st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Moorabin man thats a bit rich to pin that clause on the board ... unless you were part of the contract negotiation process how do you know that it wasnt Ross Lyons side that pushed for that clause in the contract ? considering that the clause benifited Ross in a major way i tend to lean to the side that it was Ross who asked for that clause .. thinking about that clause considering when most coaches get sacked its pretty much with a days notice the three month notice clause would have been a safe guard for ross that if he was to be sacked then he had three months security ...
You're kidding aren't you? What coach in his right mind puts a clause like that in a contract? Of course it was done by the board. Lyon wanted security and the board gave him 12 weeks. You call that security? Most coaches get sacked THEN paid out.
THe board were getting jittery because narrow minded silly supporters wanted us to go back to the good ole days and play attractive footy. It was permeating all through the media and the pressure was on. Well we kick more goals these days at least, but strange how ppl still aren't happy.....I wonder why?
