Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
I agree with P66.
How on earth is the umpire supposed to see the elbow.
Cut the guy some slack.
How on earth is the umpire supposed to see the elbow.
Cut the guy some slack.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 272 times
- Been thanked: 628 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Na that was Motlop later on. Although I don't know how that wasn't a free, was right in front of the umpire. A trip by hand used to be an automatic fifty.SainterK wrote:Was that when he tripped him by grabbing his ankle?Beno88 wrote:I reckon Varcoe could be in trouble for kicking Geary in the first quarter too. Happened on the boundary line near the saints bench well after the ball had gone.
Didn't like the attention.
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
stinger wrote:he can't even spell maggott for pity's sake......CURLY wrote:plugger66 wrote:
Its more amazing what supporters see and also miss. its good to see you back once there is a knocking of umpires thread. I still cant beleive you didnt belt an impire when you played or was the end free kicks 70 to your side and nil to the opposition?
Why would you belt a umpire in local football? They dont have agends like AFL umpires. Anyone see the last quarter of Collingwood v GWS ? You would swear someone had gone down at three quarter time and told them to give GWS nothing.
Whats going on rolling eyes?
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Beno88 wrote:Na that was Motlop later on. Although I don't know how that wasn't a free, was right in front of the umpire. A trip by hand used to be an automatic fifty.SainterK wrote:Was that when he tripped him by grabbing his ankle?Beno88 wrote:I reckon Varcoe could be in trouble for kicking Geary in the first quarter too. Happened on the boundary line near the saints bench well after the ball had gone.
Didn't like the attention.
No its just a free kick. Sounds like an error.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Wed 21 Oct 2009 11:18am
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Only saw it the once but the Stanley whack to the pod's head in the last looked........impressive?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23243
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1798 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Jack will go for this for sure and so he ought to
2 weeks for the dirty sniper Steven - the whole world could see he was trying to take poor old Pods elbow out using his jaw!
Just a low act......
"The above illustrates current MRP logic - all names have been left the same to deflect attention away from Cats players in the gun....."
2 weeks for the dirty sniper Steven - the whole world could see he was trying to take poor old Pods elbow out using his jaw!
Just a low act......
"The above illustrates current MRP logic - all names have been left the same to deflect attention away from Cats players in the gun....."
“Yeah….nah””
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Teflon wrote:Jack will go for this for sure and so he ought to
2 weeks for the dirty sniper Steven - the whole world could see he was trying to take poor old Pods elbow out using his jaw!
Just a low act......
"The above illustrates current MRP logic - all names have been left the same to deflect attention away from Cats players in the gun....."
And to think I thought Bartel got a week for something that many thought he may get off.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9053
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
How was Motlop not reported?. That's tripping plain and simple. So you can do that now - when a player runs past grab his leg and try and get him injured? Didn't even get a free. Unbelievable how much the umpires love Geelong.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Bluthy wrote:How was Motlop not reported?. That's tripping plain and simple. So you can do that now - when a player runs past grab his leg and try and get him injured? Didn't even get a free. Unbelievable how much the umpires love Geelong.
Well a journo on SEN today thought James Hird should get off because he believes in his own innocence. By that logic if Motlop didn't "feel" like getting reported you should all f%$# off.
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
maverick wrote:very lucky for low impact, Steven had to go off, would have thought medium contact.
I think that is decided by our clubs medical report.
- Greg T
- Club Player
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 825 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
SainterK wrote:It's hard to see the elbow though, it's blocked by Jacks chin
Sure was, got a bit of a fist first too......
Should of got 3 IMO
100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
"Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points)."
Negligent makes me laugh. You could see his intent.
Negligent makes me laugh. You could see his intent.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11351
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1344 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
A cowardly Cat gets a slap on the wrist. Surprise, surprise.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
- Greg T
- Club Player
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 825 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Infuriating really, the more u watch it the more the intent ...Griggsy wrote:"Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points)."
Negligent makes me laugh. You could see his intent.
100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8371
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1906 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Low impact? WT<deleted by forum police>
Pod is about 30 kg heavier than Jack so his arms are strong.
Low impact doesn't result in the player ending up on the turf, unless your name is Selwood or you play soccer.
Pod is about 30 kg heavier than Jack so his arms are strong.
Low impact doesn't result in the player ending up on the turf, unless your name is Selwood or you play soccer.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Basing findings on club's medical reports is a joke.
I could slap a rear naked choke on someone and they'd be unconscious in 8 seconds. Out cold.
The doctor's report would say that I'm fine within 5 minutes of waking up.
If you clip someone on the jaw, they can be knocked out cold but wake up without any issues at all.
Does this mean that both of these situations would be classed as low impact? It's ridiculous. Jack was elbowed flush on the jaw, and was put on his arse due to it. He went off the ground.
Does the fact that his jaw wasn't broken and/or he wasn't concussed mean it was low impact? Fair dinkum. Who thinks this s*** up?
I remember Ryan Hargreaves giving Heath Black one on the chin with far less force than what Podsiadly did to Jack - but Black spent the afternoon on the bench because of it.
I could kick someone in the liver which would drop them like a bag of spuds and kep them down for 5 minutes. But once they got back up, they'd be fine. Does that mean that is considered low impact?
Fair dinkum moronic.
I could slap a rear naked choke on someone and they'd be unconscious in 8 seconds. Out cold.
The doctor's report would say that I'm fine within 5 minutes of waking up.
If you clip someone on the jaw, they can be knocked out cold but wake up without any issues at all.
Does this mean that both of these situations would be classed as low impact? It's ridiculous. Jack was elbowed flush on the jaw, and was put on his arse due to it. He went off the ground.
Does the fact that his jaw wasn't broken and/or he wasn't concussed mean it was low impact? Fair dinkum. Who thinks this s*** up?
I remember Ryan Hargreaves giving Heath Black one on the chin with far less force than what Podsiadly did to Jack - but Black spent the afternoon on the bench because of it.
I could kick someone in the liver which would drop them like a bag of spuds and kep them down for 5 minutes. But once they got back up, they'd be fine. Does that mean that is considered low impact?
Fair dinkum moronic.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
I still can't believe he didn't get a free against him! Unbelievable.Greg T wrote:Infuriating really, the more u watch it the more the intent ...Griggsy wrote:"Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points)."
Negligent makes me laugh. You could see his intent.
- SunburySaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 2:47pm
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
The free was already payed for holding the ball.... If it wasn't holding the ball then there would of been a free for high contact.... either way we still got a free kick, so not sure why we are still harping on about a "free" not being payed against him....different story if no free kick was payed at allrodgerfox wrote:I still can't believe he didn't get a free against him! Unbelievable.Greg T wrote:Infuriating really, the more u watch it the more the intent ...Griggsy wrote:"Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points)."
Negligent makes me laugh. You could see his intent.
Now lives in Geelong...
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
Watch the replay.
No free was paid to Jack. The umpire didn't even flinch let alone put the whistle to his mouth, until Podsiadly was taken to ground.
I don't comment on umpires wearing my eye patch. I'm not complaining as a Saints supporter that there wasn't a free paid. I'm commenting on the incompetence to be meters away and in direct sight if it - yet miss it entirely. It's unbelievable.
No free was paid to Jack. The umpire didn't even flinch let alone put the whistle to his mouth, until Podsiadly was taken to ground.
I don't comment on umpires wearing my eye patch. I'm not complaining as a Saints supporter that there wasn't a free paid. I'm commenting on the incompetence to be meters away and in direct sight if it - yet miss it entirely. It's unbelievable.
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
rodgerfox wrote:Watch the replay.
No free was paid to Jack. The umpire didn't even flinch let alone put the whistle to his mouth, until Podsiadly was taken to ground.
I don't comment on umpires wearing my eye patch. I'm not complaining as a Saints supporter that there wasn't a free paid. I'm commenting on the incompetence to be meters away and in direct sight if it - yet miss it entirely. It's unbelievable.
Rubbish RF. How could the umpire possibly see the elbow
Here is the still that proves the umpires innocence
[/quote]
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Furphy
- Club Player
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 2:48pm
- Location: Berwick
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Podsiadly elbow to Jack
I agree, the most blatant tripping I have seen and no action taken. Imagine if Stephen Baker did something like that!Bluthy wrote:How was Motlop not reported?. That's tripping plain and simple. So you can do that now - when a player runs past grab his leg and try and get him injured? Didn't even get a free. Unbelievable how much the umpires love Geelong.