote:So who would you have in front of him?plugger66 wrote:jamesmc wrote:+1Waltzing St Kilda wrote:plugger66 wrote:Waltzing St Kilda wrote:Interesting.
On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.
Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.
If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.
P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.
As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.
Only because of age the 2 jacks.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Which players would you say are the guilty ones of poor delivery to Nick?plugger66 wrote:jamesmc wrote:So who would you have in front of him?plugger66 wrote:jamesmc wrote:+1Waltzing St Kilda wrote:plugger66 wrote:Waltzing St Kilda wrote:Interesting.
On one hand, we don't need another Riewoldt running the club. On the other, there's no question Jack is being underused at Richmond.
Methinks it's more likely Hardwick will get sacked for that reason, though. Senior players questioning the game plan is not a good look.
If Rooy was running the club then we would still have GT or RL as coach. I dont know where people get these ideas unless of course you have heard something i certainly havent.
P66, you can take things too literally when you choose to. I mean that N. Riewoldt has too many people (players and officials) in his thrall. It would be difficult to deny that he demands the ball even when he's triple teamed, that he throws hissy fits when the delivery isn't lace out (though his own delivery isn't crash hot), and that he earns a SC-straining salary for his trouble. All of which isn't to dispute that he's a great player.
Nick's delivery to team mates is very poor.
Handballs to the feet of or team mates standing still.
As opposed to the excellent delivery he gets. He actually a very good field kick but sometimes does hanball poorly. Still I would have him over just about every single player on our list.
Only because of age the 2 jacks.
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
Havent got the time or space to answer that question. What are you getting at?
Re: Should we try for Riewoldt J?
J Riewoldt and J Cameron running around our forward line next year will be good to see...