The goal that wasn't

[plugger66]

because i think it was a goal pluggsy
thats all that matters

calling the goal umpire a cheat would be numpty like

Do you think it hit his hands first?

[bergsone]

because i think it was a goal pluggsy
thats all that matters

calling the goal umpire a cheat would be numpty like

Do you think it hit his hands first?

I dont

[plugger66]

because i think it was a goal pluggsy
thats all that matters

calling the goal umpire a cheat would be numpty like

Do you think it hit his hands first?

I dont

Fair enough. I thought it may have. The goal umpire said it did.

[bergsone]

Goes to show us all.......umpires can be wrong

[BigMart]

If that's what the umpire thought, good chance we are right then.... It's a wonder he wasn't in the field of play, getting in the way.

[plugger66]

Arent you ignoring me as you promised every single person on here.

[BigMart]

Not sure I said that

But you can report inaccurately....... You normally do...

If I knew how to do the foe list thing I would.... I don't like the idea of it, but would make an exception..

[plugger66]

Not sure I said that

But you can report inaccurately....... You normally do...

If I knew how to do the foe list thing I would.... I don't like the idea of it, but would make an exception..

Its very easy if you really wanted to do it. A few have old you but I will as well. Up the top there is something called user control pane. Click on that and then the tabs friends and foes. It is that simple. Put plugger66 as either a friend or foe. In this case I will have a guess as a foe. So there you go. You dont have to see my posts again unless someone quotes me. See you it was fun while it lasted.

[Pwoit]

because i think it was a goal pluggsy
thats all that matters

calling the goal umpire a cheat would be numpty like

I looked hard and long and I "thunk" it was a goal too.

[matrix]

because i think it was a goal pluggsy
thats all that matters

calling the goal umpire a cheat would be numpty like

Do you think it hit his hands first?

???

if i thought it hit his hands first pluggsy then i wouldnt be telling you i thought it was a goal would i ?!

[plugger66]

because i think it was a goal pluggsy
thats all that matters

calling the goal umpire a cheat would be numpty like

Do you think it hit his hands first?

???

if i thought it hit his hands first pluggsy then i wouldnt be telling you i thought it was a goal would i ?!

Yes you could if you thought his hands were behind the line as some certainly think.

[matrix]

anybody else want to take this one?????

[plugger66]

anybody else want to take this one?????

It should be easy for you to answer.

[Pwoit]

Matrix - confirmed

[plugger66]

Sheep are good at following.

[perfectionist]

Sheep are good at following.

Sheep only follow the leader. So at least one of them must know what it is doing. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so many sheep.

[sunsaint]

Sheep are good at following.

Sheep only follow the leader. So at least one of them must know what it is doing. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so many sheep.

Having met a few sheep, i would never call the sheep at the front a leader

[SainterK]

Not sure I said that

But you can report inaccurately....... You normally do...

If I knew how to do the foe list thing I would.... I don't like the idea of it, but would make an exception..

I've told you how BM

Click on "user control panel"

It's on the menu above where you see....

Board index . FAQ. Search. Members. 0 new messages. User Control Panel. Logout

Then you'll be shown another menu with options

Overview. Profile. Board Preferences. Private Message. Usergroups. Friends & Foes

Click on "friends and foes" and add the name in of the poster you want to foe

[matrix]

Do you think it hit his hands first?

???

if i thought it hit his hands first pluggsy then i wouldnt be telling you i thought it was a goal would i ?![/quote]


Yes you could if you thought his hands were behind the line as some certainly think.[/quote]

no plugger
i thought it was a goal
so i wouldnt have thought it hit his hands first
i thought it crossed the goal line first
hence why i thought it was a f****** GOAL NUMPTY

yeah pwoit
confirmed alright

[dragit]

Not sure I said that

But you can report inaccurately....... You normally do...

If I knew how to do the foe list thing I would.... I don't like the idea of it, but would make an exception..

I've told you how BM

Click on "user control panel"

It's on the menu above where you see....

Board index . FAQ. Search. Members. 0 new messages. User Control Panel. Logout

Then you'll be shown another menu with options

Overview. Profile. Board Preferences. Private Message. Usergroups. Friends & Foes

Click on "friends and foes" and add the name in of the poster you want to foe

[plugger66]

Do you think it hit his hands first?

???

if i thought it hit his hands first pluggsy then i wouldnt be telling you i thought it was a goal would i ?!

Yes you could if you thought his hands were behind the line as some certainly think.[/quote]

no plugger
i thought it was a goal
so i wouldnt have thought it hit his hands first
i thought it crossed the goal line first
hence why i thought it was a f****** GOAL NUMPTY

yeah pwoit
confirmed alright[/quote]


And I again say it wasnt a stupid statement because people on here thought it hit his hands first but was still a goal. Yes confirmed sheep following each other. You are a very basic person so I will speak slower next time.

[matrix]

youre a friggin idiot

seriously

idiot personified

you damn well know i said i thought it was a goal
so why ask if i thought it hit his hands first

keep prattling along by yourself in this thread
im done with it

[plugger66]

youre a friggin idiot

seriously

idiot personified

you damn well know i said i thought it was a goal
so why ask if i thought it hit his hands first

keep prattling along by yourself in this thread
im done with it

You are an abusive person but I can handle the fact that you dont read what is actually written. I will say it again some people thought it hit his hands and was still a goal. Can you read that. I wanted to know what you thought. it wasnt obvious otherwise no one would have said it hit his hands and was still a goal. Sheep are simple.

[sunsaint]

Why does the forum Numpty always have a differing opinion to at least 95% of the posters on this forum and yet still claims he is correct.

It was a goal - I believe the people who were actually at the game and had a direct line of sight view of the incident.

FFS

you do realise that all the forum numpties are also against Danny Frawley calling it a clear mark...
not a goal

[sunsaint]

and as already been pointed out - if Roo decided to shepherd the ball through instead of blindsiding the goal umpire,
it would have been a goal
no corruption, no ineptitude, just whinging