Televisin commentaryBombers game
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- GrumpyOne
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8163
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
- Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne
Televisin commentaryBombers game
FFS for those of us unfortunately confined to watching the team on TV, could we get a worst combination of commentators?
I watched the game three times now, and each time I have yelled at the TV to Shut The f*** Up.
I do not want to hear, whilst the game is going on, inane conversations about the use of lasers to mark out 50 metre penalties, arguments about selective Twitter comments, and I think everyone knows by now that Jack Steven is the boy from Lorne on the Great Ocean Road.
Just tell us who has got the ball and who they are passing it to. And consign the in-jokes with the over-rampant egos to the garbage bin.
I know, I could turn the sound off, but then I miss out on the information from the boundary line, telling me who is getting treatment for what injury, and who has been subbed off and when.
On TV, you do not have the luxury to scan the ground at various times to see mark-ups, positioning etc. That is what should be commentated on.
I watched the game three times now, and each time I have yelled at the TV to Shut The f*** Up.
I do not want to hear, whilst the game is going on, inane conversations about the use of lasers to mark out 50 metre penalties, arguments about selective Twitter comments, and I think everyone knows by now that Jack Steven is the boy from Lorne on the Great Ocean Road.
Just tell us who has got the ball and who they are passing it to. And consign the in-jokes with the over-rampant egos to the garbage bin.
I know, I could turn the sound off, but then I miss out on the information from the boundary line, telling me who is getting treatment for what injury, and who has been subbed off and when.
On TV, you do not have the luxury to scan the ground at various times to see mark-ups, positioning etc. That is what should be commentated on.
Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Im with you. I had volume off and abc radio on. But then we started getting ahead in the 3rd I put tv volume on. But then they started crapping on about lasers so I reverted back to abc radio for commentary.GrumpyOne wrote:FFS for those of us unfortunately confined to watching the team on TV, could we get a worst combination of commentators?
I watched the game three times now, and each time I have yelled at the TV to Shut The f*** Up.
I do not want to hear, whilst the game is going on, inane conversations about the use of lasers to mark out 50 metre penalties, arguments about selective Twitter comments, and I think everyone knows by now that Jack Steven is the boy from Lorne on the Great Ocean Road.
Just tell us who has got the ball and who they are passing it to. And consign the in-jokes with the over-rampant egos to the garbage bin.
I know, I could turn the sound off, but then I miss out on the information from the boundary line, telling me who is getting treatment for what injury, and who has been subbed off and when.
On TV, you do not have the luxury to scan the ground at various times to see mark-ups, positioning etc. That is what should be commentated on.
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Its funny but i prefer a bit of chat through the game. It isnt radio. You can see what is happening. The thing is they must do surveys on what people want so maybe there are more who dont complain about it than they do.
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
TOTALLY agree. Taylor is a dumb hack
Dwells on giving our players nicknames
you'd hear kids at kindergarten laughing
at. I turn sound down these days. Then
listen to replay.ouT
Dwells on giving our players nicknames
you'd hear kids at kindergarten laughing
at. I turn sound down these days. Then
listen to replay.ouT
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9053
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
I've watched the replay a number of times - without the sound. Bliss.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Err yes - of course they do. No doubt about that. But being the popular view doesn't mean it is the 'right' view. Once again you seem to follow the conventional view and than take that as being 'right'.plugger66 wrote:Its funny but i prefer a bit of chat through the game. It isnt radio. You can see what is happening. The thing is they must do surveys on what people want so maybe there are more who dont complain about it than they do.
Clearly everyone has differing opinions and clearly the majority must like what i consider crap. But that also doesn't invalidate my view that its crap.
e.g a current affair/today tonight get 1 million viewers as does home and away. Doesn't 'prove' they are awesome shows cos thats what the punters want.
I still say both are shite. But yes - I accept many people like the commentators to talk s*** and use the word 'superstar' every 2 minutes. Doesn't mean 'the majority is right and the whingers are wrong' which is what you keep defending.
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Con Gorozidis wrote:Err yes - of course they do. No doubt about that. But being the popular view doesn't mean it is the 'right' view. Once again you seem to think follow the conventional view and than take that as being 'right'.plugger66 wrote:Its funny but i prefer a bit of chat through the game. It isnt radio. You can see what is happening. The thing is they must do surveys on what people want so maybe there are more who dont complain about it than they do.
Clearly everyone has differing opinions and clearly the majority must like what i consider crap. But that also doesn't invalidate my view that its crap.
e.g a current affair/today tonight get 1 million viewers as does home and away. Doesn't 'prove' they are awesome shows cos thats what the punters want.
I still say both are shite. But yes - I accept many people like the commentators to talk s*** and use the word 'superstar' every 2 minutes. Doesn't mean 'the majority is right and the whiners are wrong' which is what you keep defending.
Its funny but you and many others tell me off for just going the opposite way to what others think and now you are having a go at me for taking what you describe as the populist view. Im actually taking my view and the commentators dont worry me and I then pointed out why they probably commentate that way but it isnt the reason i like it. Make up your mind on how i feel. Im glad you know how i feel and why as well.
And as you cant read i will explain it to you. I didnt say the others were wrong. I said what i liked. So to prove you arent lying again show me where I said the whiners are wrong. Really you arent going that well at the minute or the year.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2358
- Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 6:58pm
- Location: East of Bentleigh
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Agree with the inane conversation during the telecast.
And as I said another thread, Samantha Lane's participation at the Thompson press conference was appalling.
She asked the harder type of question on "Before the Game" instead of offering up statements to give the chance for Thompson to have a whinge.
And as I said another thread, Samantha Lane's participation at the Thompson press conference was appalling.
She asked the harder type of question on "Before the Game" instead of offering up statements to give the chance for Thompson to have a whinge.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
No - you are a sheep/sycophant/hanger on. You go with whatever you think the club or afl or majority or anyone in 'authority' says.plugger66 wrote:
Its funny but you and many others tell me off for just going the opposite way to what others think and now you are having a go at me for taking what you describe as the populist view. Im actually taking my view and the commentators dont worry me and I then pointed out why they probably commentate that way but it isnt the reason i like it. Make up your mind on how i feel. Im glad you know how i feel and why as well.
And as you cant read i will explain it to you. I didnt say the others were wrong. I said what i liked. So to prove you arent lying again show me where I said the whiners are wrong. Really you arent going that well at the minute or the year.
You go the opposite to everyone on here because you think that you are an 'insider' and part of the 'footy establishment' and everyone else on here is a 'pleb outsider idiot fan'.
You follow that logic? I'm very consistent on that view. Do you understand it or want it in a pictures?
Once again you think you have caught me out on logic - but exposed yourself as a fool.
You're entitled to like the commentary and yes I'm sure they have surveys to say people like it - but you seem to think because that is the majority view then those against the 'commercial mainstream' are 'wrong'. You think power is always right and you think you are an 'insider' - hence it is very consistent for me to say you go with the mainstream view every time and also oppose/dismiss many on here. Its consistent with your self view as an 'insider' that you picked up as a hanger on.
I personally don't like how every 2nd player and word is either 'superstar' or 'elite' and talking up how great the Bombers 'character' is.
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Taylor used to be an excellent commentator. Now he wants to be the modern Rex Hunt.
Talking about birthday parties, Mexican food, lasers, EEEEEEEELLLLLIIIIIIIIII, The do, etc.
The colour commentary is drowned out by is inanities, and most of the colour commentary was quite good on Saturday.
Taylor tends to wreck it for me, but then his every statement is not a question like Bruce, doesn't he? isn't he? wont it? etc etc etc
Talking about birthday parties, Mexican food, lasers, EEEEEEEELLLLLIIIIIIIIII, The do, etc.
The colour commentary is drowned out by is inanities, and most of the colour commentary was quite good on Saturday.
Taylor tends to wreck it for me, but then his every statement is not a question like Bruce, doesn't he? isn't he? wont it? etc etc etc
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19106
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2019 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
These guys make Sandy Roberts sound like Martin Tyler.
A different game I know but unfortunately we really don't have our own version of Martin Tyler.
BT is a flog.
Bruth is an idiot.
Darcy, well no comment.
I don't mind Ritcho.
On the radio, KB is the worst.
Is Hamish McLachlan the biggest case of nepotism ever?
A different game I know but unfortunately we really don't have our own version of Martin Tyler.
BT is a flog.
Bruth is an idiot.
Darcy, well no comment.
I don't mind Ritcho.
On the radio, KB is the worst.
Is Hamish McLachlan the biggest case of nepotism ever?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5534
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
- Contact:
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
I'd almost put up with most of that if he was an accurate caller...But he is simply not. Getting facts, players and game situations wrong all the time.joffaboy wrote:Taylor used to be an excellent commentator. Now he wants to be the modern Rex Hunt.
Talking about birthday parties, Mexican food, lasers, EEEEEEEELLLLLIIIIIIIIII, The do, etc.
The colour commentary is drowned out by is inanities, and most of the colour commentary was quite good on Saturday.
Taylor tends to wreck it for me, but then his every statement is not a question like Bruce, doesn't he? isn't he? wont it? etc etc etc
And the entire team seem to think that the viewing audience is there to solely hear the pointless banter between them all.
Just call the effing game!
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Con Gorozidis wrote:No - you are a sheep/sycophant/hanger on. You go with whatever you think the club or afl or majority or anyone in 'authority' says.plugger66 wrote:
Its funny but you and many others tell me off for just going the opposite way to what others think and now you are having a go at me for taking what you describe as the populist view. Im actually taking my view and the commentators dont worry me and I then pointed out why they probably commentate that way but it isnt the reason i like it. Make up your mind on how i feel. Im glad you know how i feel and why as well.
And as you cant read i will explain it to you. I didnt say the others were wrong. I said what i liked. So to prove you arent lying again show me where I said the whiners are wrong. Really you arent going that well at the minute or the year.
You go the opposite to everyone on here because you think that you are an 'insider' and part of the 'footy establishment' and everyone else on here is a 'pleb outsider idiot fan'.
You follow that logic? I'm very consistent on that view. Do you understand it or want it in a pictures?
Once again you think you have caught me out on logic - but exposed yourself as a fool.
You're entitled to like the commentary and yes I'm sure they have surveys to say people like it - but you seem to think because that is the majority view then those against the 'commercial mainstream' are 'wrong'. You think power is always right and you think you are an 'insider' - hence it is very consistent for me to say you go with the mainstream view every time and also oppose/dismiss many on here. Its consistent with your self view as an 'insider' that you picked up as a hanger on.
I personally don't like how every 2nd player and word is either 'superstar' or 'elite' and talking up how great the Bombers 'character' is.
So if I go with the majority then you are saying everyone on here thinks like the minority. Now that would be weird. Why our club? And how many times Con can i tell you to stop saying I am an insider. Its a lie by you. No reason why you would even say it. Show me where i have said im an insider. I probably told you 100 times i am not. I can really see why you seem to move houses a lot.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
BT is an absolute hack commentator. Clearly the worst of all. Constantly gets the players names wrong, which surely is the prerequisite for a commentator. He remains at 7 purely because of the boys club that exists there. Ruins the game.
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
twirlyhair wrote:BT is an absolute hack commentator. Clearly the worst of all. Constantly gets the players names wrong, which surely is the prerequisite for a commentator. He remains at 7 purely because of the boys club that exists there. Ruins the game.
You realise he has only been at 7 for 2 or 3 years.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
And you point is?plugger66 wrote:twirlyhair wrote:BT is an absolute hack commentator. Clearly the worst of all. Constantly gets the players names wrong, which surely is the prerequisite for a commentator. He remains at 7 purely because of the boys club that exists there. Ruins the game.
You realise he has only been at 7 for 2 or 3 years.
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
twirlyhair wrote:And you point is?plugger66 wrote:twirlyhair wrote:BT is an absolute hack commentator. Clearly the worst of all. Constantly gets the players names wrong, which surely is the prerequisite for a commentator. He remains at 7 purely because of the boys club that exists there. Ruins the game.
You realise he has only been at 7 for 2 or 3 years.
They must join the boys club quickly. Im pretty sure boys have stopped commentating over the years. Roberts for example. he will given the marching orders whether is in the boys club or not if he effects ratings. Thats all TV stations care about not a silly boys club.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2358
- Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 6:58pm
- Location: East of Bentleigh
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
I'm sure at one stage during Saturday night's game he called the Saints as "the Cats" before he corrected himself.twirlyhair wrote:BT is an absolute hack commentator. Clearly the worst of all. Constantly gets the players names wrong, which surely is the prerequisite for a commentator. He remains at 7 purely because of the boys club that exists there. Ruins the game.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Do you realise that nowdays bruce does the commentary whilst naked in a hot tub , smeared in baby oil !Cairnsman wrote:Bruce is overdoing the gravely guteral bursts of exaggerated excitement calls IMO. Useby date...maybe.
In red white and black from 73
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Agree - Bruce is just a parody of himself these days.
That Hawks - Geel was a crap game of footy and they were talking it up like it was a classic
That Hawks - Geel was a crap game of footy and they were talking it up like it was a classic
- stevie
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 144 times
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Looking forward to hearing Martin at the World Cup! Will be a lot of staying awake for a couple of days for me. The wife and kids are away for the majority of the tournament. Woohoo!SaintPav wrote:These guys make Sandy Roberts sound like Martin Tyler.
A different game I know but unfortunately we really don't have our own version of Martin Tyler.
BT is a flog.
Bruth is an idiot.
Darcy, well no comment.
I don't mind Ritcho.
On the radio, KB is the worst.
Is Hamish McLachlan the biggest case of nepotism ever?
Re: Televisin commentaryBombers game
Cleeeveer#gosaintas wrote:Agree - Bruce is just a parody of himself these days.
That Hawks - Geel was a crap game of footy and they were talking it up like it was a classic