roskilde wrote:that was the bishop of st kilda they just showed on the screen.
go saints!!!!
He's gone all Kremlin though.
Good game from Webster
Game thread v Port
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Game thread v Port
He's gone all Kremlin though.
Good game from Webster
-
Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Game thread v Port
There is a lot of covert cheating in the AFL nowadays, are we ever a victim of it ?
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
whiskers3614
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4555
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 312 times
Re: Game thread v Port
Radio said 40% kicking efficiency!savatage wrote:Jesus roo has butchered it. Done so much hard work but lets so much of it undone through poor kicking.
Re: Game thread v Port
Seems right. We would've won easily had it been up to something decent.whiskers3614 wrote:Radio said 40% kicking efficiency!savatage wrote:Jesus roo has butchered it. Done so much hard work but lets so much of it undone through poor kicking.
-
St. Luke
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5268
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
- Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!
Re: Game thread v Port
Vital free kick to the Saints!!
When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
Re: Game thread v Port
Cairnsman... Are you breaking the rules?
Lucky the mods are inconsistent.....
If we lose, the first half can be to blame..... If we win, the second half will be the reason, pretty simple....
Pretty obvious one would think.... Either way, first half unacceptable? What do ya reckon cairnsman
Lucky the mods are inconsistent.....
If we lose, the first half can be to blame..... If we win, the second half will be the reason, pretty simple....
Pretty obvious one would think.... Either way, first half unacceptable? What do ya reckon cairnsman
-
St. Luke
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5268
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
- Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!
Re: Game thread v Port
All over! Port by 5
When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
-
Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Game thread v Port
That hurt but at least the boys showed some heart. So many youngsters played gutsy football. We need to use our early picks well next draft. There's some light at the end of the tunnel.
-
Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
-
St. Luke
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5268
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
- Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!
Re: Game thread v Port
Proud of the boys, but there were some very dodgy decisions made by the umpiring fraternity in that last qtr. What a shame! I honestly had a feeling we'd win this.
When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
-
Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Game thread v Port
WANKER. TOTAL WANKER. COME ON MATE. COME OUT AND TELL US HOW GOOD YOU ARE ARE AND HOW MUCH YOU KNOW ABOUT EVERYTHING. IF WE WERE IN THE SAME ROOM NOW I RECKON YOU WOULD BE ON THE FLOOR.BigMart wrote:Cairnsman... Are you breaking the rules?
Lucky the mods are inconsistent.....
If we lose, the first half can be to blame..... If we win, the second half will be the reason, pretty simple....
Pretty obvious one would think.... Either way, first half unacceptable? What do ya reckon cairnsman
Re: Game thread v Port
Unfortunately it's true. He tends to make circles when he gets the ball. Trent Dennis lane isn't a footballers arsehole and should not be gifted any more games.Con Gorozidis wrote:Farren ray gets the ball but he makes horrible decisions.
Last edited by savatage on Sat 20 Jul 2013 11:20pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
sainterinsydney
- Club Player
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Mon 30 Nov 2009 11:03am
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Game thread v Port
We showed we have a future, and we are ensuring that we will get a good draft pick--the result could have been worse.
Re: Game thread v Port
How can an umpire give 50m against dal when he did not see it - that is absolute bulls*** & as Richo said Hickey mark was absolutely clear
Re: Game thread v Port
Agreed.sainterinsydney wrote:We showed we have a future, and we are ensuring that we will get a good draft pick--the result could have been worse.
Re: Game thread v Port
Please watch the replay of Westhoff's last contested mark??
Look at Rhys Stanley's effort 2 metres behind him.... Just did not compete and pulled up short.... There's a word for him
Look at Rhys Stanley's effort 2 metres behind him.... Just did not compete and pulled up short.... There's a word for him