Think Pluggs has the s***s up after his and Bigmarts love child got traded. The footy club did not rate their opinions either..Hallalj#3 wrote:No not at all everyone has an opinion. I just think you've been wrong lately and I'm only calling you on it, because I don't rate your opinions and obviously the club think Hickey can take that mantle and I agree with them.. Time to let go of the past and look forward we have a plan and it's starting to take shape.
Fisher for Bruce Trade
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- evo
- Club Player
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
- Location: Wimmera
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
evo wrote:Think Pluggs has the s***s up after his and Bigmarts love child got traded. The footy club did not rate their opinions either..Hallalj#3 wrote:No not at all everyone has an opinion. I just think you've been wrong lately and I'm only calling you on it, because I don't rate your opinions and obviously the club think Hickey can take that mantle and I agree with them.. Time to let go of the past and look forward we have a plan and it's starting to take shape.
No the premiership team did. The team that has also got Gibson, Lake, Burgoyne and Gunston in the last few years. And yes Im upset Ben has gone because I rated him but unlike some I hope pick 18 and savage end up better for us than McEvoy would have.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
plugger66 wrote:evo wrote:Think Pluggs has the s***s up after his and Bigmarts love child got traded. The footy club did not rate their opinions either..Hallalj#3 wrote:No not at all everyone has an opinion. I just think you've been wrong lately and I'm only calling you on it, because I don't rate your opinions and obviously the club think Hickey can take that mantle and I agree with them.. Time to let go of the past and look forward we have a plan and it's starting to take shape.
No the premiership team did. The team that has also got Gibson, Lake, Burgoyne and Gunston in the last few years. And yes Im upset Ben has gone because I rated him but unlike some I hope pick 18 and savage end up better for us than McEvoy would have.
I'm not sure that is perfect logic. Just because they did some good trades doesn't mean they don't make mistakes. Big Mac is at least going to get on the park something they don't seem to be able to find in ruck men. I had started to lose patience with the big guy towards the end. His only really strong position was as a chop out across half back but he was immobile and slow if he didn't mark the ball.
The Hawks might be able to reinvent his game but we weren't getting good value from him in 2013. They are mortgaging the future on another reload but at least he is still young enough to improve dramatically. Hope he steps up because he seems a good guy.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5017
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Maybe we would of been thought of the same way in 2009, if not for straight kicking...plugger66 wrote:evo wrote:Think Pluggs has the s***s up after his and Bigmarts love child got traded. The footy club did not rate their opinions either..Hallalj#3 wrote:No not at all everyone has an opinion. I just think you've been wrong lately and I'm only calling you on it, because I don't rate your opinions and obviously the club think Hickey can take that mantle and I agree with them.. Time to let go of the past and look forward we have a plan and it's starting to take shape.
No the premiership team did. The team that has also got Gibson, Lake, Burgoyne and Gunston in the last few years. And yes Im upset Ben has gone because I rated him but unlike some I hope pick 18 and savage end up better for us than McEvoy would have.
Dawson, Gardiner, King, Schneider, Dempster, Gram, Ray & even Milne...
It happens with more teams than you think....
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
girls please lets keep this on track.
For me i hope we get bruce for fisher and i hope that Gilbert is staying put.
For me i hope we get bruce for fisher and i hope that Gilbert is staying put.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
gringo wrote:plugger66 wrote:evo wrote:
Think Pluggs has the s***s up after his and Bigmarts love child got traded. The footy club did not rate their opinions either..
No the premiership team did. The team that has also got Gibson, Lake, Burgoyne and Gunston in the last few years. And yes Im upset Ben has gone because I rated him but unlike some I hope pick 18 and savage end up better for us than McEvoy would have.
I'm not sure that is perfect logic. Just because they did some good trades doesn't mean they don't make mistakes. Big Mac is at least going to get on the park something they don't seem to be able to find in ruck men. I had started to lose patience with the big guy towards the end. His only really strong position was as a chop out across half back but he was immobile and slow if he didn't mark the ball.
The Hawks might be able to reinvent his game but we weren't getting good value from him in 2013. They are mortgaging the future on another reload but at least he is still young enough to improve dramatically. Hope he steps up because he seems a good guy.
Its just as much logic as someone saying ive got the s***s because a love child got traded. matter of fact its much more logical. And who said they dont make mistakes. I pointed out that the premiership side rates him. It is very logical.
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Haha stop shaking old man it's okay.. Get used to it players are going to leave more often.. Welcome to 2013plugger66 wrote:Hallalj#3 wrote:Well you don't.. Hence why you've banged on about it all day. Why would you trade away your number 1 ruckmen.. Because he isn't our number 1 ruckmen. Wrong opinion. And you've been banging on all year about holding on to our champions. Wrong opinion and people that matter agree..
He was our number one ruckman in every game we played this year. Fact. You obviously have no idea between opinion and fact. I shouldnt have a go at you though because you really dont get it. By the way who are our champions we have gotten rid of? Wrong opinion. Now that is a strange thing to say. I think its time for bed. You have to get up for school tomorrow.
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Hallalj#3 wrote:Haha stop shaking old man it's okay.. Get used to it players are going to leave more often.. Welcome to 2013plugger66 wrote:Hallalj#3 wrote:Well you don't.. Hence why you've banged on about it all day. Why would you trade away your number 1 ruckmen.. Because he isn't our number 1 ruckmen. Wrong opinion. And you've been banging on all year about holding on to our champions. Wrong opinion and people that matter agree..
He was our number one ruckman in every game we played this year. Fact. You obviously have no idea between opinion and fact. I shouldnt have a go at you though because you really dont get it. By the way who are our champions we have gotten rid of? Wrong opinion. Now that is a strange thing to say. I think its time for bed. You have to get up for school tomorrow.
Stop shaking old man. What the hell does that even mean? Im sure you havent got a clue. As for your second statement that means even less in context to the discussion. Bed time little fella. Who are our champions we are getting rid of? We only have 2 in our side and they are both there next year.
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
I don't know whats the obsession with getting rid of Dal for a 20ish pick? That's a terrible idea.
Fisher for Bruce seems ok, and probably a trade of a pick/downgrade I guess, unless we put in another player?
I saw on the news our Pick 23 will be exchanged for Hawthorns Pick 20, not sure what's that about?
Fisher for Bruce seems ok, and probably a trade of a pick/downgrade I guess, unless we put in another player?
I saw on the news our Pick 23 will be exchanged for Hawthorns Pick 20, not sure what's that about?
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
He was our number one ruckman in every game we played this year. Fact. You obviously have no idea between opinion and fact. I shouldnt have a go at you though because you really dont get it. By the way who are our champions we have gotten rid of? Wrong opinion. Now that is a strange thing to say. I think its time for bed. You have to get up for school tomorrow.[/quote]
Haha stop shaking old man it's okay.. Get used to it players are going to leave more often.. Welcome to 2013[/quote]
Stop shaking old man. What the hell does that even mean? Im sure you havent got a clue. As for your second statement that means even less in context to the discussion. Bed time little fella. Who are our champions we are getting rid of? We only have 2 in our side and they are both there next year.[/quote]
I've forgotten more about the game then you know and you continually show me that with the dribble you constantly post. You don't even remember half the crap you write.. You get worked up when someone challenges you.. Loser
Haha stop shaking old man it's okay.. Get used to it players are going to leave more often.. Welcome to 2013[/quote]
Stop shaking old man. What the hell does that even mean? Im sure you havent got a clue. As for your second statement that means even less in context to the discussion. Bed time little fella. Who are our champions we are getting rid of? We only have 2 in our side and they are both there next year.[/quote]
I've forgotten more about the game then you know and you continually show me that with the dribble you constantly post. You don't even remember half the crap you write.. You get worked up when someone challenges you.. Loser
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
lefty wrote:I don't know whats the obsession with getting rid of Dal for a 20ish pick? That's a terrible idea.
Fisher for Bruce seems ok, and probably a trade of a pick/downgrade I guess, unless we put in another player?
I saw on the news our Pick 23 will be exchanged for Hawthorns Pick 20, not sure what's that about?
Personally I've always rated Fisher as a better player than Dal Santo. He's been a favourite for years.
I can switch off the emotion and see the logic though
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
wonderful thread.
do we need to give up anything with fisher to get bruce? any whispers? bruce is younger, obviously, but they're chasing fisher rather than us bruce?
do we need to give up anything with fisher to get bruce? any whispers? bruce is younger, obviously, but they're chasing fisher rather than us bruce?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Give it a rest will ya. Bloody hell. Another slanging match. Talk about the footy and leave the slanging crap out of it. So farkin tedious. Makes it unreadable.Hallalj#3 wrote:
I've forgotten more about the game then you know and you continually show me that with the dribble you constantly post. You don't even remember half the crap you write.. You get worked up when someone challenges you.. Loser
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
It's got legs!Old Mate wrote:I wouldn't be surprisedsax wrote:Fisher + 17 for Bruce + Giles
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/g ... 6737041475
And here!
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/s ... 6737589496
Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Bizarre.Old Mate wrote:sax wrote:Fisher + 17 for Bruce + Giles
So giles and macca are pretty much the same.
So after a few swings and roundabouts we lose macca and fisher and get giles savage and bruce and a better draft pick.
So we still keep pick 3 and 18 ?
Am i missing something ?
Out : Macca fisher pick 21
In: Bruce Savage Giles pick 18
If Pelchen pulls that off he truly is a genius.
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
What made you suggest pick 17? Just your personal opinion? Cos personally I don't love it.sax wrote:It's got legs!Old Mate wrote:I wouldn't be surprisedsax wrote:Fisher + 17 for Bruce + Giles
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/g ... 6737041475
And here!
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/s ... 6737589496
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Would prefer to rookie a ruckman and put him in a glass case to smash in case of emergency to be honest.sax wrote:Fisher + 17 for Bruce + Giles
I could throw a blanket over picks 8-20, therefore, lets take them to the draft unless we are upgrading, or unless someone crazy good comes up in discussion, of which, I haven't seen us linked to yet.
Imagine Aish/Kelly, Acres and Dumont - or Sheed, what if Crouch slid? Maybe the Pelch WAS after 4 first rounders this year after all
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Can't see why we'd do a number on GWS to be honest, we have a decent history with them and they will never deal with us when they decide one of Boyd or Patton has to be traded in 2015Munga wrote:Can we get Bruce in the PSD and keep our picks?
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
Very good pointSt Ick wrote:Can't see why we'd do a number on GWS to be honest, we have a decent history with them and they will never deal with us when they decide one of Boyd or Patton has to be traded in 2015Munga wrote:Can we get Bruce in the PSD and keep our picks?
Fortius Quo Fidelius
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2011 8:05pm
- Location: Australia
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
just like a tool pointing out sum one cant spell, or its to hot for day light savings in perthst.byron wrote:Give it a rest will ya. Bloody hell. Another slanging match. Talk about the footy and leave the slanging crap out of it. So farkin tedious. Makes it unreadable.Hallalj#3 wrote:
I've forgotten more about the game then you know and you continually show me that with the dribble you constantly post. You don't even remember half the crap you write.. You get worked up when someone challenges you.. Loser
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30091
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Fisher for Bruce Trade
I hope not. We are setting ourselves up for the future and not next year.sax wrote:It's got legs!Old Mate wrote:I wouldn't be surprisedsax wrote:Fisher + 17 for Bruce + Giles
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/g ... 6737041475
And here!
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/s ... 6737589496
We sacrificed Ben for a long terms rebuild. Basically swapping Ben for Giles would be going sideways, and not upwards in the future.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....