Umpires
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Umpires
Carlton v Essendon umpires let everything go. Everyone saying it was well umpired. If it was it means they choose to dish the s*** up that we cop.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Umpires
Yes. They even let that Garlett non/goal go without a review in the 1st Q !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
Re: Umpires
CURLY wrote:Carlton v Essendon umpires let everything go. Everyone saying it was well umpired. If it was it means they choose to dish the s*** up that we cop.
Issues. Please check them out.
Re: Umpires
Eastern wrote:Yes. They even let that Garlett non/goal go without a review in the 1st Q !!
And they lost by 5 points. What if that happened to us? Just imagine the thread about it on here.
- Greg T
- Club Player
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 825 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Umpires
I wouldn't have been happy with some of the ones they let go,
But they let them go all nite, except the s*** 50 at the end...
But they let them go all nite, except the s*** 50 at the end...
100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: Umpires
Agree with CURLY and plugger66.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Carlton v Essendon umpires let everything go. Everyone saying it was well umpired. If it was it means they choose to dish the s*** up that we cop.
Issues. Please check them out.
let's get these umpiring issues checked out.
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8310
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1876 times
- Been thanked: 874 times
Re: Umpires
Halfway thru the last quarter, the commentators said "total frees so far- 15" that was the total !
There shoulda been a dozen droppin the ball, and several in-the-back that were ignored, one mark where the guy clearly pushed from behind and the ump was 13m away AND on the perfect angle behind, he was in the frame and saw 100% but chose to pay the mark. Unbelievable.
There shoulda been a dozen droppin the ball, and several in-the-back that were ignored, one mark where the guy clearly pushed from behind and the ump was 13m away AND on the perfect angle behind, he was in the frame and saw 100% but chose to pay the mark. Unbelievable.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤![🤍](//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/twitter/twemoji@latest/assets/svg/1f90d.svg)
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3149
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 536 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: Umpires
Yes the Garlett 'point' should have been a goal viewing the replaylummox wrote:Eastern wrote:Yes. They even let that Garlett non/goal go without a review in the 1st Q !!
And they lost by 5 points. What if that happened to us? Just imagine the thread about it on here.
Think that was made up for by the Betts 'goal' where his foot looked over the goal line while kicking it thru - definite point IMO
No Contract, No contact ![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: Umpires
So what's the verdict was it well umpired? People on Big Footy and SEN are full if prrise for the umpiring yet it was nothing like what we've seen.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Umpires
CURLY wrote:So what's the verdict was it well umpired? People on Big Footy and SEN are full if prrise for the umpiring yet it was nothing like what we've seen.
How mant times can you say the same line before it is similar to what we have seen? Issues.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: Umpires
No it wasn't not at all. The umpires clearly changed there mindset for last nights game.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:So what's the verdict was it well umpired? People on Big Footy and SEN are full if prrise for the umpiring yet it was nothing like what we've seen.
How mant times can you say the same line before it is similar to what we have seen? Issues.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Umpires
CURLY wrote:No it wasn't not at all. The umpires clearly changed there mindset for last nights game.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:So what's the verdict was it well umpired? People on Big Footy and SEN are full if prrise for the umpiring yet it was nothing like what we've seen.
How mant times can you say the same line before it is similar to what we have seen? Issues.
Ive read that as well from you. Keep going. There are more lines we can all read again.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: Umpires
You cant answer Plugger because you know Im right. Last nights game was apparently umpired brilliantly. Which means the s*** they dish up has to be deemed as poor.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Umpires
CURLY wrote:You cant answer Plugger because you know Im right. Last nights game was apparently umpired brilliantly. Which means the s*** they dish up has to be deemed as poor.
Because like I have said to you many times, you see things in black and white. There is no grey. Games are umpired differently because all games are different and secondly most people watch games not involving your team through 2 eyes.
I unlike you would hardly know if the game is umpired differently because I dont watch the umpires, I watch the game and its amazing how you hardly notice them doing it that way.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: Umpires
All the talk back has been loaded with people saying how they let it go and how much better the game was. More frees to North last week than in the entire game last night.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Umpires
CURLY wrote:All the talk back has been loaded with people saying how they let it go and how much better the game was. More frees to North last week than in the entire game last night.
Yep and so whats your point? Different game, different umpires and so on. Is there a set rule on how many frees in a game?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: Umpires
There clearly is no rules. Its interpretations and as we have seen they are much different in our game.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10192
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1306 times
Re: Umpires
Another umpire who wont concede the truth or admit they are wrong.st.byron wrote:Keep up the good work Plugger. These threads are making me laugh now.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9040
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: Umpires
Yes, that's what I thought watching it on TV, but he might have got one millimetre of boot to the ball before all of the ball crossed the line. Those ones are forgivable, but the other one was not, especially when a review system is available. There was also a stupid waste of time with a boundary umpire who initially signalled it had gone through for a point and then, well, I don't know why it was reviewed. The best solution to poor goal umpiring decisions (and I don't always blame the goal umpire) is to have two goal umpires at each end. It means that they only have to cover 6.4 metres rather than 19.2 metres and unless they are blind, can always tell whether the ball has hit a post, which (as we know all too well) is the biggest boo boo possible.MCG-Unit wrote:...Yes the Garlett 'point' should have been a goal viewing the replay
Think that was made up for by the Betts 'goal' where his foot looked over the goal line while kicking it thru...
I agree that Carlton supporters are entitled to squeal, not that they need any excuse.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 171 times
- Been thanked: 381 times
Re: Umpires
No way, there were some shocking non decisions to Essendon, one 30metres out from goal was quite simply a marking infringement and had to be paid.perfectionist wrote:
I agree that Carlton supporters are entitled to squeal, not that they need any excuse.
I am with some here, you cannot change interpretations week to week. It reeks of pressure from outside on the umpires which then brings into question the integrity of their jobs.
If it is a free kick, pay it, I don't care if there are 80 free kicks a game if they are there pay them.
To say that only having 15 free kicks is well umpired, then it is well umpired by omission, the omission of umpiring to the laws of the game.
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Umpires
Umpiring, and Melbourne, remain the 2 biggest concerns for the AFL at the moment.
The price of a hot pie would come in a close third.
The price of a hot pie would come in a close third.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Umpires
The thread title would be "THE plugger66 LYNCH MOB"lummox wrote:Eastern wrote:Yes. They even let that Garlett non/goal go without a review in the 1st Q !!
And they lost by 5 points. What if that happened to us? Just imagine the thread about it on here.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)