What was Blake thinking
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Verdun66
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
- Location: Dubai, UAE
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
He looked pretty embarrassed. Guilty face if I ever saw one. Reckon he was just trying to get going quickly and forgot the sequence. Tough night for him that's for sure.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9022
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
13.1 Football Must be Kicked
Unless Law 12.4 applies, when a Behind has been recorded, the
following shall apply:
(a) the football must be Kicked back into play by any Player of the
defending Team within a reasonable time;
(b) the football must be Kicked from within the Goal Square. For
the avoidance of doubt, one foot of the Player must be behind
any of the lines which define the Goal Square at the time when
the Player Kicks the football;
(c) Other than the Player kicking the football into play, all
Players must immediately vacate the area within 5 metres
of the Goal Square.
(d) the Player Kicking the football into play may, provided they have
Kicked the football clear from their hands, regain possession
and play on from within the Goal Square.
13.2 Direction by Umpire and Football Brought in to
Play Incorrectly
(a) After giving a Player a reasonable opportunity, the field Umpire
shall direct a Player to Kick the football back into play. If a
Player fails to Kick the football back into play after being
instructed to do so by a field Umpire, the field Umpire shall
call “Play On”. The Player shall be required to dispose of the
football in accordance with Laws 13.1 (b) and (d). Opposing
Players, however, may enter the Goal Square and tackle the
Player with the football once “Play On” is called. The provisions
of these Laws relating to Free Kicks shall apply.
(b) If the field Umpire is of the opinion that a Player has not Kicked
the football back into play in accordance with Law 13.1, the field
Umpire shall bounce the football on the centre of the Kick-Off
Line to recommence play.
Unless Law 12.4 applies, when a Behind has been recorded, the
following shall apply:
(a) the football must be Kicked back into play by any Player of the
defending Team within a reasonable time;
(b) the football must be Kicked from within the Goal Square. For
the avoidance of doubt, one foot of the Player must be behind
any of the lines which define the Goal Square at the time when
the Player Kicks the football;
(c) Other than the Player kicking the football into play, all
Players must immediately vacate the area within 5 metres
of the Goal Square.
(d) the Player Kicking the football into play may, provided they have
Kicked the football clear from their hands, regain possession
and play on from within the Goal Square.
13.2 Direction by Umpire and Football Brought in to
Play Incorrectly
(a) After giving a Player a reasonable opportunity, the field Umpire
shall direct a Player to Kick the football back into play. If a
Player fails to Kick the football back into play after being
instructed to do so by a field Umpire, the field Umpire shall
call “Play On”. The Player shall be required to dispose of the
football in accordance with Laws 13.1 (b) and (d). Opposing
Players, however, may enter the Goal Square and tackle the
Player with the football once “Play On” is called. The provisions
of these Laws relating to Free Kicks shall apply.
(b) If the field Umpire is of the opinion that a Player has not Kicked
the football back into play in accordance with Law 13.1, the field
Umpire shall bounce the football on the centre of the Kick-Off
Line to recommence play.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Wed 21 Oct 2009 11:18am
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: What was Blake thinking
That aside. If ever his time was up it is now.
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1959 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
So given the plethora of choices we have, who would you put down back Einstein?The Redeemer wrote:That aside. If ever his time was up it is now.
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Re: What was Blake thinking
Did he maybe think he was paid the mark as he did mark the footy close to the line
Re: What was Blake thinking
Even if that was the case, and the umpire had paid the mark, he screwed up anyway, as it would have resulted as a behind to Richmond. He "marked" the ball in front of the behinds and ran behind the goal post and through the goals to then play on. If the umpire is on the ball (highly doubt that on their performance....) then that should be called a behind.resaintlee wrote:I had a good view and I reckon he believed he had marked it.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008 2:30am
Re: What was Blake thinking
Einstein would have made a good defender as he would have been explaining to the forwards that everything is relative, and meanwhile might haveSaintPav wrote:So given the plethora of choices we have, who would you put down back, Einstein?The Redeemer wrote:That aside. If ever his time was up it is now.
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
created a wormhole from the kickout line to our goal square so that every kickout from a behind would result in a shot at goal for us.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Re: What was Blake thinking
yep...my thoughts too.....Eastern wrote:I reckon he thought that he marked the ball inside the line and simply played on, then handballed to a team-mate. Yes, he got it horribly WRONG !!plugger66 wrote:Handballing out from FB. By the way are we definitely sure its a free or should have he been made to take his kick.
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: What was Blake thinking
Not Blake.SaintPav wrote:So given the plethora of choices we have, who would you put down back Einstein?The Redeemer wrote:That aside. If ever his time was up it is now.
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
His rubbish attempts at 1-1 defender have been going on for years too.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
if you believe that you are having a bigger brain fade then blakestinger wrote:yep...my thoughts too.....Eastern wrote:I reckon he thought that he marked the ball inside the line and simply played on, then handballed to a team-mate. Yes, he got it horribly WRONG !!plugger66 wrote:Handballing out from FB. By the way are we definitely sure its a free or should have he been made to take his kick.
in that situation he would have to kick the ball over the mark (between the point post) not run around out of bounds and come out the goal square on a different angle
Seeya
*************
*************
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
Totally agreeThe Redeemer wrote:That aside. If ever his time was up it is now.
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
Answer is obvious
Stanley goes back for height and Simpkin plays
I mean FFS it's not hard to see Blake is defending like its 1999 as Prince said...
Look at that - we didn't even need Einstein just needed to use the brain...
“Yeah….nah””
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1959 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
You don't need to take everything so personally Teflon.Teflon wrote:Totally agreeThe Redeemer wrote:That aside. If ever his time was up it is now.
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
Answer is obvious
Stanley goes back for height and Simpkin plays
I mean FFS it's not hard to see Blake is defending like its 1999 as Prince said...
Look at that - we didn't even need Einstein just needed to use the brain...
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: What was Blake thinking
You had a wanky go at me, I didn't take it personally.SaintPav wrote:You don't need to take everything so personally Teflon.Teflon wrote:Totally agreeThe Redeemer wrote:That aside. If ever his time was up it is now.
Why does he feel the need to literally hug opposing forwards when he plays from behind?
He does this and has done this for years and has assisted in power forwards kicking bags against us.
Thanks but no thanks Blake
Answer is obvious
Stanley goes back for height and Simpkin plays
I mean FFS it's not hard to see Blake is defending like its 1999 as Prince said...
Look at that - we didn't even need Einstein just needed to use the brain...
I just know you are a wanker
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1959 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
I didn't say you did but your mate did who's trying to start something again.
Love the way you have a go at St Kilda players you don't like. Show some respect...it's not that hard.
BTW, you calling me a wanker is a compliment.
Love the way you have a go at St Kilda players you don't like. Show some respect...it's not that hard.
BTW, you calling me a wanker is a compliment.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: What was Blake thinking
We have some useless players on our list.SaintPav wrote:I didn't say you did but your mate did who's trying to start something again.
Love the way you have a go at St Kilda players you don't like. Show some respect...it's not that hard.
BTW, you calling me a wanker is a compliment.
Some that should not be employed as AFL footballers as they are awful at their job.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1959 times
Re: What was Blake thinking
The Redeemer wrote:We have some useless players on our list.SaintPav wrote:I didn't say you did but your mate did who's trying to start something again.
Love the way you have a go at St Kilda players you don't like. Show some respect...it's not that hard.
BTW, you calling me a wanker is a compliment.
Some that should not be employed as AFL footballers as they are awful at their job.
not as bad as some of the useless and awful supporters who post on here.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Re: What was Blake thinking
Blakey was dealing with some stress.... It looked like Jack was going to kick a dozen on him