Rate Roo

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Rate Roo

Post: # 1349307Post older saint »

Coming in to his 250th good time to assess exactly where Roo stands in the all time great players at this club.
5 Time B& F winner
2 time leading Goal kicker
4 time All Australian ( inc 2009 captain)
NAB Rising Star
AFLPA MVP 2004

In my time watching and remembering players he is now in the top 3
Lockett, Harvey Reiwoldt

Pre my time you add Stewart , Baldock, Mohr

For me he sits 3rd in modern players and perhaps 5th all time.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349360Post BigMart »

3rd, maybe 4th all time

250 games is already twice as many as Badock, many more than Stewart and Lockett..

His record through in a strong team as its best player over a decade is remarkable......

I'd say
Harvey
Lockett
Stewart
Riewoldt


User avatar
rexy
SS Life Member
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 12:12am
Location: The Gully

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349365Post rexy »

Definitely in best 3 I've seen with Locket Harvey !
What about CHFs all time, I've got him above Brown Brereton easily and on a par with Carey!


Maybe this year?
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349369Post bigcarl »

Lockett then Stewart then Harvey, Riewoldt and Baldock all on the same tier.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17024
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3644 times
Been thanked: 2916 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349373Post skeptic »

best of all time for mine

Works harder than Lockett and had to constantly develop and redevelop his game
More gifted than Harvey

Take nothing away from those 2 players don't get me wrong but Roo is a freak


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349374Post bigcarl »

skeptic wrote:best of all time for mine

Works harder than Lockett and had to constantly develop and redevelop his game
More gifted than Harvey

His kicking renders him ineffective as a forward ... when compared with Lockett. No shame in that.

I'd say he's different to Harvey in his key attributes, but not more gifted.

Let's just say he's in the top 5.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17024
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3644 times
Been thanked: 2916 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349383Post skeptic »

bigcarl wrote:
His kicking renders him ineffective as a forward ... when compared with Lockett. No shame in that.

I'd say he's different to Harvey in his key attributes, but not more gifted.

Let's just say he's in the top 5.
I'll pay that RE Lockett. Looking at Roo now, I just wonder what Lockett could have been for us if he had Roo's mindset and attitude

With Harvey I'm having difficulty articulating what I mean... thought about it for a few minutes and remain stumped. I think father time has just removed some memories RE how good banger really was so withdrawn.

Roo is still my fav thogh


merimbula
Club Player
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon 31 Dec 2012 6:28am

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349384Post merimbula »

Having watched them play:

Ian Stewart was truly unbelievable;
Tony Lockett was truly unbelievable;
Darrel Baldock, Robert Harvey & Nick Riewoldt are unbelievable;

football champions!


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349386Post Cairnsman »

Comparing Roo with Lockett is a little easier than comparing Roo with Harvey in terms of positions played.

Whilst Roos kicking wasn't as sharp as Locketts Roo has other attributes that beat Lockett on and off the field. Being part of a winning premiership alters peoples perception about a player when having these types of discussion and Roo possibly would be rated by most as the all time great hands down if he had one of those little medallion things, and although he doesn't, coming closer to that elusive prize more than Lockett ever did surely must elevate his value to the team AND CLUB over a longer period over Lockett. His leadership and professionalism kills Locketts as well as his fitness and ability to work both ways. Lockett was lightening fast over 10m and could only lead out and probably wouldn't be suited to the modern game.

To be an all time great of a club I reckon you have to be a one club player so here my opion:


Baldock, Harvey and Roo Equal pegging for first

Burkey and Lowe Equal second and all of the obvious 66 premiership players


PADDLEPOP1001
Club Player
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 109 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349391Post PADDLEPOP1001 »

Lockett wouldn't be suited to the modern game seriously ,he could play in any era and adjust accordingly!


PADDLEPOP1000
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349393Post plugger66 »

Well Lockett clearly number one. Then it is Roo, Harvey and Hayes. Didnt see the Doc or Stewart really so would be making that up.


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9053
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349416Post perfectionist »

Nick is the best contested marking forward I have seen. He is the best tall gut runner the game has seen. He is skilled on both sides, always gives 100% effort and is fiercely team oriented. He would be a coach's dream player. Tony Lockett, Peter Hudson and John Coleman appear to be the only forwards who were able to master the "big sticks" nerves. All three were able to have their heads directly over the ball at the moment of contact. That is not an easy physical manoeuvre for a tall player, but it means the ball generally goes straight. Nick's accuracy is about the same as the other top forwards over the years. Had he had the accuracy of Tony Lockett he would have the perfect player. It has been a delight to watch him play our great game - for the Mighty Saints - over the last 12 years. In every contest, he has made the ball the object. He has shone a light on sportsmanship that many had thought had dimmed. He is one of the greatest Saints.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349418Post bergholt »

PADDLEPOP1001 wrote:Lockett wouldn't be suited to the modern game seriously ,he could play in any era and adjust accordingly!
I dunno. His man would run off him a lot so he'd be asked to push a long way up the field when the opposition have the ball. I'm not sure aerobic fitness was ever one of his strengths, so he might be too buggered to lead or kick by the time he got back inside 50.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349420Post Cairnsman »

bergholt wrote:
PADDLEPOP1001 wrote:Lockett wouldn't be suited to the modern game seriously ,he could play in any era and adjust accordingly!
I dunno. His man would run off him a lot so he'd be asked to push a long way up the field when the opposition have the ball. I'm not sure aerobic fitness was ever one of his strengths, so he might be too buggered to lead or kick by the time he got back inside 50.
Yep weight control and fitness was an issue for locket from what I remember and I think he was also an asthmatic. Seem to remember the trainers having to bring out his blue puffer during a game.


User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349423Post 8856brother »

perfectionist wrote:Nick is the best contested marking forward I have seen. He is the best tall gut runner the game has seen. He is skilled on both sides, always gives 100% effort and is fiercely team oriented. He would be a coach's dream player. Tony Lockett, Peter Hudson and John Coleman appear to be the only forwards who were able to master the "big sticks" nerves. All three were able to have their heads directly over the ball at the moment of contact. That is not an easy physical manoeuvre for a tall player, but it means the ball generally goes straight. Nick's accuracy is about the same as the other top forwards over the years. Had he had the accuracy of Tony Lockett he would have the perfect player. It has been a delight to watch him play our great game - for the Mighty Saints - over the last 12 years. In every contest, he has made the ball the object. He has shone a light on sportsmanship that many had thought had dimmed. He is one of the greatest Saints.
I agree with everything you have said except for your first comment. Contested marking is not his greatest strength. Pretty sure he has stated that. This is why he runs so bloody hard to lose his opponant, harder than anyone who has ever played AFL. This is why he is so good. Loewe and Lockett were both far better contested marks. In saying that I only rate Plugger as a better Saints player in my time than Roo. An absolute champion of our club and the game.


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349424Post stinger »

merimbula wrote:Having watched them play:

Ian Stewart was truly unbelievable;
Tony Lockett was truly unbelievable;
Darrel Baldock, Robert Harvey & Nick Riewoldt are unbelievable;

football champions!
+1..i've been truly blessed to have watched all 5 play........


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349435Post BigMart »

Tony didn't take 8 marks a game, get 16 possessions a game, play 250 games or have half the goal assists?

Tony was no doubt a better FF

Who was the better CHF?

Wayne Carey was a better player than Tony, and was not as accurate, nor was Ablett.

So to say Tony's kicking made him a better fwd is odd. CHF is considered the most important position on the ground, and Plugger never played there?!

To say Roo is ineffective as a fwd because of his kicking whilst winning 6 best and fairests (pencilled in) and kicking 550 goals is bizarre???

Also not to rate Robert Harvey as our greatest player is bizarre???
He didn't get his accolades (head and shoulders above anyone and too much to list)
Not sure on what score he isn't
Consistency at length at absolute elite level?? 1991-2005 (8 AA)
Best individual season 97/98
Best individual game 45 possessions, 3 goals
Finals record
I find it hard to believe he is underrated...

Plugger was glorious at his best

Harvey was too and for twice as long

Riwoldt in mind is a combination of the two...


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349436Post BigMart »

Obvious mistakes in post, bloody phones..,

Accolades by accident.


remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2133
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 587 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349438Post remboy »

I always thought the best Saints (in no order ) were Lockett, Harvey, Stewart and Baldock. Didn't see the last two play but on reputations and achievemnts they deserve to be there. Lockett influenced the outcome of more games singlehandedly than any other player I've ever seen, which makes him no1 in my book. Harvey pretty much invented gut running and forced opposition coaches to rotate players on him. Anyone who changes the way the game is played desrves to be there.
I think the term champion is used way too loosely. A guy at work calls Brad Johnson a champion. Maybe at the Bulldogs but not of the AFL. In my mind to be truly called a champion a player must be in the elite of the competition and maintain that level for the majority of their career. In looking over the stats and achievements people have already mentioned in this thread it's nearly impossib le not to put Roo in that category.
It' also silly to compare him to Carey or Brereton or Lockett. Those guys were power athletes. Roo is a CHF with the athletic ability of a midfielder. We will be waiting a long time to see another player of his type again.
I remember Daley Thompson saying that if he was able to train Roo at his peak for 4 years, he'd get him into an Olympic 400 metre final. This guy is truly unique.
While we're on the subject of rating players, Stewiw Loewe was the best contested maek I've seen. Always up against two or more. I lost count of the number of times he'd take marks two or three deep in a pack.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12792
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 802 times
Been thanked: 428 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349442Post Mr Magic »

Having seen all 5 play in their prime I would rate them in the following order as 'best' (not greatest)

Baldock (the best I've ever seen)
Lockett (people came to the footy just to watch him)
Harvey (the greatest gut runner the game has ever seen)
Roo (revolutionized the way CHF is played)
Stewart (sublime skills and courage)

As 'greatest Saints' I have had the pleasure of watching I would rate the top 5 as
Harvey
Barker
Roo
Baldock
Burke


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9142
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349444Post spert »

How good would it be to have that lot running around with Roo for us today (including Stewart)


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349455Post bergholt »

BigMart wrote:Best individual season 97/98
No quibbles from me about most of your post except this bit. Lockett's 1991 was as good as Harvey's 97 and 98. 127 goals in 17 games - 7.5 goals a game. The highest goal average for a season in VFL/AFL history. Six bags of ten or more. If he'd played the first six games that year he would have kicked 150+ and won his second Brownlow, as it was he finished eighth. Won the Coleman by a street, Sumich finished 16 goals behind him but played eight more games.

Our side that year was OK - Harvs, Loewey and Winmar were both right up there, Morris, Timmy Pekin and Frankie Coghlan good in support. But really, Plugger dragged us into the finals single-handed with a superhuman season, one of the best of all time.


User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349460Post 8856brother »

bergholt wrote:
BigMart wrote:Best individual season 97/98
No quibbles from me about most of your post except this bit. Lockett's 1991 was as good as Harvey's 97 and 98. 127 goals in 17 games - 7.5 goals a game. The highest goal average for a season in VFL/AFL history. Six bags of ten or more. If he'd played the first six games that year he would have kicked 150+ and won his second Brownlow, as it was he finished eighth. Won the Coleman by a street, Sumich finished 16 goals behind him but played eight more games.

Our side that year was OK - Harvs, Loewey and Winmar were both right up there, Morris, Timmy Pekin and Frankie Coghlan good in support. But really, Plugger dragged us into the finals single-handed with a superhuman season, one of the best of all time.
Lockett's first game that season was round 7 at Moorabbin against the Crows. He had 9 goals at half time. Would have been 10 except for the umpire to call play on as he had a shot after the 1/2 time siren that went through. Umpire judged he ran around the mark.

He tired after half time and only kicked another 3 to make it 12 for the game. I think sometimes people forget how rediculously good a player he was. All my non Saints mates would come with me to Moorabbin just to watch this beast play. Many others did too. Best footballer ever IMO.


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349468Post gringo »

So hard to rate players from different eras.
Harves was so adaptable- he saw an era that mids ran off each other and still played an elite brand in an era of run with players.

Lockett got me back into footy after the 1980s -he was just scarily dominant.

Riewoldt would have to be next in line just again has played the hardest position on the ground through different eras and just adapted to it. Played elite footy flat out.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Rate Roo

Post: # 1349483Post bigcarl »

remboy wrote:Lockett influenced the outcome of more games singlehandedly than any other player I've ever seen
Yep. including the Careys and Ablett Seniors. who incidentally played in better teams.

From memory he kicked 10 or more 22 times.


Post Reply