He should have been playing before Ross & Murdoch throughout the year & Ross has been quite poor in past two weeks ...bergholt wrote:Murdoch, Webster, Dunell, Newnes, Ross - surely there's a limit to the number of young mids you can have in one side?WinnersOnly wrote:Yeah what a surprise poor old Tom LEDGER misses again ... Watters approach with Ledger/Curren has been no better than RL was with Steven/Armitage & co.
Round 14 Team v Richmond
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
WinnersOnly wrote:He should have been playing before Ross & Murdoch throughout the year & Ross has been quite poor in past two weeks ...bergholt wrote:Murdoch, Webster, Dunell, Newnes, Ross - surely there's a limit to the number of young mids you can have in one side?WinnersOnly wrote:Yeah what a surprise poor old Tom LEDGER misses again ... Watters approach with Ledger/Curren has been no better than RL was with Steven/Armitage & co.
I think Murdoch can be more of a utility type as he's solid and long kicking. Dunell is playing that same type of forward or back or anywhere he's needed role. Newnes is a backman as is Webster but Armo and Steven are both clearance winning inside mids and then when Lenny comes back Armo is pushed elsewhere. He's been unlucky to not get games so far but there are obviously reasons why. He's probably just a little one dimensional to demand a place right now but things change.
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Like to see Lenny ease on midway through the third when the pace is out of the game and pick up a lazy 12 touches...
Why's he playing at Ballarat
Why's he playing at Ballarat
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Saad has had numerous opportunities. Not too sure if he is a better kick than Tom. It's hard to have an opinion when he averages about 2 kicks per game.Munga wrote:Poor player management??? The guy can't kick a footy!
My point. Why do some guys get chance after chance and some get donuts.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Your saad flogging is becoming monotonous bro... the guy has kicked 41 goals in his first 27 games close to Milnes much vaunted 2/game ratio.8856brother wrote:Saad has had numerous opportunities. Not too sure if he is a better kick than Tom. It's hard to have an opinion when he averages about 2 kicks per game.Munga wrote:Poor player management??? The guy can't kick a footy!
My point. Why do some guys get chance after chance and some get donuts.
Yes he has struggled this year, along with about 15 others... but he's still our 3rd highest goal kicker, the guy is learning the game still.
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
H![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
How many has he kicked by the way?
My issue is that Ledger is not getting an opportunity, not the fact Saad has been gifted games he hasn't deserved. Not Ahmed's fault by the way. That is another point for discussion.dragit wrote:Your saad flogging is becoming monotonous bro... the guy has kicked 41 goals in his first 27 games close to Milnes much vaunted 2/game ratio.8856brother wrote:Saad has had numerous opportunities. Not too sure if he is a better kick than Tom. It's hard to have an opinion when he averages about 2 kicks per game.Munga wrote:Poor player management??? The guy can't kick a footy!
My point. Why do some guys get chance after chance and some get donuts.
Yes he has struggled this year, along with about 15 others... but he's still our 3rd highest goal kicker, the guy is learning the game still.
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
How many has he kicked by the way?
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
The club always needs to delist players at the end of a season, Ledger , clearly, must be in the gun for ousting...it happens.
Curren may well walk with him
Curren may well walk with him
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
We always seem to have a late change so perhaps we'll still see Ledg on Sunday. ![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1198 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Never doubt the word of a good Dr.Dr Spaceman wrote:We always seem to have a late change so perhaps we'll still see Ledg on Sunday.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1276 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
So we might see a St. Ledgertony74 wrote:Never doubt the word of a good Dr.Dr Spaceman wrote:We always seem to have a late change so perhaps we'll still see Ledg on Sunday.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3147
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond - Final
I won't then - maybe Ledger will be another one of Watters Late changestony74 wrote:Don't bet on it.MCG-Unit wrote:In: Wright
Out: Simpkin
I/C: Newnes, Dunell, Ross, Murdoch
Emerg: Siposs, Ledger, Saad
Ledger misses out again..........
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Might consider taking some of the Saints at the line of $1.90 +30.5 pts start
Also Saints are $5.25 U39.5 pts
Stand your ground ![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Why does Ledger deserve a go? has he done more to knock out Newnes or Webster?spot on wrote:Gotta give ledger a go, sippos in for simpkin, think newnes or Webster have a rest
all this talk about him is he really that good or is he the new T Walsh...
Fortius Quo Fidelius
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Ah, OK, I see. Watters not only needs to play the kids, he needs to play exactly the right kids?WinnersOnly wrote:He should have been playing before Ross & Murdoch throughout the year & Ross has been quite poor in past two weeks ...bergholt wrote:Murdoch, Webster, Dunell, Newnes, Ross - surely there's a limit to the number of young mids you can have in one side?
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Amazing really. Some people just think he has earned his opportunity with strong performances in the VFL. No one is suggesting he will even make the grade, let alone be a good player, just give him an opportunity so we can at least form an opinion.ShanghaiSaint wrote:Why does Ledger deserve a go? has he done more to knock out Newnes or Webster?spot on wrote:Gotta give ledger a go, sippos in for simpkin, think newnes or Webster have a rest
all this talk about him is he really that good or is he the new T Walsh...
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
8856brother wrote:Amazing really. Some people just think he has earned his opportunity with strong performances in the VFL. No one is suggesting he will even make the grade, let alone be a good player, just give him an opportunity so we can at least form an opinion.ShanghaiSaint wrote:Why does Ledger deserve a go? has he done more to knock out Newnes or Webster?spot on wrote:Gotta give ledger a go, sippos in for simpkin, think newnes or Webster have a rest
all this talk about him is he really that good or is he the new T Walsh...
Do you really think he wouldnt be playing if he is doing the right things at Sandy. I think it is hilarous firstly that some people suggest certain players should play but dont even see these guys play at Sandy. Not suggesting you do or dont but i can bet many dont but they somehow know more than SW and nearly as bad are people who watch him play and then look at the stats and say he deserves a game without knowing what the coaches are asking him to do during games. maybe he isnt doing what is asked. maybe he is playing a much poorer standard of footy and the coaches dont think he is up to AFL standard. maybe they are wrong but even if they are they still have much more information than any of us have on here.
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Who's ledger in for tony?
Scott talking about midfield supply.
Maybe he'll drop a forward?
Scott talking about midfield supply.
Maybe he'll drop a forward?
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Not enough outside mids?
I think there is easily room for three inside mids in a team make-up; I feel Cockie and Ledger and Curren are inside options for the future, but Curren also as a half forward.
Right now inside mids; Armo, Steven, Ross (with Jones rotating or defensive forward). Then Lenny to come back next week.
Outside mids; Joey, Milera, Dal Santo (and half back), and possibly Dunell. In my opinion this is where we have missed Goddard/Gilbert, and as a result we are not hurting teams.
But this is being addressed if you look at our young guns who can either run and carry, or kick, or both; Newnes, Webster, Wright, Ross (Milera/Dunell)
I would like to see Ledger play. I think he is a potential good inside mid, but with a little bit of dash too; but his ball use has been criticised. I wonder if his tank is being monitored. He is, after all, Watters' blast boy.
I think there is easily room for three inside mids in a team make-up; I feel Cockie and Ledger and Curren are inside options for the future, but Curren also as a half forward.
Right now inside mids; Armo, Steven, Ross (with Jones rotating or defensive forward). Then Lenny to come back next week.
Outside mids; Joey, Milera, Dal Santo (and half back), and possibly Dunell. In my opinion this is where we have missed Goddard/Gilbert, and as a result we are not hurting teams.
But this is being addressed if you look at our young guns who can either run and carry, or kick, or both; Newnes, Webster, Wright, Ross (Milera/Dunell)
I would like to see Ledger play. I think he is a potential good inside mid, but with a little bit of dash too; but his ball use has been criticised. I wonder if his tank is being monitored. He is, after all, Watters' blast boy.
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 10:38pm
- Location: In a laundrette, San Francisco USA
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
I would say Dunell. No use playing him up forward if he doesn't have the confidence to have a shot at goal.SainterK wrote:Who's ledger in for tony?
Scott talking about midfield supply.
Maybe he'll drop a forward?
Not Craw, CRAW!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Good point. When you add Gram to the mix we've lost our three main rebouding half backs from last year. You'd expect it to leave a hole.millarsaint wrote:
In my opinion this is where we have missed Goddard/Gilbert, and as a result we are not hurting teams.
.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
We have added Roberton & Wright though, while obviously not as effective yet, both young and pretty exciting prospects... also Newnes & Webster have played when they might not have if BJ & Gram were still around.remboy wrote:Good point. When you add Gram to the mix we've lost our three main rebouding half backs from last year. You'd expect it to leave a hole.millarsaint wrote:
In my opinion this is where we have missed Goddard/Gilbert, and as a result we are not hurting teams.
.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 567 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Roberton has been a great pick up. However, BJ and Gram played about 350 games between them, the four you've mentioned will probably be good long term players, but at the moment they've played about 50 games between them. We're just going to have to grin and bare it while the new guys get some experience.dragit wrote:We have added Roberton & Wright though, while obviously not as effective yet, both young and pretty exciting prospects... also Newnes & Webster have played when they might not have if BJ & Gram were still around.remboy wrote:Good point. When you add Gram to the mix we've lost our three main rebouding half backs from last year. You'd expect it to leave a hole.millarsaint wrote:
In my opinion this is where we have missed Goddard/Gilbert, and as a result we are not hurting teams.
.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Sat 17 Sep 2011 11:17am
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
To those of you who get to watch alot of Sandys games, who do you think is better Tom curren or Tom ledger? And how is young staley coming on? Could he make it as a key back in the future?
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Round 14 Team v Richmond
Will it be wet weather footy today in Melbourne?
If so, what team do you reckon that will suite? Might suit the in and under players like Ross and Armitage..
I would also leave Kosi out and bring in another small running type if its wet.
If so, what team do you reckon that will suite? Might suit the in and under players like Ross and Armitage..
I would also leave Kosi out and bring in another small running type if its wet.