Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1449921Post bergholt »

Hayes - 8: Not a vintage Lenny game but still was our best. Great attack, good disposal, but missed a goal he could have kicked.
Ray - 7: Standard game for him, tried hard and was involved a lot without doing a huge amount of damage.
Riewoldt - 7: Good battle with Talia. Missed one he should have kicked and made uncharacteristic mistakes by foot. But still very solid.
Newnes - 7: Probably his best game for mine, showing signs of very good disposal. Work to do but improving.
Saunders - 7: Promising game especially in the second half when it was one way traffic. Lots to like.
Dunstan - 7: Solid but faded in the last and made mistakes. Still very good for game number 4.
Steven - 6.5: Never really found much space and wasn't hugely damaging. Obviously will be great when he finds touch though.

Stanley - 6: I actually thought he was good though he's very frustrating at times. Presents OK then goes missing for a quarter.
Jones - 6: Classic CJ game. Ran around a lot, found the footy, made some mistakes. Had a bunch of his possessions in junk time. But still tried hard.
Geary - 6: Did a solid job on Betts and was OK with the ball. Hard down back when there's an avalanche.
Delaney - 5.5: Pods kicked three but a couple of lucky ones, I actually though Delaney was OK. Not classy but big and willing.
Armitage - 5.5: Disappointing for mine, just didn't impact the game enough in a midfield that was being smashed.
Dempster - 5: OK coming out of defence but beaten badly in a few one on ones. Tough day for him.

Gwilt - 4.5: Not sure why he was sent forward but he wasn't too effective down there. Not agile enough for that.
Longer - 4.5: His opponent was BOG and Billy only had one kick. But his ruckwork showed some positive signs.
Savage - 4.5: His best game for us - only because he kicked a goal. Still doesn't get the ball anywhere near enough.
Templeton - 4.5: Did a couple of good things but by and large couldn't get near it. Well held.
Montagna - 4: Absolutely blanketed by Kerridge who kicked a couple of goals of his own. Too small to shake a physical tag easily.
Webster - 4: Shocker for him, couldn't do much right and was part of a defence which conceded a lot of goals.
Curren - 3.5: Not sure what his job was but all of their midfielders went well. Doesn't find much of it which is a concern.
Maister - 3: Didn't get any of it up forward then was badly beaten in defence. Missed a set shot from 20m. Can't play next week.
Wright - 0: Barely touched it before Gears cleaned him up.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1449956Post Con Gorozidis »

I like your ratings as usual bergholt - but I think you are a bit love struck with Len-dog which is an understandable ailment.
No way he deserved an 8 today with his disposal.
Some of those high loopy kicks to noone when under no pressure were shockers.
And I think Gwilt had to be worth more than a 4.5.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1449960Post gringo »

Curren was one of my only winners for the day. apart from getting pushed out of the way in a marking contest he frustrated the crap out of Dangerfield. I would have said a 7 or 8 for a very disciplined heavy tag with out the Collingwood style scragging.

gwilt was good as a forward and thought that was a decent move.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1449979Post dragit »

Current was super, it wasn't his fault we were belted, danger field only had 19 touches in a game where they had nearly 100 more disposals. 7/10 for mine

I thought Jones was just terrible, his kicking particularly early on was disgraceful. 3

Templeton was pretty bad, but it's only his 4th game. 3


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4941
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 491 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1449991Post Moods »

I watched Stanley carefully today. He's one of the reasons this team can't compete against the good teams. He's lazy and a little soft. Just doesn't impose himself. We NEED big bodies to help the kids out. He's in his 5th year and has done nothing. Is being played on potential only because of his athletic qualities - and he doesn't use those qualities nearly enough.

Savage so far has been a massive disappointment. Maybe I expected too much. He looks too light, and gets pushed around too easily for a guy in his 4-5th year as well. Has no tank.

These two guys I thought are at the age/experience where they simply have to take the next step.

Maister is simply not at AFL standard.

Some of the kids look really promising. Thought Dunstan was great (who cares about the last quarter, they were all pretty crap by then)
Eli gets himself into some dangerous positions. Obviously didn't do much today but I hold out hope.
Thought Saunders really imposed himself when he came on.

The way the ball was delivered into the Crows fwd line today made it pretty hard for the backs, but I thought they did okay for the most part. Our mids were poor today. They got some really clean clearances where guys were able to stroll away and do what they want.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450111Post plugger66 »

Forget ratings and just look at their actually ability at this stage of their career and they may have been Joeys worst ever game. I dont think it was helped by where he seemed to be playing.


bergsone
SS Life Member
Posts: 2928
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
Location: victoria
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450114Post bergsone »

IMO Savage seems a good player in a very good side

A good player in a good side

A average player in a average side


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450119Post Devilhead »

bergsone wrote:IMO Savage seems a good player in a very good side

A good player in a good side

A average player in a average side
The term is "Frontrunner" or for those with a winter disposition "Downhill Skiier"


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
bergsone
SS Life Member
Posts: 2928
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
Location: victoria
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450123Post bergsone »

Devilhead wrote:
bergsone wrote:IMO Savage seems a good player in a very good side

A good player in a good side

A average player in a average side
The term is "Frontrunner" or for those with a winter disposition "Downhill Skiier"
Yeah you said it much better than me :wink:


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450124Post plugger66 »

bergsone wrote:
Devilhead wrote:
bergsone wrote:IMO Savage seems a good player in a very good side

A good player in a good side

A average player in a average side
The term is "Frontrunner" or for those with a winter disposition "Downhill Skiier"
Yeah you said it much better than me :wink:

Reckon both of you are far to nice.


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10429
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 713 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450151Post desertsaint »

bergsone wrote:IMO Savage seems a decent player in a very good side

An average player in a decent side

A poor player in an average side

Unwatchable in a poor side
Edited slightly.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
Newman
Club Player
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat 20 Mar 2004 11:01pm
Location: Brisbane (heart in Melbourne)
Been thanked: 28 times
Contact:

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450155Post Newman »

Maister huge disappointment.


User avatar
stevie
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4898
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450181Post stevie »

Devilhead wrote:
bergsone wrote:IMO Savage seems a good player in a very good side

A good player in a good side

A average player in a average side
The term is "Frontrunner" or for those with a winter disposition "Downhill Skiier"
This also applies to players who only perform against crap teams. eg, betts


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9144
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450186Post spert »

I thought there was only two positives from yesterday's poor effort. 1. Steven will be better for the run 2. Saunders put his hand up for more senior games.

Too many negatives to go on hugely about- a poor team game with terrible defensive work from the forwards and midfield, and I expect Richo will be reviewing some of his tactical work too. Too many players let their opponents run off them and set up play resulting in Crow goals.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450187Post bergholt »

Con Gorozidis wrote:I like your ratings as usual bergholt - but I think you are a bit love struck with Len-dog which is an understandable ailment.
No way he deserved an 8 today with his disposal.
Some of those high loopy kicks to noone when under no pressure were shockers.
And I think Gwilt had to be worth more than a 4.5.
Probably right on Lenny, I still think he was our best and most effective - at least he was winning the ball in the midfield all day.

I can't get behind you on Gwilt though. Apart from kicking that one goal I thought he was anonymous up forward.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450189Post bergholt »

gringo wrote:Curren was one of my only winners for the day. apart from getting pushed out of the way in a marking contest he frustrated the crap out of Dangerfield. I would have said a 7 or 8 for a very disciplined heavy tag with out the Collingwood style scragging.
You're probably right there, I honestly don't notice Dangerfield out there and so didn't pick up that Curren was running with him.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9144
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Player Ratings: Rd 4 v Adelaide

Post: # 1450190Post spert »

Lenny had a crack, but his disposal was ordinary and didn't help the forwards at all, and as a result not very effective. I think Richo put Gwilt in the forward line to try and play a defensive game, as the forwards didn't lead, played from behind, and just sat on their backsides for most of the game and watched the Crows run away from half back in numbers, so he had to make some kind of move.


Post Reply