Tom Lynch

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10120
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 1299 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1332728Post CURLY »

No issue with Lynch leaving isnt much chop to be honest.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1332789Post BigMart »

Clearly Adelaide had Tex and Tipett last year who were ahead of him

Now he'll get a good go at it

Amazing what opportunity brings

Good on him


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16881
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3580 times
Been thanked: 2842 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1332795Post skeptic »

I don't really get the argument here

Most acknowledge that we got a good trade for him so that's not an issue
Most wish him well
Most acknowledge that he still hasn't made it

I dare say that he has at least proven that he has potential and is worth persevering with

The only contentious issue in this thread is whether or not we developed him well enough... some ppl seem to actually be saying yes?!!


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30089
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1332800Post saintsRrising »

BigMart wrote:Clearly Adelaide had Tex and Tipett last year who were ahead of him

Now he'll get a good go at it

Amazing what opportunity brings

Good on him
So how is that different from when he was at the Saints and had to wait his turn?


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
saintact7
Club Player
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon 08 Apr 2013 9:46am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334267Post saintact7 »

Another one starved of opportunities by Ross Lyin who played for the present, no eye on future at all. Lynch obviously not a first round pick cos he was a dud, Johnny Beveridge is better than that.

The kid grew up as a Saints supporter but of course he left when he couldn't get a game ahead of has beens (never weres) like Gamble and Charlie Gardiner from the Cats.

Scott Watters has had to pick upm the pieces and get games into kids that Lyin wouldn't play. Armo, Jack S, benny Mac, Gears etc should have 20-30 more games in them by now and be even more advanced than they are now, hence the gap between the 6-7 elite players and the next level.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334269Post Spinner »

saintact7 wrote:Another one starved of opportunities by Ross Lyin who played for the present, no eye on future at all. Lynch obviously not a first round pick cos he was a dud, Johnny Beveridge is better than that.

The kid grew up as a Saints supporter but of course he left when he couldn't get a game ahead of has beens (never weres) like Gamble and Charlie Gardiner from the Cats.

Scott Watters has had to pick upm the pieces and get games into kids that Lyin wouldn't play. Armo, Jack S, benny Mac, Gears etc should have 20-30 more games in them by now and be even more advanced than they are now, hence the gap between the 6-7 elite players and the next level.

How many names did Lynch play last year?


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18834
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1567 times
Been thanked: 1959 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334273Post SaintPav »

saintact7 wrote:Another one starved of opportunities by Ross Lyin who played for the present, no eye on future at all. Lynch obviously not a first round pick cos he was a dud, Johnny Beveridge is better than that.

The kid grew up as a Saints supporter but of course he left when he couldn't get a game ahead of has beens (never weres) like Gamble and Charlie Gardiner from the Cats.

Scott Watters has had to pick upm the pieces and get games into kids that Lyin wouldn't play. Armo, Jack S, benny Mac, Gears etc should have 20-30 more games in them by now and be even more advanced than they are now, hence the gap between the 6-7 elite players and the next level.
Charlie Gardner played in 2008 and Tom wasn't even at the club.

Young guys could not have played an extra 20-30 games but I appreciate you trying to re write history.

One of the main reasons we got Tom was because he came recommended by Stewie Loewe. It wasn't a great selection for us and I prefer Newnes from what I have seen. Tom is too small to be a key position forward and he's a bit slow as well.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334283Post savatage »

He will struggle to kick 10 goals for the remainder of the season.


saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5410
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334285Post saintly »



gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334303Post gringo »


The guy was killing it at SANFL level 33 possies in defence last year. Funny how Jack Darling isn't too small according to some but Lynch is.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8581
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334319Post kosifantutti »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:It was his 16th game and he a lifelong Saints supporter. He didn't want to leave, but had no choice under the Lyin regime.
That makes no sense. Lyon left before Lynch did.
Both left at the end of 2011. Tom had asked to be traded before Ross walked.
So he had at least two weeks to change his mind. I can't remember if Watters was in place before trade week but Lynch knew Lyon wasn't coaching.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334322Post SainterK »

By that time, sando probably promised him the world.


saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5410
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334335Post saintly »

From my memory Watters tried to keep him, but he still left.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334345Post Dr Spaceman »

SainterK wrote:By that time, sando probably promised him the world.
Yeah in his mind it probably came down to Sando or Sandy :wink:


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334435Post savatage »

I like how he's shrunk to 190cm too.


hayes66
Club Player
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu 25 Nov 2010 9:08pm
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334454Post hayes66 »

CURLY wrote:No issue with Lynch leaving isnt much chop to be honest.
Big call!!
You may well be right but he was continually in the best players at Sandy. Plays well in the SANFL, now has kicked ten goals in an AFL game. If Tom Lee kicks ten in the VFL we will all be hailing him as a ready made AFL player.
Matt Rendall, who Collingwood have now employed, and has a big wrap on him as a recruiter saw something in Tom.
I'm not sure you're right.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334471Post Sobraz »

10 goals is 10 goals...

I like Lynch and would've preferred to keep him... He wanted to go, and good on him for taking his chance...

Thought he was treated fairly poorly during his years as a Saint... His debut game getting thrown to the wolves was a terrible initiation... Poor player management by Lyon that day..

As I see it, Robert Eddy would not be able to kick 10 goals in an under 12's match let alone on an AFL field... Yet he was given all the time in the world by the previous coaching panel... Got to have the talent to do it, and the opportunity to show it...


hayes66
Club Player
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu 25 Nov 2010 9:08pm
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334474Post hayes66 »

Sobraz wrote:10 goals is 10 goals...

I like Lynch and would've preferred to keep him... He wanted to go, and good on him for taking his chance...

Thought he was treated fairly poorly during his years as a Saint... His debut game getting thrown to the wolves was a terrible initiation... Poor player management by Lyon that day..

As I see it, Robert Eddy would not be able to kick 10 goals in an under 12's match let alone on an AFL field... Yet he was given all the time in the world by the previous coaching panel... Got to have the talent to do it, and the opportunity to show it...
Very good post. Agree 100%.
Case: Poorly treated by The Saints
Verdict: Guilty.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334493Post SainterK »

Forwards take longer, isn't that what people are saying about Tom Lee?


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334509Post plugger66 »

hayes66 wrote:
Sobraz wrote:10 goals is 10 goals...

I like Lynch and would've preferred to keep him... He wanted to go, and good on him for taking his chance...

Thought he was treated fairly poorly during his years as a Saint... His debut game getting thrown to the wolves was a terrible initiation... Poor player management by Lyon that day..

As I see it, Robert Eddy would not be able to kick 10 goals in an under 12's match let alone on an AFL field... Yet he was given all the time in the world by the previous coaching panel... Got to have the talent to do it, and the opportunity to show it...
Very good post. Agree 100%.
Case: Poorly treated by The Saints
Verdict: Guilty.

He played 5 games in his last year at the saints and when he was a year older he played 6 at Adelaide. How have they treated him better than we did?


hayes66
Club Player
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu 25 Nov 2010 9:08pm
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334544Post hayes66 »

plugger66 wrote:
hayes66 wrote:
Sobraz wrote:10 goals is 10 goals...

I like Lynch and would've preferred to keep him... He wanted to go, and good on him for taking his chance...

Thought he was treated fairly poorly during his years as a Saint... His debut game getting thrown to the wolves was a terrible initiation... Poor player management by Lyon that day..

As I see it, Robert Eddy would not be able to kick 10 goals in an under 12's match let alone on an AFL field... Yet he was given all the time in the world by the previous coaching panel... Got to have the talent to do it, and the opportunity to show it...
Very good post. Agree 100%.
Case: Poorly treated by The Saints
Verdict: Guilty.

He played 5 games in his last year at the saints and when he was a year older he played 6 at Adelaide. How have they treated him better than we did?
For a start, i think they rate him. I say that because they traded for him. Secondly, when Tom is playing for Glenelg, he is played in the position they will play him in when selected for the AFL. Where at St Kilda he was played forward in the AFL and at Sandy, back.
How does that work?
Train, play as a back but when selected for AFL will throw you forward. That confuses me, so it may of confused Tom.
As mentioned previously, debut game, pick up Fletcher, have an off night, that's it. Can't play, go back to Sandy and play back.
But all this is, is an opinion. I felt he was poorly treated.
Am i convinced he will be a good AFL player? Not sure but i am perplexed how people can call him a spud!!
As i previously posted, "That's a big call".
I do think he has ability and time will sort out how good he becomes and i do wish he was still with the Saints.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334562Post Spinner »

plugger66 wrote:
hayes66 wrote:
Sobraz wrote:10 goals is 10 goals...

I like Lynch and would've preferred to keep him... He wanted to go, and good on him for taking his chance...

Thought he was treated fairly poorly during his years as a Saint... His debut game getting thrown to the wolves was a terrible initiation... Poor player management by Lyon that day..

As I see it, Robert Eddy would not be able to kick 10 goals in an under 12's match let alone on an AFL field... Yet he was given all the time in the world by the previous coaching panel... Got to have the talent to do it, and the opportunity to show it...
Very good post. Agree 100%.
Case: Poorly treated by The Saints
Verdict: Guilty.

He played 5 games in his last year at the saints and when he was a year older he played 6 at Adelaide. How have they treated him better than we did?

He was treated a whole 1 game better at Adelaide last year.

Development.

Or maybe it's just that he is a bit older now and there is an opportunity at Adelaide with Walker and Tippet out. That might be a bit too simple an explanation for us though. We all want the narrative.


SuperDuper
Club Player
Posts: 1310
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 99 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334581Post SuperDuper »

The fact is players hit their peak at 22-23... look at age vs supercoach scores.... Lynch is now getting to his prime. He may be a decent player for the next 5 years.. but GWS is not a good guide.... so lets see. I still think Newenes will be better than him, but good luck to him


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334611Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:
hayes66 wrote:
Sobraz wrote:10 goals is 10 goals...

I like Lynch and would've preferred to keep him... He wanted to go, and good on him for taking his chance...

Thought he was treated fairly poorly during his years as a Saint... His debut game getting thrown to the wolves was a terrible initiation... Poor player management by Lyon that day..

As I see it, Robert Eddy would not be able to kick 10 goals in an under 12's match let alone on an AFL field... Yet he was given all the time in the world by the previous coaching panel... Got to have the talent to do it, and the opportunity to show it...
Very good post. Agree 100%.
Case: Poorly treated by The Saints
Verdict: Guilty.

He played 5 games in his last year at the saints and when he was a year older he played 6 at Adelaide. How have they treated him better than we did?[/quoteApparently was kept isolated from the senior group and not communicated with. No plan put to him. May be Adelaide set him a program. Anyone bagging the whole academy concept need to realise that this kind of simple structure can give the players vision and hope.


vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Tom Lynch

Post: # 1334613Post vacuous space »

Lynch was drafted around where he should have, just perhaps by the wrong team. He's a Pavlich sized KPF with elite endurance and strong overhead marking skills. The only reason he wasn't top-10 was because it was an abnormally strong draft. I'm not sure he ever made a lot of sense for us. We had Roo and Kosi up front and Lyon wasn't going to play a third tall. My memory has most people around here wanting us to take Sam Blease or Jackson Trengove and I think both of those would have been better fits. I can't blame them for taking the best player on the board though. There's no way to know what you're going to need 3-5 years down the road when picks start to really mature.

Given the shenanigans that went on in Adelaide regarding Tippett, I wonder if they told Tom his chances of getting a KPF spot would be dramatically improved this year. It didn't make much sense at the time. He left a team with older established KPFs for a team with younger established KPFs.

Good on him for kicking ten, even if it was against historically awful opposition. Newnes really does fit our current needs better, so hopefully this is one of those trades that works out for everyone.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
Post Reply