Blow

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Blow

Post: # 1334930Post Con Gorozidis »

So you reckon any of our lads might have tested +ve for blow?


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4603
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 379 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334932Post loris »

Con Gorozidis wrote:So you reckon any of our lads might have tested +ve for blow?
Qu'est-ce? :? :? :? :?


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12737
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 753 times
Been thanked: 407 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334934Post Mr Magic »

Con Gorozidis wrote:So you reckon any of our lads might have tested +ve for blow?
Only if they are really dumb.

Reality says that only 26 positives in 1500 tests (not including the 'self-reporters) of young males between 18 and 35 with heaps of disposable income is nowhere near the result you'd get if you tested 1500 non AFL males the morning after a big night out.

So either the AFL players are completely opposite to the rest of the male population of that demographic or the Testing Regime is no good at catching those that have imbibed.

My opinion it is the latter proposition rather then the former.

I also don't believe that any legitimate testing regime on such a sample of players (1500+ tests) could/would/should result in zero positives for weed.

Other than the opportunity for Demetriou to 'trumpet' these results, I see absolutely no point in testing for 'illicit substances' out of competition.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334937Post sunsaint »

phew - I always thought it was a witch hunt against Cousins


Seeya
*************
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334938Post plugger66 »

Mr Magic wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:So you reckon any of our lads might have tested +ve for blow?
Only if they are really dumb.

Reality says that only 26 positives in 1500 tests (not including the 'self-reporters) of young males between 18 and 35 with heaps of disposable income is nowhere near the result you'd get if you tested 1500 non AFL males the morning after a big night out.

So either the AFL players are completely opposite to the rest of the male population of that demographic or the Testing Regime is no good at catching those that have imbibed.

My opinion it is the latter proposition rather then the former.

I also don't believe that any legitimate testing regime on such a sample of players (1500+ tests) could/would/should result in zero positives for weed.

Other than the opportunity for Demetriou to 'trumpet' these results, I see absolutely no point in testing for 'illicit substances' out of competition.

Dont think to many people with high income smoke weed these days. They target test so im unsure what else they can do apart from scrap it altogether but Im of the opinion if it helps one person its better than no testing at all. And being sportsmen i think the figures would be lower than the normal population. Obviously not as low as the figures show though.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334940Post st_Trav_ofWA »

honestly and i might be alone in this but i really couldnt care less if players are on rec drugs on their down time ... it is after all their life to stuff up how ever they like ... what i expect from footballers is to train hard and play the game as hard as they can what they do in their own time is up to them as long as it doesnt effect their training and playing ability and they dont get into trouble with the law then i could care less...


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334951Post dragit »

Pfiew, not another duthie episode.

Our players are just as likely as any b.t.w.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334956Post Con Gorozidis »

My understanding is its out of your system in a day or two - so youd have to be very unlucky to be caught.
No doubt the '+ves" only represent a tiny fraction of actual drug taking events.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334957Post Con Gorozidis »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:honestly and i might be alone in this but i really couldnt care less if players are on rec drugs on their down time ... it is after all their life to stuff up how ever they like ... what i expect from footballers is to train hard and play the game as hard as they can what they do in their own time is up to them as long as it doesnt effect their training and playing ability and they dont get into trouble with the law then i could care less...
yeah - i dont give much of a hoot either.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334963Post SainterK »

More worried about the 'other' drugs


Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1334983Post Toy Saint »

Pretty sure Con is refering to cocain


mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 236 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335005Post mr six o'clock »

All this talk of Blow would explain Gilbo's hair !
He does also have a big honker .


In red white and black from 73
paddy
Club Player
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2011 7:06pm

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335006Post paddy »

mr six o'clock wrote:All this talk of Blow would explain Gilbo's hair !
He does also have a big honker .
i dont get the connection to gilbos hair?

surely the boys who have short hair/shaved head would be the ones to be suspicious of... to avoid hair testing


mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 236 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335009Post mr six o'clock »

paddy wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:All this talk of Blow would explain Gilbo's hair !
He does also have a big honker .
i dont get the connection to gilbos hair?

surely the boys who have short hair/shaved head would be the ones to be suspicious of... to avoid hair testing

I was attempting to make a light hearted joke !

Gilbo's hair reminds me of some of those famous celebrity mugshots like james brown or nick nolte !
If i had any idea how to cut and paste i'd post them !


In red white and black from 73
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18739
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1560 times
Been thanked: 1928 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335011Post SaintPav »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:honestly and i might be alone in this but i really couldnt care less if players are on rec drugs on their down time ... it is after all their life to stuff up how ever they like ... what i expect from footballers is to train hard and play the game as hard as they can what they do in their own time is up to them as long as it doesnt effect their training and playing ability and they dont get into trouble with the law then i could care less...
That's interesting. Most people including probably myself would have the same view.

So basically we only care about the players in the context of playing performance and how well they play? What about the health and personal impacts drugs have on players etc?

Philosophically this concept does not sit well with me as it's selfish and sad. Viewing players as a commodity is a reflection of our society we live in; just like profit over people.

Maybe we care more about players having the freedom to choose how they treat their bodies etc. I like that better so I'll go with that. :roll:


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335018Post Iceman234 »

I can't fathom why any of them would do it given their positions and income. I'm sure some of them would be high profile with a massive amount to lose, in health, wealth and reputation.

Anyone, not just footballers, buying this rubbish they call "recreational" drugs, is supporting high end organised crime. The higher profile a person the more susceptible they are to being extorted, being subject to match-fixing propositions and more likely to damage the reputations of themselves, their families, their clubs and their code or organisation.

We constantly hear footballers bleating about how their careers are only short compared to other careers so they need to be highly paid, however if you're good at it you can earn in 10 years what the average person struggles to earn over a lifetime. An 18 year old kid probably earns more than the average wage of a family breadwinner with kids to support.

And their money is front-ended, whereas my golden handshake doesn't come until I've done 30 years or more in my job.

Yet they find the need to resort to cocaine and other drugs while they are in their halcyon earning years?


Image
User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335023Post Rosco »

SaintPav wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:honestly and i might be alone in this but i really couldnt care less if players are on rec drugs on their down time ... it is after all their life to stuff up how ever they like ... what i expect from footballers is to train hard and play the game as hard as they can what they do in their own time is up to them as long as it doesnt effect their training and playing ability and they dont get into trouble with the law then i could care less...
That's interesting. Most people including probably myself would have the same view.

So basically we only care about the players in the context of playing performance and how well they play? What about the health and personal impacts drugs have on players etc?

Philosophically this concept does not sit well with me as it's selfish and sad. Viewing players as a commodity is a reflection of our society we live in; just like profit over people.

Maybe we care more about players having the freedom to choose how they treat their bodies etc. I like that better so I'll go with that. :roll:
We care, but I also care about my work colleagues too. They don't get tested. What are footy players different?


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335029Post satchmo »

Iceman234 wrote:I can't fathom why any of them would do it given their positions and income. I'm sure some of them would be high profile with a massive amount to lose, in health, wealth and reputation.

Anyone, not just footballers, buying this rubbish they call "recreational" drugs, is supporting high end organised crime. The higher profile a person the more susceptible they are to being extorted, being subject to match-fixing propositions and more likely to damage the reputations of themselves, their families, their clubs and their code or organisation.

We constantly hear footballers bleating about how their careers are only short compared to other careers so they need to be highly paid, however if you're good at it you can earn in 10 years what the average person struggles to earn over a lifetime. An 18 year old kid probably earns more than the average wage of a family breadwinner with kids to support.

And their money is front-ended, whereas my golden handshake doesn't come until I've done 30 years or more in my job.

Yet they find the need to resort to cocaine and other drugs while they are in their halcyon earning years?
Pretty sure that there are so many doing it that it actually seems like normal behavior.


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
Munga
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5286
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335030Post Munga »

So who are the players?


Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335031Post plugger66 »

satchmo wrote:
Iceman234 wrote:I can't fathom why any of them would do it given their positions and income. I'm sure some of them would be high profile with a massive amount to lose, in health, wealth and reputation.

Anyone, not just footballers, buying this rubbish they call "recreational" drugs, is supporting high end organised crime. The higher profile a person the more susceptible they are to being extorted, being subject to match-fixing propositions and more likely to damage the reputations of themselves, their families, their clubs and their code or organisation.

We constantly hear footballers bleating about how their careers are only short compared to other careers so they need to be highly paid, however if you're good at it you can earn in 10 years what the average person struggles to earn over a lifetime. An 18 year old kid probably earns more than the average wage of a family breadwinner with kids to support.

And their money is front-ended, whereas my golden handshake doesn't come until I've done 30 years or more in my job.

Yet they find the need to resort to cocaine and other drugs while they are in their halcyon earning years?
Pretty sure that there are so many doing it that it actually seems like normal behavior.

Id be pretty sure there are much less than normal society doing it that it is more abnormal than normal.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23195
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 733 times
Been thanked: 1772 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335039Post Teflon »

pretty sure Icouldmt care less.

AFL needs to spend all its energies catching REAL performance enhancing drug addicts aka Essendon and not wimping out on soft penalties which they will do.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335043Post Cairnsman »

satchmo wrote:
Iceman234 wrote:I can't fathom why any of them would do it given their positions and income. I'm sure some of them would be high profile with a massive amount to lose, in health, wealth and reputation.

Anyone, not just footballers, buying this rubbish they call "recreational" drugs, is supporting high end organised crime. The higher profile a person the more susceptible they are to being extorted, being subject to match-fixing propositions and more likely to damage the reputations of themselves, their families, their clubs and their code or organisation.

We constantly hear footballers bleating about how their careers are only short compared to other careers so they need to be highly paid, however if you're good at it you can earn in 10 years what the average person struggles to earn over a lifetime. An 18 year old kid probably earns more than the average wage of a family breadwinner with kids to support.

And their money is front-ended, whereas my golden handshake doesn't come until I've done 30 years or more in my job.

Yet they find the need to resort to cocaine and other drugs while they are in their halcyon earning years?
Pretty sure that there are so many doing it that it actually seems like normal behavior.
I think you are spot on. Most chemicals pass through your system within a matter of 2 days hence the reason they are so popular with people that work in an industry that has a drug testing regime. Also most places have a policy for rehabilitation that provide you with a safety net if you get caught. Most people including AFL footballers would see it as a sport within itself to circumvent the system.


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335047Post satchmo »

plugger66 wrote:
satchmo wrote:
Iceman234 wrote:I can't fathom why any of them would do it given their positions and income. I'm sure some of them would be high profile with a massive amount to lose, in health, wealth and reputation.

Anyone, not just footballers, buying this rubbish they call "recreational" drugs, is supporting high end organised crime. The higher profile a person the more susceptible they are to being extorted, being subject to match-fixing propositions and more likely to damage the reputations of themselves, their families, their clubs and their code or organisation.

We constantly hear footballers bleating about how their careers are only short compared to other careers so they need to be highly paid, however if you're good at it you can earn in 10 years what the average person struggles to earn over a lifetime. An 18 year old kid probably earns more than the average wage of a family breadwinner with kids to support.

And their money is front-ended, whereas my golden handshake doesn't come until I've done 30 years or more in my job.

Yet they find the need to resort to cocaine and other drugs while they are in their halcyon earning years?
Pretty sure that there are so many doing it that it actually seems like normal behavior.

Id be pretty sure there are much less than normal society doing it that it is more abnormal than normal.
I'd be pretty sure that this is the company line. I'd file that with the Easter bunny and sex after marriage.


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
paddy
Club Player
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2011 7:06pm

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335050Post paddy »

mr six o'clock wrote:
paddy wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:All this talk of Blow would explain Gilbo's hair !
He does also have a big honker .
i dont get the connection to gilbos hair?

surely the boys who have short hair/shaved head would be the ones to be suspicious of... to avoid hair testing

I was attempting to make a light hearted joke !

Gilbo's hair reminds me of some of those famous celebrity mugshots like james brown or nick nolte !
If i had any idea how to cut and paste i'd post them !
Oh, sorry mate...


i'm a lil on the slow side today

:lol:


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Blow

Post: # 1335052Post Dr Spaceman »

mr six o'clock wrote: I was attempting to make a light hearted joke !

Gilbo's hair reminds me of some of those famous celebrity mugshots like james brown or nick nolte !
If i had any idea how to cut and paste i'd post them !

Image


Post Reply