Jolly Gone.

Dr Spaceman · Tue 10 Sep 2013 1:18pm

"Once a jolly......

...hmmm....

......no longer a jolly!"

Con Gorozidis · Tue 10 Sep 2013 1:33pm

Doesnt he have a bung knee?

plugger66 · Post: # 1387926Post **plugger66** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 4:35pm

SainterK wrote:No way.

Not even as ruck coach.

You don't have to try hard to join the dots, he clearly is a pain behind the scenes.

Why not a rucks coach? if he is good at that sort of thing then grab him. Certainly to old to play though. Ive joined the dots and come up with 2 flags.

Eastern · Post: # 1387932Post **Eastern** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 4:44pm

savatage wrote:I reckon we should get Lazar Vidovic back to give the guys some experience.

As long as he doesn't get anywhere near the cheque book !!

thejiggingsaint · Tue 10 Sep 2013 4:45pm

getting his jollys some place else?

onlooker2 · Post: # 1388004Post **onlooker2** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 6:07pm

We don't want him. All reports are that he has a stuffed knee which has given him grief all season

Megamaguire · Tue 10 Sep 2013 6:31pm

If the club can lure a v.good ruck coach to give McAboy & Hickey some new angles and strategies we have to do it.
If Jolly fits the category of coarse he should be considered.

St. Kilda has to make every recruit (including coaches ) the very best we can get. I wouldn't bother going down the sentimental road on these vital ingredients.

GO SAINTS!

Kickit · Post: # 1388027Post **Kickit** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 6:34pm

Megamaguire wrote:If the club can lure a v.good ruck coach to give McAboy & Hickey some new angles and strategies we have to do it.
If Jolly fits the category of coarse he should be considered.

St. Kilda has to make every recruit (including coaches ) the very best we can get. I wouldn't bother going down the sentimental road on these vital ingredients.

GO SAINTS!

Jason Blake should write a book. "Rucking against vastly bigger opponents for dummies "

He'd be an OK ruck coach IMO.

SainterK · Post: # 1388030Post **SainterK** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 6:39pm

We should get King back, they rave about him at the dogs.

PADDLEPOP1001 · Tue 10 Sep 2013 6:43pm

After what he wrote about Fraser not sure he is the sort of quality bloke we need around young blokes!

gringo · Post: # 1388069Post **gringo** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 7:22pm

Jolly was always just an average ruck man. No thanks.

plugger66 · Post: # 1388071Post **plugger66** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 7:24pm

gringo wrote:Jolly was always just an average ruck man. No thanks.

Yep completely fluked 2 flags.

BigMart · Post: # 1388090Post **BigMart** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 7:43pm

He played in a couple of good teams..... Was at the right place at the right time....

Understudy to White, Ball and Grundy...

plugger66 · Post: # 1388094Post **plugger66** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 7:46pm

BigMart wrote:He played in a couple of good teams..... Was at the right place at the right time....

Understudy to White, Ball and Grundy...

Was the main ruckman when they beat us.

noob · Post: # 1388131Post **noob** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 8:21pm

LTN16 · Post: # 1388219Post **LTN16** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 9:57pm

Teflon wrote:
BigMart wrote:Cockhead
Second that - toss bag

A rats toss bag? In the great words of Malcolm Blight.

The Fireman · Tue 10 Sep 2013 10:08pm

no hacks now..we are on the rebuild.

saintsRrising · Tue 10 Sep 2013 10:21pm

BigMart wrote:Why do you suppose Bucks flicked him?

Because Bucks can't handle players as well as Malthouse could.

dragit · Post: # 1388240Post **dragit** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 10:31pm

saintsRrising wrote:
BigMart wrote:Why do you suppose Bucks flicked him?
Because Bucks can't handle players as well as Malthouse could.

Malthouse let players get away with anything…

so long as they were good players…

giant douche.

BigMart · Post: # 1388244Post **BigMart** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 10:33pm

I think Bucks is great... The players there are sooks.... Living in the past, and can't accept the fact they are a sliding team and their gamestyle is dated....

They want to play 2010 footy, in the 2010 team and are spooking because Bucks is not giving into them...

He should flick 8-10 including 4 stars

Wayne42 · Post: # 1388248Post **Wayne42** » Tue 10 Sep 2013 10:39pm

BigMart wrote:I think Bucks is great... The players there are sooks.... Living in the past, and can't accept the fact they are a sliding team and their gamestyle is dated....

They want to play 2010 footy, in the 2010 team and are spooking because Bucks is not giving into them...

He should flick 8-10 including 4 stars

That's a few flicked as of today, he'll trade a few others and voila, his problems are now someone else's, well, if anyone picks them up...

The Fireman · Tue 10 Sep 2013 11:10pm

I think Bucks is a self centred goose who panders to his sugar daddy Eddie

thejiggingsaint · Wed 11 Sep 2013 12:34am

I reckon the recruitment of Jolly and Ball won the Magpies the flag in 2010. Having said that, however I wouldn't go near either of them now with a barge pole while we're in rebuild mode.

Wayne42 · Post: # 1388295Post **Wayne42** » Wed 11 Sep 2013 12:44am

thejiggingsaint wrote:I reckon the recruitment of Jolly and Ball won the Magpies the flag in 2010. Having said that, however I wouldn't go near either of them now with a barge pole while we're in rebuild mode.

I'm not sure if Nathan wants to get too near them either

BigMart · Post: # 1388306Post **BigMart** » Wed 11 Sep 2013 1:55am

What about the other 20 players?

I'd think Ball and Jolly needed the Collingwood stars.... More than Visa Versa

Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.

Re: Jolly Gone.