How did Port recover so quickly?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
How did Port recover so quickly?
I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
Agree, but it would be better with my original thread title because it was meant to be a discussion about how Port improved and what we need to do to match it. The other thread was just a discussion of Port's prospects and maybe should have been in the Opp forum.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
Point taken, I think I've fixed it now.perfectionist wrote:Agree, but it would be better with my original thread title because it was meant to be a discussion about how Port improved and what we need to do to match it. The other thread was just a discussion of Port's prospects and maybe should have been in the Opp forum.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
Can we please leave the bloody threads the way they were and put them back!kosifantutti wrote:Point taken, I think I've fixed it now.perfectionist wrote:Agree, but it would be better with my original thread title because it was meant to be a discussion about how Port improved and what we need to do to match it. The other thread was just a discussion of Port's prospects and maybe should have been in the Opp forum.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
Whilst both discussions included Port they were different topics. Please don't become the Nazi moderators and try and dictate how we should discuss things which I've already noticed is starting to happen.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
<MODERATORS HAVE FOUND THAT - the use of the term Nazi in this context is not culturally offensive in that it gained enough cultural acceptance with the Seinfeld Soup Nazi episode where it simply meant being over officious>
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
Settle… neither should probably be in this forum mate, so Nazi would be to put both in the Opp forum…Cairnsman wrote:Whilst both discussions included Port they were different topics. Please don't become the Nazi moderators and try and dictate how we should discuss things which I've already noticed is starting to happen.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
Mate I don't know what you are on about but the thread I started had everything to do with the Saints and I want it back in this fan forum in it's original form.dragit wrote:Settle… neither should probably be in this forum mate, so Nazi would be to put both in the Opp forum…Cairnsman wrote:Whilst both discussions included Port they were different topics. Please don't become the Nazi moderators and try and dictate how we should discuss things which I've already noticed is starting to happen.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
I'm aware they were different topics and as Perfectionist pointed out, one was about how we can emulate Port.Cairnsman wrote:Whilst both discussions included Port they were different topics. Please don't become the Nazi moderators and try and dictate how we should discuss things which I've already noticed is starting to happen.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
Rightly or wrongly, we have a forum specifically for discussing the opposition. Part of the role of the moderators is to keep each forum as a whole on topic.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
What the f****** hell are you on about, did you even read the f****** thing, The thread I started was about how I don't think we have a flying rats arse chance of winning a flag in the next 10 or so years and that it would be good if our rebuild took a little longer while the franchise teams peaked.kosifantutti wrote:I'm aware they were different topics and as Perfectionist pointed out, one was about how we can emulate Port.Cairnsman wrote:Whilst both discussions included Port they were different topics. Please don't become the Nazi moderators and try and dictate how we should discuss things which I've already noticed is starting to happen.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
Rightly or wrongly, we have a forum specifically for discussing the opposition. Part of the role of the moderators is to keep each forum as a whole on topic.
<MODERATORS HAVE FOUND THAT The content of Cairnsman's post IS overly aggressive and borderline abusive to the moderator, but mostly it seems to be abusing the moderation system, HOWEVER given that this is borderline, we shall overlook it this time. aS A REMINDER TO ALL ... The moderators do have the right to merge threads that double or triple up on the same topic - even if opinions or approaches are different e.g. Clint Jones can't kick thread could be merged with a Clint Jones can't handball thread>
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Port need to win the GF this year
Apologies for not re reading your original post again. I looked at both threads today, both with a title about Port, both going down similar paths and neither with much mention of the Saints as the threads developed regardless of how they had started.Cairnsman wrote:What the f****** hell are you on about, did you even read the f****** thing, The thread I started was about how I don't think we have a flying rats arse chance of winning a flag in the next 10 or so years and that it would be good if our rebuild took a little longer while the franchise teams peaked.kosifantutti wrote:I'm aware they were different topics and as Perfectionist pointed out, one was about how we can emulate Port.Cairnsman wrote:Whilst both discussions included Port they were different topics. Please don't become the Nazi moderators and try and dictate how we should discuss things which I've already noticed is starting to happen.kosifantutti wrote:I've merged the two Port threads, partly to see how merged threads work. Partly because two Port threads is at least one too many.
Rightly or wrongly, we have a forum specifically for discussing the opposition. Part of the role of the moderators is to keep each forum as a whole on topic.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"