Summers is quoting a "vision" and everyone needs to be on the same page basically with that vision- so reading between the lines, Watters was sacked as he didn't share the vision.
Clearly there is a structure that the club has in place, where Pelchin is running the football dept., and Watters answers to Pelchin..so far sounds like a normal business structure, or in the club's case, the vision? So it appears Watters can't get along with Pelchin or some players, although Watters denies this- in other words, we have someone in authority (Watters) who is having problems working with his immediate manager( Pelchin) and also those under him (players), to add to that, the team he coached has basically under-achieved during his tenure.
So Watters has issues communicating in his workplace, doesn't recognise the management structure and has some personality issues with certain people he works with, plus the job he is hired to do- coach the team, has not produced adequate results. This all points to why he would have been sacked.
I guess in conclusion, it is just a matter of an executive group sacking a manager who has problems working within the structure of their business..not an unusual thing at all these days.
What I can gather so far from all this
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu 23 Oct 2008 4:40pm
Re: What I can gather so far from all this
If things settle in the next 60 days or so , then we will know that SW was a problem .
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: What I can gather so far from all this
What a great analogy! Have an emoticon!
St Kilda forever ( God help me)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 437 times
Re: What I can gather so far from all this
I can't wait 60 days, I want things to settle within 2 months. Maybe The problem was not SW..might be everyone else?T a n k i n g . wrote:If things settle in the next 60 days or so , then we will know that SW was a problem .
Re: What I can gather so far from all this
spert wrote:I can't wait 60 days, I want things to settle within 2 months. Maybe The problem was not SW..might be everyone else?T a n k i n g . wrote:If things settle in the next 60 days or so , then we will know that SW was a problem .
Is that delibrate comedy or accidental?
Re: What I can gather so far from all this
Disagree. I can't wait 60 days or 2 months. Must be settled by the New Year.spert wrote:I can't wait 60 days, I want things to settle within 2 months. Maybe The problem was not SW..might be everyone else?T a n k i n g . wrote:If things settle in the next 60 days or so , then we will know that SW was a problem .
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...