Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357392Post Eastern »

It be that it was on TV. It might be my failing eyesight (old age) but I thought both Tom Lee & Tom Hickey looked to have put on a bit of muscle over the past month or two. Has anyone else noticed this? or Am I barking up the wrong tree ..................again? !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357399Post savatage »

Tom Lee has definitely put on some size - but also he is noticeably carrying "puppy fat".

This next pre-season, if attacked right - he should be able to carve out a stronger, fitter body in general. He kind of looks like he's "just going" physically at the minute.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18636
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1980 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357403Post bigcarl »

Lee's going to be a very good full forward and Hickey an exceptional ruckman


User avatar
wolfpup
Club Player
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu 06 May 2004 6:00pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357415Post wolfpup »

Eastern wrote:It be that it was on TV. It might be my failing eyesight (old age) but I thought both Tom Lee & Tom Hickey looked to have put on a bit of muscle over the past month or two. Has anyone else noticed this? or Am I barking up the wrong tree ..................again? !!
Yep i agree, Lee looked much bigger was pleasantly surprised. That mcevoy tap to jack and mark and goal from 50 by Lee (2nd quarter i think) reminded of the gehrig days.


-----------

St.Kilda Forever!
User avatar
mightysainters
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357419Post mightysainters »

a good pre season of Danks supplements will heed some great results... 4 or 5 kg of lean muscle...

Why not? Essendon will get off scott free


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357439Post plugger66 »

Based on a bit of experience i have never heard of any fit player puting on size during the season. Most young players will lose weight from about Febuary until just about the end of the year because they dont do as many weights as pre season and due to the running they do usually lose a little during the season. A guy like Markworth should put on weight during the year.


joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357443Post joffaboy »

I saw them both up near an Essendon botox clinic last month.

THought they were getting their crows feet done :shock: :shock:


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357446Post dragit »

plugger66 wrote:A guy like Markworth should put on weight during the year.
Yes & I think that is why they were holding him back from VFL games last year, so he could a) bulk up and b) not lose it all in games…

I do wonder though whether adding a lot of bulk like that increases the chances of a joint injury like he did in the summer.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357451Post Bernard Shakey »

Both the same as they were at the start of the season. Back in May, after a Sandy game, I said that Lee looks like a footballer and he still does.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
LTN16
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2494
Joined: Sun 11 Jun 2006 9:50pm

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357471Post LTN16 »

Thought that Saunders had put on some size too.

He was looking fit.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357475Post Cairnsman »

One of the commentators on SEN during the game who seemed to know a fair bit about Lee was putting Lee in the mid 90kg range and reckon he had put on size since leaving the WAFL. We could have our next power forward.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9144
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357487Post spert »

Forget all these special diets and banned substances- just feed the boys up on meat and 3 veg every meal, and the trainers should carry a packet of Twisties and a 2lt bottle of coke (not the Essendon variety of coke) to take out to players on the field..the guys would all bulk up nicely- even TDL and Milera


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357489Post FQF »

Lee seems to be to be a forward in the mould of Kennedy.


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5023
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357493Post maverick »

Funny, one week to the next Lee is a superstar or a dud?
Which is it?

IMO he will play 150 games and be very serviceable, exactly what we need in our development phase.
Neither a star nor a dud, but worth the pick swap we did.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357496Post saintspremiers »

maverick wrote:Funny, one week to the next Lee is a superstar or a dud?
Which is it?

IMO he will play 150 games and be very serviceable, exactly what we need in our development phase.
Neither a star nor a dud, but worth the pick swap we did.
I tend to agree. A bit of a Meister - but hopefully slightly better. I cannot see Lee being a star, but if he plays 100 to 150 games that'd be a fair result.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5023
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357500Post maverick »

saintspremiers wrote:
maverick wrote:Funny, one week to the next Lee is a superstar or a dud?
Which is it?

IMO he will play 150 games and be very serviceable, exactly what we need in our development phase.
Neither a star nor a dud, but worth the pick swap we did.
I tend to agree. A bit of a Meister - but hopefully slightly better. I cannot see Lee being a star, but if he plays 100 to 150 games that'd be a fair result.
Different player obviously, but in the Blake category for mine.
Watching the replay he hardly looks like he's carrying anything, except for a bit too much hair, needs a cut...


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357536Post gringo »

The SEN commentator was was saying Lee is massive compared to the last season. He looked noticeably skinny at Claremont against port melbourne but was really slippery and elusive. i was a bit worried they might try to play him away from his strengths. He looked like an over grown Milney to me- snuck goals and created with his evasiveness and clean one touch handling of the ball but still a nice lead up chest marker. He has real potential to be a star forward if he can play like he did at WAFL- he looks like with better delivery and structure he could be very good.

Much more natural star potential than Maister who is a work horse type he has x factor Lee.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357562Post Con Gorozidis »

I think Lee is more athletic and agile than Maister.
Will be good for us.

We got Maister for nothing and he has been a good workhorse for us. Cant knock the bloke at all. Was going well when he got injured.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357815Post Bernard Shakey »

maverick wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
maverick wrote:Funny, one week to the next Lee is a superstar or a dud?
Which is it?

IMO he will play 150 games and be very serviceable, exactly what we need in our development phase.
Neither a star nor a dud, but worth the pick swap we did.
I tend to agree. A bit of a Meister - but hopefully slightly better. I cannot see Lee being a star, but if he plays 100 to 150 games that'd be a fair result.
Different player obviously, but in the Blake category for mine.
Watching the replay he hardly looks like he's carrying anything, except for a bit too much hair, needs a cut...
Lee is a footballer and former WAFL player with a future.
Wilkes is a WAFL player with no future.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357831Post ausfatcat »

god I wish me putting on the weight got such good posts, I just get the nagging saying I am getting fat


User avatar
jimmy_slats
Club Player
Posts: 433
Joined: Mon 05 Nov 2007 10:54am

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357868Post jimmy_slats »

defiantly putting on size I've been to alot of vfl games this year and you have to remember he has missed a fair few games this year through injury


'WALK THIS WAY!!!!!'
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357869Post Old Mate »

It is true players are at their biggest after the pre season when a lot of weight training has been done over the off season however that doesn't mean player specific diets (eating in a caloric surplus) and weight training is not continued for those who require addition strength / size. Lee has spent the year with a dodgy foot so fair chance he's spent more time under the iron while having a limited running program. He definitely looks bigger than when I saw him in the NAB Cup.


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357872Post stinger »

Old Mate wrote:It is true players are at their biggest after the pre season when a lot of weight training has been done over the off season however that doesn't mean player specific diets (eating in a caloric surplus) and weight training is not continued for those who require addition strength / size. Lee has spent the year with a dodgy foot so fair chance he's spent more time under the iron while having a limited running program. He definitely looks bigger than when I saw him in the NAB Cup.
the geelong players all bulked up suddenly when robinson and his mate dank were about......i think it was reported that a few of them put on 5 ks ..in a hurry......


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357876Post Old Mate »

stinger wrote:
Old Mate wrote:It is true players are at their biggest after the pre season when a lot of weight training has been done over the off season however that doesn't mean player specific diets (eating in a caloric surplus) and weight training is not continued for those who require addition strength / size. Lee has spent the year with a dodgy foot so fair chance he's spent more time under the iron while having a limited running program. He definitely looks bigger than when I saw him in the NAB Cup.
the geelong players all bulked up suddenly when robinson and his mate dank were about......i think it was reported that a few of them put on 5 ks ..in a hurry......
Well that's another topic. 5 kegs is not difficult to put on over a period covering an off season however maintaining speed, agility, endurance and gaining that sort of significant size and strength in an off season is extremely difficult and Geelong's program certainly has question marks. Watching the replay of the Dons/Port game I couldn't help but notice the size of guys like Hibberd, Howlett and Heppell. These players are young kids who look like they've seen a decade of training in a professional environment. A lot of similarities between the Bombers players and Geelong's aesthetically speaking.


paddy
Club Player
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2011 7:06pm

Re: Lee & Hickey-SIZE?

Post: # 1357879Post paddy »

i do remember seeing Lee and Stanely walking beside each other and thinking that they almost looked the same height...

so he may have grown a little?!


Post Reply