Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373879Post SainterK »

Injuries
Gwilt

Possible ins include Wright, Hickey, Ross, Ledger

Schneider would have to be in the side with someone else to sub.

I'd be giving Ben and Roo a rest, but can't see it happening.

Hannebury and Jack are their two driving forces this year, Jones will take one, I'd like to see Wright come in to replace Gears in the backline so he take the other.

Michy and Saunders looked great with their pace and pressure, and should be used to more advantage when we 'slingshot' or whatever the term is.

I can see Hickey coming in given Swans play all of Tippett, Mumford, Pyke and White.

So for mine

In Hickey Wright
Out Gwilt Len (who I think is sore)


Burkey 1
Club Player
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon 01 Mar 2010 9:39pm

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373883Post Burkey 1 »

I think for the last 3 weeks we should play Rooey at CHB to help out our short defence, we play some strong sides before we finish the season & we want to go into the pre season with a bit of confidence not off 3 smashings, Rooey is struggling to convert anyway so i think it would help us and him if he played as a key tall for the last few games.

We have Tom Lee up there anyway so let the kid see how he goes without Rooey next to him, I think he will step up.

Play Gwilt CHF ( If not reinjured ), wont hurt now & I remeber some of Jimmy's early games as a forward & he did quite well actually.

Just putting it out there ???


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4566
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373885Post whiskers3614 »

Lucky Plugger not around ATM.
Sacrilege in his eyes!


Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373893Post Trev from the Bush »

There won't be too many changes because the cupboard is looking pretty bare at this end of the season.

Dare I suggest Ledger as a possible inclusion? Ross as well because outright leg speed is not a vital commodity on a small ground like the SCG.


Saint supporter since '62
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373894Post Bernard Shakey »

SainterK wrote:
Michy and Saunders looked great with their pace and pressure, and should be used to more advantage when we 'slingshot' or whatever the term is.
Who is Michy?

If you're referring to Darren Minchington, he's known as Minch around the club. It's like calling Jack Steven, Stevens, which Leigh Matthews does all the time.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8381
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1907 times
Been thanked: 884 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373899Post WellardSaint »

Need someone to stand Tippett. Have no idea about Sandy defenders, but promote someone big and fast to try to negate him.
Swans move very quickly, so I don't care if Ledger kicks poorly, give him a run
to see whether he can rack up 25-30. At least it denird them the ball.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
#gosaintas
Club Player
Posts: 820
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373918Post #gosaintas »

Burkey I agree with you on Roo into the backline. He can't kick a goal anyway at the moment and it should take some pressure from him.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373923Post saintspremiers »

#gosaintas wrote:Burkey I agree with you on Roo into the backline. He can't kick a goal anyway at the moment and it should take some pressure from him.
Great idea. I reckon we could kick 5 goals for the game.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Kickit
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed 12 Dec 2012 8:52pm

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373953Post Kickit »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:
Michy and Saunders looked great with their pace and pressure, and should be used to more advantage when we 'slingshot' or whatever the term is.
Who is Michy?

If you're referring to Darren Minchington, he's known as Minch around the club. It's like calling Jack Steven, Stevens, which Leigh Matthews does all the time.
Hmmm pretty sure that no=one is calling Ben "Big-boy" round the club.
I read the other day that they called him "Minchy" round the club. Its not like calling Jack "Stevens" because that's his real name.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373963Post matrix »

his surname is steven

im sure K just missed the 'n' in Minchy when she typed
im pretty sure she knows his name bs


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373967Post SainterK »

matrix wrote:his surname is steven

im sure K just missed the 'n' in Minchy when she typed
im pretty sure she knows his name bs
Couldn't be stuff typing it in full :wink:


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373970Post Dr Spaceman »

matrix wrote:his surname is steven

im sure K just missed the 'n' in Minchy when she typed
im pretty sure she knows his name bs
No sweat matix 8-)


User avatar
stevie
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4898
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1373979Post stevie »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
matrix wrote:his surname is steven

im sure K just missed the 'n' in Minchy when she typed
im pretty sure she knows his name bs
No sweat matix 8-)
It's all good pacman


PADDLEPOP1001
Club Player
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 109 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374019Post PADDLEPOP1001 »

In Shenton,Ledger
Out Gwilt,Murdoch (Good luck on Tippett Blakey)


PADDLEPOP1000
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374021Post stinger »

SainterK wrote:Injuries
Gwilt

Possible ins include Wright, Hickey, Ross, Ledger

Schneider would have to be in the side with someone else to sub.

I'd be giving Ben and Roo a rest, but can't see it happening.

Hannebury and Jack are their two driving forces this year, Jones will take one, I'd like to see Wright come in to replace Gears in the backline so he take the other.

Michy and Saunders looked great with their pace and pressure, and should be used to more advantage when we 'slingshot' or whatever the term is.

I can see Hickey coming in given Swans play all of Tippett, Mumford, Pyke and White.

So for mine

In Hickey Wright
Out Gwilt Len (who I think is sore)
milne's a chance.....less than 50/50 though....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
#gosaintas
Club Player
Posts: 820
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374055Post #gosaintas »

saintspremiers wrote:
#gosaintas wrote:Burkey I agree with you on Roo into the backline. He can't kick a goal anyway at the moment and it should take some pressure from him.
Great idea. I reckon we could kick 5 goals for the game.

We seem to kick more than 5 goals a game when he doesn't play, we even win sometimes. He is shot in front of goal, flapping around like a sook. Take the pressure off him and move him back.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13318
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 675 times
Been thanked: 1958 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374056Post The Fireman »

after the loss to the Skunks they will come out firing...it will be ugly.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374058Post plugger66 »

#gosaintas wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
#gosaintas wrote:Burkey I agree with you on Roo into the backline. He can't kick a goal anyway at the moment and it should take some pressure from him.
Great idea. I reckon we could kick 5 goals for the game.

We seem to kick more than 5 goals a game when he doesn't play, we even win sometimes. He is shot in front of goal, flapping around like a sook. Take the pressure off him and move him back.

Should drop him then if we play better without him. The one thing I know with 100% certainty is he isnt playing back this week or this year and probably never.


#gosaintas
Club Player
Posts: 820
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 9:58am

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374060Post #gosaintas »

Nah, don't drop him. Move him back, take the pressure off him and let him play across half back. Solves a few problems. Gets some height in the backline. Gets him out of the forward line and frees up the rest of the team to attack without getting blasted by our captain.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374065Post plugger66 »

#gosaintas wrote:Nah, don't drop him. Move him back, take the pressure off him and let him play across half back. Solves a few problems. Gets some height in the backline. Gets him out of the forward line and frees up the rest of the team to attack without getting blasted by our captain.

It isnt happening so be set to get disappointed. I reckon he couldnt give a stuff about pressure. We are on 3 wins so there isnt to much pressure. He was an AA forward just 5 or 6 weeks ago.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374099Post Bernard Shakey »

plugger66 wrote:
#gosaintas wrote:Nah, don't drop him. Move him back, take the pressure off him and let him play across half back. Solves a few problems. Gets some height in the backline. Gets him out of the forward line and frees up the rest of the team to attack without getting blasted by our captain.

It isnt happening so be set to get disappointed. I reckon he couldnt give a stuff about pressure. We are on 3 wins so there isnt to much pressure. He was an AA forward just 5 or 6 weeks ago.
Still is an AA CHF !


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374110Post plugger66 »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
#gosaintas wrote:Nah, don't drop him. Move him back, take the pressure off him and let him play across half back. Solves a few problems. Gets some height in the backline. Gets him out of the forward line and frees up the rest of the team to attack without getting blasted by our captain.

It isnt happening so be set to get disappointed. I reckon he couldnt give a stuff about pressure. We are on 3 wins so there isnt to much pressure. He was an AA forward just 5 or 6 weeks ago.
Still is an AA CHF !

Doubt it now.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9144
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1374127Post spert »

No matter what else happens, the game will be won or lost in the midfield, and the way we are going in the midfield, the under-manned backline will again be under continual pressure. As we have no defensive game whatsoever, I expect the Swan smalls and mids to carve us up.. for once this season I would like to see a man-up game across the field, rather than seeing multiple opposition players unchecked in the centre corridor getting easy possessions.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1375057Post SainterK »

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2013-08-1 ... uld-return

How weird would it be the last couple of weeks is our strongest side for this year with all of Gilbo, Maister, Schneider back in.

Hopefully a good fortnight and bring the form into 2014.


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Saints v Swans - changes and discussion

Post: # 1375071Post The Redeemer »

plugger66 wrote:
#gosaintas wrote:Nah, don't drop him. Move him back, take the pressure off him and let him play across half back. Solves a few problems. Gets some height in the backline. Gets him out of the forward line and frees up the rest of the team to attack without getting blasted by our captain.

It isnt happening so be set to get disappointed. I reckon he couldnt give a stuff about pressure. We are on 3 wins so there isnt to much pressure. He was an AA forward just 5 or 6 weeks ago.
He still will be the AA CHF which is ridiculously good in a side that has managed 3 wins


Post Reply