Another superb, in depth response. As long as you feel liked, you'll be ok.Dr Spaceman wrote:Mr. Desperate to be unpopular above all else?
Honeymoon over, AR.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
Have we found our new P66 versus BM replacement?White Winmar wrote:Another superb, in depth response. As long as you feel liked, you'll be ok.Dr Spaceman wrote:Mr. Desperate to be unpopular above all else?
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
Ray is a tough one, MC Gusto. His output in terms of possessions is good and he does run hard, but the value of his disposal is questionable. So often he undoes his good work with a poor decision or disposal. I'm the first to agree we need our share of veterans in the team, but I think we would be well enough served through playing Roo, Joey, Lenny, Schneider, Dempster, Fisher and Gilbert (when fit). They are all quality players who still have good footy left in them.MC Gusto wrote:I don't think ray is a clogger. Ray is a good footballer
I just can 't see Farren improving and I think we will get longer term value from playing the likes of Acres, Markworth, Murdoch, Siposs et. al. We are, after all, in a three to four year rebuild. If we're going to experiment, it may as we'll be now.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8371
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1906 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
Twitter-AR said "We learnt from the Crows loss"
No they didn't.
If they HAD, they would have actually put PRESSURE on the dorks instead of letting them do circle work.
Against the Crows, Saints were witches hats. Yesterday, even better.
Is that called learning?
Red Dwarf fans- Arnold Rimmer failed his astronavigation exam countless times.
Did he learn from each failure?
No they didn't.
If they HAD, they would have actually put PRESSURE on the dorks instead of letting them do circle work.
Against the Crows, Saints were witches hats. Yesterday, even better.
Is that called learning?
Red Dwarf fans- Arnold Rimmer failed his astronavigation exam countless times.
Did he learn from each failure?
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
They have a looooong way to go.Cairnsman wrote:Have we found our new P66 versus BM replacement?White Winmar wrote:Another superb, in depth response. As long as you feel liked, you'll be ok.Dr Spaceman wrote:Mr. Desperate to be unpopular above all else?
I have found the general atmosphere on the forum much improved since a few agitators were banished to BF.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
I think one of the false sense of security us fans and the media (and maybe the coaches) fell into was based on us doing ok against the Eagles.WellardSaint wrote:Twitter-AR said "We learnt from the Crows loss"
No they didn't.
If they HAD, they would have actually put PRESSURE on the dorks instead of letting them do circle work.
Against the Crows, Saints were witches hats. Yesterday, even better.
Is that called learning?
Red Dwarf fans- Arnold Rimmer failed his astronavigation exam countless times.
Did he learn from each failure?
Everyone over-rated the Eagles so a close loss to them in Perth made us feel good about ourselves.
Reality is the Eagles are shizen. They are heading for bottom half finish as well.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19096
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
lol.White Winmar wrote:If you're going to be a smartarse, ShanghaiSaint, it is advisable that you can spell, or get your terms right. I believe the correct term is, "hear, hear". Must try harder.ShanghaiSaint wrote:Here here WW
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
White Winmar wrote:If you're going to be a smartarse, ShanghaiSaint, it is advisable that you can spell, or get your terms right. I believe the correct term is, "hear, hear". Must try harder.ShanghaiSaint wrote:Here here WW
i was agreeing with your post you flog.... the old spelling attack... my god
for the record... i have a year 10 education...no VCE no degree i can't spell, i have owned my own company since 2011 after 4 years working in finance starting as a customer service and working up to a sales trader in some of the better Foreign exchange / Derivative companies in Melb/Europe. Beating guys with degrees to promotions. (that could spell)
So my point high education and spelling anit the be all end all. 'hear hear' i will remember that for next time.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11351
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1344 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
Is it "hear, hear"or "here, here"? Have never worked that one out. I once heard it can be either of the two. But perhaps that tipbit of information was incorrect.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
A loss like that is due to a total player shut down...there is something seriously wrong with the psyche of a club to capilulate like that. I thought AR would be the answer but some of the set ups across the midfield, forward and defensive lines are very poor!
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
Settle ShanghaiSaint. I didn't mean to cause grave offence. It's all a bit of fun. I apologise. I realise, given your background and experiences that I may have struck a raw nerve. Nothing to be embarrassed about. For the record, i know lots of people who have tertiary qualifications and they struggle to chew gum and fart at the same time. I too, was trying to be a smartarse. Looks like I failed. Maybe I'll have to try harder next time.ShanghaiSaint wrote:White Winmar wrote:If you're going to be a smartarse, ShanghaiSaint, it is advisable that you can spell, or get your terms right. I believe the correct term is, "hear, hear". Must try harder.ShanghaiSaint wrote:Here here WW
i was agreeing with your post you flog.... the old spelling attack... my god
for the record... i have a year 10 education...no VCE no degree i can't spell, i have owned my own company since 2011 after 4 years working in finance starting as a customer service and working up to a sales trader in some of the better Foreign exchange / Derivative companies in Melb/Europe. Beating guys with degrees to promotions. (that could spell)
So my point high education and spelling anit the be all end all. 'hear hear' i will remember that for next time.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
Surely you're not calling for the coaches head. I mean failure is much easier to predict than success so surely you gotta hold you powder for at least another loss or two.WinnersOnly wrote:A loss like that is due to a total player shut down...there is something seriously wrong with the psyche of a club to capilulate like that. I thought AR would be the answer but some of the set ups across the midfield, forward and defensive lines are very poor!
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
no worries WW i took it the wrong way..... no offense taken, all good champ.White Winmar wrote:Settle ShanghaiSaint. I didn't mean to cause grave offence. It's all a bit of fun. I apologise. I realise, given your background and experiences that I may have struck a raw nerve. Nothing to be embarrassed about. For the record, i know lots of people who have tertiary qualifications and they struggle to chew gum and fart at the same time. I too, was trying to be a smartarse. Looks like I failed. Maybe I'll have to try harder next time.ShanghaiSaint wrote:White Winmar wrote:If you're going to be a smartarse, ShanghaiSaint, it is advisable that you can spell, or get your terms right. I believe the correct term is, "hear, hear". Must try harder.ShanghaiSaint wrote:Here here WW
i was agreeing with your post you flog.... the old spelling attack... my god
for the record... i have a year 10 education...no VCE no degree i can't spell, i have owned my own company since 2011 after 4 years working in finance starting as a customer service and working up to a sales trader in some of the better Foreign exchange / Derivative companies in Melb/Europe. Beating guys with degrees to promotions. (that could spell)
So my point high education and spelling anit the be all end all. 'hear hear' i will remember that for next time.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: Honeymoon over, AR.
"Hear him! Hear him!" was referred to in Debates in Parliament in 1688, and from the context it's clear it was a commonly heard phrase at the time.Sainternist wrote:Is it "hear, hear"or "here, here"? Have never worked that one out. I once heard it can be either of the two. But perhaps that tipbit of information was incorrect.