Collingwood?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 705 times
Re: Collingwood?
[quote="rexy"]Think it's rough to suggest pies have been no where near that level since! They were clearly the best side in 2011 but gone done in the GF...[/quote="rexy"]
Geelong beat them three times that year.
Geelong beat them three times that year.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13268
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 649 times
- Been thanked: 1918 times
Re: Collingwood?
The Skunks were juiced up against us in the 2nd granny, gut feeling ? we know the coach is a liar so dishonesty is accepted down that way, recreational drugs were being used.....damn shame they will get away with it.
They are teflon...worth too much to the greedy AFL
They are teflon...worth too much to the greedy AFL
- PaytonPlace
- Club Player
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2011 8:31pm
Re: Collingwood?
You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: Collingwood?
A bit like Sean Payton?PaytonPlace wrote:James Hird not the brightest bulb?
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/p ... 2r2aw.html
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
- PaytonPlace
- Club Player
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2011 8:31pm
Re: Collingwood?
My powers of articulate thought are usually more coherent in my comebacks of a New Orleans diss...Bernard Shakey wrote:A bit like Sean Payton?PaytonPlace wrote:James Hird not the brightest bulb?
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/p ... 2r2aw.html
However, it is early, I haven't had my coffee yet, so a Twitter-esque "grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr" and an angry smiley face shall have to suffice
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
- PaytonPlace
- Club Player
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2011 8:31pm
Re: Collingwood?
I don't believe any of these people, in anything, I just thought it was interesting to read...matrix wrote:I Don't believe it,
Maybe Eddie wrote it?
You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Collingwood?
Sorry Payton I should've been a tad clearer.
I don't believe it that they didnt use HGH.
Which from doing a bit if reading is like a masking agent apparently.
HGH can increase the effects of other PEDs.....and give the time these drugs are used in the system a bit of a decrease in the time it can be detected.
There's creams about that would be banned on the wada list and you are in the clear within three hrs!
I don't believe it that they didnt use HGH.
Which from doing a bit if reading is like a masking agent apparently.
HGH can increase the effects of other PEDs.....and give the time these drugs are used in the system a bit of a decrease in the time it can be detected.
There's creams about that would be banned on the wada list and you are in the clear within three hrs!
- PaytonPlace
- Club Player
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2011 8:31pm
Re: Collingwood?
My belief is that the Pies did SOMETHING, and I always believe that, and even if it was legal or wasn't legal or whatever they want to have us believe, I hate that a replayed Grand Final became decided not by players, but by chemists and scientistsmatrix wrote:Sorry Payton I should've been a tad clearer.
I don't believe it that they didnt use HGH.
Which from doing a bit if reading is like a masking agent apparently.
HGH can increase the effects of other PEDs.....and give the time these drugs are used in the system a bit of a decrease in the time it can be detected.
There's creams about that would be banned on the wada list and you are in the clear within three hrs!
That is definition of "eroded faith" in a competition....
You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: Collingwood?
Will be interesting to see if the filth supporters give it to golden boy.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.